• After 15+ years, we've made a big change: Android Forums is now Early Bird Club. Learn more here.
There is no offical 4g standard yet. The Evo uses wimax.

Therefore at&t can not go to something that doesn't exist.

LTE (long term evolution) and wimax are commonly refered to as "4g" since it will be the next generation up from 3g, even though an "official" 4g standard has not be diclaired.

AT&T to Deploy 4G LTE Network in 2011

AT&T is working on a LTE network upgrade to fire up in the middle of next year. If they use the frequencies they use now to pump out this new standard it might be possible for phones like the Captivate touse them. But there are much more factors than just the frequency...

The answer is, I dont know. AT&T and Samsung might not even know yet.
 
Upvote 0
AT&T and VZ both will be trialing in selected markets in less than 6 months.

In the case of AT&T there will eventually be LTE, 3G, and 2G hardware on every tower. The Captivate would require an additional radio to use LTE. SO not happening, hence no gain from LTE on Captivate. But then there will continue to be back compatibility for some time.

Surely similar plans hold for VzW [with resp to back compatibility].

I'm not simply reading press but know this as a somewhat insider in both camps.
 
Upvote 0
By the time there is any real substantial LTE coverage available from ATT most of us will have a different phone or be ready for a new phone

Exactly..18 months to 2 yrs is long enough for everything to change: processor speed, screen size, screen touch technology, and wireless data system. Two yrs ago I had a iPhone 3g: much slower, single process,early touch technology. Was fine then, but why would I still want such?
 
Upvote 0
I swear there was a post in this very forum where one of our posters [I think resides in Canada] was able to get the captivate to see 4G but was restricted by network protocols?
The phone was hacked of course and they were trying different things. Anyone remember this? Or I could be wrong *shrugs*

US testing is just getting set up..Much cell site hardware to install...so in a word the Canadian presence already or even US: unlikely
 
Upvote 0
There is more involved with the LTE rollout than you guys know...what's with the constant complaining. 75 million people may not be a lot, but there is no rush for AT&T. AT&T will rollout LTE on 700MHz/1700MHz because those were the bands that were auctioned off. They can't use their existing spectrum because it would reduce 3G/2G capacity and people would complain even more.

They have a lot more headroom with their HSPA network than Verizon does with EVDO...which explains Verizon's urgency. T-Mobile doesn't have the money (nor spectrum) to move to LTE quickly....which is why they are marketing an rolling out HSPA+.

There isn't a phone out right now that supports LTE either way.
 
Upvote 0
Upvote 0
In English, Captivate doesn't have the hardware to pull off a 4G speed, the same way the oldest iPhone can't use 3G speeds. The best we can do is use HSUPA, which is faster than 3G and slower than 4G which the T-Mobile Vibrant is able to use (I think it's called 3.5G, but I can't confirm that). The Captivate is able to use it, too, but AT&T has only given access to HSUPA to the iPhone. Time goes on, blah blah, ROM's start to come out with HSUPA (check XDA's development section for the Captivate), but ROM's such as Cognition stopped integrating HSUPA into their ROM's since they claim that between Froyo's internet speed and HSUPA, there's not that big of a difference and that there is a lot of battery drain with HSUPA. Basically, they don't think it's worth it for the small speed increase, but a lot of ROM's still have it if you're interested.
 
Upvote 0

BEST TECH IN 2023

We've been tracking upcoming products and ranking the best tech since 2007. Thanks for trusting our opinion: we get rewarded through affiliate links that earn us a commission and we invite you to learn more about us.

Smartphones