Nice input guys. As for wiseguy, I stated in my original post that I do understand the fact for limiting phones in general because if such actions weren't taken Verizon, HTC, etc. would not be able to provide adequate technical support. However, that does not mean I shouldn't have the right (or even dumb people for that matter) to do with my equipment as I wish insofar as knowing it would void all technical support and/or warranty that comes with the phone. I personally did receive the rebate for the phone, and purchased it for the price of $199. However, I DO own the equipment, the rebate is offered for agreeing to a 2 year contract with Verizon. If I break this agreement, I don't give the phone back. I do retain ownership of the phone, however I owe Verizon ECT fees for doing so. So, whether I bought the phone outright or with the 2 year agreement, I still own the phone, so that is a moot point. And as for services such as tethering, that is completely unrelated to my thoughts - of course, that is an ongoing service provided by Verizon, and should be paid for accordingly (you signed the contract, you can bitch all you want, but it's not going to get you anywhere). However, just because this is a side effect of rooting does not mean I should not be allowed to modify my phone as I wish.
I think Jeeper and benjamin made this more clear for me with the car analogy. Although you are certainly within your rights to modify the device as you see fit, it is not the manufacturer's obligation to provide details on how to do just that.
However, car manufacturers aren't installing addtional "security" measures after assembling the car to specifically keep one from modifying the internals. HTC is blatently putting in place additional preventative measures to keep users from accessing the true potential of their phone. To me, it's as if Microsoft Windows prevented a user from upgrading hardware, or only allowing users to access half (half being arbitrary) of the features of a desktop/laptop computer. The line is slowly blurring between PC and phone - is a company within its right to restrict users from being in complete control of hardware that is sold to consumers? Sure, you a company isn't required to provide instructions on everything you can possibly do with a rooted phone -- but why should they not be obligated to at least provide you with the ability to do so? This isn't modifying a car -- this is getting a car ready to be modified. The difference in rooting and car modifying is rooting shouldn't have to be modifying. You don't need to "hack" a car to perform modifications to the components. You shouldn't have to with pc and phone devices either. The need to "hack" or modify components to do the ACTUAL modding is ridiculous. I am in full knowledge that I do all of this at my own risk and void my support/warranty. I should have to hack a phone in order to take full advantage of the phone.
Just my thinking at the moment.