Do you think it is fair to require internet with all smartphones?
I ask because I doubt we will see an android phone without a data package. I have seen a number of posters (on other forums) who firmly believe a smartphone is completely useless without a data package. I believe this holds true for one or two phones. (Cliq and backflip) and ones similar to them. I can't object to saying those particular phones having data packages is a requirement. However, I am around wifi 24/7 be it at home or school so pretty much any other phone out there I could use wifi for.
I have come to find it quite annoying with no justifiable logic. I mean yeah, with android especially its based on google which revolves around the internet and I can understand that line of logic. However, if wifi is going to offer a faster connection and I am around it nearly 100% of the time.. why pay 30$ on something I won't use at all?
I ask because I doubt we will see an android phone without a data package. I have seen a number of posters (on other forums) who firmly believe a smartphone is completely useless without a data package. I believe this holds true for one or two phones. (Cliq and backflip) and ones similar to them. I can't object to saying those particular phones having data packages is a requirement. However, I am around wifi 24/7 be it at home or school so pretty much any other phone out there I could use wifi for.
I have come to find it quite annoying with no justifiable logic. I mean yeah, with android especially its based on google which revolves around the internet and I can understand that line of logic. However, if wifi is going to offer a faster connection and I am around it nearly 100% of the time.. why pay 30$ on something I won't use at all?