AirPush: Do you want ads in your Notification Tray?
In case you haven't seen it yet, there is a post on Phandroid about AirPush, and their ad tech that lets Devs push ads to your notification tray even when the app from that dev ISN'T running!
That dev removed the AirPush ads from his app after receiving a horde of 1 star ratings and being reported as malware.
I am completely in favour of Devs making money from their apps! I have purchased apps, and I have free apps that serve ads IN THE APP, and I have NO problem with that.
KEEP YOUR ADS OUT OF MY NOTIFICATION TRAY!
I found this thread between Devs and AirPush. Let them know how you feel.
I am not a developer, I am an end user and I am here to tell AirPush, and Developers, that if I download an app that serves ads via AirPush, I will 1. Uninstall the app. 2. Give it a bad review. 3. Flag it as Malware, and 4. NEVER buy that app or install apps from that developer again.
To be clear I COMPLETELY support the right of devs to make money either by selling their apps, or by having ads IN the app.
I have many free apps with ads in the app, which doesn't bother me. I have also purchased apps, some of them after trying the free version.
The thing you devs don't seem to consider is that your app might not bug people... "Hey, it's just one ad in your notification tray", but if many devs start doing this, the tray will be full of ads!
NO WAY.
You can see what happened to APNDroid, it can happen to you too.
I have started a thread in the Developers sub-forum telling them how I feel about AirPush. If you are against AirPush, take a moment to pop over and let them know.
Device(s): Droid Bionic, OG Droid - Simply Stunning (retired)
Thanks: 26
Thanked 245 Times in 208 Posts
Regardless of what developers think, or what AirPush says, if users dislike the concept enough to remove the "offending" apps, nobody will be making money with AirPush.
Regardless of what developers think, or what AirPush says, if users dislike the concept enough to remove the "offending" apps, nobody will be making money with AirPush.
This, I will not have any ap that uses "AirPush" on my phone, period (and I actually do buy paid apps in the Android Market).
Device(s): Evo 3D & 4G, Epic Touch, Epic 4G slide, Captivate. (Moment, LG Optimus S, Vibrant)
Thanks: 483
Thanked 464 Times in 338 Posts
Also from another user:
Quote:
Originally Posted by frostkat
Just found AirPush Detector by Dan Bjorge for free on the market. Not connected to AirPush and it showed me the app that's using it--totally not the one I was thinking it would be!
I would boycott any developer who uses Air Push ads. I don't care how great the app is.
Device(s): Samsung Captivate, 2.3.3, Serendipity VII
Thanks: 174
Thanked 210 Times in 164 Posts
I too would boycott any developer who used this - I pay for apps. Always. If there's a donate version, I pay for it. I will not be subjected to ads on my phone....I don't do ads period, on any platform, if I can block them. If they want to pay part of my cell phone bill then maybe I'll consider it, until then, sorry Charlie!
__________________
Ann, Palm refugee, learning to grok Android. Perhaps your answer is in the CapFAQ Excellent video tutorials, watch and learn!! Now on Serendipity VII, click link to learn more Did you read the first post in the thread?
The Following User Says Thank You to reinbeau For This Useful Post:
Device(s): HTC Hero (FroydVillain),
Sony Ericsson Xperia Arc
Thanks: 29
Thanked 100 Times in 83 Posts
There is no way on earth i would ever accept this from an app - it would be an instant uninstall.
I have no problem with developers using in-app ads (although i can't stand them, and will prefer to pay for an app without ads than have a free app with ads), but bombarding me with ads outside the app itself is beyond the pale.
__________________ Sony Ericsson Xperia Arc : GiffGaff : UK
The Following User Says Thank You to daveybaby For This Useful Post:
Device(s): Galaxy S II (Sprint), Blackberry Curve 3G (T-mo), iPad 2, Chrome netbook (Cr-48), and Win 7 netbook
Thanks: 652
Thanked 901 Times in 628 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by reinbeau
I too would boycott any developer who used this - I pay for apps. Always. If there's a donate version, I pay for it. I will not be subjected to ads on my phone....I don't do ads period, on any platform, if I can block them. If they want to pay part of my cell phone bill then maybe I'll consider it, until then, sorry Charlie!
I also always by apps, and if there is no paid version, I use AdBlock anyways, I can't stand ads. At least there is an app to permanently opt out of these SPAM notifications!!
The Following User Says Thank You to chrlswltrs For This Useful Post:
So I have downloaded the airpush detector, which comes up with nothing. I am getting airpush ads though. I have opted out using their app, but then deleted the app, and the ads are still there. So I guess I have to either delete all my apps or keep their damn app? I'm very frustrated with this, as I've wasted several hours with it. I agree that it's just going to push people away from the platform. I've tried to find a list of offending apps, but can't seem to find one. I've read something saying airpush claims that the user will only get one ad a day, but i just got three. I feel like throwing this phone through a Verizon store window.
This is may be an other kind of AirPush named LeadBolt.
Apps with this kind of addons push spam on the notification bar
'AirPush Detector' finds AirPush addons but not LeadBolt's.
The app 'Addons Detector' lists all addons on the phone.
When AirPush or LeadBolt is on the (very long) list of apps for an app then this app is a source of notifications bar spamming.
Uninstall the so listed app and you'll get rid of this spam
But don't forget to write an review in Market before you uninstall!
For more info you'd search in this forum for LeadBolt.
Harry
__________________
Google Translator is to blame for my English
Last edited by Harry2; October 31st, 2011 at 03:37 AM.
As one of the devs of Addon Detector. Please let us know if our app doesn't detect one of the push notification ad addons of the spamming app. Next update will allow filtering just for these kind of addons. Until that one is released, check for Leadbolt and Airpush.
Let us know if you get spammed by apps that don't list one of those!
While I would never tolerate a notification ad on my device, I can understand where some people might be more inclined to use it if in app ads interfered with app usage. Perhaps a toggle between airpush and in app ads would be a great compromise
I have deleted several apps that were guilty of air push adverts. Adverts within apps I can handle but I don't want icons in my notification bar. Let alone notifications for dating apps! This does raise some eyebrows with my poor boyfriend when he sees I'm being advertised dating agencies on my phone!
Apps that don't use push also need to vet the damn ads. I've seen the same for dating services, plus some religious ones. Accidently fatfingering one of those ads could be a problem if the ad has the same privileges as the app like access to your contact list.
I think the Android Market TOS should forbid this practice based on devaluation of the Android brand. If developers want to incorporate notification-based ads, then they can publish elsewhere--just keep it out of the official marketplace.
I answered no.
Apps who push adds into my notification bar would be uninstalled immediately.
My problem with this is not the ads persé. I have no problems with some advertising in a good free app. It is the fact that airpush comes out of the app and basicly hijacks your phone. I feel it is violating to have an app change your possession.
Device(s): HTC Desire Z, Asus Eee Pad Transformer with Keyboard Dock
Thanks: 107
Thanked 203 Times in 171 Posts
I recently installed NFL Pro 2012. It pushes ads to my notification bar. I'm contemplating removing it as I don't play the game very often as of late because I've been rather busy as of late. I'll see if I want to continue playing it on a regular basis. If not, I'll uninstall it.
Update: got fed up with notifications. Uninstalled it just now.
Last edited by Stuntman; December 25th, 2011 at 07:41 PM.
Device(s): HTC Desire Z, Asus Eee Pad Transformer with Keyboard Dock
Thanks: 107
Thanked 203 Times in 171 Posts
Well, at least the notifications I get from NFL Pro 2012 are obviously from that app. I know which app to remove in order to get rid of those annoying notifications.
I'm with the overwhelming majority of No! More ads sounds like a push (no pun intended) in the wrong direction! We're supposed to be inventing new ways of selling products to customers, no throwing as many boring ads as possible at them.
Sounds like a good app, ByQ. I'll put it on my 'to download' list if ever I get airpush crap.
Airpush doesn't just send ads though, they also send malware. There are often things made to trick you into thinking you have messages, or need to update something, when often you will get billed for touching these things.
I'm ok with ads in apps that don't interfere with using the app (e.g. unobtrusively placed in the app or pop ups between actions) and give me the option of going ad free. I do use ad block, but would support an app specific variety as some apps supported by ads don't provide enough utility for me to purchase them so I would like to support them thrugh ads. The notification bar however, is off limits to me. I decide what can put something there and is not for adverts. This is non negotiable for me.
__________________
If someone helped, hit Thanks, if you see rude or abusive posts, spam, or threads that need staff attention, hit Report. Site Rules / Android Forums FAQ
Device(s): Galaxy S II (Sprint), Blackberry Curve 3G (T-mo), iPad 2, Chrome netbook (Cr-48), and Win 7 netbook
Thanks: 652
Thanked 901 Times in 628 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by pupkact
I'm ok with ads in apps that don't interfere with using the app (e.g. unobtrusively placed in the app or pop ups between actions) and give me the option of going ad free. I do use ad block, but would support an app specific variety as some apps supported by ads don't provide enough utility for me to purchase them so I would like to support them thrugh ads. The notification bar however, is off limits to me. I decide what can put something there and is not for adverts. This is non negotiable for me.
I use Adblock also, but I also always buy an app if given the option.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mayhem
I can't recall the name of the app that spammed my notification bar, but it did so despite the fact that adblock was running.
I could look and see if I can find it in my reviews, but I make no promises.
Had the same thing happen to me, I gave the app a 1 star review and emailed the dev. He emailed me an ad free apk and I believe he has since released a paid ad free version. I did not buy that app or use the ad free one he sent me as a matter of principle. And developer that wants to use airpush will never get 1 penny from me!!
I'm a french android dev.
I've got an app that comes in 2 ways:
- a free one with ads IN the app (only banners) that could be removed by purchasing the ad-free in-app option directly IN the app.
- a paid one that is the same than the free one without the ads (for people that have no access to in-app purchase).
Lot of users ask me to do a widget to display directly the infos on the home instead of having to launch the app. I'm ok with that but then if they do not start the app anymore, the ads won't display anymore and no more revenue !
So, I was thinking to add a widget to my app and then when the user choose to install the widget and so can view the app infos directly through the widget, he'll receive notifications ads (only for users that didn't purchase ad-free option).
If he removes the widget, he won't get anymore notifications ads and stil can use the app normally.
What do you think about that? Which better solutions could you propose?
Device(s): Galaxy S II (Sprint), Blackberry Curve 3G (T-mo), iPad 2, Chrome netbook (Cr-48), and Win 7 netbook
Thanks: 652
Thanked 901 Times in 628 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by Seb79
Hello,
I'm a french android dev.
I've got an app that comes in 2 ways:
- a free one with ads IN the app (only banners) that could be removed by purchasing the ad-free in-app option directly IN the app.
- a paid one that is the same than the free one without the ads (for people that have no access to in-app purchase).
Lot of users ask me to do a widget to display directly the infos on the home instead of having to launch the app. I'm ok with that but then if they do not start the app anymore, the ads won't display anymore and no more revenue !
So, I was thinking to add a widget to my app and then when the user choose to install the widget and so can view the app infos directly through the widget, he'll receive notifications ads (only for users that didn't purchase ad-free option).
If he removes the widget, he won't get anymore notifications ads and stil can use the app normally.
What do you think about that? Which better solutions could you propose?
Thanks.
My recommended solution would be to make the widget part of the ad free version. Free app = no widget. That is much more reasonable than ever putting apps in the notification bar!
The Following User Says Thank You to chrlswltrs For This Useful Post:
I'm a french android dev.
I've got an app that comes in 2 ways:
- a free one with ads IN the app (only banners) that could be removed by purchasing the ad-free in-app option directly IN the app.
- a paid one that is the same than the free one without the ads (for people that have no access to in-app purchase).
Lot of users ask me to do a widget to display directly the infos on the home instead of having to launch the app. I'm ok with that but then if they do not start the app anymore, the ads won't display anymore and no more revenue !
So, I was thinking to add a widget to my app and then when the user choose to install the widget and so can view the app infos directly through the widget, he'll receive notifications ads (only for users that didn't purchase ad-free option).
If he removes the widget, he won't get anymore notifications ads and stil can use the app normally.
What do you think about that? Which better solutions could you propose?
Thanks.
First of all, nice approach asking here first.
I see your conundrum, as this is the first justifiable reason I have seen. I am not a developer so I am not sure what options you have with regard to notifying the user. Here are my thoughts as a user.
Make sure that you are able to only activate AirPush in the widget (this is where my lack of dev skills leaves me short). Even if your intent is noble, if it isn't technically possible to prevent AirPush when the user isn't using the widget, you may alienate your users that you have already.
Make sure the user knows that you are using AirPush. Put that early on in your app description and basically tell the story you did in this post. I think users are more upset when they have to hunt around for the offending app. I also don't know what you can do for notification that activating the widget activates this feature, probably something on the widget configuration screen, but if you could do a popup when the widget loads informing the user, it may be helpful.
I think most users want to support developers and many would understand. I just think you need to disclose, disclose, disclose. I use free apps with well placed ads and where my desire for the app is sufficient enough to justify the price, I'll buy it. If I have downloaded a free app and before I even get to try it out I have AirPush ads that I don't know about, its gone and I am not getting anything from that dev again.
BTW, I feel this same level of disclosure should be used for apps that support in app purchases (especially games) as my 4yr old has zapped me before and I didn't know it was even an option. I would have disabled it had I known, but nowhere in the app description or in the app itself could I find any disclosure.
So, I was thinking to add a widget to my app and then when the user choose to install the widget and so can view the app infos directly through the widget, he'll receive notifications ads (only for users that didn't purchase ad-free option).
If he removes the widget, he won't get anymore notifications ads and stil can use the app normally.
What do you think about that? Which better solutions could you propose?
Thanks.
I should think that this thread demonstrates just how much hatred there is for pushing ads to the notification bar. Keep in mine, for each person who takes the time to complain, there are many more who agree, but don't say anything.
The solution seems to be a simple one. Either; a) release the widget as a free stand-alone app WITH the push ads, BUT with a warning in the description that they are in use; and/or b) have a PAID version of the widget that doesn't serve ads.
One alternative I've seen for free widgets is that the ads are shown when the user goes in to the widget settings.
Pretty terrible to start advertising in a core function of the phone. Next step is for apps to start fake-calling you and leaving messages or texts for ads.
If an app doesn't explicitly state its ads will appear in the notification area, it's malware.
Device(s): Galaxy S II (Sprint), Blackberry Curve 3G (T-mo), iPad 2, Chrome netbook (Cr-48), and Win 7 netbook
Thanks: 652
Thanked 901 Times in 628 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by Concat
Pretty terrible to start advertising in a core function of the phone. Next step is for apps to start fake-calling you and leaving messages or texts for ads.
If an app doesn't explicitly state its ads will appear in the notification area, it's malware.
IMO even if it states it, it is still malware!
The Following User Says Thank You to chrlswltrs For This Useful Post:
There's a chat log from a customer service rep at Air Push, and she seems to support the idea that end-users shouldn't necessarily know what app is pushing the notifications.
I get that developers are their customers, and not the end-users, but hiding this information definitely constitutes malware.
I can see some legitimate uses for Air Push, such as ad-supported widgets, but it should be something the end-users are made aware of prior to installing. Otherwise it's practically a trojan.
And yeah, if this becomes the norm for ad-supported apps, then Google is seriously devaluing it's own product by allowing it.
Device(s): Galaxy S II (Sprint), Blackberry Curve 3G (T-mo), iPad 2, Chrome netbook (Cr-48), and Win 7 netbook
Thanks: 652
Thanked 901 Times in 628 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by Concat
And yeah, if this becomes the norm for ad-supported apps, then Google is seriously devaluing it's own product by allowing it.
if this were to somehow become the norm as much as I like Android I think I would jump ship to another OS! I think there is way too much backlash for this to ever really take off though.
The Following User Says Thank You to chrlswltrs For This Useful Post:
And big thank you all for your responses!
That's confirm my thoughts.
I wanted to get your opinion on other thing too even if I guess it ;-)
It exists another indirect way of making money. Some networks pay a fee for each installation of the app. The network SDK install 2 or 3 shortcuts on the Home that redirects to a web search engine.
So, no ads and the user can delete those shortcuts.
So, is it worse, better or the same than notif. ads?
if this were to somehow become the norm as much as I like Android I think I would jump ship to another OS! I think there is way too much backlash for this to ever really take off though.