View Single Post
Old December 12th, 2009, 06:04 PM   #36 (permalink)
Nashdroid
Senior Member
 
Nashdroid's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: Nashville, TN
Posts: 917
 
Device(s): HTC Droid Incredible (retired), Samsung Galaxy Nexus (returned), Motorola Droid Razr Maxx (current)
Thanks: 602
Thanked 1,491 Times in 316 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by alamoe View Post
Before the Droid Verizon had the (well-deserved) reputation of having the best network but the worst phones. The hype over the Droid has all of a sudden made everyone think thats changed, but that may not be the case. If you actually think about it, manufacturers may not want to go out of their way to create a device that runs on basically two networks, Verizon and Sprint. Look how long it took Verizon to get the BlackBerry Curve Making a CDMA device is like having a vegan friend over for Thanksgiving dinner; you have to cook a special dish just for them that no one else will eat. Inconvenient.
I can see your point here. However, Verizon and Sprint have a HUGE share of the market and Verizon happens to be a Google/Android partner mobile provider. So...though I see your point, I believe that putting a CDMA radio in a device would be pretty well worth the effort in order to get access to all of the Sprint and Verizon customer base. Cause think about it, it's pretty much split down the middle. AT&T/T-Mobile vs Verizon/Sprint. It would make more sense to either make a phone that worked on ALL networks, which COULD possibly be the rumored "Google phone" or to just make a GSM version and a CDMA version. I see your point, but it would just make more sense to try to sell handsets to ALL possible carriers, rather than alienate some.
Nashdroid is offline  
Reply With Quote