View Single Post
Old February 20th, 2013, 10:48 AM   #64 (permalink)
ov3rdriv3
New Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2013
Posts: 8
 
Device(s):
Carrier: Not Provided

Thanks: 0
Thanked 2 Times in 2 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Hadron View Post
DNA owners have generally been saying that is pretty efficient with the battery, and the One's battery is 15% larger with a smaller screen area to light up. So while I'd prefer a larger battery, there's reason to be hopeful.
Well depends on their usage doesn't it? I also know plenty of DNA owners who switched due to inadequate battery life (mostly heavy users tbf). And this on pushes more pixels too right? Should do better than DNA theoretically, but still it's a bit meh since you'll never be able to take full advantage of the great screen. Or they could've at least just released it with removable battery. Will probably get myself one regardless, looks fab!

PS: Love Arnie!
ov3rdriv3 is offline  
Last edited by ov3rdriv3; February 20th, 2013 at 10:54 AM.
Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to ov3rdriv3 For This Useful Post:
EarlyMon (February 20th, 2013)