View Single Post
Old February 8th, 2013, 01:50 PM   #17 (permalink)
Join Date: Dec 2009
Posts: 197
Carrier: Not Provided

Thanks: 14
Thanked 38 Times in 28 Posts

Originally Posted by lightsleeper23 View Post
Yeah. But it's supposed to be a major market here. If they advertise it as nationwide coverage and claim there is good coverage in this city but these are typical results here, I would call it a joke overall. That's not to say it cant be a little better in other places...
If Sprint says there's WiMax coverage in SLC, and that was your experience, then I can understand your frustration. But Salt Lake City is hardly typical to the point that its coverage issues can be extrapolated everywhere. It's a city of 200,000 people in a state of less than 3 million. That's not a knock on where you live, but the reality is that providers will focus their coverage more on where more people live. In that light, coverage in San Francisco and Silicon Valley are MUCH more likely to be "typical" of the promised WiMax coverage areas. This is not to discount your experience, but your experience and your location does not by itself make for a typical case.
yfan is offline  
Last edited by yfan; February 8th, 2013 at 01:56 PM.
Reply With Quote
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to yfan For This Useful Post:
Rxpert83 (February 8th, 2013), trekleech (February 8th, 2013)