• After 15+ years, we've made a big change: Android Forums is now Early Bird Club. Learn more here.

doesn't the lack of a D pad drive you crazy?

jmz768

Android Enthusiast
Nov 5, 2009
267
22
I was going to go with a Droid X but ended up with the Droid 2 after finding it frustrating as hell navigating web sites. There's no way to accurately click on links unless you pinch zoom large enough and even then I found it difficult. With the Droid 2 I do most of my surfing in landscape mode using the arrow keys to navigate.

Anybody else not like the exclusion of a navigation pad trend we're seeing with new devices?
 
Just went to ESPN.com. They've got a mobile version of their site apparently. I could navigate it with no issues. I've never had problems navigating with my DInc.

Go to the full site and try. Be sure to try an area where there are multiple links next to each other. Navigating mobile sites is obviously not a problem, full sites are a nightmare in most cases.
 
Upvote 0
How is it silly? Go to a site like ESPN.com and try to navigate with just a touch screen. I'd lose it in a minute

I shoulda been more clear and said that it woulda been pointless to add a d-pad on a Galaxy S.

I found that double tap to zoom or even pinch to zoom on my Galaxy S was faster than clicking the d-pad on my Cliq to scroll to get to the link that I wanted to get to. And the only reason I had to use the D-pad on my Cliq was b/c that screen was extremely inaccurate and than stopped working all together.

Galaxy S has probably the most accurate multi-touch touch screen, so yes, I think that it would be silly if they added a d-pad to this phone.

On a side note, I just went to espn's full site and had absolutley no problem navigating through it.
 
Upvote 0

BEST TECH IN 2023

We've been tracking upcoming products and ranking the best tech since 2007. Thanks for trusting our opinion: we get rewarded through affiliate links that earn us a commission and we invite you to learn more about us.

Smartphones