View Single Post
Old April 2nd, 2013, 09:17 AM   #89 (permalink)
novox77
Leeeroy Jennnkinnns!
 
novox77's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Posts: 3,968
 
Device(s): Evo 4G, 3D, LTE
Carrier: Not Provided

Thanks: 1,190
Thanked 3,268 Times in 1,410 Posts
Default

Sometimes I feel like we ought to make our phone camera selection based on which post-processing filter we prefer the most.... These days, the optics, sensor, pixels, etc probably have less impact than the post-processing.

From an optical physics standpoint, I think we've mastered the pinhole camera. What makes the "camera" stand out is the intelligence of the post processing: can the firmware figure out the best settings to apply to a given shot?

When we're comparing photos taken in a bar, we're not comparing megapixels, or optics, or sensor quality. We're comparing which firmware can fix the crappy photo the best.

Garbage in, garbage out. If you take a photo in the worst physical conditions possible, you aren't going to get a good picture. But maybe the "auto-photoshop" in the firmware can salvage it somewhat.
__________________

The good thing about science is that it's true whether or not you believe in it. -Neil deGrasse Tyson

Help me out: Sign up with Dropbox and we both get 500MB extra space. Thanks!
novox77 is offline  
Reply With Quote
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to novox77 For This Useful Post:
EarlyMon (April 2nd, 2013), toad6386 (April 2nd, 2013)