Hmmm. I didn't intend to start this back and forth. I really just found it interesting that BetterMost mixes sensationalism with fact. This came about when I suggested a certain thread by BetterMost had run its course and I was met with hostility by some forum members. (As in that I was a wannabe moderator.)
As a result of this mix of fact and fiction, I took a second look at the postings of BetterMost. (I think it is an assumption that BetterMost is a guy.)
While I think there certainly is a need to call someone out when postings are contradictory about basic facts, I have had second thoughts about being antagonistic to BetterMost’s posts. The key is to simply wade through the b.s. and extract the morsels of fact which remain.
Thus, I must give credit to BetterMost on at least two elements. First, the postings that buttons remained lit on the bottom of the Evo. While I acknowledge that multiple threads about the same issue are irritating, I think BetterMost had a valid concern despite some obvious exaggeration and hyperbole.
Second, I must admit that BetterMost has never responded in kind to the sometimes personal attacks leveled against him/her. This includes my rather snarky comment about the screen performance. It turns out that BetterMost has more tolerance than I, and I give him/her credit for that.
So my irritatingly long post concludes with the following I have learned and will try to abide by: Try to maintain your humor in the forum, and try to exercise patience with other posters. I know this is trite and obvious, but if we respond with humor rather than irritation, we might keep things from spiraling out of control at times.
(Although I’m still pissed at the guy who called me a “wannabe moderator”.)