The speed test app doesnt work right on my G2.
It stutters and gives me really poor speeds that are inconsistent with my browsing experience.
I'll try that and report back.
EDIT: no tethering with the G2. Silly me.
Well, I downloaded the FCC Speed Test app and it's working much better.
5 down and 2 up.
Why aren't the browser-based solutions accurate?
If I transfer a 7 meg file in less than 7 seconds doesnt that speak for itself?
Yeah that seems a bit more realistic. Just go download PDANet from market and use it to tether. It's free.
Iowa I remember you saying that T-Mobile basically sucks, and that At&t already uses HSPA+ .... But you still never told me which At&t cities are HSPA+
Also didn't tell me which At&t phones are HSPA+
Oh ya, when you you compile your list of cities that have At&t HSPA+
please provide documented proof, and links.
Yeah that seems a bit more realistic. Just go download PDANet from market and use it to tether. It's free.
There is a huge difference between burst speed, speed that only last for a few seconds, and through put speeds.
Burst speeds happen because of how the wireless works. The system gives you a high hz for a few seconds, then adjust for your signal strength. If you down load very small files, it will do it all at once.
Through put is total amount of data speed over any given connection.
Hspa is very good at burst speeds, especially when no one is using the same tower. But when you have more then a few people using your tower, the connection will slow to about 2-3mbps. Which is why hspa is not a good long term technology.
For the op, to get an really good idea of your true through put, you need to measure it 16 times through out the day. Take the average of all of those readings, that is your burst rate.
To get your through put rate you need to down load a file from more then 3,000 miles away from your isp connection, not your physical location. The file should be larger then 500MB. You need to do this 16 times throughout the day.
With the average hspa+ you should run about 3-5 mbps burst and about 2-3mbps through put.
With wimax, you will run about 8-12mbps burst, about 4-8mbps through put.
The will vary depending on towers location, server load, and tower load.
What you proved is you can have a 5 sec burst up to 10mbps. You can do the same thing with evdo, with a 1.3mb file.
Yeah... pretty IOWA is just a bitter old t-mobile hater. AT&T only has HSPA 7.2 and plans to upgrade to 14.4 of which still is not designated as HSPA+ and until they upgrade to 21mbps they don't have HSPA+, pretty much anyone on T-Mobile and living in a major city knows T-Mobile doesn't suck. Maybe if someone lives outside of cities it may suck but hey no one carrier is perfect. verizon still has some of the slowest speeds until they roll out LTE and get devices.
You throw around those numbers like they actually mean something.
The average dsl/broadband speed for the united states is less then 5.1mbps. Once your wireless connection hits the internet, it is not treated any different then any other ip address. Which means your average wireless speed is less then 5.1 mbps to any give internet.
There is very little chance that t-mobile will offer you a 14.2mbps when the average internet is only 5.1mbps. They would have to own every server between you and your data.
So you can run around and spew marketing, but in the real world. Your average speed wireless speed is going to be slower then your average broadband speed.
You can look here to see your average burst speed. Your specific connection will vary, but on average, it is all the same internet. Most connection on your phone will self throttle for long downloads to save battery life. The facts about internet speed is that you will not see much improvement over the next 5 years, for the most part average throughput will hover around 6-8mbps for wimax and lte. Only after the vast majority of the backbone of the internet is changed will you see an increase in speed.
There is a huge difference between testing the closest server to you and testing the average speed of the internet you use every day. In the real world, 14mbps throughput will not happen until 2015 at the earliest. 50mbps not until 2020. 100mbps not until after 2020.
Which is why hspa+ is a good choice for the compressed proxies like t-mobilles and att uses for their products. It allows the compression of image and items to reduce the total amount data sent across the network, increasing the speed. Works really well.
Which is why the OP picture says at the bottom "We recommended you try a 3MB or faster test to accurately test your connection." The test that he used was a picture test, which t-mobiles server compressed down to less then 3MB. The test saw that it was transferred less then 3MB, which is why it told him to use the greater then 3MB test. The 7MB file was compressed to 3MB and sent over the connection, which means the actual speed was probably less then 4.5Mbps. But to the average user it would seem like 10mbps, so we will just ignore that little fact. There is so many twists and turns in wireless communication it will leave your heading spinning.
http://files.cwa-union.org/speedmat...A_Report_on_Internet_Speeds_2009_Appendix.pdf
I'd listen to this guy. Despite all my research, when it comes to frequencies, wireless bandwidth, and all things hertz, he's got everyone here schooled. Period. Everything RiverOfIce has said, I've verified as true and accurate.
And no, T-Mobile can not get faster 4G speeds than Sprint, because T-Mobile doesn't have anything that will ever come close to having the 4G label.
And you can have all the burst speeds in the world, throughput is a different story, and I just may set up a video recording of Sprint's WiMax vs T-Mobiles HSPA+ on a large file download with video camera's, since I just so happen to be in both areas.
And T-Mobile's 3G coverage (yes that's HSPA+ too) is minimal and scarce, and that's being optimistic. It's smaller than ATT's pithy 3G network, so how can it be the largest "any" network?
You throw around those numbers like they actually mean something.
The average dsl/broadband speed for the united states is less then 5.1mbps. Once your wireless connection hits the internet, it is not treated any different then any other ip address. Which means your average wireless speed is less then 5.1 mbps to any give internet.
There is very little chance that t-mobile will offer you a 14.2mbps when the average internet is only 5.1mbps. They would have to own every server between you and your data.
So you can run around and spew marketing, but in the real world. Your average speed wireless speed is going to be slower then your average broadband speed.
You can look here to see your average burst speed. Your specific connection will vary, but on average, it is all the same internet. Most connection on your phone will self throttle for long downloads to save battery life. The facts about internet speed is that you will not see much improvement over the next 5 years, for the most part average throughput will hover around 6-8mbps for wimax and lte. Only after the vast majority of the backbone of the internet is changed will you see an increase in speed.
There is a huge difference between testing the closest server to you and testing the average speed of the internet you use every day. In the real world, 14mbps throughput will not happen until 2015 at the earliest. 50mbps not until 2020. 100mbps not until after 2020.
Which is why hspa+ is a good choice for the compressed proxies like t-mobilles and att uses for their products. It allows the compression of image and items to reduce the total amount data sent across the network, increasing the speed. Works really well.
Which is why the OP picture says at the bottom "We recommended you try a 3MB or faster test to accurately test your connection." The test that he used was a picture test, which t-mobiles server compressed down to less then 3MB. The test saw that it was transferred less then 3MB, which is why it told him to use the greater then 3MB test. The 7MB file was compressed to 3MB and sent over the connection, which means the actual speed was probably less then 4.5Mbps. But to the average user it would seem like 10mbps, so we will just ignore that little fact. There is so many twists and turns in wireless communication it will leave your heading spinning.
http://files.cwa-union.org/speedmat...A_Report_on_Internet_Speeds_2009_Appendix.pdf
Lets see idk because the network t-mobile calls 4G covers more areas than any other 4G called network. Yup including sprint and their borrowed 3.xG network that you seem to think is okay to call 4G but not t-mobile. Verizon doesn't have theirs out yet. AT&T is still on regular HSPA 7.2 instead of HSPA+ and have plans on going to regular LTE instead of advanced I do believe it was. You verify RiverOfIce statements to be true but what credibility do you have to go along with confirming his statements true? are you a network specialist or something? not trying to sound like an a*hole but you get the gist of what I am saying. To your knowledge t-mobile can't get anywhere near Sprints but how far does your knowledge about network technologies really go? I mean ever since these 4G wars came up everyone wants to play expert with it based on their wikipedia found knowledge.
Iowa you can not argue with a tv ad. Sorry you just cant. 4g, as the 4th generation of wireless communication is not the same as 4g the unit of measurement set by the IMT-Advanced standard. You want to offer facts back by a tv commercial, we are not going to go anywhere. HSPA+ is a good technology that about 40% of the population will not notice the difference in speeds. But it is still based on a very ineffective protocols that only increases speed by decreasing availability. Once more then 60% of the population have more then a dumb phone, you are going to have to move to something that can offer everyone the same speeds. Not just 22% of the them a higher speeds then they are currently getting and 88% of them lower speeds then they are currently getting. But to minor points here 1.) Att has a hspa+ network. A very large one, but since I have stop dealing with last decades technology about 3 years ago. I really could not tell you the extend of that foot print. 2.) I am in fact a girl, not a boy. Sorry for the disappointment. I do not want you to know what I do for a living, because I want you to check your facts against mine. I want you to not trust what I say so you can try to prove me wrong, and there for learn. Mindlessly accepting the facts, like the "FACTS" given in a tv ad, is why we are even having this argument.
Iowa you can not argue with a tv ad. Sorry you just cant. 4g, as the 4th generation of wireless communication is not the same as 4g the unit of measurement set by the IMT-Advanced standard. You want to offer facts back by a tv commercial, we are not going to go anywhere. HSPA+ is a good technology that about 40% of the population will not notice the difference in speeds. But it is still based on a very ineffective protocols that only increases speed by decreasing availability. Once more then 60% of the population have more then a dumb phone, you are going to have to move to something that can offer everyone the same speeds. Not just 22% of the them a higher speeds then they are currently getting and 88% of them lower speeds then they are currently getting. But to minor points here 1.) Att has a hspa+ network. A very large one, but since I have stop dealing with last decades technology about 3 years ago. I really could not tell you the extend of that foot print. 2.) I am in fact a girl, not a boy. Sorry for the disappointment. I do not want you to know what I do for a living, because I want you to check your facts against mine. I want you to not trust what I say so you can try to prove me wrong, and there for learn. Mindlessly accepting the facts, like the "FACTS" given in a tv ad, is why we are even having this argument.
I have a pretty good understanding of IP networks and the air interface networks are VERY similar. Not that any of that matters.
HSPA+ will never been a 4G tech. Never.
WiMax, already is.
Maybe you should quit fighting with gravity, because it's not doing a whole lot of justice. TMo's network is hands down, the smallest, and worst out of the big four. It doesn't have the largest anything, unless your talking about gaps in coverage.
And even if TMo had an Air interface of 1000gigbits per second, it would still be slow due to their weak backbone.
LOL WiMax is NOT 4G its upgradable but in no way is regular WiMax 4G by technical standards. HSPA+ covers more areas than wimax, that is how T-mobile is the largest 4G network. Hey and at least T-mo users don't have to pay a premium for HSPA+ unlike Sprint because they BORROW WiMax FROM CLEARWIRE! that alone makes t-mobile better. Worse than AT&T HAH! why is it that AT&T users are always complaining about dropped calls than t-mobile users? what they do? yeah just go look anywhere and you will see. All the coverage in the world doesn't matter if all your calls will get dropped anyways. I have had less than 5 dropped calls despite your claim of spotty coverage. Ihave gotten signal in more places than AT&T and SPrint hadn't exactly had the chance to compare verizon's signal supposedly they are good but your claim of t-mobile being the worst of the 4 is based on air.
We've been tracking upcoming products and ranking the best tech since 2007. Thanks for trusting our opinion: we get rewarded through affiliate links that earn us a commission and we invite you to learn more about us.