Originally Posted by mthoren68
The thing that will decide Prime v. RAZR for me is battery life, period. For 99% of users, both will be fast enough, both will have good enough cameras for a phone, both will have good call quality, both will have tiny, little inconsequential quirks that don't matter in the big picture, both will have great screens with slight differences, but if either demonstrates a meaningful advantage in battery life, they gots my vote. I be wantin' to nots charge my phone any more than I have to. And I nots be wantin' to get an extended battery that makes my thin phone thick. I DEMAND a full day's moderate (not "Ooh I just gots my new phone so I be usin' the crap out of it!") LTE usage. Samsung? Moto? Which one of you is going to step up?
I hear you but I dunno anymore. An old Motorola Die Hard FanBoy I have been disappointed as of late by Moto.
That Bionic in my eyes is a large failure with its lousy display and camera. There is more but that's another thread.
Samsungs cameras have been the best in my eyes and I am a photographer.
don't know about the Razar thouh.