• After 15+ years, we've made a big change: Android Forums is now Early Bird Club. Learn more here.

Thoughts on Samsung S IV presentation?

Just watched the Samsung S IV presentation online, and am wondering what people thought of it.

Some initial thoughts:

- The humour felt forced and often fell flat.
- Dead crowd. Almost no cheering, clapping, or crowd sounds/interaction.
- The little kid was great.
- A bit short on hardware 'wow' factors, or perhaps the hardware side felt underrepresented - wish they had spent more time on this. Lots of software info that I'll probably never use.
- Like the S translate: can see myself using that.
- 'Chinese' is not a language. It's mostly Mandarin or Cantonese.
- The whole presentation felt very Hollywood. Not sure if it's my thing.

- Like that the S IV is actually smaller than the S3 :)
- Like that it has an IR sensor, so can use phone as remote. Wish more phones offered this built in.
- Like that it has additional sensors (thermometer...).
 
Upvote 0
I just watched the Galaxy S 4 unveil in New York City Times Square. I must say it is a total let down. Although there are many new improvements to TouchWiz, none are significant and none will be used in daily life to be realistic. It's safe to say that I will be using my galaxy s3 for a long time to come. At what I was so excited to see, turned out to be a total let down.
 
Upvote 0
I liked the phone presentation. I am looking forward to owning the device as it is an upgrade over my Razr Maxx. I see a lot of people complaining about it though so I am having a few second thoughts. I like the screen size and the camera as well as the S translate. The phone is going to be nice in my opinion. I did not like the Hollywood presentation.
 
Upvote 0
I understand, the quad-core edition of the phone will be no slouch. But it seems that when Samsung makes a new phone, there's two editions; the uber-powerful phone and then the bastard child of a phone. And of course, the US gets the bastard child of a phone.

Why can't the US get the high-end phone? What are we? Chopped liver?

Yeah. Gotta respectfully disagree here.

For the SGS3, they got a quad of A-9 architecture, the US got a dual of Kraits, basically A-15 class.

That was done because of parts availability to satisfy LTE needs. The S4 in the SGS3 had a world modem that included everything needed for all US frequencies, all carriers - that meant lower parts count, lower cost, higher reliability, and some benchmarks being ok on one, not on the other. DESPITE what some claim, performance wasn't hugely different.

Now, the Snapdragon 600 Krait processors are 15% more clock-cycle efficient (read: faster) than in the S4 cores used last year.

Either processor - the Exynos dual-quadcore, or the Snapdragon 600, will max out at 4 A-15 cores running at once, tops.

You're free to believe that last year you got chopped liver and it's a repeat this year - but it's not what's in the silicon. ;)

Hope this helps. :)
 
Upvote 0
But I thought moar cores mean better.

In some ways, I think that Samsung hyped the phone too much. So much so that when it finally was unveiled, it didn't live fully up to the hype.

Does that mean that I won't buy it when it comes out? No, I will definitely buy it. There's no denying that I will buy it when it comes out.

It just seems that in some ways, we've been handed the Galaxy S3s to borrow from the Apple scene.
 
  • Like
Reactions: EarlyMon
Upvote 0

BEST TECH IN 2023

We've been tracking upcoming products and ranking the best tech since 2007. Thanks for trusting our opinion: we get rewarded through affiliate links that earn us a commission and we invite you to learn more about us.

Smartphones