Quote:
Originally Posted by HereticSins
So after making some calculations, I will be saving 120 dollars on sprint on a two year contract with two galaxy s3's for me and my gf.
Sprint- 140*24= 3360+50+50=$3460.
Metro- 110*24=2640+520+520=$3680
Even on Verizon it wouldn't be that much different.
140*24=3360+200+200=3760.
Not that much and for good service and speeds.
Yeah metro you don't have to keep your service but then why pay 500 dollars for a phone? Oh and on contract you can get a discount on another phone.
Just food for thought.
Can anyone give me reasons why being on one of the big four on contract is bad? Never been on one.
|
Sprint has things called surcharges and random fees that make you end up paying more so... plus on metro you don't have to worry about a cancellation fee of 250 or more for a line... . And trust me things happen when you least expect it. Another thing is if you miss a payment it starts to affect your credit. Which of course I'm suffering with ATM since I still owe sprint over 350 bucks for canceling a 2 year contract. And whenever it comes to getting a car or apt. First thing they always mention is "Sprint bill" -___-. So yea. Buy the phone at 500 and I promise in a Years run you'll see yourself paying much less
