• After 15+ years, we've made a big change: Android Forums is now Early Bird Club. Learn more here.

Screen Responsiveness

Just watched this video about the screen responsiveness on the Desire vs the Samsung Galaxy S. These are the two phones I'm considering, so I just wanted people's opinions on it.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hVlsRCMltDg&feature=player_embedded

Now, I understand that chances are I won't be moving my fingers across the screen like that in day-to-day use, but still...

So, my question/concern is, how responsive is the screen for the HTC Desire? Has anyone had any major issues with it? How well does it handle games/general use?

The only touchscreen device I've used as of yet is my iPod Touch (second generation), so that's all I've got to compare it with. Seeing as neither of these devices are in Canada yet, I can't really test them out for myself.

Thanks for any feedback ;)
 
+1


Having said that, I'd pick the Galaxy S simply for the bigger screen and better ability to play games

I'm really debating between the two. There's pros and cons to both... I just can't decide :mad:

I'm sure I'll be happy with whichever one I get... but still... ;l

Ultimately, I'd say pick the one you think looks the sexiest. Internals aren't that much different, especially if you're not a real serious geek. If you were you wouldn't be asking :p
 
Upvote 0
For a start, the app used on the Desire in that video (and one I have used) the spots/bars snap to each other like a magnet, whereas the app on the samsung they don't. This to me shows an error in the programming of the app and not the screen itself and I would take that test with a pinch of salt. I've had no problems with my screen or its responsiveness.
 
Upvote 0
I'd agree that the screen on the desire is easily as responsive if not better than my ipod touch and leagues ahead of the resistive TouchHD screen. General usage now just requires a light touch rather than jamming my finger\stylus into the screen. And my ability to type accurately has more than doubled (quadrupled if you include swype ;) )
 
Upvote 0
I'd agree that the screen on the desire is easily as responsive if not better than my ipod touch and leagues ahead of the resistive TouchHD screen. General usage now just requires a light touch rather than jamming my finger\stylus into the screen. And my ability to type accurately has more than doubled (quadrupled if you include swype ;) )


I feel your pain, having owned a TouchHD too. What an abysmal piece of kit that was, managed to put up with it for two months before getting rid. The Desire on the other hand, 100x better. I find it responsive, accurate and maybe slightly oversensitive, would rather overly sensitive than vice versa though!
 
Upvote 0
I feel your pain, having owned a TouchHD too. What an abysmal piece of kit that was, managed to put up with it for two months before getting rid. The Desire on the other hand, 100x better. I find it responsive, accurate and maybe slightly oversensitive, would rather overly sensitive than vice versa though!

Too true. However the touch was infinately better than the LG Viewty I had (I used that for less than a week and sold it and went back to my trusty N95)
 
Upvote 0
Ultimately, I'd say pick the one you think looks the sexiest. Internals aren't that much different, especially if you're not a real serious geek. If you were you wouldn't be asking :p

I am too a geek ;'(
Just a very confused one...

& The desire looks 100x better imo. I'm not really a fan of the SGS's look. Reminds me to much of my iPod touch... just bored of it.

Anyways, thanks for all the responses guys...
Judging by the sounds of it there aren't any issues at all with the Desire's responsiveness.

I've seen a couple side by side posts on games (such as Quake) and the SGS seems to run it a fair bit better. I'm not a big gamer on my phone, I like to stick to Tetris... and a few other games like that. I'd assume the Desire can run those no problem since my ancient iPod touch can?

Thanks for the helpp (L)
 
Upvote 0
First of all, the Desire uses an older Synaptics controller which is single touch only, pinch to zoom is somehow simulated, it doesn't have native multitouch suport. It is not as responsive, I'm afraid, but the point is moot.

The Desire is much better than the Samsung simply because of the interface. Sense UI is more than pretty widgets, there is much improvement below the surface which doesn't exist in stock android, and the samsung does feel pretty cheap software-wise, and is very ugly IMHO. There will be no real gaming on android for some time, so the gpu in SGS really doesn't mean much. Although it is necessary to note the horrible video camera and low storage space of the Desire...
 
Upvote 0
First of all, the Desire uses an older Synaptics controller which is single touch only, pinch to zoom is somehow simulated, it doesn't have native multitouch suport. It is not as responsive, I'm afraid, but the point is moot.

The Desire is much better than the Samsung simply because of the interface. Sense UI is more than pretty widgets, there is much improvement below the surface which doesn't exist in stock android, and the samsung does feel pretty cheap software-wise, and is very ugly IMHO. There will be no real gaming on android for some time, so the gpu in SGS really doesn't mean much. Although it is necessary to note the horrible video camera and low storage space of the Desire...

Agree with this. There is no need for a good GPU at the moment as no apps really take advantage of it. In the future perhaps, but right now the Desire is still top of the Android phones, and the reviews show it.
 
Upvote 0

BEST TECH IN 2023

We've been tracking upcoming products and ranking the best tech since 2007. Thanks for trusting our opinion: we get rewarded through affiliate links that earn us a commission and we invite you to learn more about us.

Smartphones