View Single Post
Old June 22nd, 2010, 04:40 PM   #76 (permalink)
mrspeedmaster
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2010
Posts: 886
 
Device(s): A bunch of phones and tablets.
Thanks: 14
Thanked 255 Times in 144 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by EarlyMon View Post
Doh. This is a no brainer. I just noticed from your latest test that the iPhone does everything in H.264 (AVC, MPEG4 Part 10) vs. the Evo's MPEG4 Part 2 (ASP, note compatibility to H.263).

Nothing more to decide or test. H.264 is simply a superior codec.


MAYBE we will be able to buy an H.264 _encoder_ for the phone, in future.
And then we might get closer to the iPhone's video performance.
!
The H.264 is a vendor specific implementation. Galaxy S will have it.

Google is not just going to give it away for free. It cost money and Apple has the economy of scale to cross-license.
They have it in all their products from OS to high-end editing apps. They also have Pro apps division (Motion/FCP) so they have the talent/man power to implement a superior software solution for the recording.

So they, definitely have the upper hand and a cost advantage of $10-15 per unit over HTC (codec licenses/man power/talent for camera software, etc).
This is just one area where it is hard for others to compete.
mrspeedmaster is offline  
Reply With Quote