[FONT=Helvetica, Arial, sans-serif][FONT=Helvetica, Arial, sans-serif]The Myth [/FONT][/FONT][FONT=Helvetica, Arial, sans-serif]
[FONT=Helvetica, Arial, sans-serif]The megapixel myt[/FONT][FONT=Helvetica, Arial, sans-serif]h was started by camera makers and swallowed hook, line and sinker by
camera measurebators. Camera makers use the number of megapixels a camera has to hoodwink you into thinking it has something to do with camera quality. They use it because even a tiny linear resolution increase results in a huge total pixel increase, since the total pixel count varies as the total area of the image, which varies as the square of the linear resolution. In other words, an almost invisible 40% increase in the number of pixels in any one direction results in a doubling of the total number of pixels in the image. Therefore camera makers can always brag about how much better this week's camera is, with even negligible improvements.[/FONT]
[FONT=Helvetica, Arial, sans-serif]This gimmick is used by salespeople and manufacturers to you feel as if your current camera is inadequate and needs to be replaced even if the new cameras each year are only slightly better.[/FONT]
[FONT=Helvetica, Arial, sans-serif]One needs at least a doubling of linear resolution or film size to make an obvious improvement. This is the same as quadrupling the megapixels. A simple doubling of megapixels, even if all else remained the same, is very subtle. The factors that matter, like color and sharpening algorithms, are far more significant.[/FONT]
[FONT=Helvetica, Arial, sans-serif]The megapixel myth is also prevalent because men always want a single number by which something's goodness can be judged.[/FONT]
[FONT=Helvetica, Arial, sans-serif]Unfortunately, it's all a myth because the number of megapixels (MP) a camera has has very little to do with how the image looks. Even worse, plenty of lower MP cameras can make better images than poorer cameras with more MP.[/FONT]
[/FONT]
