Even with corroboration, would it change anything?
I'm not going to go searching for hours to find a single post just to make what I wrote more tangible.
Why?
Because no matter how much I reference, you still don't know who is providing it. They person who wrote it could work for Google or they could be some homeless guy living on the street typing on a stolen phone. Not likely, but why is it THAT important.
The fact is, regardless if this fixes others, it fixed mine.
The reason I dismiss many claiming their phone is untouched is because of all of the activation issues plaguing these devices, and the fact that you have people like Mgatskiewho say it, and then you dig deeper and find they while they did not install anything, they used the menu trick to activate 1x vs. 3x, which is at the heart of the matter. Or they installed something, then took it off and claimed they are stock.
All I can go buy is how my phone handles these, while you may not like the theory, it stands for at least my phone as fact. What we need is another person with a working phone, like Scyy, who is willing to see if these apps make their phone stop connecting. This will providing a much better feedback than people claiming their phone is stock simply because of the activation issues, and the many people who say they are stock when they aren't. I'm not saying people are lying, I'm just saying some are leaving out crucial info and it's hard to discern between activation issues, outtages, app issues and such. It's a lot of variables and honestly, I don't think many can tell the difference.
A clean working phone that we can corrupt would provide the best test platform. Finding someone willing to do so though will likely not be so easy.
