Go Back   Android Forums > Android Discussion > Android Lounge
Android Lounge A place for general Android discussion and questions.

test: Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools
Old August 16th, 2010, 12:20 PM   #1 (permalink)
New Member
Thread Author (OP)
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: On a couch with wifi, somewhere in SE Asia.
Posts: 10
 
Device(s): Galaxy S
Carrier: Not Provided

Thanks: 0
Thanked 1 Time in 1 Post
Default Would some standardization of hardware be a good thing?

Complete freedom in hardware sounds good in theory, but I see a big advantage for Apple in its uniform hardware, with OS X and with iPhone. It's a lot easier to ensure compatibility when there is a very restricted set of hardware being used.

Just wondering whether there's anything practical that Android could take from this? A tighter set of standards on "approved" hardware, discouraging proliferation of hardware components for the sake of it? Of course it's open source, so people could still use it how they want, but it would be handy to know if most or all of the hardware has been tested and approved by Android developers - then the buyer is better informed. This might reduce (to an extent) the proliferation of hardware components used in phones, which would be a good thing in terms of compatibility, reducing hardware conflicts and flakiness.

This idea comes partly from my experiences with Linux being flaky on certain hardware, and now from my experience with Galaxy S, which has lag and other flakiness. Also from the observation that corporations like to give us variety and tell us it's good, even if it's variety of crap.

Not sure if this is a practical solution, but I do believe something is needed to improve hardware compatibility in Linux-based systems, including Android.

Advertisements
Chriswaterguy is offline  
Reply With Quote
sponsored links
Old August 16th, 2010, 12:35 PM   #2 (permalink)
Member
 
Join Date: May 2010
Posts: 405
 
Device(s):
Carrier: Not Provided

Thanks: 32
Thanked 53 Times in 39 Posts
Default

This is an iffy subject.

I think Android can still enjoy its openness if it incorporates a better app store. Currently the rating system, search, and organization of the Android marketplace....kinda sucks.

In the apple app store, they have a section that separates iOS4 apps from the regular apps, or apps that incorporate Retina display.

Android needs better organization, maybe a section just for Froyo would be a good start. Maybe a featured section, favorites by Google, etc.
MrX8503 is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old August 17th, 2010, 11:44 AM   #3 (permalink)
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: Singapore
Posts: 22
 
Device(s): moto milestone
Carrier: Not Provided

Thanks: 0
Thanked 1 Time in 1 Post
Default

gingerbread's minimum requirements announcement = google's rough way of standardizing android

although i don't think it would be a bad thing. 3.0 will separate the "tablet/phone" from the smart-phone(2.2).

1.6 and 2.1 will slowly disappear in the market ( phone contract expiry is one big reason, although i bet many will still circulate in the reselling market. good thing there's custom roms...)

the smart-phones will be divided into the low-end (wildfire, x10-mini), and and the hi-end (n1,desire). the in-betweens would just be laggy hi-ends.
vani77a is offline  
Reply With Quote
Reply
Tags
compatibility, hardware, linux


Go Back   Android Forums > Android Discussion > Android Lounge
Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 01:11 PM.
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2014, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.