Go Back   Android Forums > Android Discussion > Android Lounge

Android Lounge A place for general Android discussion and questions.



Closed Thread
 
LinkBack Thread Tools
Old March 21st, 2010, 02:36 AM   #1 (permalink)
Ultimate Member
 
IOWA's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: Chicago
Posts: 7,166
 
Device(s): Lol.. my sig has em.
Thanks: 788
Thanked 983 Times in 595 Posts
Default sick of people crying they dont have the latest upgrade rant.

What's with everyone crying like little kids they don't have 2.1 yet? Seriously.

Why is it you feel entitled to these upgrades, when you are not paying one red dime for them. Who cares how long it takes, its coming to you. Nobody really understands the complexity of programming and custom suiting an OS to fit their device.

"Well the iphone gets upgrades right away so why don't we?"

Easy. The iphone is simply one device, with slightly improved hardware each time, but is all compatible. With android, we have a wide array of choices, styles, form factors, and hardware to choose from. That is one of the reasons android is so much better than iphone. Also, apple works on the os all year, and releases it on their timetable. People never really know when its ready, or what is intended, and what actually is in the release.

"But I paid x amount of money I expect the best! How come my phone is outdated in 3 months."

Tough cookies. That's just the way the mobile industry, and tech industry in general is. It has always been this way, and will always be this way. You could buy the top of the line pc, but in 3-6 months time, there is something bigger, faster, and better than what you spend your benjamins on. Are you complaing about that too?

Some people really need to tune out of fantasy sailor moon land, and back into a little something I call earth. Please stop complaining, the upgrade is coming. There are complications with things like this, and cannot be avoided.

They push back launch dates to fix bugs and optimize it for us, the consumer, to make us happier. Would you really want 2.1 but it was buggy as hell because they didn't take the time needed to properly fit it to x device? And yes it will still have some bugs possibly, can't help that.

If you really want 2.1 or x upgrade so badly, then by all means produce your own version, co-ordinate its mass release, that is cost-efficient, and you will be haild savior of x device.

/end rant

__________________
Devices: | Asus Transformer - Prime 3.2 | Nook Color - CM7 | Evo Shift 4G - CM7 | Evo4G - CM7 | Epic4G - ACS/Genocide Kernal | Moment - 2.2 Froyo rooted | G1 - CM6

Don't forget to hit the button when someone helps you
IOWA is offline  
The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to IOWA For This Useful Post:
TheSultan (March 21st, 2010), Trident (March 21st, 2010), twospirits (March 21st, 2010)
Sponsors
Old March 21st, 2010, 04:13 AM   #2 (permalink)
Senior Member
 
Caloy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Houston, TX
Posts: 1,298
 
Device(s): HTC Evo 4G
Thanks: 140
Thanked 127 Times in 93 Posts
Default

I think most of the people complaining realize that the update is coming, but the manufacturers should also try to expedite the update as well. Especially that there are new models coming out very soon. If the new models comes out before the update, I would bet that some of these dissatisfied customers would go to the new phone, and if they leave dissatisfied, some of these people will not go back to that brand of phone.
Caloy is offline  
Old March 21st, 2010, 04:27 AM   #3 (permalink)
Owner of Banlandia
 
twospirits's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Queens, NY
Posts: 4,688
 
Device(s): Moto Photon 4G, Lenovo Thinkpad tablet 32GB, HTC EVO 4G, HTC Hero, Notion Ink Adam, Galaxy Tab
Thanks: 3,000
Thanked 3,087 Times in 1,055 Posts
twospirits411
Default

But if the manufacturer rushes the updates to the consumer and consumer finds bugs that were not taken care of or new bugs, then consumer would start complaining about it. I would rather wait for a less bug filled update than one that does have more bugs because it was rushed.

TS out
__________________
Members, want to make this place better, just ask the staff. Remember, the "No' is always there, you are just looking for the "Yes". and please read the guidelines, otherwise you may end up in Banlandia.

Google + and twitter user.
twospirits is offline  
Old March 21st, 2010, 05:25 AM   #4 (permalink)
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Posts: 1,581
 
Device(s): Nexus One
Thanks: 12
Thanked 174 Times in 126 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by IOWA View Post
Why is it you feel entitled to these upgrades, when you are not paying one red dime for them.
You also don't pay for software updates and game patches, do you? I'm not one of the people complaining (duh, phone has 2.1 out of the box anyway), but people who are do have some justification. When you buy software, you expect some level of subsequent support. Would you be okay if a game you bought is laggy and glitchy, then the developers release a patch only you have to pay an extra $40 for it? Dunno about you, but most reasonable people would be pissed off. Of course, it's to be expected that if your Android handset has custom UI slapped on top of it, updates are bound to be slower: but the fact's that most OEM/carriers are not at all motivated to release firmware updates unless pressed.

Quote:
Tough cookies. That's just the way the mobile industry, and tech industry in general is. It has always been this way, and will always be this way. You could buy the top of the line pc, but in 3-6 months time, there is something bigger, faster, and better than what you spend your benjamins on. Are you complaing about that too?
Bad analogy; you're comparing hardware to software. Unless the hardware isn't up to it, it will be able to run the latest software fine. Your average three-to-six months old top-of-the-line PC will run the latest games without trouble. It'd be different if you're complaining that your P4 machine from 2002 can't run Win7 and Crysis, but this isn't the case.

Quote:
If you really want 2.1 or x upgrade so badly, then by all means produce your own version, co-ordinate its mass release, that is cost-efficient, and you will be haild savior of x device.
Not valid. Look up Ebert's Law. If you go to a restaurant and find the food unsatisfactory/inedible, you have every right to complain and take issue with the chef. If the chef says you should go open your own restaurant and make your own gourmet food, then that chef deserves to be fired post-haste. That's how the real world works, sorry.
grainysand is offline  
Old March 21st, 2010, 09:27 AM   #5 (permalink)
Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Maryland
Posts: 169
 
Device(s): Motorola Droid
Thanks: 2
Thanked 25 Times in 22 Posts
Default

Quote:
You also don't pay for software updates and game patches, do you? I'm not one of the people complaining (duh, phone has 2.1 out of the box anyway), but people who are do have some justification. When you buy software, you expect some level of subsequent support.
Except that isn't what is going on here. We've got people all bent out of shape because they aren't getting their update right this very femtosecond. They're getting all pissy because they don't have the absolute latest and greatest on their phone RIGHT NOW!!!!! I fully expect the same people to do the same complaining when 2.1.00000001 is rumored to be ready (hey, some guy on a blog somewhere said he met someone who's third cousin twice removed worked down the street from a Verizon store and they saw a couple of Verizon reps acting kinda funny).

Quote:
If you go to a restaurant and find the food unsatisfactory/inedible, you have every right to complain and take issue with the chef. If the chef says you should go open your own restaurant and make your own gourmet food, then that chef deserves to be fired post-haste.
I think that is an equally invalid example. Android phones are pretty easily rooted, and a lot of rooted users have been using 2.1 for quite some time now.

Maybe I'm weird, but as a long-time Slackware user, I've come to expect upgrades when they are ready, and not before. This has saved me a ton of headaches over time. The latest and greatest is frequently only one of the two.
Hangdog42 is offline  
Old March 21st, 2010, 09:44 AM   #6 (permalink)
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Posts: 1,581
 
Device(s): Nexus One
Thanks: 12
Thanked 174 Times in 126 Posts
Default

People who already rooted wouldn't be complaining. Although even then, it'd be comparable to going home and eating homemade food, not opening a new restaurant. To wit, rooting your phone isn't remotely comparable to making a version of 2.1 and releasing it to every phone that isn't rooted. Either way, IOWA's suggestion is incredibly asinine.
grainysand is offline  
Old March 21st, 2010, 02:29 PM   #7 (permalink)
Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Maryland
Posts: 169
 
Device(s): Motorola Droid
Thanks: 2
Thanked 25 Times in 22 Posts
Default

Quote:
People who already rooted wouldn't be complaining. Although even then, it'd be comparable to going home and eating homemade food, not opening a new restaurant.
No, it is comparable to going down the street to a different restaurant.

Quote:
To wit, rooting your phone isn't remotely comparable to making a version of 2.1 and releasing it to every phone that isn't rooted.
Except that all the hard work is already done for you. If someone wants 2.1, it is already out there, no hard work needed.

E
Quote:
ither way, IOWA's suggestion is incredibly asinine.
Different strokes for different folks I guess. To be honest, IOWA's suggestion really isn't all that different from an other bit of open source software. Either use what is there, help make it better or make your own. Bitching and moaning about how other people should be working harder for you just doesn't cut it.

Yeah, I can hear the moaning now "But I paid good money for support!". Support is coming, it just isn't coming this very second. It isn't like 2.01 is some sort of garbage heap that can't do anything. The problem is that people think they can get new and shiny and are getting all pissy about not getting it right now. It is a temper tantrum, pure and simple.
Hangdog42 is offline  
Old March 21st, 2010, 02:40 PM   #8 (permalink)
Member
 
saltorio's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Ottawa, ON (Canada)
Posts: 264
 
Device(s): SE Xperia X10a (Black)
Thanks: 6
Thanked 17 Times in 14 Posts
Default

I'd much rather have to wait for updates knowing I'd get them, rather than not have them available at all (as was the case with my iPAQ).
saltorio is offline  
Old March 21st, 2010, 02:45 PM   #9 (permalink)
Senior Member
 
TheSultan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Rochester, NY
Posts: 1,484
 
Device(s): HTC Thunderbolt
Thanks: 33
Thanked 255 Times in 129 Posts
Default

who's waiting?? I've already got it on my Eris
TheSultan is offline  
Old March 22nd, 2010, 03:38 AM   #10 (permalink)
Ultimate Member
 
IOWA's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: Chicago
Posts: 7,166
 
Device(s): Lol.. my sig has em.
Thanks: 788
Thanked 983 Times in 595 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by grainysand View Post
You also don't pay for software updates and game patches, do you? I'm not one of the people complaining (duh, phone has 2.1 out of the box anyway), but people who are do have some justification. When you buy software, you expect some level of subsequent support. Would you be okay if a game you bought is laggy and glitchy, then the developers release a patch only you have to pay an extra $40 for it? Dunno about you, but most reasonable people would be pissed off. Of course, it's to be expected that if your Android handset has custom UI slapped on top of it, updates are bound to be slower: but the fact's that most OEM/carriers are not at all motivated to release firmware updates unless pressed.

Bad analogy; you're comparing hardware to software. Unless the hardware isn't up to it, it will be able to run the latest software fine. Your average three-to-six months old top-of-the-line PC will run the latest games without trouble. It'd be different if you're complaining that your P4 machine from 2002 can't run Win7 and Crysis, but this isn't the case.

Not valid. Look up Ebert's Law. If you go to a restaurant and find the food unsatisfactory/inedible, you have every right to complain and take issue with the chef. If the chef says you should go open your own restaurant and make your own gourmet food, then that chef deserves to be fired post-haste. That's how the real world works, sorry.
Ok first off, just because you don't pay for software updates, doesn't mean they are owed to you. Companies really don't have to update at all. It is not their problem once you buy it. They do it, to keep us happy, and sometimes, it takes a while. Companies have to maintain a profit to stay in business, and cannot devote all their resources to keep people like YOU happy. What people like YOU don't realize, is things take TIME to develop, work out bugs, etc. It is quite obvious you have little or no business experience.

Many chefs (if they are good enough) will tell a customer that on a whim, and the restaurant won't do a damn thing about it. Take it you have been to a restaurant higher class than a 2 star rating. THAT is how the real world works.

And my analogy was about hardware, you just didn't get it. I don't have to explain this one to you, I hope.

Why do you even bother trying to oppose me? Really? Everytime you do, I prove you wrong, so do others(evidence in this very post) and you diminish your credibility, and make yourself look silly. If your here to make your self look silly, and complain, ( which is pretty much all I've seen you do) then people like you really aren't needed here.



EDIT: Another thing I just thought of. Sometimes, you DO INDEED pay for some game "patches". They generally call them expansions, but they are still just patches to the original software. And you definitely pay for new OS's, which, android 2.0, is a NEW VERSION of an OS. If you have windows xp/vista do you expect windows 7 free as well? (and it was awfully nice of MS to give free WIN7 upgrades to recent vista purchasers, something they didn't have to do either.)

Dun dun dun, another bites the dust...
IOWA is offline  
Last edited by IOWA; March 22nd, 2010 at 03:45 AM.
Sponsors
Old March 22nd, 2010, 04:55 AM   #11 (permalink)
Member
 
gogol's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Posts: 117
 
Device(s):
Thanks: 7
Thanked 16 Times in 11 Posts
Default

When you bought an Android phone from HTC, and it has Android version 1.7 (suppose), and later on Google updated the Android to version 2.2 which Google said the new version 2.2 fixed the following bugs and some additional enhancements.

That could happen, right?

Now, do you think HTC does not owe you to update your Android phone to 2.2?

In a good restaurant, you can ask for replacement of your meal if it does not satisfy you (for example, you ordered steak medium, they gave you well done) ..... Or, you can ask to have more sauce, or more cucumber in the salad

Believe me, good restaurant will do that without asking

So, certainly I will come back to that restaurant (phone manufacturer) for their meal (phone product) and services (bug fixes and upgrade).

It is so simple.

People get used to that good service.

Of course ... of course ... of course ... They don't have to do that, like you said. But people will move to other restaurant


Quote:
Originally Posted by IOWA View Post
Ok first off, just because you don't pay for software updates, doesn't mean they are owed to you. Companies really don't have to update at all. It is not their problem once you buy it. They do it, to keep us happy, and sometimes, it takes a while. Companies have to maintain a profit to stay in business, and cannot devote all their resources to keep people like YOU happy. What people like YOU don't realize, is things take TIME to develop, work out bugs, etc. It is quite obvious you have little or no business experience.

Many chefs (if they are good enough) will tell a customer that on a whim, and the restaurant won't do a damn thing about it. Take it you have been to a restaurant higher class than a 2 star rating. THAT is how the real world works.

And my analogy was about hardware, you just didn't get it. I don't have to explain this one to you, I hope.

Why do you even bother trying to oppose me? Really? Everytime you do, I prove you wrong, so do others(evidence in this very post) and you diminish your credibility, and make yourself look silly. If your here to make your self look silly, and complain, ( which is pretty much all I've seen you do) then people like you really aren't needed here.



EDIT: Another thing I just thought of. Sometimes, you DO INDEED pay for some game "patches". They generally call them expansions, but they are still just patches to the original software. And you definitely pay for new OS's, which, android 2.0, is a NEW VERSION of an OS. If you have windows xp/vista do you expect windows 7 free as well? (and it was awfully nice of MS to give free WIN7 upgrades to recent vista purchasers, something they didn't have to do either.)

Dun dun dun, another bites the dust...
gogol is offline  
Old March 22nd, 2010, 05:14 AM   #12 (permalink)
Senior Member
 
vido.ardes's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Kent, UK
Posts: 1,059
 
Device(s): HTC Incredible S
Thanks: 4
Thanked 191 Times in 39 Posts
Default

Let's try and have an adult discussion eh? There's no need to attack one another because you ave different opinions... I suggest you try and discuss it like adults or this thread will be closed
vido.ardes is offline  
Old March 22nd, 2010, 05:14 AM   #13 (permalink)
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Posts: 1,581
 
Device(s): Nexus One
Thanks: 12
Thanked 174 Times in 126 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by IOWA View Post
Ok first off, just because you don't pay for software updates, doesn't mean they are owed to you. Companies really don't have to update at all. It is not their problem once you buy it. They do it, to keep us happy, and sometimes, it takes a while. Companies have to maintain a profit to stay in business, and cannot devote all their resources to keep people like YOU happy. What people like YOU don't realize, is things take TIME to develop, work out bugs, etc. It is quite obvious you have little or no business experience.
Have you heard of customer loyalty? It's something all businesses try to build and keep. Care to share your "business experience" with us since you must be so successful that you don't need to care about customer loyalty? I hear Steve Jobs does that although--actually, nah, Apple invests millions in marketing to develop customer loyalty.

Quote:
Many chefs (if they are good enough) will tell a customer that on a whim, and the restaurant won't do a damn thing about it. Take it you have been to a restaurant higher class than a 2 star rating. THAT is how the real world works.
Restaurants of true class don't categorize themselves by "stars." That's a silly, peasant thing done and conceived by trashy middle-class American peasants who desperately wish they actually possessed some culture and belonged to the upper class. Let me assure you: chefs belonging to refined properties don't come out to have shouting matches with the customers. That'd be crass.

Quote:
Why do you even bother trying to oppose me? Really? Everytime you do, I prove you wrong, so do others(evidence in this very post) and you diminish your credibility, and make yourself look silly. If your here to make your self look silly, and complain, ( which is pretty much all I've seen you do) then people like you really aren't needed here.
Where have you proven me wrong? I just see you flailing here, and elsewhere, a lot.

Quote:
They generally call them expansions, but they are still just patches to the original software. And you definitely pay for new OS's, which, android 2.0, is a NEW VERSION of an OS. If you have windows xp/vista do you expect windows 7 free as well? (and it was awfully nice of MS to give free WIN7 upgrades to recent vista purchasers, something they didn't have to do either.)
1) Expansion packs add new content. New campaign, new graphics, new assets. They're nice, but not needed. Patches fix issues and bugs. Those are needed.
2) You don't pay for service packs. Now, while I like Android as much as anyone, it's hard to argue that 2.1 is vastly different from, say, 2.01. It's nowhere near the difference between WinXP and Win7 (as implied by the "2" in common). Even 1.6 to 2.1 isn't exactly a mighty leap forward. If there was significant UI rehauling, huge code modification and optimization, sure. But there isn't. Stock 2.1's still stuck in .29 kernel, even, and apps2sd still hasn't been implemented.
grainysand is offline  
Old March 22nd, 2010, 06:41 AM   #14 (permalink)
Ultimate Member
 
IOWA's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: Chicago
Posts: 7,166
 
Device(s): Lol.. my sig has em.
Thanks: 788
Thanked 983 Times in 595 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by grainysand View Post
Have you heard of customer loyalty? It's something all businesses try to build and keep. Care to share your "business experience" with us since you must be so successful that you don't need to care about customer loyalty? I hear Steve Jobs does that although--actually, nah, Apple invests millions in marketing to develop customer loyalty.



Restaurants of true class don't categorize themselves by "stars." That's a silly, peasant thing done and conceived by trashy middle-class American peasants who desperately wish they actually possessed some culture and belonged to the upper class. Let me assure you: chefs belonging to refined properties don't come out to have shouting matches with the customers. That'd be crass.



Where have you proven me wrong? I just see you flailing here, and elsewhere, a lot.



1) Expansion packs add new content. New campaign, new graphics, new assets. They're nice, but not needed. Patches fix issues and bugs. Those are needed.
2) You don't pay for service packs. Now, while I like Android as much as anyone, it's hard to argue that 2.1 is vastly different from, say, 2.01. It's nowhere near the difference between WinXP and Win7 (as implied by the "2" in common). Even 1.6 to 2.1 isn't exactly a mighty leap forward. If there was significant UI rehauling, huge code modification and optimization, sure. But there isn't. Stock 2.1's still stuck in .29 kernel, even, and apps2sd still hasn't been implemented.
The funny part is, your missing my base argument completely. If you can't figure that out, it's YOUR problem. Maybe read the original post again, and try not to always argue or disagree with someone before jumping to your rash/illogical conclusions.

And I guess your restaurant of "true class" must be your local BBQ join or hot dog stand....
(C'mon kids we goin to BBQ hut tonight, put your church clothes on!")

Also, in this day and age, barring older generations, "customer loyalty" is becoming less, and less relevant. It's all about marketing, and who's got the biggest and baddest.

EDIT: It also seems our peers have sided with me on this one, so I have to thank you for taking away your own credibility. It makes proving my point that much easier. Good day to you, sir.
IOWA is offline  
Last edited by IOWA; March 22nd, 2010 at 06:54 AM.
Old March 22nd, 2010, 06:46 AM   #15 (permalink)
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Posts: 1,581
 
Device(s): Nexus One
Thanks: 12
Thanked 174 Times in 126 Posts
Default

You had an argument? Looks like a tirade to me. By the way, care to share your yearly income figure since you seem to think you're in a position to belittle someone's social class? What about those amazing business tips that'll let you succeed without building customer loyalty? Yes?
grainysand is offline  
Old March 22nd, 2010, 07:02 AM   #16 (permalink)
Ultimate Member
 
IOWA's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: Chicago
Posts: 7,166
 
Device(s): Lol.. my sig has em.
Thanks: 788
Thanked 983 Times in 595 Posts
Default

Sure. I make enough to live comfortably, but not enough to stop working completely.

I didn't belittle anyone. You did.

Quote:
Restaurants of true class don't categorize themselves by "stars." That's a silly, peasant thing done and conceived by trashy middle-class American peasants who desperately wish they actually possessed some culture and belonged to the upper class. Let me assure you: chefs belonging to refined properties don't come out to have shouting matches with the customers. That'd be crass.
And as for business, it's about having quality, and at a fair price, mixed in with a good marketing strategy. It's no trade secret.
IOWA is offline  
The Following User Says Thank You to IOWA For This Useful Post:
twospirits (March 22nd, 2010)
Old March 22nd, 2010, 07:06 AM   #17 (permalink)
Check six!
 
Slug's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Inverness, UK
Posts: 10,798
 
Device(s): HTC Hero (Elelinux_7.1.0_v3.6), HTC DesireZ (Virtuous Quattro RC2), Samsung GS2 (DlevROM v3.1)
Thanks: 1,095
Thanked 4,182 Times in 2,367 Posts
Send a message via Skype™ to Slug slugbrem@gmail.com
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by vido.ardes View Post
I suggest you try and discuss it like adults or this thread will be closed
You didn't.... it is.
Slug is online now  
Closed Thread

Bookmarks


Go Back   Android Forums > Android Discussion > Android Lounge User CP
Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Support Is this as a result of the latest upgrade? wooks63 Sony Ericsson Xperia X10 9 July 15th, 2010 03:27 AM
I dont see people waiting on line.. SysAdmNj AT&T 8 June 14th, 2010 09:46 PM
Latest Radio Upgrade with Fresh 2.1.1. apollomaker Sprint Hero - All Things Root 14 May 29th, 2010 05:11 PM
need help with people being added when i dont want them to be manning18fan HTC Hero 2 December 24th, 2009 06:38 PM



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 12:48 AM.
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2012, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Custom vBulletin Skins by: Relivo


SEO by vBSEO 3.3.2 ©2009, Crawlability, Inc.