Originally Posted by dan330
i did not read the court briefings...
but some of the comments there.. say that the article is miss-leading.
Oracle does have to pay.. but not for what the article says or that much.
for making google doing some study 3 times.. or for not doing something the court ordered them to do.. not sure.
Yep, the comments there are why I linked to that article instead of another.
But the lousy write-up does not change the fact.
Oracle has to pay.