Go Back   Android Forums > Android Forums Community > The Lounge
The Lounge We're all friends here. Hang out, kick your feet up and talk about whatever the heck you want!

View Poll Results: 62(1+2) = ?
9 94 54.34%
1 77 44.51%
7 2 1.16%
Voters: 173. You may not vote on this poll

Like Tree27Likes

test: Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools
Old April 29th, 2011, 03:02 PM   #101 (permalink)
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Posts: 9,944
 
Device(s):
Carrier: Not Provided

Thanks: 1,745
Thanked 1,990 Times in 1,545 Posts
Default

i refuse to be inside () with usta!!!!!
and i do not multiply with rose
and never am i under earlymon
and nova is not my equal

that is = divide by zero

Advertisements
dan330 is offline  
Last edited by dan330; April 29th, 2011 at 03:06 PM.
Reply With Quote
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to dan330 For This Useful Post:
alostpacket (April 29th, 2011), jroc (April 29th, 2011)
sponsored links
Old April 29th, 2011, 03:04 PM   #102 (permalink)
The PearlyMon
 
EarlyMon's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: New Mexico, USA
Posts: 46,374
 
Device(s): M8, LTEvo, 3vo, and Shift - Evo retired
Carrier: Sprint

Thanks: 42,729
Thanked 57,186 Times in 22,978 Posts
Default

Quote:
Also, I think It's pretty clear that:

EarlyMon/Rose(dan330+usta)=nova777 (imo)

And that's my final proof. Irrefutable! Just be sure to evaluate the (imo) first.
Oh! Now you're just showing off how you knew it was 42!!!

Quote:
Originally Posted by dan330 View Post
i refuse to be inside () with usta!!!!!
and i do not multiply with rose
and never am i under earlymon

that is = divide by zero
Sigh.

You do not multiply with Roze - you add with Usta, then I multiply the outcome, all to be divided by Roze.

Uh oh. Roze is being divisive!
EarlyMon is online now  
Last edited by EarlyMon; April 29th, 2011 at 03:07 PM.
Reply With Quote
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to EarlyMon For This Useful Post:
alostpacket (April 29th, 2011), jroc (April 29th, 2011)
Old April 29th, 2011, 03:12 PM   #103 (permalink)
Destroying Balls Everyday
Thread Author (OP)
 
Vihzel's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: Manhattan, NY
Posts: 5,369
 
Device(s): Galaxy Nexus
Carrier: Not Provided

Thanks: 190
Thanked 1,061 Times in 673 Posts
Default

Hooray for 100+ posts!
Vihzel is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old April 29th, 2011, 03:12 PM   #104 (permalink)
Over Macho Grande?
 
alostpacket's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: NY
Posts: 7,920
 
Device(s): GlassXE, MotoX, N5, N4, N7'12, GNex, N1, SGT10.1, Revue, Xoom, Eris, OG Droid
Carrier: TMO

Thanks: 4,603
Thanked 3,578 Times in 1,530 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by RiverOfIce View Post
LOL. 2 pages over this?

That answer is 9, could not be anything else. Regardless of how you read it.

I guess you want me to prove it right?

Ok, easy.
6/2 (1+2)= 6/2 is what you do with them. (1+2) is what they are, so....

You have to make a dog house,....

But what kind of dog is it? I mean if it's a little lap dog thing... then the answer is 1. Because that kinda dog doesn't need so much room.

On the other hand, if it's Lassie, then Grandpa fell down the mine and we need to get help.
alostpacket is offline  
Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to alostpacket For This Useful Post:
Ichapp (April 30th, 2011)
Old April 29th, 2011, 03:20 PM   #105 (permalink)
Leeeroy Jennnkinnns!
 
novox77's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Posts: 3,968
 
Device(s): Evo 4G, 3D, LTE
Carrier: Not Provided

Thanks: 1,190
Thanked 3,270 Times in 1,410 Posts
Default

I was wondering if this problem was designed to isolate left-brainers from right-brainers, but the roughly 50/50 split seems to indicate otherwise. But for sure, our viewpoint (whether correct or not) says something about our personalities and how we see the world.
__________________

The good thing about science is that it's true whether or not you believe in it. -Neil deGrasse Tyson

Help me out: Sign up with Dropbox and we both get 500MB extra space. Thanks!
novox77 is offline  
Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to novox77 For This Useful Post:
jroc (April 29th, 2011)
Old April 29th, 2011, 03:25 PM   #106 (permalink)
Hiding behind a mystery
 
Roze's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Where the Sakura grows
Posts: 9,847
 
Device(s): Moto Atrix [lovin'] Nexus One [Lost] LG Vu [Lost]
Carrier: Not Provided

Thanks: 809
Thanked 2,192 Times in 1,489 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by DaSchmarotzer View Post
PS: Roze, what a disappointment.

EDIT: Wow, I wrote that before EarlyMon had posted again.
Misconception that accountants are good at math. We only deal with basic math of addition, subtraction multiplication and they are usually in excel :P lol

Quote:
Originally Posted by alostpacket View Post
Also, I think It's pretty clear that:

EarlyMon/Rose(dan330+usta)=nova777 (imo)

And that's my final proof. Irrefutable! Just be sure to evaluate the (imo) first.
WTH! lol when you start using people in the equation...that means we're moving on from the question at hand.

but hmm....
so if EM and Roze are equal (both being mods), we are basically negated in the equation so...

If we are following PEDMAS, that means dan + usta = novox

Quote:
Originally Posted by dan330 View Post
i refuse to be inside () with usta!!!!!
and i do not multiply with rose
and never am i under earlymon
and nova is not my equal

that is = divide by zero
nope, read statement above! Refuse all you want :P lol

Quote:
Originally Posted by EarlyMon View Post
Oh! Now you're just showing off how you knew it was 42!!!

Sigh.

You do not multiply with Roze - you add with Usta, then I multiply the outcome, all to be divided by Roze.

Uh oh. Roze is being divisive!
Aren't I always?
__________________
Sign up with Dropbox using my referral and get an additional 1/2GB on top of the 2GB you get for signing up http://db.tt/YbULMZX

Many thanks,
Roze
Roze is offline  
Last edited by Roze; April 29th, 2011 at 03:32 PM.
Reply With Quote
Old April 29th, 2011, 03:31 PM   #107 (permalink)
Leeeroy Jennnkinnns!
 
novox77's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Posts: 3,968
 
Device(s): Evo 4G, 3D, LTE
Carrier: Not Provided

Thanks: 1,190
Thanked 3,270 Times in 1,410 Posts
Default

my name got pretty bastardized in the last half-page of posts. wonder what it will eventually evolve to.
novox77 is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old April 29th, 2011, 03:32 PM   #108 (permalink)
The PearlyMon
 
EarlyMon's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: New Mexico, USA
Posts: 46,374
 
Device(s): M8, LTEvo, 3vo, and Shift - Evo retired
Carrier: Sprint

Thanks: 42,729
Thanked 57,186 Times in 22,978 Posts
Default

I kept thinking of dan's assertions - and it hit me what you were saying:

Quote:
EarlyMon/Rose(dan330+usta)=nova777 (imo)
So - that's the same as:

EarlyMon*dan330 + EarlyMon*Usta = novox77 * Roze (imo)

So, if novox77 and Roze multiplied (imo), the result might be confused - very confused.

Schizophrenic even.

And what about that (imo)? Is that putting on the dog? Or just its house?

I'm just glad it wasn't a cat - we'd never know where he was.
EarlyMon is online now  
Reply With Quote
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to EarlyMon For This Useful Post:
apavolka (April 30th, 2011), jroc (April 29th, 2011)
Old April 29th, 2011, 03:36 PM   #109 (permalink)
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Posts: 9,944
 
Device(s):
Carrier: Not Provided

Thanks: 1,745
Thanked 1,990 Times in 1,545 Posts
Default

i dont like it.. i tell you
dan330 is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old April 29th, 2011, 03:37 PM   #110 (permalink)
Leeeroy Jennnkinnns!
 
novox77's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Posts: 3,968
 
Device(s): Evo 4G, 3D, LTE
Carrier: Not Provided

Thanks: 1,190
Thanked 3,270 Times in 1,410 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by EarlyMon View Post
So, if novox77 and Roze multiplied (imo), the result might be confused - very confused.
and my wife would kill me.
novox77 is offline  
Reply With Quote
sponsored links
Old April 29th, 2011, 03:40 PM   #111 (permalink)
The PearlyMon
 
EarlyMon's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: New Mexico, USA
Posts: 46,374
 
Device(s): M8, LTEvo, 3vo, and Shift - Evo retired
Carrier: Sprint

Thanks: 42,729
Thanked 57,186 Times in 22,978 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Roze View Post
but hmm....
so if EM and Roze are equal (both being mods), we are basically negated in the equation so...

If we are following PEDMAS, that means dan + usta = novox
Jeez - calling dan one usta shy of a novox was pretty personal there!

You left out the (imo) -

dan330 + Usta = novox77 (imo)

And that's only presuming we're equal (both being mods).

I think the real reason you factored us out with that sleight of hand was because you didn't want people to see you under me. *cough*

Quote:
Aren't I always?
Only when it's sunny or dark, Roze, only when it's sunny or dark.

edit and PS - Am I the only one who realizes what (imo) looks like if you tip your head all the way to the right????

Kinda makes the solution obvious.
EarlyMon is online now  
Last edited by EarlyMon; April 29th, 2011 at 03:43 PM.
Reply With Quote
Old April 29th, 2011, 03:42 PM   #112 (permalink)
Hiding behind a mystery
 
Roze's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Where the Sakura grows
Posts: 9,847
 
Device(s): Moto Atrix [lovin'] Nexus One [Lost] LG Vu [Lost]
Carrier: Not Provided

Thanks: 809
Thanked 2,192 Times in 1,489 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by novox77 View Post
and my wife would kill me.
*points*
Quote:
Originally Posted by Roze View Post
so if EM and Roze are equal (both being mods), we are basically negated in the equation so...

If we are following PEDMAS, that means dan + usta = novox
I think your wife would be fine with that
Roze is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old April 29th, 2011, 03:45 PM   #113 (permalink)
The PearlyMon
 
EarlyMon's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: New Mexico, USA
Posts: 46,374
 
Device(s): M8, LTEvo, 3vo, and Shift - Evo retired
Carrier: Sprint

Thanks: 42,729
Thanked 57,186 Times in 22,978 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Roze View Post
*points*

I think your wife would be fine with that
Jeez Roze - suppose his wife is waiting to go out tonight and dan330 and Usta show up...

Yer opening a can o' worms here...
EarlyMon is online now  
Reply With Quote
Old April 29th, 2011, 05:08 PM   #114 (permalink)
Senior Member
 
Stinky Stinky's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: In a Dumpster! :D
Posts: 3,794
 
Device(s): Huawei Ascend Y300 :D
Carrier: Not Provided

Thanks: 5,121
Thanked 1,406 Times in 1,053 Posts
Question

Quote:
Originally Posted by Stinky Stinky View Post
Hahah!

LOL I was wrong!

Yay!

I told you I suck at maths!

Hmm every day life hey?

Not a maths question but has numbers involved, that is a little strange but that is cool by me

So then what...

NO DON'T FRACKING JOKE!!!

I think it's TIME!!!

xD

Hahahaa!

I am going crazy trying to answer this 1

Ahhhhhhhhhh!!

I think I am right!!! xD

It IS time or a clock!!

11........12........1..........2.......3.........4 ..........5.........6.........7.....8......9.....1 0...........11.....12..........1

They are paired together!!!! xD

It is the hours of a clock!!!

MWhahahaaa!!!

SO THE NEXT NUMBER IS:

2


Damn I could be wrong though!
__________________
Out walking me Roach Coach ek se!

Brb in 1 000 years
Stinky Stinky is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old April 29th, 2011, 05:15 PM   #115 (permalink)
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Posts: 9,944
 
Device(s):
Carrier: Not Provided

Thanks: 1,745
Thanked 1,990 Times in 1,545 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by EarlyMon View Post
Jeez Roze - suppose his wife is waiting to go out tonight and dan330 and Usta show up...

Yer opening a can o' worms here...

Like I said... I don't like this
dan330 is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old April 29th, 2011, 05:33 PM   #116 (permalink)
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Posts: 2,615
 
Device(s): Droid X1, Droid 1, RAZR, Rezound, Maxx HD
Carrier: Not Provided

Thanks: 4,171
Thanked 363 Times in 282 Posts
Default

The last handful of posts is one of the great things I LOVE about this forum!!!!

Dont let me interrupt, please continue....
__________________
The ultimate measure of a man is not where he stands in moments of comfort and convenience, but where he stands at times of challenge and controversy.

MLK, Jr.
jroc is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old April 29th, 2011, 07:32 PM   #117 (permalink)
New Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2011
Posts: 1
 
Device(s):
Carrier: Not Provided

Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Default

(Copied from Yahoo questions) Just felt like adding fuel to the fire.


I am your college professor that you requested, with a doctorate in Mathematics. I will break this down as simply as possible and end this debate as approx. 10 students have already asked me this today.
The problem as it is written is 62(1+2) , the cannot be substituted with a fraction bar because they have different ranks on the order of operations. It is an illegal math move to do this. The bar ranks with parentheses, is interchangeable with *. therefore the problem must be solved as 62(1+2) NOT 6 (over) 2(1+2) we do the parentheses first, so 62(3), the parentheses are now no longer relevant, because the number inside is in it's simplest form. Every single number has implied parentheses around it.
62(3)
(6) (2)(3)
62*3,
or even converting the division to multiplication by a reciprocal (a legal math move)
(6)(1 (over) 2)(3)
are all correct ways to write this problem and mean exactly the same thing. Using pemdas, where md and as are interchangeable, we work from left to right, so (3)(3) or
3*3= 9

Just because something is implied rather than written does not give it any special rank in the order of operations.

The problem in it's simplest form, with nothing implied would look like this:
(1+1+1+1+1+1 (over) 1) (1+1 (over) 1) * ((1(over) 1) + (1+1 (over) 1))
From here, nothing is implied, This again, works out to 9.

If the symbol '/' was used this whole debate would be ambiguous since that symbol can mean "to divide by" or it could mean a fraction bar.

HOWEVER, because the symbol is used, it can not be changed to mean a fraction bar because that would change the order of operations and thus the whole problem, you can't change a symbol to mean something because you want to, in doing so you are changing the problem.

Once and for all, the answer is 9.

Hopefully some of my students see this so I can stop answering this question.

End of debate... hopefully.
windowshade is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old April 29th, 2011, 07:35 PM   #118 (permalink)
The PearlyMon
 
EarlyMon's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: New Mexico, USA
Posts: 46,374
 
Device(s): M8, LTEvo, 3vo, and Shift - Evo retired
Carrier: Sprint

Thanks: 42,729
Thanked 57,186 Times in 22,978 Posts
Default

Welcome to the forums!
EarlyMon is online now  
Reply With Quote
Old April 29th, 2011, 08:00 PM   #119 (permalink)
Destroying Balls Everyday
Thread Author (OP)
 
Vihzel's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: Manhattan, NY
Posts: 5,369
 
Device(s): Galaxy Nexus
Carrier: Not Provided

Thanks: 190
Thanked 1,061 Times in 673 Posts
Default

Welcome windowshade! I've seen several emails from math professors that solved the problem and they all say 9 (if none of them are photoshopped... but that would be a bit extreme). I'll see if I can try to dig them up because I saw them in the many posts on Facebook.

I do agree with the poster that it would be different if the symbol was '/' instead of '', which I believe is the source of the confusion. I've come across so many people who believe that it simply means "over"... but that would be puzzling because if you say it's "over" in this case, what would stop it from meaning over in this case:

93+6*3 meaning 9/3+6*3

In what cases would it mean to "divide" and in what cases would it mean "over" if we treat the symbol as just "over" in 62(1+3)? The D in PEDMAS would be meaningless. hehe

I just cast my vote and wow it is closer than I thought on this forum site. lol How amusing this simple problem can cause such a ruckus.
Vihzel is offline  
Last edited by Vihzel; April 29th, 2011 at 08:09 PM.
Reply With Quote
Old April 29th, 2011, 11:41 PM   #120 (permalink)
Senior Member
 
Outlaw71's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: Vancouver, British Columbia
Posts: 2,482
 
Device(s): Droid eXtreme... running the leaked Gingerbread 2.3.3./LG G2x running Bionix2 + Trinity kernel
Carrier: Not Provided

Thanks: 263
Thanked 483 Times in 315 Posts
Default

People who do math in their spare time... for fun... without being forced into it... are strange.
__________________
Check out my apps...
Outlaw71 is offline  
Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to Outlaw71 For This Useful Post:
jroc (April 30th, 2011)
sponsored links
Old April 29th, 2011, 11:41 PM   #121 (permalink)
Senior Member
 
Outlaw71's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: Vancouver, British Columbia
Posts: 2,482
 
Device(s): Droid eXtreme... running the leaked Gingerbread 2.3.3./LG G2x running Bionix2 + Trinity kernel
Carrier: Not Provided

Thanks: 263
Thanked 483 Times in 315 Posts
Default

Outlaw71 is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old April 30th, 2011, 08:50 AM   #122 (permalink)
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Posts: 9,944
 
Device(s):
Carrier: Not Provided

Thanks: 1,745
Thanked 1,990 Times in 1,545 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Outlaw71 View Post
People who do math in their spare time... for fun... without being forced into it... are strange.
i agree...

same as those that talk about their phones .. strange!!!
dan330 is offline  
Reply With Quote
The Following 4 Users Say Thank You to dan330 For This Useful Post:
jroc (April 30th, 2011), krouget (May 2nd, 2011), novox77 (April 30th, 2011), Vihzel (April 30th, 2011)
Old April 30th, 2011, 11:25 AM   #123 (permalink)
Destroying Balls Everyday
Thread Author (OP)
 
Vihzel's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: Manhattan, NY
Posts: 5,369
 
Device(s): Galaxy Nexus
Carrier: Not Provided

Thanks: 190
Thanked 1,061 Times in 673 Posts
Default

My calc teacher back in high school did calc for fun... We teased him about it and he didn't care. lol He also did a lot of stats for some website to make extra money. I forgot what he was doing exactly but I know he made a good amount of money.
Vihzel is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old April 30th, 2011, 12:41 PM   #124 (permalink)
Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: NYC
Posts: 498
 
Device(s): Droid X
Carrier: Not Provided

Thanks: 33
Thanked 48 Times in 45 Posts
alex.amp502
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Vihzel View Post
My calc teacher back in high school did calc for fun... We teased him about it and he didn't care.
My high school calc teacher was the same way. He's famous for having started the Math Club at our highschool when he was a student.

Must be something inherent to highschool calc teachers, eh?
sonofaresiii is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old April 30th, 2011, 01:44 PM   #125 (permalink)
Hiding behind a mystery
 
Roze's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Where the Sakura grows
Posts: 9,847
 
Device(s): Moto Atrix [lovin'] Nexus One [Lost] LG Vu [Lost]
Carrier: Not Provided

Thanks: 809
Thanked 2,192 Times in 1,489 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by sonofaresiii View Post
My high school calc teacher was the same way. He's famous for having started the Math Club at our highschool when he was a student.

Must be something inherent to highschool calc teachers, eh?

Gee.. why do you think they became math teachers? To pass on their love of math to the students. I find the teachers I had that were passionate about what they were teaching were the best teachers.
Roze is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old April 30th, 2011, 10:02 PM   #126 (permalink)
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Posts: 2,615
 
Device(s): Droid X1, Droid 1, RAZR, Rezound, Maxx HD
Carrier: Not Provided

Thanks: 4,171
Thanked 363 Times in 282 Posts
Default

So the answer is nine. I need to make sure so when I help my kids with their homework I dont contribute to them getting D's n F's...lol
jroc is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old May 1st, 2011, 07:10 AM   #127 (permalink)
Moderati ergo sum
 
lunatic59's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: Pennsylvania
Posts: 25,130
 
Device(s): Galaxy Note 10.1 (2014), Nexus 4, Galaxy S II, Captivate, Nexus 1, Nook Color, Asus Transformer T-1
Carrier: AT&T

Thanks: 8,453
Thanked 13,436 Times in 7,352 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Roze View Post
I find the teachers I had that were passionate about what they were teaching were the best teachers.
That explains my sex-ed teacher.
__________________
_
If the information is useful, Like the post, if the person was helpful, Thank the member.
RULES: Lest we forget | This part of signature intentionally left blank.
_________________________________________________

No Ivory-Billed Woodpeckers were harmed in the composition of this message.
lunatic59 is online now  
Reply With Quote
Old May 1st, 2011, 08:49 AM   #128 (permalink)
Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: Waukesha, WI
Posts: 144
 
Device(s):
Carrier: Not Provided

Thanks: 6
Thanked 20 Times in 17 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by lunatic59 View Post
That explains my sex-ed teacher.
^^^

I don't care who you are, that's funny!

Thank you all for this wonderful math discussion. I thought I understood math before this thread. Anyway, it seems to me that the answer has to be 9.

Givens:
1. PEDMAS is correct
2. PEDMAS = PEMDSA (as a Randian Objctivist I assert that division and multiplication have equal standings in the order of operations and cannot at the same time be unequal due to someone creating a mnemonic.)
3. The person who posed this question knew enough about math to understand the logic problems this would cause mathletes.
4. With point 3 stipulated, the original author could have written this problem as 6/2(1+2), but didn't for a reason. (for some reason I can't stop thinking of Vizzini arguing with himself over which goblet of iocane laced wine he should drink for the Dread Pirate Roberts)

Therefore, we have :
6 divided by 2(3) (I just spent 3 minutes looking for the divided by symbol on my keyboard without success)

3(3)

9

BTW, after being out of high school for over 20 years I am taking my math placement tests for college on Tuesday. I do not have the math background that some on this board have, but hopefully I'll be computer engineer in a few years. This tread is certainly thought provoking.
tfek70 is offline  
Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to tfek70 For This Useful Post:
jroc (May 1st, 2011)
Old May 1st, 2011, 09:09 AM   #129 (permalink)
New Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: Living in Brighton U.K, born in Gran Canaria, Spain.
Posts: 4
 
Device(s): Dell Streak running Froyo 2.2.2
Carrier: Not Provided

Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Bob Maxey View Post
Since I am a world champion thread hijacker, I'll ask the gathered group to give the next number in this series and explain their guess.

1,1,1,2,1 _____[
1,1
1,2
1,3
1,4
0
Time is out.

Shiuko is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old May 1st, 2011, 12:09 PM   #130 (permalink)
Destroying Balls Everyday
Thread Author (OP)
 
Vihzel's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: Manhattan, NY
Posts: 5,369
 
Device(s): Galaxy Nexus
Carrier: Not Provided

Thanks: 190
Thanked 1,061 Times in 673 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Roze View Post
I find the teachers I had that were passionate about what they were teaching were the best teachers.
I agree... but sometimes... they can be a bit too passionate. lol One of my linguistics professors would often go on big tangents if he was on a "roll". lol It usually ended up with him trying to explain things with terms that we haven't even heard of before. He definitely knows his stuff though!
Vihzel is offline  
Reply With Quote
sponsored links
Old May 1st, 2011, 12:36 PM   #131 (permalink)
Senior Member
 
Bob Maxey's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2010
Posts: 4,837
 
Device(s):
Carrier: Not Provided

Thanks: 381
Thanked 811 Times in 641 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by sonofaresiii View Post
1, 1, 2, 1, 3, 1, 4, 1, 5, 1, 6, 1, 7, 1, 8, 1, 9, 1, 1, 2, 2, 2, 3, 2...

The first number denotes the unit's sequential order, the second the "round." it's like a date followed by a year.

Edited because i forgot one of the numbers

nope.
Bob Maxey is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old May 2nd, 2011, 12:25 PM   #132 (permalink)
Member
 
ssick92's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Cal Poly San Luis Obispo
Posts: 289
 
Device(s): Rooted Galaxy Nexus
Carrier: Not Provided

Thanks: 12
Thanked 42 Times in 27 Posts
Default

I was taught that a number next to parenthesis means nothing more than a multiplication sign. Therefore, 6 / 2(3) reads 6 / 2 * 3 = 9.

Anyone who says do order of operations and gets the answer 1 is simply mistaken for what the P in PEMDAS means. It means do what is INSIDE the parenthesis, not multiply what is on the outside by what is on the inside.
__________________
Samsung Galaxy S4 - Verizon
Nexus 7 32gb + Data
Always rooted, Always changing
ssick92 is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old May 2nd, 2011, 12:30 PM   #133 (permalink)
Member
 
ssick92's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Cal Poly San Luis Obispo
Posts: 289
 
Device(s): Rooted Galaxy Nexus
Carrier: Not Provided

Thanks: 12
Thanked 42 Times in 27 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Vihzel View Post
Welcome windowshade! I've seen several emails from math professors that solved the problem and they all say 9 (if none of them are photoshopped... but that would be a bit extreme). I'll see if I can try to dig them up because I saw them in the many posts on Facebook.

I do agree with the poster that it would be different if the symbol was '/' instead of '', which I believe is the source of the confusion. I've come across so many people who believe that it simply means "over"... but that would be puzzling because if you say it's "over" in this case, what would stop it from meaning over in this case:

93+6*3 meaning 9/3+6*3

In what cases would it mean to "divide" and in what cases would it mean "over" if we treat the symbol as just "over" in 62(1+3)? The D in PEDMAS would be meaningless. hehe

I just cast my vote and wow it is closer than I thought on this forum site. lol How amusing this simple problem can cause such a ruckus.
There isnt any difference between and /. They both simply create a fraction. if there is no parenthesis in the denominator, then it is only that single number in the denominator. 62(1+2) = 6/2 * (1+2)
ssick92 is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old May 2nd, 2011, 10:01 PM   #134 (permalink)
Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Posts: 268
 
Device(s): Captivate
Carrier: Not Provided

Thanks: 6
Thanked 12 Times in 11 Posts
Default

I can't believe this is still floating around...it's 1.

Simple math...

Because of the parentheses, 62(1+2) is:
Attached Images
File Type: jpg math1.jpg (1.3 KB, 47 views)
Sharkonwheels is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old May 2nd, 2011, 11:00 PM   #135 (permalink)
Member
 
n0ct3m's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: Mississippi
Posts: 419
 
Device(s): Samsung Fascinate
Carrier: Not Provided

Thanks: 9
Thanked 60 Times in 40 Posts
Send a message via AIM to n0ct3m Send a message via MSN to n0ct3m
Default

This is starting to look like one of those 0.99... = 1 threads. Also, my stellar (I can't believe I just said that) intelligence says the answer is 9.
__________________
Quote:
Your opinion is irrelevant.
n0ct3m is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old May 2nd, 2011, 11:22 PM   #136 (permalink)
Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Posts: 268
 
Device(s): Captivate
Carrier: Not Provided

Thanks: 6
Thanked 12 Times in 11 Posts
Default

So...mathematically.... How'd you separate the '2' from the '(1+2)'
As in the attachment, if you separate the '2' from the '(1+2)', I don't think 9 is your answer.
.
I dunno... even kAlgebra under Linux gives answer as 1.

Good problem, though!
Sharkonwheels is offline  
Last edited by Sharkonwheels; May 2nd, 2011 at 11:47 PM.
Reply With Quote
Old May 2nd, 2011, 11:56 PM   #137 (permalink)
The PearlyMon
 
EarlyMon's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: New Mexico, USA
Posts: 46,374
 
Device(s): M8, LTEvo, 3vo, and Shift - Evo retired
Carrier: Sprint

Thanks: 42,729
Thanked 57,186 Times in 22,978 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Sharkonwheels View Post
So...mathematically.... How'd you separate the '2' from the '(1+2)'
As in the attachment, if you separate the '2' from the '(1+2)', I don't think 9 is your answer.
.
I dunno... even kAlgebra under Linux gives answer as 1.

Good problem, though!
My earlier posts covered how this is was a compiler and tool issue.

The answer is 9.
EarlyMon is online now  
Reply With Quote
Old May 3rd, 2011, 12:20 AM   #138 (permalink)
Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Posts: 268
 
Device(s): Captivate
Carrier: Not Provided

Thanks: 6
Thanked 12 Times in 11 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by EarlyMon View Post
My earlier posts covered how this is was a compiler and tool issue.

The answer is 9.
SO, mathematically, how'd ya separate the 2 from (1+2) ?

Following others logic...

62(1+2)

62(3)

Then some want to jump out and make it
3(3)

But why is the parentheses being ignored?

It should be

62(1+2)
62(3)
66
=
1


I'd like to know why everyone is just ignoring the parentheses.

If you said
62x(1+2)

I'd buy it.

That goes to 62x(3)
which gives 3x(3)
which gives 9.


People are IGNORING the parentheses, which takes precedence, PEMDAS.
Sharkonwheels is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old May 3rd, 2011, 01:21 AM   #139 (permalink)
The PearlyMon
 
EarlyMon's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: New Mexico, USA
Posts: 46,374
 
Device(s): M8, LTEvo, 3vo, and Shift - Evo retired
Carrier: Sprint

Thanks: 42,729
Thanked 57,186 Times in 22,978 Posts
Default

That means do what's inside the parens, that is all. That the 2 touches it only means *.

Please review the thread.
EarlyMon is online now  
Reply With Quote
Old May 3rd, 2011, 01:55 AM   #140 (permalink)
Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Posts: 268
 
Device(s): Captivate
Carrier: Not Provided

Thanks: 6
Thanked 12 Times in 11 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by EarlyMon View Post
That means do what's inside the parens, that is all. That the 2 touches it only means *.

Please review the thread.
I have.

And while I see 62x(1+2)= 9

I don't see 62(1+2) = 9.

62(1+2)

is

6
--------
2(1+2)

So how does that solve to 9?


6
------
2(3)


6
----- = 1
6


Now, as I've said, if you said 62x(1+2)

that would be

6
---- (1+2)
2

which works out to

6
---- (3)
2

which works out to

3(3) = 9
Sharkonwheels is offline  
Reply With Quote
sponsored links
Old May 3rd, 2011, 02:03 AM   #141 (permalink)
Senior Member
 
Usta's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: The Netherlands
Posts: 2,585
 
Device(s): SGS II I9100
Carrier: Not Provided

Thanks: 127
Thanked 1,366 Times in 331 Posts
Default

I think we will get the next Android OS (Ice Cream Sandwich) before this math issue is settled...
Usta is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old May 3rd, 2011, 02:13 AM   #142 (permalink)
The PearlyMon
 
EarlyMon's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: New Mexico, USA
Posts: 46,374
 
Device(s): M8, LTEvo, 3vo, and Shift - Evo retired
Carrier: Sprint

Thanks: 42,729
Thanked 57,186 Times in 22,978 Posts
Default

It was settled long ago.

Wanting a thing does not make it so.
EarlyMon is online now  
Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to EarlyMon For This Useful Post:
krouget (May 3rd, 2011)
Old May 3rd, 2011, 02:22 AM   #143 (permalink)
Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Posts: 268
 
Device(s): Captivate
Carrier: Not Provided

Thanks: 6
Thanked 12 Times in 11 Posts
Default

Not mathematically.
Noone's showing any math working out that

6
-----
2(1+2)

equals 9


Who knows - maybe it's NewMath


BUT!

I guarantee we'll settle this before Moto unlocks the Atrix bootloader


UPDATE: All I want to see is the math worked out.

I just want someone, ANYONE, to show me how

6
----
2(1+2)

is equal to 9

look at it this way. Car inventory.

ya got 6 cars on an available-for-sale list.
your total available cars divided my inventories cars SHOULD = 1, or you got math issues.

so using that, I have a list saying I have a total of 6 cars available available for sale.
I have 2 lots, each with 1 new car, and 2 used cars.

62(1+2) = 1

?

Maybe as a word problem it's seen better.

Anything other than 1, and either my list is off, or my lot inventories are off.
Sharkonwheels is offline  
Last edited by Sharkonwheels; May 3rd, 2011 at 02:30 AM.
Reply With Quote
Old May 3rd, 2011, 02:26 AM   #144 (permalink)
The PearlyMon
 
EarlyMon's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: New Mexico, USA
Posts: 46,374
 
Device(s): M8, LTEvo, 3vo, and Shift - Evo retired
Carrier: Sprint

Thanks: 42,729
Thanked 57,186 Times in 22,978 Posts
Default

You'll settle it when you read the thread, not skim it, and stop repeating yourself.
EarlyMon is online now  
Reply With Quote
Old May 3rd, 2011, 02:38 AM   #145 (permalink)
Over Macho Grande?
 
alostpacket's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: NY
Posts: 7,920
 
Device(s): GlassXE, MotoX, N5, N4, N7'12, GNex, N1, SGT10.1, Revue, Xoom, Eris, OG Droid
Carrier: TMO

Thanks: 4,603
Thanked 3,578 Times in 1,530 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Sharkonwheels View Post
Not mathematically.
Noone's showing any math working out that

6
-----
2(1+2)

equals 9


Who knows - maybe it's NewMath


BUT!

I guarantee we'll settle this before Moto unlocks the Atrix bootloader

Because that's an incorrect representation of the original problem. You cant just move the 2+1 to the denomainator just because a 2 is multiplied to it.

That would be like saying:


1
___ = 2+1
2+1

Which is clearly wrong.

Everyone who comes up with 1 for the answer has to multiply the two next even though that isn't correct in the order of operations, because they "see" the problem in their minds as 6(2(1+2)) which puts in new parenthesis and changes the problem. Adding an x just further changes the problem by introducing a new variable heh.

I think it just come down to the fact that there were two incorrect assumtions people were making:

1) "Being next to a parenthisis has special meaning" in math.

2) or "division automatically implies everything that comes after it ends up in the denominator."

Neither of which are true.

I dont know if reading it that way helps people make any more sense of it ...but it's fun to try!
alostpacket is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old May 3rd, 2011, 02:43 AM   #146 (permalink)
Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Posts: 268
 
Device(s): Captivate
Carrier: Not Provided

Thanks: 6
Thanked 12 Times in 11 Posts
Default

I have read the thread, even followed the links, even to the one where someone links to google, and the formula gets obfuscated to (6/2)*(1+2) which is NOT the original expression...

Then there was the detour about functions...


Oh - and I STILL say this will be settled before the Atrix bootloader issue is

Can't believe there is SO MUCH about this on the net!

googling " 62(1+2)" brings up some funny stuff - and some answers wackier than 1 or 9!!!
Sharkonwheels is offline  
Last edited by Sharkonwheels; May 3rd, 2011 at 02:52 AM.
Reply With Quote
Old May 3rd, 2011, 02:52 AM   #147 (permalink)
The PearlyMon
 
EarlyMon's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: New Mexico, USA
Posts: 46,374
 
Device(s): M8, LTEvo, 3vo, and Shift - Evo retired
Carrier: Sprint

Thanks: 42,729
Thanked 57,186 Times in 22,978 Posts
Default

The expression 2(1+2) has not the special property you ascribe. The P in PEDMAS stops at the parens insides.

You got a Ph.D. in math saying it, in physics, a doctoral candidate saying it, and finally Wikipedia.

Your opinion of the evaluation is incorrect.
EarlyMon is online now  
Reply With Quote
Old May 3rd, 2011, 02:58 AM   #148 (permalink)
Member
 
n0ct3m's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: Mississippi
Posts: 419
 
Device(s): Samsung Fascinate
Carrier: Not Provided

Thanks: 9
Thanked 60 Times in 40 Posts
Send a message via AIM to n0ct3m Send a message via MSN to n0ct3m
Default

Wait, so did we settle that it was 1 or 9? My brain imploded at 62(1+2) = ?
n0ct3m is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old May 3rd, 2011, 03:08 AM   #149 (permalink)
Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Posts: 268
 
Device(s): Captivate
Carrier: Not Provided

Thanks: 6
Thanked 12 Times in 11 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by n0ct3m View Post
Wait, so did we settle that it was 1 or 9? My brain imploded at 62(1+2) = ?
I dunno - seems people are trying to imply that 2(x+y) is no longer the same as 2x+2y.

when you type that formula into google, it automagically ADDS parentheses, and THEN declares it's 9!
They translate it to
(6 2) * (1 + 2) = 9


NewMath, I tell ya.
NewMath.
Sharkonwheels is offline  
Last edited by Sharkonwheels; May 3rd, 2011 at 03:13 AM.
Reply With Quote
Old May 3rd, 2011, 03:11 AM   #150 (permalink)
The PearlyMon
 
EarlyMon's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: New Mexico, USA
Posts: 46,374
 
Device(s): M8, LTEvo, 3vo, and Shift - Evo retired
Carrier: Sprint

Thanks: 42,729
Thanked 57,186 Times in 22,978 Posts
Default

PLEASE stop trolling. Sarcasm is pointless, this has been covered.
EarlyMon is online now  
Reply With Quote
Reply


Go Back   Android Forums > Android Forums Community > The Lounge
Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 09:33 AM.
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2014, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.