__________________
Have you seen me in a kilt? Site Rules/Guidelines
Use the !Report button to report spam or objectionable posts.
If you find a post helpful please use the button!
Device(s): EVO 4G LTE Root W/Regaw, LazyPanda S-Off, Viper 2.0.2
Asus Transformer 16GB
Carrier: Not Provided
Thanks: 2,624
Thanked 1,752 Times in 961 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by PyroSporker
For those in certain areas of these cities (full deployment will continue after launch):
Atlanta, Dallas, Houston, Kansas City and San Antonio
I hope to see some speedy tests around July 15
I had a glimpse of LTE in Wichita, KS today. I noticed it on and only lasted a few minutes. I was able to download speed test and run it before it went away.
I had a glimpse of LTE in Wichita, KS today. I noticed it on and only lasted a few minutes. I was able to download speed test and run it before it went away.
Not Verizon fast, but still respectable. Hopefully the speeds will improve as the network is built out and officially activated!
This was taken in Oakbrook, Ill., which is a western 'burb of Chicago. 3G speeds have slowed down a bit within the last week and a half for some reason. Was averaging 1.00-1.5MBPS pretty regularly, even in the office.
Read a couple of articles on ons4gru.com that in regards to Chicago, Sprint's strategy was to start outside Chicago proper and work their way in. So most of the Chicagoland area (burb's, NW Indiana, etc.) should have LTE by October and Chicago will be the last to get it by years end.
Supposedly areas in NW Indiana are actually up and running with LTE but it's never been confirmed.
Last edited by bearballz; July 13th, 2012 at 12:22 PM.
The Following User Says Thank You to bearballz For This Useful Post:
Device(s): S3, Evo LTE,Galaxy Note, Skyrocket, Aria, Nook Color
Lg thrill,HTC EVO 4g, HTC Inspire,S7 slim,Acer
Carrier: Not Provided
Thanks: 965
Thanked 1,326 Times in 932 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by SamuraiBigEd
Nothing here at home yet, did it get pushed back? I thought the roll out was supposed to be city wide which is why it took so long to accomplish.
Not at all...this is a soft launch. What area are you in? Dallas for example was switched on this week yes, but scheduled completion is not until November
Quote:
Originally Posted by chong67
I am only getting average of 12 mbps down and 6 mbps up.
Device(s): S3, Evo LTE,Galaxy Note, Skyrocket, Aria, Nook Color
Lg thrill,HTC EVO 4g, HTC Inspire,S7 slim,Acer
Carrier: Not Provided
Thanks: 965
Thanked 1,326 Times in 932 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by Citizen Coyote
Not Verizon fast, but still respectable. Hopefully the speeds will improve as the network is built out and officially activated!
What exactly is everyone classifying as "verizon fast"
verizon and att both have an average LTE speed of 8-12 Mbps...sure there will be peaks of faster speeds, especially closer to the tower, but don't set expectations on that.
In the limited testing I did yesterday I got speeds anywhere from 3.5-25Mbps dload ...dependent on how far I was from the tower.
It was exactly what I expected speed wise...I was hoping signal would carry further from the tower though.
Device(s): EVO 4G LTE Root W/Regaw, LazyPanda S-Off, Viper 2.0.2
Asus Transformer 16GB
Carrier: Not Provided
Thanks: 2,624
Thanked 1,752 Times in 961 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mr. Ed
Not at all...this is a soft launch. What area are you in? Dallas for example was switched on this week yes, but scheduled completion is not until November
I'm in San Antonio and according to what I have read from Sprint the first cities (which includes S.A.) would be fully live on 7/15 with the other cities starting to be active in November. This was supposedly being done to guaranty we did not have the fiasco that was the wimax rollout where some parts of town still don't have it to this day.
Last edited by SamuraiBigEd; July 15th, 2012 at 01:57 PM.
Device(s): S3, Evo LTE,Galaxy Note, Skyrocket, Aria, Nook Color
Lg thrill,HTC EVO 4g, HTC Inspire,S7 slim,Acer
Carrier: Not Provided
Thanks: 965
Thanked 1,326 Times in 932 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by SamuraiBigEd
I'm in San Antonio and according to what I have read from Sprint the first cities (which includes S.A.) would be fully live on 7/15 with the other cities starting to be active in November. This was supposedly being done to guaranty we did not have the fiasco that was the wimax rollout where some parts of town still don't have it to this day.
Where did you read that...I have seen nothing that claimed full capacity on roll out date
the specific page I had was on the inside sprint now site I believe and has since been pulled
Device(s): EVO 4G LTE Root W/Regaw, LazyPanda S-Off, Viper 2.0.2
Asus Transformer 16GB
Carrier: Not Provided
Thanks: 2,624
Thanked 1,752 Times in 961 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mr. Ed
They will constantly be adding cities from this point on
Very nice!
The Austin comment was only because of the rivalry between S.A. and Austin, if they weren't getting LTE it would be another thing to rub in their faces.
Device(s): EVO 4G LTE Root W/Regaw, LazyPanda S-Off, Viper 2.0.2
Asus Transformer 16GB
Carrier: Not Provided
Thanks: 2,624
Thanked 1,752 Times in 961 Posts
Not sure where this info is coming from but the map is so far off from what I am actually seeing as to almost be funny. I drove straight through the densest area just above Kirby and never got 4G but do get it north of 1604 on 281 and in an area that only serves a few parks and a landfill!
beaumont texas....supposedly it's slow because they're upgrading towers in our area
3g, 72kbps download
3g, 115kpbs upload
never heard of uploading being faster but....o well that's what speedtest says
I hope this is the case in Denver too. I haven't seen Denver listed in any of the "initial cities" lists (even though it was one of the first for Wimax) but the 3G speeds are horrendous downtown. I am talking speeds that rival my 1st gen iphone on EDGE in the heart of downtown with full bars.
Device(s): S3, Evo LTE,Galaxy Note, Skyrocket, Aria, Nook Color
Lg thrill,HTC EVO 4g, HTC Inspire,S7 slim,Acer
Carrier: Not Provided
Thanks: 965
Thanked 1,326 Times in 932 Posts
[EXPERIMENT] data speed test: volunteers needed
As usual I can't just leave things as they are
I am conducting some 3g tests after changing settings at *#*#4636#*#*
Please help me with the following.
Confirm Data settings
Menu.Settings.Mobile Data
network mode LTE/CDMA
Roaming Automatic
Baseline:4-6 speed tests done with app of choice
Root should not be required , settings are reversible but as always , I take no responsibility for broken phones.
Open dialer
Press *#*#4636#*#*
Press phone information
Scroll down and change preferred network type to cdma/evdo/GSM/wcdma/lte auto
Watch 3g icon. It will turn off and then come back on. If it does not, use the button there to turn off radio. Wait for x and no signal bars. Turn radio back on.
Return to speed test and run 4-6 more tests.
Share results
So far my speeds went from roughly .3-.6 up and down to 1.5-2.5 up and 1 down
Fluke...maybe, but that is why I need you.
Further testing will include battery effects and lte response
These settings revert at reboot back to CDMA + LTE/EvDo at reboot and slower speeds return. Feel free to play with other network modes though take note...some modes kill voice data text etc
DO NOT CHANGE RADIO BANDS
DO NOT CHANGE RADIO BANDS
Mega pain to fix if you do
Last edited by Mr. Ed; July 25th, 2012 at 02:22 AM.
Device(s): S3, Evo LTE,Galaxy Note, Skyrocket, Aria, Nook Color
Lg thrill,HTC EVO 4g, HTC Inspire,S7 slim,Acer
Carrier: Not Provided
Thanks: 965
Thanked 1,326 Times in 932 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by falconey
I tried it out. My speeds stayed the same.
Do provide some data for me please. I am looking at more than just speeds in the results.
You can also try the network mode setting that ends in prl as well.
I know it is doing something (much like previous experiments on the orig evo, I did this over 3 hours well over 100 times switching back and forth etc)
Last edited by Mr. Ed; July 25th, 2012 at 10:36 AM.
Device(s): HTC EVO 4g(Retired), HTC EVO LTE(Retired), LG Lucid(Returned), Motorola Droid Razr M, Nexus 7
Carrier: GOD
Thanks: 3,789
Thanked 4,023 Times in 1,992 Posts
Here you go my speeds are in mb. Also the bottom one is WiFi. The other 2 from bottom were before and the others are after the change. Hope this helps.
1st 5 are after, others are before. after this I switched back and forth a couple times. although the average dropped off, there wasn't a significant difference between the two.
I wonder if it was just the radio reset that helped you?
Device(s): S3, Evo LTE,Galaxy Note, Skyrocket, Aria, Nook Color
Lg thrill,HTC EVO 4g, HTC Inspire,S7 slim,Acer
Carrier: Not Provided
Thanks: 965
Thanked 1,326 Times in 932 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by dr g
1st 5 are after, others are before. after this I switched back and forth a couple times. although the average dropped off, there wasn't a significant difference between the two.
I wonder if it was just the radio reset that helped you?
That's is one of my theories but I believe there is another variable as well,maybe two.
Those participating,
can you update your post with baseband and network type
Baseband and network type is at
Menu.settings.about.network
Menu.settings .about.software information
In my testing yesterday I found this really only helped while on eHRPD
I was also on the new baseband...being that I am rooted I have switched back To the old baseband and have seen more consistant results without resetting the radio
Interesting test: do a speed test while on a call (should only work on eHRPD)
What does all of this mean. Well my theory is this
Our phones have the choice to connect to multiple sources now that Network Vision is being implemented. I don't believe hand off between sources is occurring like it should ...what can we do about it? That is the answer I am looking for.
The Following User Says Thank You to Mr. Ed For This Useful Post:
The HTC EVO 4G LTE is Sprint's version of the HTC One X. It comes with all the same specs, except for the processor, internal storage and radios (includes LTE). And aesthetics are also significantly different.
While many users have complaine... Read More