• After 15+ years, we've made a big change: Android Forums is now Early Bird Club. Learn more here.

Only cops should have guns

you don't count. you are in Europe.

Yes, why on Earth would we follow a more civilized group of Nations.
:D

Guns and more guns.

I think the mentally insane should be armed because it is their right just as it is yours. The 2nd amendment does NOT say they CAN'T just as you seem to put a period and truncate the rest of the sentence to to suit your purpose.

btw- What militia are you forming today? Did the redcoats come back? It's amazing how people put a period after the word arms even though it is not written as such by the same CONSTITUTION they quote for their rights.
 
Upvote 0
Yes, why on Earth would we follow a more civilized group of Nations.

because we are America. we don't want, nor need, to follow anyone.

we aren't idiots and think that mentally unstable people should be allowed to own a firearm. sure they have a right to, but there are laws that restrict that because they aren't fit enough because THEY ARE MENTALLY UNSTABLE.

do you know who the militia in the USA is composed of? the organized militia, and the reserve militia. the reserve militia are all able bodied men between 17 AND 45 who are not a part of the National Guard and the Naval Militia.

the Bill of Rights are amendments to the Constitution. the right to keep and bear arms is never mentioned in the original Constitution.
 
Upvote 0
because we are America. we don't want, nor need, to follow anyone.

we aren't idiots and think that mentally unstable people should be allowed to own a firearm. sure they have a right to, but there are laws that restrict that because they aren't fit enough because THEY ARE MENTALLY UNSTABLE.

do you know who the militia in the USA is composed of? the organized militia, and the reserve militia. the reserve militia are all able bodied men between 17 AND 45 who are not a part of the National Guard and the Naval Militia.

the Bill of Rights are amendments to the Constitution. the right to keep and bear arms is never mentioned in the original Constitution.

Too bad a minimum IQ requirement is not mandatory in order to possess a gun.

AND in the ORIGINAL constitution it was a RIGHT to OWN SLAVES...so what's your point.

The Constitution is a living document and it evolves but then again they probably typed in on their I-phone ver 0.1

Try not to cherry pick the parts you want and the version you want because sometimes when you pick cherries you can fall out of the tree.:D

So then YOU have NO PROBLEM with MUSLIMS buying up all the guns/ammo? It is their RIGHT, correct?
 
Upvote 0
cops cannot be everywhere and they are not for personal protection. Nor can they always respond fast enough to save you or your family. What about someone who is disabled? Elderly? A lone female, or just a guy who is outnumbered by gang bangers? They and everyone has the right to defend themselves. But if you really feel that only cops should have guns then you may want to leave the USA because it is a right here. My gun has twice saved my life. My neighbor saved his families lives when he shot an intruder in his yard one night. People now a days just wont rob you and take your money and leave you alone. mentally ill and drug addled perps as well as 13 year old gang bangers have no regard for your life or that of your families.


These a some of my thoughts, like I said it is a right in our country, and the most important imho. Otherwise a corrupt government can take control of it's people less they be armed. The first Ammendment and all others would be null and void.


Ps Our Constitution is not a living document as much as some would like, and it never said we could own slaves.

We also already have laws restricting who can own guns, mentally ill, felons and others are already excluded. In fact there are thousands of laws restricting gun ownership.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Bob Maxey
Upvote 0
Too bad a minimum IQ requirement is not mandatory in order to possess a gun.

but there are other laws that restrict firearm ownership. some of them i have a problem with, some of them i don't. so what's your point?

AND in the ORIGINAL constitution it was a RIGHT to OWN SLAVES...so what's your point.

no where in the Constitution said it was a right to own slaves. these are the only mention of slaves in the Constitution:
Slavery is seen in the Constitution in a few key places. The first is in the Enumeration Clause, where representatives are apportioned. Each state is given a number of representatives based on its population - in that population, slaves, called "other persons," are counted as three-fifths of a whole person. This compromise was hard-fought, with Northerners wishing that slaves, legally property, be uncounted, much as mules and horses are uncounted. Southerners, however, well aware of the high proportion of slaves to the total population in their states, wanted them counted as whole persons despite their legal status. The three-fifths number was a ratio used by the Congress in contemporary legislation and was agreed upon with little debate.
In Article 1, Section 9, Congress is limited, expressly, from prohibiting the "Importation" of slaves, before 1808. The slave trade was a bone of contention for many, with some who supported slavery abhorring the slave trade. The 1808 date, a compromise of 20 years, allowed the slave trade to continue, but placed a date-certain on its survival. Congress eventually passed a law outlawing the slave trade that became effective on January 1, 1808.
The Fugitive Slave Clause is the last mention. In it, a problem that slave states had with extradition of escaped slaves was resolved. The laws of one state, the clause says, cannot excuse a person from "Service or Labour" in another state. The clause expressly requires that the state in which an escapee is found deliver the slave to the state he escaped from "on Claim of the Party."

nothing about the right to own slaves in any of that.

The Constitution is a living document and it evolves but then again they probably typed in on their I-phone ver 0.1

yes it is. nice to see you remembered something about the Constitution.

Try not to cherry pick the parts you want and the version you want because sometimes when you pick cherries you can fall out of the tree.:D

at least i'm close to the cherries. you are in the apple orchard.

So then YOU have NO PROBLEM with MUSLIMS buying up all the guns/ammo? It is their RIGHT, correct?

if they are law abiding Americans that have no problem with their background check, then by all means, they can buy as many as they wish.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Mr. Boom
Upvote 0
cops cannot be everywhere and they are not for personal protection. Nor can they always respond fast enough to save you or your family. What about someone who is disabled? Elderly? A lone female, or just a guy who is outnumbered by gang bangers? They and everyone has the right to defend themselves. But if you really feel that only cops should have guns then you may want to leave the USA because it is a right here. My gun has twice saved my life. My neighbor saved his families lives when he shot an intruder in his yard one night. People now a days just wont rob you and take your money and leave you alone. mentally ill and drug addled perps as well as 13 year old gang bangers have no regard for your life or that of your families.


These a some of my thoughts, like I said it is a right in our country, and the most important imho. Otherwise a corrupt government can take control of it's people less they be armed. The first Ammendment and all others would be null and void.


Ps Our Constitution is not a living document as much as some would like, and it never said we could own slaves.

We also already have laws restricting who can own guns, mentally ill, felons and others are already excluded. In fact there are thousands of laws restricting gun ownership.


Sounds like you live in a bad City with that much crime.
*How does he know the person on the lawn was not lost or trying to approach to ask for direction?
 
Upvote 0
Even though I don't own a gun by choice I am opposed to giving up my 2nd amendment or any other right.For anyone so naive to think only police should have them or that by making them illegal will somehow magically change morality or character is foolish.Making gun ownership illegal would only make it easier for the illegal element to apply their trade and/or for anyone wishing to change our way of life,(government included).
Citizens right to bear arms is and maybe the only equalizing factor between our pursuits of life, liberty & justice.Crooks don't care weather it's illegal to have a gun because they will have them,but they do care if there's a possibility I or you may have one.Evil will always pray on the weak,(governments included).
 
  • Like
Reactions: AndroidSPCS
Upvote 0

BEST TECH IN 2023

We've been tracking upcoming products and ranking the best tech since 2007. Thanks for trusting our opinion: we get rewarded through affiliate links that earn us a commission and we invite you to learn more about us.

Smartphones