View Single Post
Old August 11th, 2012, 01:59 PM   #61 (permalink)
Rachel A
Senior Member
 
Rachel A's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: In front of my S3
Gender: Female
Posts: 2,459
 
Device(s): VZW GS3 4.0.4 Rooted, Droid Incredible (Retired) , Motorola Xoom 4.0.4 (Unrooted)
Carrier: Not Provided

Thanks: 607
Thanked 869 Times in 637 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Bob Maxey View Post
So what? Owning 57% does not give him the freedom to do anything he wants to do. He is not spending his cash; he must also be mindful of the other shareholders who might not like what MZ did.

Especially when it comes to spending a billion dollars in secret.

Perhaps the board will bend to Mark's will. So what? The board also bends to the will of the stockholders and I am not sure they are all that pleased these days. That said, it might be possible the board either cannot or will not do anything about it, anyway. Not so sure the stockholders will not sue.

This will likely end up in court. Shareholders can bring a law suit, after all. Not saying they will prevail.

Lots of bad things we never read about happen every day. Like CEOs giving themselves raises or like the case of Zuckerberg, spending a ton of cash behind closed doors.

I think someone is headed to court, eventually.
You must not know much about how companies operate. With Zuck having a 57% control at the time he could do anything he wanted. The shareholders really had sod all to do with it.

A post IPO FB would perhaps find it harder to do such deals, however at the time it was private and Mark could do pretty much whatever he wanted. Board be damned.
__________________
If I helped you then please consider thanking me. A thanks produces lots of warm and fuzzies and is cheaper and easier than buying me a round of booze.
Rachel A is offline  
Reply With Quote