View Single Post
Old February 10th, 2010, 11:18 AM   #73 (permalink)
wonderbread
Senior Member
 
wonderbread's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Posts: 702
 
Device(s):
Thanks: 92
Thanked 297 Times in 73 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by vzw+google+htc=:) View Post
look how big the label is Nexus one at 54.35 length and this new one at 64.8
It's longer but not wider. The N1 is 47 across while the new on is 39 which actually amounts to about the same surface area for each.

Quote:
Originally Posted by tdub88 View Post
I don't think FCC label size really means very much.

But I guess it's fun to speculate the angle from the grassy knoll.
Well, maybe not the actual size but these labels almost always go under the battery so if you can match the shape of the label to the back of a new phone you might be able to deduce which phone the filing is for. The Incredible certainly has a unique back to it. Also worthy to note, that if the pictures we see of the final product do NOT have the FCC label on them, then it is under the battery which means the battery is removable.
Quote:
Originally Posted by cdmta View Post
Found the sprint hero fcc filing: https://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/oetcf/eas/reports/ViewExhibitReport.cfm?mode=Exhibits&RequestTimeout =500&calledFromFrame=N&application_id=744248&fcc_i d=%27NM8HERO200%27


Mentions CDMA2000 and EVDO only. don't see 850 and 1900 bands.

Confirmation of verizon?
Good find. The "Report DTS" (page 6) does test the 850 and 1900 bands so we can't confirm VZW. Also, if you look at the operating frequency listed in that Sprint Hero filing and the operating frequency listed in the PB31200 filing, they are the same: 842.7MHz - 848.3MHz. The Eris on the other hand had multiple operating frequencies. Not sure if that is enough to confirm Sprint. I'm sure there's something conclusive in that test report that reveals the carrier but it might take a carrier tech to recognize it.
wonderbread is offline  
Last edited by wonderbread; February 10th, 2010 at 12:56 PM.
Reply With Quote