Why os it that if company A makes a product and company B makes a similar product that if a person buys the product that company B makes then company A thinks that they have lost revenue and then come up with multitude ways to get revenue back or get company B shut down ?
This to me to me is flawed logic . It cannot be known a customer would do if company B's product didn't exist . In the case here if HTC didn't exist I would still never buy an iPhone so whether or not HTC exists or not doesnt guarantee that Apple will get my money instead .
This same argument is used by tons of companies and even governments to force changes when they believe revenues are being funneled to away from their coffers and into sombody else's .
|