Go Back   Android Forums > Android Carriers > Sprint > 4G Discussion

test: Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools
Old April 29th, 2010, 09:25 PM   #1 (permalink)
Member
Thread Author (OP)
 
nickoakdl's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Posts: 102
 
Device(s):
Carrier: Not Provided

Thanks: 17
Thanked 32 Times in 21 Posts
Default 4G Tower Range???

When a city gets 4G, does anyone know the range that encompasses the 4G ability? I'm wondering because I live 15 miles out of Minneapolis "as the crow flies" and want to know how far the 4G will reach once it gets there later in the year. I live 2 miles from St. Paul so I assume it would cover my area but I really have no idea.

Advertisements
nickoakdl is offline  
Reply With Quote
sponsored links
Old April 29th, 2010, 09:26 PM   #2 (permalink)
Premium Member
 
SprintFun's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Columbus, OH
Posts: 1,547
 
Device(s): Evo
Carrier: Not Provided

Thanks: 192
Thanked 658 Times in 289 Posts
Default

With Minneapolis I would assume it will encompass all of the Twin Cities area, but I don't know. eieio could answer maybe directly for you. But the actual range of the towers is NOT that great. 2 miles may be pushing it realistically.
SprintFun is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old April 29th, 2010, 09:43 PM   #3 (permalink)
Member
Thread Author (OP)
 
nickoakdl's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Posts: 102
 
Device(s):
Carrier: Not Provided

Thanks: 17
Thanked 32 Times in 21 Posts
Default

Bummer. Oh well, the next best option is 3G so might as well stick with this phone anyway and wait for 4G to spread.
nickoakdl is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old April 29th, 2010, 09:53 PM   #4 (permalink)
Premium Member
 
SprintFun's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Columbus, OH
Posts: 1,547
 
Device(s): Evo
Carrier: Not Provided

Thanks: 192
Thanked 658 Times in 289 Posts
Default

Don't take my post as fact lol....you never know. And even if you aren't initially covered they will still be expanding the coverage area. You'll probably get 4G sooner than most.
SprintFun is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old April 29th, 2010, 10:25 PM   #5 (permalink)
Junior Member
 
gibsonhtp's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Posts: 76
 
Device(s): HTC Evo4g
Carrier: Not Provided

Thanks: 15
Thanked 38 Times in 10 Posts
Default

WiMAX - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

31 miles is the max range for Wimax (you'd get almost no speed at that range though). Though it comes down to individual towers on the max range Clear / Sprint wants to put it at depending on factors.

My guess is that they would want to keep it at 1-2 miles for each tower.
gibsonhtp is offline  
Last edited by gibsonhtp; April 29th, 2010 at 10:28 PM.
Reply With Quote
Old April 29th, 2010, 10:29 PM   #6 (permalink)
Premium Member
 
SprintFun's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Columbus, OH
Posts: 1,547
 
Device(s): Evo
Carrier: Not Provided

Thanks: 192
Thanked 658 Times in 289 Posts
Default

Real world range is probably more like 1-4 miles I think. River of Ice or eieio can offer more solid answers than I.
SprintFun is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old April 29th, 2010, 10:36 PM   #7 (permalink)
Member
Thread Author (OP)
 
nickoakdl's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Posts: 102
 
Device(s):
Carrier: Not Provided

Thanks: 17
Thanked 32 Times in 21 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by SprintFun View Post
Real world range is probably more like 1-4 miles I think. River of Ice or eieio can offer more solid answers than I.
Do these guys have a bat signal or something?
nickoakdl is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old April 30th, 2010, 01:00 AM   #8 (permalink)
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: In exile
Posts: 1,716
 
Device(s):
Carrier: Not Provided

Thanks: 177
Thanked 1,255 Times in 484 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by nickoakdl View Post
When a city gets 4G, does anyone know the range that encompasses the 4G ability? I'm wondering because I live 15 miles out of Minneapolis "as the crow flies" and want to know how far the 4G will reach once it gets there later in the year. I live 2 miles from St. Paul so I assume it would cover my area but I really have no idea.

The total coverage depends on number of users, build out finish speed, and physical geography.

The build out can reach 20-30 miles. Usually if you live with in 30 miles of the build out you are covered. Usually.

One thing to remember. If your city is on the list to get wimax. It does not stop. Baltimore, Portland, Los Vegas, are all still being built and expanded.

So if you do not get it at first turn on, it could be only a few months later.

Looking at the 3g coverage. Anything in orange should be covered in the first round. Because the tower placement wimax is added on to 3g towers. So the area in orange should be covered.

But that is depend alot of things, but it is a good indicator.

I can not promise you it will, but more then likely it will.

RiverOfIce is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old April 30th, 2010, 01:21 AM   #9 (permalink)
Member
 
RTan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Posts: 109
 
Device(s): HTC Hero, Samsung Moment, EVO 4G, and Epic 4G
Carrier: Not Provided

Thanks: 0
Thanked 24 Times in 12 Posts
Default

If you bring up the 4G Settings menu in the EVO device, there is a "Network notification" option for you to select. If the device picks up any 4G signal, it will show a message in the notification bar. Here is the network priority list: 4G -> WiFi -> 3G (if you have turned them on).
RTan is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old April 30th, 2010, 03:07 AM   #10 (permalink)
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Lakeland,FL
Posts: 63
 
Device(s): HTC EVO 4g this summer
Carrier: Not Provided

Thanks: 70
Thanked 17 Times in 11 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by RiverOfIce View Post
The total coverage depends on number of users, build out finish speed, and physical geography.

The build out can reach 20-30 miles. Usually if you live with in 30 miles of the build out you are covered. Usually.
I had a couple Q about range you might be able to answer.

Since WiMax ( cell phone use ) is a 2 way signal, with the tower pushing signal 30 miles out. ( approx.)

Can your phone push a signal back 30 miles and if so what will that do to your batt. life ?

Also, we should talk about external antenna options for extended range and/or signal amps, etc.

mobile powered antenna extends your cell range, whats the best options is what I'm wondering.

thanks
stkshooter is offline  
Reply With Quote
sponsored links
Old April 30th, 2010, 07:24 AM   #11 (permalink)
New Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: Atlanta, GA
Posts: 6
 
Device(s): HTC Incredible
Carrier: Not Provided

Thanks: 0
Thanked 4 Times in 1 Post
Send a message via AIM to Broo2 Send a message via Yahoo to Broo2 Send a message via Skype™ to Broo2
Default WiMax Issues

Clear/Sprint WiMax also depends on lots of other factors as well...

I was an early adopter of Clear WiMax (for home and Mobile USB) when it came to Atlanta; for several months I was getting decent speeds (6-8Mpbs)- but now that Spring is here and the trees are filling out, I am getting around 1.5Mbps.

WiMax is VERY line-of-site; i.e. if there is a building between you and the only tower in your area, you will not get a signal. They usually overlap tower coverage to resolve this, but there are more than a few places in Atlanta where this occurs.

WiMax speed also drops to 1/2 of normal during a heavy rain.

One of the Clear reps informed me that if you work in an office building, it is unlikely that you will get a good signal over the 9th floor as the antennas are pointed down.

WiMax is very spotty, but it is decent if/when you can get it to work. Personally I am staying with a 3G phone until a more reliable option is available- and switching back to DSL for my home (or AT&T U-Verse when it is available!)
Broo2 is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old April 30th, 2010, 10:58 AM   #12 (permalink)
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: In exile
Posts: 1,716
 
Device(s):
Carrier: Not Provided

Thanks: 177
Thanked 1,255 Times in 484 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by stkshooter View Post
I had a couple Q about range you might be able to answer.

Since WiMax ( cell phone use ) is a 2 way signal, with the tower pushing signal 30 miles out. ( approx.)

Can your phone push a signal back 30 miles and if so what will that do to your batt. life ?

Also, we should talk about external antenna options for extended range and/or signal amps, etc.

mobile powered antenna extends your cell range, whats the best options is what I'm wondering.

thanks
It is a 4 way signal not a 2 way. Your cell phone does not push back 30 miles, I can but does not have to. The build out is 30 miles not the tower. Battery life is manageable. The speeds will decrease for a 30 mile tower, deceasing the speed saves battery life more then the distance.


Broo2 I know you are a lte fan, and love verizon. BUT...

To get the rain problem, you would have to have more then 10 inches of rain an hour. WE have see a bizarre fog effect, and still are trying to understand that.

And leaves can effect your signal. But not in a lost of 80%. That would be really hard to do because each leaf would have to be about 4 inches thick.

Do wimax suffer from poor build out in some areas, yes it does.

Has clear really messed it up, yes they have. Wimax can bounce off houses not rain or leaves.

So please have your equipment checked.

What you are stating is really impossible, and has not been seen it any real life testing.

If you are truly suffering from these problems, then you need to contact clear, explain the problem so they can build out your area.

Remember, even if you have a build start in 2007, it is not done. So please help them help you.
RiverOfIce is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old April 30th, 2010, 12:39 PM   #13 (permalink)
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Lakeland,FL
Posts: 63
 
Device(s): HTC EVO 4g this summer
Carrier: Not Provided

Thanks: 70
Thanked 17 Times in 11 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by RiverOfIce View Post
It is a 4 way signal not a 2 way. Your cell phone does not push back 30 miles, I can but does not have to. The build out is 30 miles not the tower. Battery life is manageable. The speeds will decrease for a 30 mile tower, deceasing the speed saves battery life more then the distance.
o.k. let me ask the Q a diff. way.

A Wimax device using signal for say voice calls would have to carry that data both ways wouldn't it ?

If in the middle of desert, Can 1 tower cover a 30 mile radius ? If in desert with no other towers around and ( without using a external antenna ) can my Wimax phone push it's signal back to tower or how does the connection take place over the modern cell phones standard range of about 4 miles ?

I would like to clarify this because I think people are confusing 1 tower signal vs build out of many towers covering a 30 mile radius.

2nd Q : If we use external amplified antenna from our cell phone / device, can we extend Wimax range and what is best mobile set up options ? If cell phone range can be extended considerably by using external amplified antenna, what are the best options for Wimax

thanks
stkshooter is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old April 30th, 2010, 03:11 PM   #14 (permalink)
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: In exile
Posts: 1,716
 
Device(s):
Carrier: Not Provided

Thanks: 177
Thanked 1,255 Times in 484 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by stkshooter View Post
o.k. let me ask the Q a diff. way.

A Wimax device using signal for say voice calls would have to carry that data both ways wouldn't it ?

If in the middle of desert, Can 1 tower cover a 30 mile radius ? If in desert with no other towers around and ( without using a external antenna ) can my Wimax phone push it's signal back to tower or how does the connection take place over the modern cell phones standard range of about 4 miles ?

I would like to clarify this because I think people are confusing 1 tower signal vs build out of many towers covering a 30 mile radius.

2nd Q : If we use external amplified antenna from our cell phone / device, can we extend Wimax range and what is best mobile set up options ? If cell phone range can be extended considerably by using external amplified antenna, what are the best options for Wimax

thanks
Going to divide this into two sections.

Clear part.

Question 1.
No, with your average cell phone, you can not reach 30 miles. The reason make a build out with many towers, is to make a spiderweb coverage. The phones are designed and made to use the spider web system. The spider web system will cover about 30 miles around target city.

It would be pointless to make a usable cellphone that would have that much range. It would be literally be like using a .50 caliber gun to go duck hunting. It would just be numbing to work it out in a high tower area.

Question 2
Femtocell - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

There are also repeaters (sprints overdrive, and clear spot) and other devices. The range is what every the base station is set to usually 5-10 miles. But can be up to 30.

There will come out a wimax broadband router. That will use wimax connection to repeat both wimax/wifi signal. These will be used for cars and mobile objects.

I have said it before, I will say it again, and make people mad. Wimax is an extension of wifi. It is made to extend the network from lan (local area network) to Man (metropolitan area network)


Not clear part
wimax does not use voice. If it does it is just voip which is data.


Ok we will just talk theoretical here. Because it does really depend on way too many factors.

If all limitations where removed. Yes you should be able to do that. In real world the limit is set to about 4-5 miles, for many reasons, because you are dealing with 90 or so base stations in a 30 mile area. Just like modern phones. But you could do it for 30 miles. And I have seen it work with 30 miles. In nomadic mode.

Your gsm/cdma phone can reach 25 miles. So it is not out of the question.

The problem with that in no real world area would you want to do that.

But there is no clear answer to your question.

There are too many issues. Too many questions. I have seen it done, but only on limited bases.
RiverOfIce is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old April 30th, 2010, 07:38 PM   #15 (permalink)
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Lakeland,FL
Posts: 63
 
Device(s): HTC EVO 4g this summer
Carrier: Not Provided

Thanks: 70
Thanked 17 Times in 11 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by RiverOfIce View Post
Going to divide this into two sections.

Clear part.

Question 1.
No, with your average cell phone, you can not reach 30 miles. The reason make a build out with many towers, is to make a spiderweb coverage. The phones are designed and made to use the spider web system. The spider web system will cover about 30 miles around target city.

It would be pointless to make a usable cellphone that would have that much range. It would be literally be like using a .50 caliber gun to go duck hunting. It would just be numbing to work it out in a high tower area.

Question 2
Femtocell - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

There are also repeaters (sprints overdrive, and clear spot) and other devices. The range is what every the base station is set to usually 5-10 miles. But can be up to 30.

There will come out a wimax broadband router. That will use wimax connection to repeat both wimax/wifi signal. These will be used for cars and mobile objects.

I have said it before, I will say it again, and make people mad. Wimax is an extension of wifi. It is made to extend the network from lan (local area network) to Man (metropolitan area network)


Not clear part
wimax does not use voice. If it does it is just voip which is data.


Ok we will just talk theoretical here. Because it does really depend on way too many factors.

If all limitations where removed. Yes you should be able to do that. In real world the limit is set to about 4-5 miles, for many reasons, because you are dealing with 90 or so base stations in a 30 mile area. Just like modern phones. But you could do it for 30 miles. And I have seen it work with 30 miles. In nomadic mode.

Your gsm/cdma phone can reach 25 miles. So it is not out of the question.

The problem with that in no real world area would you want to do that.

But there is no clear answer to your question.

There are too many issues. Too many questions. I have seen it done, but only on limited bases.
Thanks, duck hunting with 50 cal. now I understand that's funny.

Would the FCC allow cell phone next to your head to push out 30 mi ?

You said, base router would have longer range so I assume the cell phone range was limited for power / health reasons.

I have femtocell (airave) at home and it works great now that I have faster cable broadband which can support it. wimax wifi router the same type set up.

I was hoping to use wifi type antenna on vehicle connected to EVO for extended range coverage of wimax vs buying overdrive type device and paying additional fees. any ideas?

Example: If wimax coverage area is 30 miles and I travel 28 mi out from center, ( less towers ) my speeds will be slower unless I can improve signal on my end with antenna is what I was asking about before. I should also be able to extend range with antenna or powered antenna shouldn't I ?

used 1 tower and voice example to simplify my Q of 2 way data traffic. but yes voip.

more later, gotta run...
stkshooter is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old April 30th, 2010, 07:51 PM   #16 (permalink)
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: In exile
Posts: 1,716
 
Device(s):
Carrier: Not Provided

Thanks: 177
Thanked 1,255 Times in 484 Posts
Default

That really depends. I would not worry. You see a small decrease but not enough to buy extra equipment for.

antenna for cars is coming.


Remember you always have 3g. 4g is not the end of 3g . And in some cases 3g will work better then 4g.

Traveling from 4g to 3g to 4g.

90% of that trip will be on 3g.

The last thing, for the most part you are not going to see that much of increase in speed.

It does take time to get wimax up and running. It does need to be fine tuned.

Just like 3g does.

This is not a circle coverage. See map above.
RiverOfIce is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old April 30th, 2010, 09:18 PM   #17 (permalink)
Member
 
So-Low Da Don's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Houston, TX
Posts: 451
 
Device(s): My Touch, Moment, Hero, Evo 4G, Epic 4G, Current: Epic 4G Touch!!
Carrier: Not Provided

Thanks: 44
Thanked 90 Times in 62 Posts
Default

there's a 4g coverage map on sprint if you search it up
__________________
WHAT'S AN APPLE TO AN ANDROID?!?!? (NOTHING)
So-Low Da Don is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old May 1st, 2010, 04:18 AM   #18 (permalink)
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Lakeland,FL
Posts: 63
 
Device(s): HTC EVO 4g this summer
Carrier: Not Provided

Thanks: 70
Thanked 17 Times in 11 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by RiverOfIce View Post
That really depends. I would not worry. You see a small decrease but not enough to buy extra equipment for.

antenna for cars is coming.

Remember you always have 3g. 4g is not the end of 3g . And in some cases 3g will work better then 4g.

Traveling from 4g to 3g to 4g.

90% of that trip will be on 3g.

The last thing, for the most part you are not going to see that much of increase in speed.

It does take time to get wimax up and running. It does need to be fine tuned.

Just like 3g does.

This is not a circle coverage. See map above.


Example: If I lived were the red dot is located on map and wanted to use wimax on my EVO 4G from that location (outside without any land obstructions / buildings between towers. ), are there any good cost effective ways to connect or would I be better off with 3G ? Many people will be asking this Q before long.

I travel the state and wimax would offer the link I have been waiting for without the higher cost. 4G might not be faster in some cases but if sprint offers unlimited 4G vs cap on 3G there might be some who feel that is enough reason to use external antenna to get 4G. Cost is sometimes a bigger motivator

I was hoping something like this would work if they can figure out a way to connect to EVO that is.

AOU2410 1 WATT USB WIFI ADAPTER

PS: Off topic but has anybody used a wifi antenna like this ?

thanks
stkshooter is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old May 4th, 2010, 07:14 PM   #19 (permalink)
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Lakeland,FL
Posts: 63
 
Device(s): HTC EVO 4g this summer
Carrier: Not Provided

Thanks: 70
Thanked 17 Times in 11 Posts
Default client device limited by battery drain

Quote:
Originally Posted by RiverOfIce View Post
Your cell phone does not push back 30 miles, I can but does not have to. The build out is 30 miles not the tower. Battery life is manageable. The speeds will decrease for a 30 mile tower, deceasing the speed saves battery life more then the distance.
"The allowed maximum transmission power in licensed bands is normally higher than in unlicensed bands. This implies that wider range and higher spectral efficiency can be achieved in principle.

Yet, in practice the limiting factor in most cases is the client device, where the maximum power is limited by battery drain consideration.

As a result, the client device transmit power is just as limited in the licensed band as in the unlicensed band."

ABPs Main Blog | Blog Archive Wi-Fight: New Insights on WiFi versus WiMax | ABP Tech

This is 1 reason you need 100 towers per city to reduce client device batt. drain which is also 1 of the reasons AC powered modems have a longer range. Depending on location of modem, an external antenna should still help considerably. maybe not as much on EVO because of power restrictions but should help some since a human head would not be absorbing all the signal.

RiverOfIce: I've noticed some of your post appear to be copy/pasted as I have done above. So you shouldn't mind if I don't attempt to repeat everything first hand. This WiMax thing is new to me and I'm trying to catch up. The same basic principles should apply when it comes to sending / receiving signals. (please don't split hairs, about statements in a non tech type forum)

Since you appear to be the best WiMax / WiFi authority we have here and chose to avoid my external antenna Q, I would like to ask. Do you have experience with external WiFi / Wimax antenna use on Client devices ?

I gave an example as to why I asked the Q and don't plan to use the antenna all the time, just looking for options. Any suggestions ?

I'm guessing the blue WiMax coverage area does not stop at the edge of blue line. Therefore using large antenna to gather weaker signal should allow for extended range beyond the blue area because of deflection,etc. I understand signal is pointed downward so range beyond that blue line may be very limited, just looking for options.

thanks
stkshooter is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old May 5th, 2010, 11:31 AM   #20 (permalink)
Junior Member
 
Join Date: May 2010
Posts: 24
 
Device(s):
Carrier: Not Provided

Thanks: 11
Thanked 7 Times in 5 Posts
Default

I don't know much about the fine details, but I know that the height of the antenna makes a big difference. I found this map showing the difference between what I think is normal tower height or even ground level, and then 115ft. Quite a change!

steveholtam is offline  
Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to steveholtam For This Useful Post:
stkshooter (May 5th, 2010)
sponsored links
Old May 5th, 2010, 06:54 PM   #21 (permalink)
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Lakeland,FL
Posts: 63
 
Device(s): HTC EVO 4g this summer
Carrier: Not Provided

Thanks: 70
Thanked 17 Times in 11 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by steveholtam View Post
I don't know much about the fine details, but I know that the height of the antenna makes a big difference. I found this map showing the difference between what I think is normal tower height or even ground level, and then 115ft. Quite a change!

Does anybody know min. signal strength required for clear to show coverage on map ?

I've proved myself that sprints voice coverage map is way off and needs to be updated. I imagine we will see the same thing with WiMax / WiFi depending on signal meter set up.

Example: you have this large pc of private property or public land without roads or locked gates. Company won't have easy access to test signal and may decide to show as non coverage area. I seriously doubt you would have coverage all around that one area on map except for some little square. Could be a gated community they didn't verify.

Map gives you a better idea of just how many WiMax antenna will be in an area. I have noticed a lot of new towers going up and my sprint voice signal is 4-5 bars in most places now. If all those new towers have WiMax just waiting to flip the switch, I'll be a happy customer soon.
stkshooter is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old May 5th, 2010, 07:17 PM   #22 (permalink)
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: In exile
Posts: 1,716
 
Device(s):
Carrier: Not Provided

Thanks: 177
Thanked 1,255 Times in 484 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by stkshooter View Post
Does anybody know min. signal strength required for clear to show coverage on map ?

I've proved myself that sprints voice coverage map is way off and needs to be updated. I imagine we will see the same thing with WiMax / WiFi depending on signal meter set up.

Example: you have this large pc of private property or public land without roads or locked gates. Company won't have easy access to test signal and may decide to show as non coverage area. I seriously doubt you would have coverage all around that one area on map except for some little square. Could be a gated community they didn't verify.

Map gives you a better idea of just how many WiMax antenna will be in an area. I have noticed a lot of new towers going up and my sprint voice signal is 4-5 bars in most places now. If all those new towers have WiMax just waiting to flip the switch, I'll be a happy customer soon.
To be honest, I do software. I have forward the message to some people.

To give an unofficial answer. The base station is programed to deal out x signal to y devices over z area. Allowing to increase strength x signal power, if y devices fall under w speed, in z area.

The system is made to act as a web. Each tower acts as a smart signaler. Telling the other towers to expect you and increase the signal strength based on the area.

There is a chance that if you fall out side of the z area, the base station may just ignore you. It is only made to look after the devices in z area. If it thinks you are out of z area, it will try to pass you off to another tower.

You can hit the point where the stations will just ignore you. Because you are out of range. To maintain consistent coverage, it has to be this way.

On the wimax thread I posted an video of wimax coverage and how it works.

I will post when I get any more information on your question.
RiverOfIce is offline  
Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to RiverOfIce For This Useful Post:
stkshooter (May 5th, 2010)
Old May 6th, 2010, 04:10 AM   #23 (permalink)
Member
 
djdisturbed's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: Burlington, NC
Posts: 252
 
Device(s): HTC EVO 4g Ham Radio's - KF4ZZE
Carrier: Not Provided

Thanks: 165
Thanked 81 Times in 36 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by stkshooter View Post
Thanks, duck hunting with 50 cal. now I understand that's funny.

Would the FCC allow cell phone next to your head to push out 30 mi ?

You said, base router would have longer range so I assume the cell phone range was limited for power / health reasons.

I have femtocell (airave) at home and it works great now that I have faster cable broadband which can support it. wimax wifi router the same type set up.

I was hoping to use wifi type antenna on vehicle connected to EVO for extended range coverage of wimax vs buying overdrive type device and paying additional fees. any ideas?

Example: If wimax coverage area is 30 miles and I travel 28 mi out from center, ( less towers ) my speeds will be slower unless I can improve signal on my end with antenna is what I was asking about before. I should also be able to extend range with antenna or powered antenna shouldn't I ?

used 1 tower and voice example to simplify my Q of 2 way data traffic. but yes voip.

more later, gotta run...
you would be surprised on how little power it can really take to reach 30 miles, being a HAM radio operator I have used handheld 5watt VHF radios reach close to 100 miles (in good conditions mind you w/ tuned attenna's). and HF ham radios reach the other side of the world on 50watts of power. I know our cell phone down even use a fraction of that ammount of power on higher feq.'s BUT just like w/ ham radio repeaters, you can have one higher power transmit tower transmitting data TO your phone and have a smaller reciver/repeater closer to you transmitting data back to the higher power transmitter or lan connetion to the main site (not saying this is how clear does things, but it can be done like that). or like i do at my apt (which is in a cell phone dead area to almost all the diff providers) Have a femtocell to help the signal in local bad areas b/c if someone has one in there home it will cover for a area around it as well (though not very far, i can get like 150 feet outside my apt before i lose it, BUT they dont have 4g compatable ones out.... yet)
djdisturbed is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old May 6th, 2010, 01:17 PM   #24 (permalink)
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2010
Posts: 1,584
 
Device(s): HTC Evo, Rev0002
Carrier: Sprint

Thanks: 43
Thanked 220 Times in 172 Posts
Default

I read an article about a company in NYC that installed towers in Manhattan and Brooklyn to cover a wide part of the NYC metro area. I believe they said max range was 30 miles under ideal conditions and with limited obstacle blockage/building penetration but they installed towers in 15 miles radius/interval for the area they wanted covered.

As with current 3G, I think Wimax and LTE both still are impacted by building/obstacles and topography as will almost all signal devices.

The company said they've been able to provide high-speed access to their clients with speed and costs advantages. They also mentioned that tower permits and regulations were difficult because of the amount of radiation the units produce but those same towers are typically placed several hundred or up to a thousand feet high to account for the additional risk.

One reason I've wondered about the Walmart or other store-based tower scenario is that ideally the Wimax towers would be at least 2-4 times higher than current cell towers. I don't see local codes being too friendly to that.
Rigmaster is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old May 14th, 2010, 07:20 PM   #25 (permalink)
Junior Member
 
Join Date: May 2010
Posts: 33
 
Device(s):
Carrier: Not Provided

Thanks: 3
Thanked 2 Times in 2 Posts
Default

I've been searching for a thread like this and thanks to everyone who has been involved. From a site whose URL I can't recall, I found I live .7 miles from 3 identified Clear 4G antennas but live at the edge of a bubble of non 4G (per the sprint maps) and there is by maybe 2 tenths of a mile between my house and the closest identified 4G. Hoping that there is some slop in the coverage maps or maybe these Clear antennas might not be on or fully deployed.

Lots of trees here, the terrain is mildly hilly but in winter I know I could see 2 of these 3 antenna locations (water tower and 9 story building) from my roof

So close yet so far....
jmcging is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old May 14th, 2010, 07:24 PM   #26 (permalink)
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Washington, DC
Posts: 608
 
Device(s): Samsung Galaxy Nexus
Carrier: Not Provided

Thanks: 93
Thanked 198 Times in 139 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by jmcging View Post
I've been searching for a thread like this and thanks to everyone who has been involved. From a site whose URL I can't recall, I found I live .7 miles from 3 identified Clear 4G antennas but live at the edge of a bubble of non 4G (per the sprint maps) and there is by maybe 2 tenths of a mile between my house and the closest identified 4G. Hoping that there is some slop in the coverage maps or maybe these Clear antennas might not be on or fully deployed.

Lots of trees here, the terrain is mildly hilly but in winter I know I could see 2 of these 3 antenna locations (water tower and 9 story building) from my roof

So close yet so far....
if you looked up the wimax tower locations it was probably through the towerco site...those dont show all of the wimax towers out there so there could be more around you. as far as that coverage gap, it could be an area where sprint hasnt tested the coverage
__________________
Finally a Senior Member!!!!
Dont forget to use that Thanks button, its there for a reason
THEFORCE is offline  
Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to THEFORCE For This Useful Post:
jmcging (May 14th, 2010)
Old May 14th, 2010, 07:31 PM   #27 (permalink)
Member
 
LisaFitz's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: NY
Posts: 167
 
Device(s): **HTC EVO & Samsung Moment** Backup Phone - Palm Pre
Carrier: Not Provided

Thanks: 11
Thanked 13 Times in 11 Posts
Default

This sucks because even though WiMax is coming to NYC i am about 25 mins away from there (north) which prob. translates into about 15-20mi away which means I will not get great 4g coverage either - (unless its ontop of the empire state building) than its a crap shoot lol ..

But whatever happened to the Walmart deal? Putting 4G on Walmart building tops which help me so much more with a local walmart being less than 5mi away!
LisaFitz is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old May 14th, 2010, 07:32 PM   #28 (permalink)
Junior Member
 
Join Date: May 2010
Posts: 33
 
Device(s):
Carrier: Not Provided

Thanks: 3
Thanked 2 Times in 2 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by THEFORCE View Post
if you looked up the wimax tower locations it was probably through the towerco site...those dont show all of the wimax towers out there so there could be more around you. as far as that coverage gap, it could be an area where sprint hasnt tested the coverage
Yes, towerco was the site (pretty cool stuff, with the mapping and such) And here's to hoping you are right about the reality being better than the maps.

Won't keep me from buying the phone as I work in Baltimore in a clear 4G area, but having 4G at the house would be the best.....
jmcging is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old May 14th, 2010, 07:34 PM   #29 (permalink)
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Washington, DC
Posts: 608
 
Device(s): Samsung Galaxy Nexus
Carrier: Not Provided

Thanks: 93
Thanked 198 Times in 139 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by jmcging View Post
Yes, towerco was the site (pretty cool stuff, with the mapping and such) And here's to hoping you are right about the reality being better than the maps.

Won't keep me from buying the phone as I work in Baltimore in a clear 4G area, but having 4G at the house would be the best.....
u know whats cool about the baltimore and dc area is dc and bmore will be connected with 4g so it will be this huge area of 4g coverage. towerco is just a partner with sprint some they only operate some of the towers
THEFORCE is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old May 14th, 2010, 07:35 PM   #30 (permalink)
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Washington, DC
Posts: 608
 
Device(s): Samsung Galaxy Nexus
Carrier: Not Provided

Thanks: 93
Thanked 198 Times in 139 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by LisaFitz View Post
This sucks because even though WiMax is coming to NYC i am about 25 mins away from there (north) which prob. translates into about 15-20mi away which means I will not get great 4g coverage either - (unless its ontop of the empire state building) than its a crap shoot lol ..

But whatever happened to the Walmart deal? Putting 4G on Walmart building tops which help me so much more with a local walmart being less than 5mi away!
the buildout wont stop so it will eventually get there, like 3g did
THEFORCE is offline  
Reply With Quote
sponsored links
Old May 14th, 2010, 07:49 PM   #31 (permalink)
Junior Member
 
Join Date: May 2010
Posts: 36
 
Device(s):
Carrier: Not Provided

Thanks: 40
Thanked 15 Times in 9 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by RiverOfIce View Post
The total coverage depends on number of users, build out finish speed, and physical geography.

The build out can reach 20-30 miles. Usually if you live with in 30 miles of the build out you are covered. Usually.

One thing to remember. If your city is on the list to get wimax. It does not stop. Baltimore, Portland, Los Vegas, are all still being built and expanded.

So if you do not get it at first turn on, it could be only a few months later.

Looking at the 3g coverage. Anything in orange should be covered in the first round. Because the tower placement wimax is added on to 3g towers. So the area in orange should be covered.

But that is depend alot of things, but it is a good indicator.

I can not promise you it will, but more then likely it will.

River can i please have that map for the Boston area and the Providence RI area? I live between both cities, Please and Thank you
BigdaddyPooh is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old May 14th, 2010, 08:14 PM   #32 (permalink)
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: In exile
Posts: 1,716
 
Device(s):
Carrier: Not Provided

Thanks: 177
Thanked 1,255 Times in 484 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by BigdaddyPooh View Post
River can i please have that map for the Boston area and the Providence RI area? I live between both cities, Please and Thank you
Can I please do this tomorrow, I already left the office, I actually have a date tonight, with a guy!!!!


I will look them up tomorrow, I have to go in anyway.
RiverOfIce is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old May 14th, 2010, 08:19 PM   #33 (permalink)
Junior Member
 
keyholeSecrets's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2010
Location: San Jose, CA
Posts: 54
 
Device(s): Evo Noir!
Carrier: Not Provided

Thanks: 35
Thanked 19 Times in 12 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by BigdaddyPooh View Post
River can i please have that map for the Boston area and the Providence RI area? I live between both cities, Please and Thank you
You can use the Sprint Coverage Tool. Just click the "Data, Email, and Multimedia" tab and it will show you the coverage.

Sprint - Nationwide Coverage
__________________
"If you don't make it, it's your own damn vault"
keyholeSecrets is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old May 14th, 2010, 08:21 PM   #34 (permalink)
Senior Member
 
mcbtrain929's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: ChiTown
Posts: 918
 
Device(s): Samsung Galaxy Note LTE
Carrier: Not Provided

Thanks: 107
Thanked 137 Times in 67 Posts
Default

how can you search/find out what spring 4G towers are close to you/in your area? i'm just curious.
mcbtrain929 is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old May 14th, 2010, 08:31 PM   #35 (permalink)
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Washington, DC
Posts: 608
 
Device(s): Samsung Galaxy Nexus
Carrier: Not Provided

Thanks: 93
Thanked 198 Times in 139 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by mcbtrain929 View Post
how can you search/find out what spring 4G towers are close to you/in your area? i'm just curious.
go to towerco.com and type in your state....this will show the wimax towers that are owned by towerco, a partner of sprint. these wont be the only wimax towers in your area though.
THEFORCE is offline  
Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to THEFORCE For This Useful Post:
keyholeSecrets (May 14th, 2010)
Old May 14th, 2010, 08:33 PM   #36 (permalink)
acp
Senior Member
 
acp's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Posts: 996
 
Device(s):
Carrier: Not Provided

Thanks: 83
Thanked 71 Times in 56 Posts
Default

I'm sooooo close to having 4g, probably less than 5 miles
acp is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old May 14th, 2010, 08:33 PM   #37 (permalink)
Junior Member
 
keyholeSecrets's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2010
Location: San Jose, CA
Posts: 54
 
Device(s): Evo Noir!
Carrier: Not Provided

Thanks: 35
Thanked 19 Times in 12 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by mcbtrain929 View Post
how can you search/find out what spring 4G towers are close to you/in your area? i'm just curious.
The only thing I can think of is just using the search and use the zoom out tool. I don't think it actually tells you where the towers are it only shows the coverage like so...

http://img299.imageshack.us/img299/3212/4gmap.png
San Jose, CA (unfortunately no 4G coverage I hope they plan on adding us to the list)

http://img203.imageshack.us/img203/5194/4gmap2.png
Las Vegas, NV (4G coverage in blue)
keyholeSecrets is offline  
Last edited by keyholeSecrets; May 14th, 2010 at 08:42 PM.
Reply With Quote
Old May 14th, 2010, 08:37 PM   #38 (permalink)
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: In exile
Posts: 1,716
 
Device(s):
Carrier: Not Provided

Thanks: 177
Thanked 1,255 Times in 484 Posts
Default

http://www.broadskynetworks.net/maps/img/Boston.jpg
This map is really old, but you get the hint.

http://www.broadskynetworks.net/maps/img/Providence-Newport-Rhode-Island.jpg
Old map, but I am doing this from my Blackberry. Hope this helps.
RiverOfIce is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old March 26th, 2011, 01:06 PM   #39 (permalink)
New Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Posts: 1
 
Device(s):
Carrier: Not Provided

Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Cool Speculators vs. Facts

For all you speculators heres the facts.Although some of your statements are correct alot of them are covered by that blanket of fog that is called speculation. 4g wimax has a peak of around 30 miles true, but in order to have that peak and perfect condition. You have to be in the LOS (line of sight). Which means no interference. No trees, no hills, nothing. The realistic extend of wimax is 1 to 3 miles with interference. And if your wondering this does include buildings. Thats why some 4g areas cannot get 4g inside houses even when they are in a 4g range. And like another one of you speculators stated its also dependent on the type of tower that they put up. The better the tower the better the range. So it will be highly unlikely that you get 4g at your house. If you are interested in getting 4g at your house. You should look at getting a wimax repeater.
darklordfenton is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old March 26th, 2011, 01:32 PM   #40 (permalink)
Senior Member
 
s_special's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: socal
Posts: 537
 
Device(s): GS2 epic 4G Touch Asus transformer
Carrier: Not Provided

Thanks: 98
Thanked 55 Times in 38 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by darklordfenton View Post
For all you speculators heres the facts.Although some of your statements are correct alot of them are covered by that blanket of fog that is called speculation. 4g wimax has a peak of around 30 miles true, but in order to have that peak and perfect condition. You have to be in the LOS (line of sight). Which means no interference. No trees, no hills, nothing. The realistic extend of wimax is 1 to 3 miles with interference. And if your wondering this does include buildings. Thats why some 4g areas cannot get 4g inside houses even when they are in a 4g range. And like another one of you speculators stated its also dependent on the type of tower that they put up. The better the tower the better the range. So it will be highly unlikely that you get 4g at your house. If you are interested in getting 4g at your house. You should look at getting a wimax repeater.
is LTE the same principle?
__________________
ASUS Transformer Eee pad
Samsung galaxy s2 epic 4g touch ICS
s_special is offline  
Reply With Quote
sponsored links
Old March 26th, 2011, 04:15 PM   #41 (permalink)
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: Bat Cave
Posts: 1,065
 
Device(s): Motorola StarTac
Carrier: Not Provided

Thanks: 154
Thanked 826 Times in 287 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by s_special View Post
is LTE the same principle?
For the most part yes.
eieio is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old March 28th, 2011, 10:21 AM   #42 (permalink)
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2010
Posts: 1,584
 
Device(s): HTC Evo, Rev0002
Carrier: Sprint

Thanks: 43
Thanked 220 Times in 172 Posts
Default

I get 4G in my house no problem - full signal. I think I'm less than .5 mile from a tower though. The coverage extends to about 3 miles in all directions, and I live in a pretty wooded/obstacle-filled location. I get coverage all over Trenton out to about 5 miles west, but 0 coverage in downtown Princeton.

The towers in Elizabeth/Rahway NJ seem to have range that extends 5-10 miles depending on direction. I get signal all the way over to the Elizabeth port and down to about Exit 10 near the NJ Tpk.
Rigmaster is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old January 4th, 2012, 10:59 PM   #43 (permalink)
New Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: Phelan, ca
Posts: 5
 
Device(s): LG ally
Carrier: Not Provided

Thanks: 1
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Send a message via MSN to Toushirou1989 rurounikenshin.real
Default

i see a lot of people take about the phone call its self most cell phone to my knowledge use both 2g and 3g/4g. 2g use for both texting and phone calls. you dont see 3g on a basic entry phone that does not browses the web very will with 4/3g. and for the single strength would be base on -dB like in my are the avg single for my 4g on sprint is about -80 dB witch is a good single for most things the highest it can go that i know of is about -115dB witch is pushing it for the single strength. Decibel - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia on dB. i know for a fact that cell compenys don't use phone calls on 3g/4g networks there is just now need for it. takes to much power and it to much over head, plus 2g was meant for phone calls and has been used for over 12 years now. even with better data transfer rates with 3g/4g witch use a lot more power then a 2g only phone with a phone that is 3g/4g you may be able to get about 12 to 10 hours of working time on it with normal use. with a 2g phone you are looking at about 20 to 30 hour of work time on normal use do the power demands for the lower single spacemen. from what have research over years of keeping up with new technolgys that are out there.
Toushirou1989 is offline  
Reply With Quote
Reply


Go Back   Android Forums > Android Carriers > Sprint > 4G Discussion
Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 09:07 PM.
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2014, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.