I think Tasker is a great app for the functionality it provides, but I believe it is unnecessarily overly unintuitive.
Anytime something -- and it's not just apps but anything in life -- offers great power/performance/versatility it comes with a learning curve. It's the nature of things. The dev didn't "unneccessarily" make Tasker unintuitive by intent IMO. How would you suggest making Tasker more intuitive (not fond of the word myself as intuitiveness is subjective) without affecting its capabilities? What makes you think it's unnecessarily so? I had no problems with it but I do have some background in coding and Tasker actually was very easy to pick up IMO since it provides a simple GUI.
It's really not that difficult once you learn the concept behind it rather than attempting to memorize step-by-step instructions. Tasker relies on Profiles. Profiles require Contexts to allow Tasker to know when the Profile should be active. Profiles have Entry and Exit Tasks. Entry Tasks are carried out when the Profile becomes active. Exit Tasks are carried out when the Profile becomes inactive. The Actions within the Tasks tell Tasker specifically what to do. Tackle the Profiles you're trying to create using this knowledge piece-by-piece and you'll be fine. If you try to tackle it all at once you'll be overwhelmed.
It might help to look at the examples on the Tasker site and try working with a simple example Profile even if it's not a Profile that's directly relevant to your needs/wants. You can't learn how to use it without trying and it is easier to learn with a Profile that is known to work where you know what the expected outcome is.
For anything in life, it's easier if you learn the reasoning behind the processes rather than just a sequence of specific steps. With the former, you can do whatever the solution is capable of doing. With the latter, all you know is how to do one specific thing with the solution.
That said Tasker isn't for everyone. If the learning curve is too steep or if you're just unwilling to learn there are probably "appliance" apps that will perform once (or possibly more) specific things that you're looking to accomplish. Tasker's just a much more versatile solution.
It's kind of like buying a car. You can either choose from the cars that are available (that someone else designed) and sacrifice some features that you might want because X model car just doesn't do that.
I'd put it this way:
You can buy an "appliance" car with automatic transmission that is comfortable to drive and has features suited for basic/general transportation.
Or you can buy a performance vehicle with a manual transmission, suspension designed for performance driving, summer tires, 50:50 weight balance, etc.
The first option is easier to drive and easier to push to its limits but its limits are much lower than the second option. You can drive the first option in far more conditions than the second without as much risk of getting into trouble. It's overall harder to get yourself into trouble with the first option. That's because the first option is optimized for convenience and comfort at the expense of performance.
The second option has a steeper learning curve but will reward you once you learn how to drive it. It will have much better driving limits but there's more risk in pushing it at its limits. You have to be very careful with the second option in conditions that aren't optimal (basically warm and dry). It won't be as comfortable as the suspension, wheels and tires are optimized for performance versus comfort. You can get spectacular performance out of the second option but you can also end up in spectacular accidents without experience or if you make a mistake. That's because the second option is optimized specifically for performance at the cost of convenience and comfort.
Things like this are always a double-edged sword as there are always compromises to be made. You can't max out one aspect without impacting other aspects. These various aspects tend to be price, performance, ease of use/convenience and cost but there can certainly be others depending on the specific topic.