Originally Posted by Ingenieur7
No it doesn't.
Even if these reviews are biased, the score difference is still too large.
To me, the Samsung Galaxy S3 and Note 2 are much better devices than the DNA.
Yes the DNA may have a better screen, but it's lacking everywhere else.
To me, a phone is much more than the screen. For example, my SGS2's screen as 218PPI but I still love the phone because the UI is smooth and the Super AMOLED screen has the deepest black levels and most vibrant colors of any screen.
I heard the DNA's UI is laggy and has a lot of bugs, hence the lower performance score. Also the software of the DNA is lacking.
Where are these reviews from? The DNA has the superior display, resolution, processor, build quality and its $100 cheaper than the Note 2. Thats an easy win.