I'm afraid it's not so easy. The Streetview fleet, for example, imposed itself even on unsuspecting people, collecting data from unencrypted networks en-mass (and the ignorance of those who used those networks does not say such Google's action constitutes less than an organized intelligence-collection operation). It's also not so easy when some governmental bodies and universities privatise services to said corporation. But that's just two example, without even raising the question of whether Google is a monopoly in certain markets, and all that follows from that.
Would you like anyone to know that you usually like to watch certain porn clips? Or that you're having interviews in workplaces other than your own? Or that you've been looking for certain medications for your haemorrhoids? Because that's the level of information we're talking about... to start with.
Without making comparisons, I'd just like to remind you "the right for privacy" wasn't cried-for for nothing. In certain times, in certain places, governmental bodies strived to have as much info about people as can be had - Americans experienced it under McCarthy, the East-Germans experiences it under the Stasi. Actually, any sort of dictatorship in modern history had similar aspirations, and not for nothing - knowledge is power, and your information is currency. If you don't want the government to know everything about you, why would you like Google? Again - this is the level of info we're talking about, and it's really just the start. If you have any doubt about it, go read Erik Schmidt's statements. You can google them up.