Wait, so let me get this straight, this whole time you have been complaining that the droid isn't working perfectly because your turned off sync after overloading it with 10 years worth of data?
*sigh*
yes
but I miss your point????
"overloading" "overloading"???
oh - so wait, your implying that the Droid or GC Calendar has a limit?? some unknown data limit? Really? Please show me that info someplace because as far as I know, there are numerous apps and products specially designed to help ex Palm users move over their data - ANY amount - into (1) the Droid and (2) the GC. Companionlink is just 1. There are whole areas and sites dedicated to moving Palm legacy data over. 10 years is an overload??? What's the point of a Calendar then? What's the limit? 1 year? 5 years? 6 months? Think about what your saying. It is chump change data amount measured in a few GB.
Now, you might have failed to read that it worked fine for +2 weeks or so. So, if data size and amount of data are an issue in the Calendar, please show the reference on that as what your implying, that somehow the amount of data is the issue and that was obvious to you, seems known to you and no one else. And, your also implying then that none of us better use our Calendars to much as we will reach some sort of unknown magical data limit and the Sync will stop working?
GC accepted all of the Palm data. The Droid accepted all of the Palm data. Both sync'd fine for 2+ weeks. I am not the only one with this issue either and some - long time Palm users - report no issue and some report issues. See the Google Droid tech support area for that.
There is absolutely no proof anywhere I have read in any document on any forum that mentions (1) a data limit in the Calendar and (2) importing Palm data is an isue. So, 1 day of Calendar events or 10 years, it should not matter 1 bit.. and if it does, again, we are back to a bad product then as who's Calendar has such a limit?
so what is next, you tell me the 200 contacts I moved over was "overload"
some people have 2000... your presumed data limit and supposed "overload" is totally unproven.