Go Back   Android Forums > Android Community > The Lounge
The Lounge We're all friends here. Hang out, kick your feet up and talk about whatever the heck you want!

Get excited for the Samsung Galaxy S5! Find everything you need and discuss it in our Galaxy S5 Forum!

View Poll Results: 62(1+2) = ?
9 94 54.34%
1 77 44.51%
7 2 1.16%
Voters: 173. You may not vote on this poll

Like Tree27Likes

test: Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools
Old November 8th, 2011, 09:41 AM   #251 (permalink)
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Posts: 9,597
 
Device(s):
Carrier: Not Provided

Thanks: 1,697
Thanked 1,936 Times in 1,499 Posts
Default

what are we talkin about again?

can someone write up a summary.. cliff notes? and a short essay explaining the concept to me....

dan330 is online now  
Reply With Quote
sponsored links
Old November 8th, 2011, 10:32 AM   #252 (permalink)
Mr. Logic Pants
 
IOWA's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: Chicago
Posts: 8,822
 
Device(s): GS4 ASUS Transformer TF101 GS3
Carrier: Sprint

Thanks: 1,897
Thanked 2,341 Times in 1,207 Posts
Ask and ye shall receive!
Default

Seems like pretty basic math to me.
__________________
Useful links: The Rules | The Team | FAQ | Unanswered Threads |
IOWA is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old November 8th, 2011, 11:04 AM   #253 (permalink)
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2011
Posts: 2,924
 
Device(s):
Carrier: Not Provided

Thanks: 486
Thanked 1,868 Times in 1,300 Posts
Default

62(1+2)
The question is whether the bracket is (1+2) ends with the addition and give 62x3
or the the brackets remain and 2(3) is a separate term giving 6[2(3)].
Either way I am assuming either a multiplier or a bracket making this question redundant due to lack of information . :/



Tresezk is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old January 2nd, 2013, 01:05 PM   #254 (permalink)
New Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2013
Posts: 1
 
Device(s):
Carrier: Not Provided

Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Default

I guess I look at this problem from the reverse :

How would you write these 2 seperate problems in single line form without having the ability to make a fraction or similar character from a standard keyboard device ??


6
------
2(1+2)

6
--- (1+2)
2


I would say that the first one is: 6 / [2(1+2)]
And the second is: (6/2)(1+2)

In both instances, I had to include extra brackets to the original equation to remove any possible source of ambiguity that might come into play with differences of opinions. If you look at the 2 ways I wrote the equations, there is no chance of misinterpretation which therefore tells me the original question was written poorly and leaves room for error. Hence, this drawn out forum over such a simple issue.

My final stance, there is a possibility of 2 correct answers depending on clarification of the original equation for which expressions go where.
SnakePlissken is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old January 2nd, 2013, 08:45 PM   #255 (permalink)
Senior Member
 
Bob Maxey's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2010
Posts: 4,837
 
Device(s):
Carrier: Not Provided

Thanks: 381
Thanked 811 Times in 641 Posts
Default

Sorry, but ever since Mr. Google told me that 1+2=3.1 and 99+1+98=97, I've sworn off Internet math problems.

Next thing I will learn is the earth orbits the sun. We all know that is wrong.
Bob Maxey is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old January 2nd, 2013, 10:59 PM   #256 (permalink)
AF Contributor
 
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: Chicago, IL
Posts: 1,239
 
Device(s): SGS2- GB08, Samsung Prevail- CTMod 3.75
Carrier: Not Provided

Thanks: 153
Thanked 278 Times in 167 Posts
Default

Order of precedence.

Parentheses then mult/division then add/subtraction, left to right.

62(1+2) =

6/2*3 =

3*3 =

9

After solving the parentheses you go left to right in a simple div/mult issue, correct answer should be 9.



edit: Prolly makes it easier if you rewrite the problem as: 62*(1+2) =
MoodyBlues, pbf98 and Speed Daemon like this.
kevincott is offline  
Last edited by kevincott; January 2nd, 2013 at 11:18 PM.
Reply With Quote
Old January 3rd, 2013, 12:46 AM   #257 (permalink)
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2011
Location: Kuala Lumpur
Gender: Male
Posts: 1,384
 
Device(s): Samsung Galaxy S2, iPad 3 Samsung Galaxy S4 LTE
Carrier: Not Provided

Thanks: 15
Thanked 169 Times in 152 Posts
Default

Somebody brought a dead thread back to life... lol

Anyway... I think it depends on what you were taught in school. I was taught that it was 1 simply because in terms of order, multiplication trumps division. But for some, multiplication and division are in the same order and thus you go from left to right, which gives you 9.

So, the fault(s) lies in the school education system and the damn bloody lousy equation that is ambiguous.

Either answer is RIGHT depending on what you are taught.

AND WRONG because what you want is a definitive answer since you can do plenty damage with equations like those. I am a structural engineer. Getting those wrong can cause a building to collapse. Put in the parentheses and remove the ambiguity. That's the CORRECT answer.
jroc and davoid like this.
Russell Ng is offline  
Reply With Quote
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to Russell Ng For This Useful Post:
davoid (January 10th, 2013), jroc (January 3rd, 2013)
Old January 4th, 2013, 07:24 AM   #258 (permalink)
Member
 
MyTjSux's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: Tampa, FL
Posts: 276
 
Device(s): Droid X Droid Eris
Carrier: Not Provided

Thanks: 39
Thanked 22 Times in 19 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Russell Ng View Post
Either answer is RIGHT depending on what you are taught.

.
LOL this is the fact....while we are taught the answer is 9 (which it is) the actual number nine is a representation of a value created by man which is why the answer can also be 1 or 5 or 33 all depending on how you were taught...lol

Math is man made and while nature gives us examples of formulas and representations of (proper) math, math is in fact an idea....

i thank myself
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by thread removed
[*]
MyTjSux is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old January 4th, 2013, 10:08 AM   #259 (permalink)
The PearlyMon
 
EarlyMon's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: New Mexico, USA
Posts: 44,017
 
Device(s): LTEvo, 3vo, and Shift
Carrier: Sprint

Thanks: 41,685
Thanked 54,815 Times in 21,858 Posts
Default

Math is like fire.

You can make it, but mother nature invented it.
__________________
|

Minutus cantorum, minutus balorum, minutus carborata descendum pantorum.

Links: Site Rules / Guidelines -and- Zero Tolerance Policy (All Members Read)


For right-on help, the Thanks button is on the right of the post.
For anything out in left field, the /!\ report button is to the left.

Remember, it's our forums and we're all in this together - so let's keep it cool!

Shoot the breeze at the best new gun forum!
EarlyMon is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old January 4th, 2013, 11:56 AM   #260 (permalink)
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: CO
Gender: Male
Posts: 1,357
 
Device(s): GS3, Note 10.1
Carrier: Verizon

Thanks: 4
Thanked 129 Times in 97 Posts
Default

Unsolvable. I require my equations to lack numbers completely.

y"=f(y,y')

FTW
MoodyBlues likes this.
TJGoSurf is offline  
Reply With Quote
sponsored links
Old January 4th, 2013, 02:51 PM   #261 (permalink)
- Crazy peacock person -
 
MoodyBlues's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: echo $HOME; California
Posts: 2,779
 
Device(s): Kindle Fire HD 8.9" (rooted), Motorola Atrix 2, Motorola Atrix 4G (retired), Motorola Bravo (retired
Carrier: AT&T

Thanks: 925
Thanked 1,361 Times in 822 Posts
Default

Someone please feel free to correct me if I'm remembering this wrong--after all, it was back in 1982 that I took College Algebra.

There shouldn't be any ambiguity about this equation because you're supposed to solve the contents of parentheses first, hence we do the (1+2) to get 3. Then, since the remainder of the problem involves division and multiplication, we simply go from left to right to solve it.

We have:

6 / 2 * (1 + 2) or

(6 / 2) * (1+2) or

(6 / 2) * (3) or

(3) * (3) for an answer of 9.

Right...?
MoodyBlues is online now  
Reply With Quote
Old January 4th, 2013, 03:08 PM   #262 (permalink)
Moderator
 
jhawkkw's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: Rochester, NY
Posts: 9,363
 
Device(s): Nexus 5, HP 14 Chomebook, Google Glass, LTE Nexus 7(2013), Logitech Revue, Chromecast
Carrier: T-Mobile USA

Thanks: 2,725
Thanked 5,829 Times in 3,291 Posts
jhawkkw
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by MoodyBlues View Post
Someone please feel free to correct me if I'm remembering this wrong--after all, it was back in 1982 that I took College Algebra.

There shouldn't be any ambiguity about this equation because you're supposed to solve the contents of parentheses first, hence we do the (1+2) to get 3. Then, since the remainder of the problem involves division and multiplication, we simply go from left to right to solve it.

We have:

6 / 2 * (1 + 2) or

(6 / 2) * (1+2) or

(6 / 2) * (3) or

(3) * (3) for an answer of 9.

Right...?
Yep, you are 100 percent correct. Under standard decimal arithmetic, that is the procedure to use. Many people learn the acronym PEMDAS, or the phrase "Please Excuse My Dear Aunt Sally", and incorrectly learn or assume that multiplication has higher precedence than division. Under standard rules of arithmetic, multiplication and division have the exact same precedence and must be computed from left to right. Addition and subtraction also have the same precedence and also should be completed from left to right.

This is why when I teach this topic, I prefer to use the phrase "Please Exclude Mom or Dad As Sane". It gets a chuckle out of people and also inserts the idea that it's M or D, not M then D.
jroc and MoodyBlues like this.
__________________
Site Rules/Guidelines / Meet the Team
If something needs attention, Report it .
If someone helped you, hit to show it.

Current Devices: Nexus 5, HP 14 Chromebook (Data Enabled), Google Glass, (2013) LTE Nexus 7, Logitech Revue, Chromecast
Retired: Samsung Fascinate, Droid Charge, Galaxy Nexus, (2012) WiFi Nexus 7, Asus TF700, Nexus 4
jhawkkw is online now  
Reply With Quote
Old January 4th, 2013, 03:30 PM   #263 (permalink)
- Crazy peacock person -
 
MoodyBlues's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: echo $HOME; California
Posts: 2,779
 
Device(s): Kindle Fire HD 8.9" (rooted), Motorola Atrix 2, Motorola Atrix 4G (retired), Motorola Bravo (retired
Carrier: AT&T

Thanks: 925
Thanked 1,361 Times in 822 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by jhawkkw View Post
Yep, you are 100 percent correct. Under standard decimal arithmetic, that is the procedure to use. Many people learn the acronym PEMDAS, or the phrase "Please Excuse My Dear Aunt Sally", and incorrectly learn or assume that multiplication has higher precedence than division. Under standard rules of arithmetic, multiplication and division have the exact same precedence and must be computed from left to right. Addition and subtraction also have the same precedence and also should be completed from left to right.
Yes, that's exactly how I do it.

Quote:
This is why when I teach this topic, I prefer to use the phrase "Please Exclude Mom or Dad As Sane". It gets a chuckle out of people and also inserts the idea that it's M or D, not M then D.
I like that.

I wish my dad (actually my father-in-law) was still around. He died two years ago. He was a college math professor and I'd LOVE to ask him about this.

At any rate, when I solved it, I just pictured myself back in class taking an exam, and it seemed clear as day how to solve it. But, as I said, it was actually 1982 when I was in that particular class, so maybe I was just remembering wrong.
MoodyBlues is online now  
Reply With Quote
Old January 5th, 2013, 03:09 PM   #264 (permalink)
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Posts: 2,615
 
Device(s): Droid X1, Droid 1, RAZR, Rezound, Maxx HD
Carrier: Not Provided

Thanks: 4,170
Thanked 361 Times in 280 Posts
Default

You know what got me? I was under the impression in PEMDAS "Multiplication or division, which ever comes first" meant what I had to use first to get rid of the parenthesis. Was never taught left to right. Maybe they meant that when they said which ever comes first. And the parenthesis as still there....so I multiplied to get rid of it.

62(1+2) =
62(3) =
3*3 =
9

62(1+2) =
62(3) =
66 =
1

I was hung up on getting rid of the parenthesis. Its the first rule of PEMDAS!!!! lol.
__________________
The ultimate measure of a man is not where he stands in moments of comfort and convenience, but where he stands at times of challenge and controversy.

MLK, Jr.
jroc is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old January 5th, 2013, 09:48 PM   #265 (permalink)
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2010
Posts: 556
 
Device(s):
Carrier: Not Provided

Thanks: 11
Thanked 56 Times in 51 Posts
Default

(For the record, I am of the opinion 6/2(3) = 1 is the correct answer)
funpig is offline  
Last edited by scary alien; January 6th, 2013 at 05:23 PM. Reason: redact off-topic content
Reply With Quote
Old January 6th, 2013, 02:47 PM   #266 (permalink)
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2010
Posts: 556
 
Device(s):
Carrier: Not Provided

Thanks: 11
Thanked 56 Times in 51 Posts
Default

a b = c

a = dividend or numerator, or 6

b = divisor or denominator, 2(1+3) or 6

c = quotient, 6/6 or 1

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Division_(mathematics)
funpig is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old January 6th, 2013, 02:51 PM   #267 (permalink)
Moderator
 
jhawkkw's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: Rochester, NY
Posts: 9,363
 
Device(s): Nexus 5, HP 14 Chomebook, Google Glass, LTE Nexus 7(2013), Logitech Revue, Chromecast
Carrier: T-Mobile USA

Thanks: 2,725
Thanked 5,829 Times in 3,291 Posts
jhawkkw
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by funpig View Post
a b = c

a = dividend or numerator, or 6

b = divisor or denominator, 2(1+3) or 6

c = quotient, 6/6 or 1

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Division_(mathematics)
That would be true if 2(1+3) was the denominator. However the actual denominator is only the 2. making it {6/2}(1+3). Trust the professor
jhawkkw is online now  
Reply With Quote
Old January 6th, 2013, 02:58 PM   #268 (permalink)
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2010
Posts: 556
 
Device(s):
Carrier: Not Provided

Thanks: 11
Thanked 56 Times in 51 Posts
Default

62(1+2) is not the same as {62}(1+2).

In order to get 9, you need to add the brackets {parentheses} in the latter equation which were not in the original question. If you start implying {} in different parts of the equations, you will get different answers.

FYI, up in Canada, we use the acronym BEDMAS (not that that makes any difference)
funpig is offline  
Last edited by funpig; January 6th, 2013 at 03:03 PM.
Reply With Quote
Old January 6th, 2013, 03:06 PM   #269 (permalink)
Moderator
 
jhawkkw's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: Rochester, NY
Posts: 9,363
 
Device(s): Nexus 5, HP 14 Chomebook, Google Glass, LTE Nexus 7(2013), Logitech Revue, Chromecast
Carrier: T-Mobile USA

Thanks: 2,725
Thanked 5,829 Times in 3,291 Posts
jhawkkw
Default

I used the {} to signify a fraction, not as an extra pair of parenthesis. By mathematic definition, an operation is a function that takes 2 numbers in a specific order and yields one result. An operation can be delayed by the of parenthesis BEFORE the second number. Since the 2 is not wrapped in parenthesis, it is part of the division and since division and multiplication have equal precedence according to the order of operations, it would be done before the multiplication. there's no denying that the first operation done is the addition because of the parenthesis. Since there is no exponents, that brings us to multiplication AND division. They have EQUAL precedence, therefore it is computed from left to right. 6/2 =3, then 3*3 is 9.
MoodyBlues likes this.
jhawkkw is online now  
Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to jhawkkw For This Useful Post:
MoodyBlues (January 6th, 2013)
Old January 6th, 2013, 03:14 PM   #270 (permalink)
Moderator
 
jhawkkw's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: Rochester, NY
Posts: 9,363
 
Device(s): Nexus 5, HP 14 Chomebook, Google Glass, LTE Nexus 7(2013), Logitech Revue, Chromecast
Carrier: T-Mobile USA

Thanks: 2,725
Thanked 5,829 Times in 3,291 Posts
jhawkkw
Default

Another thing that might help people see that the answer is 9, is that the definition of division is the first number times the multiplicative inverse(aka reciprocal) of the second number. If using this definition, then after the parenthesis, the expression would change to 6*{1/2} * 3 or 6*.5*3.
jhawkkw is online now  
Reply With Quote
sponsored links
Old January 6th, 2013, 03:47 PM   #271 (permalink)
- Crazy peacock person -
 
MoodyBlues's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: echo $HOME; California
Posts: 2,779
 
Device(s): Kindle Fire HD 8.9" (rooted), Motorola Atrix 2, Motorola Atrix 4G (retired), Motorola Bravo (retired
Carrier: AT&T

Thanks: 925
Thanked 1,361 Times in 822 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by funpig View Post
(For the record, I am of the opinion 6/2(3) = 1 is the correct answer)
But it's not.

And I voted for 9--because it's the correct answer.
MoodyBlues is online now  
Last edited by scary alien; January 6th, 2013 at 05:24 PM. Reason: topic is math--not other stuff, thanks!
Reply With Quote
Old January 6th, 2013, 04:15 PM   #272 (permalink)
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2010
Posts: 556
 
Device(s):
Carrier: Not Provided

Thanks: 11
Thanked 56 Times in 51 Posts
Default

jhawkkw, it appears you are correct.

Intuitively (and incorrectly), I interpreted the "" so the question appears as 6 over (2 times 3).

6
2(3)

I sourced an 1898 math reference over the internet which specifically says a b x c should be interpreted as (a b) x c. So the answer would be 9.

I am too old for this to make any difference other than looking dumb on the internet, but I am going to have to go over this with my kids. I could see this as some admissions test, and judging from poll results, almost half of us get it wrong.
funpig is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old January 6th, 2013, 04:20 PM   #273 (permalink)
Moderator
 
jhawkkw's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: Rochester, NY
Posts: 9,363
 
Device(s): Nexus 5, HP 14 Chomebook, Google Glass, LTE Nexus 7(2013), Logitech Revue, Chromecast
Carrier: T-Mobile USA

Thanks: 2,725
Thanked 5,829 Times in 3,291 Posts
jhawkkw
Default

It's a common thing that I see, I even saw this question pop up in a picture on facebook with the claim that 93% get it wrong. I don't know how true that is, but I know that order of operations questions are quite popular. I personally feel that mathematics is poorly taught to students because a large number of those that are really good with math can make bigger money elsewhere, leaving numerous secondary and primary math teachers that aren't on the same level. Here in NY, you need to have a masters degree to teach, and the starting pay is horrible. I don't know many people that would be thrilled with going to college for 6 years to start with a salary of 37,500
jhawkkw is online now  
Reply With Quote
Old January 6th, 2013, 11:08 PM   #274 (permalink)
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Posts: 9,597
 
Device(s):
Carrier: Not Provided

Thanks: 1,697
Thanked 1,936 Times in 1,499 Posts
Default

wow.. this thread got a new round.. of the same as before..
dan330 is online now  
Reply With Quote
Old January 7th, 2013, 01:53 AM   #275 (permalink)
Senior Member
 
CafeKampuchia's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2011
Location: Pursat, Cambodia
Gender: Male
Posts: 1,657
 
Device(s): Samsung Galaxy Note 8.0, Samsung Galaxy S4 i9500, Google Nexus 7 16GB Samsung Galaxy S4 Mini Duos
Carrier: CellCard & Metfone

Thanks: 1,110
Thanked 1,117 Times in 557 Posts
Default

Why all the discussion? Everyone knows that the right answer is


jhawkkw and davoid like this.
__________________
Don't just say thanks, click Thanks
Guess what's coming on April 23rd... Click here to find out.
Android Forums Site Rules/Guidelines

Please don't send me PMs with support questions. That's what the forum is for
CafeKampuchia is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old January 7th, 2013, 02:46 PM   #276 (permalink)
huh
Senior Member
 
huh's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2012
Location: in total denial
Gender: Female
Posts: 2,789
 
Device(s):
Carrier: carry this

Thanks: 499
Thanked 1,040 Times in 839 Posts
yes
Default

seriously? I am by no means a math whiz.. in fact I consider myself somewhat mathematically challenged....In fact I almost doubted myself because it seemed too easy.....
the answer is 9


1+2=3
*always do the equation in parenthesis first
6 divided by 2 =3
*if there is nothing between the two numbers always multiply
3x3=9
so the answer is 9 pieces of bacon!!!LOL
huh is offline  
Last edited by huh; January 7th, 2013 at 02:57 PM.
Reply With Quote
Old January 7th, 2013, 04:21 PM   #277 (permalink)
Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: Kansas
Posts: 241
 
Device(s): Galaxy Note 3 (black)
Carrier: TMobile

Thanks: 9
Thanked 55 Times in 44 Posts
Default

The author mentions a word puzzle, but the problem in this thread also applies:

big_z is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old January 8th, 2013, 02:47 PM   #278 (permalink)
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: England,UK
Gender: Male
Posts: 2,384
 
Device(s): HTC Desire HD ( Running CM 10.1 ) HTC Sensation (Running CM10.1)
Carrier: Three

Thanks: 808
Thanked 283 Times in 220 Posts
Default

I'm really confused. Language doesn't end in gry?
Mehta23 is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old January 10th, 2013, 07:50 AM   #279 (permalink)
huh
Senior Member
 
huh's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2012
Location: in total denial
Gender: Female
Posts: 2,789
 
Device(s):
Carrier: carry this

Thanks: 499
Thanked 1,040 Times in 839 Posts
yes
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Mehta23 View Post
I'm really confused. Language doesn't end in gry?
"There are three words in the english language".....

The English Language = three words
huh is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old January 10th, 2013, 01:52 PM   #280 (permalink)
- Crazy peacock person -
 
MoodyBlues's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: echo $HOME; California
Posts: 2,779
 
Device(s): Kindle Fire HD 8.9" (rooted), Motorola Atrix 2, Motorola Atrix 4G (retired), Motorola Bravo (retired
Carrier: AT&T

Thanks: 925
Thanked 1,361 Times in 822 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by huh View Post
"There are three words in the english language".....

The English Language = three words
But you've left out the rest of the sentence, and the rest of the paragraph, therefore your solution doesn't make sense.

Here's what's said:

Quote:
There are three words in the English language that end in "gry." "Angry" and "hungry" are two. What's the third?
So the statement is that there are "three words in the English language that end in 'gry.'" Not "there are three words in 'the English language.'" And the question being asked refers to the three words that end in "gry"--"Angry" and "hungry" are two. What's the third?

Unless I'm having a major brain fart (and that's ENTIRELY possible!), it just doesn't make sense.
MoodyBlues is online now  
Reply With Quote
sponsored links
Old January 10th, 2013, 02:33 PM   #281 (permalink)
huh
Senior Member
 
huh's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2012
Location: in total denial
Gender: Female
Posts: 2,789
 
Device(s):
Carrier: carry this

Thanks: 499
Thanked 1,040 Times in 839 Posts
yes
Default

I agree!!. It made No logical sense to me either!

I was trying to figure it out and I thought that must be what he meant?
and mehta was confused too so I posted in my two cents

I think that's what he meant.. and it makes no sense at all


hmmmm..
huh is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old January 10th, 2013, 02:39 PM   #282 (permalink)
Moderator
 
jhawkkw's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: Rochester, NY
Posts: 9,363
 
Device(s): Nexus 5, HP 14 Chomebook, Google Glass, LTE Nexus 7(2013), Logitech Revue, Chromecast
Carrier: T-Mobile USA

Thanks: 2,725
Thanked 5,829 Times in 3,291 Posts
jhawkkw
Default

I believe it has something to do with the original math question allegedly having ambiguity, which is what I think the cartoon makes a reference to. I could be totally wrong as well.
jhawkkw is online now  
Reply With Quote
Old January 10th, 2013, 04:02 PM   #283 (permalink)
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2010
Posts: 556
 
Device(s):
Carrier: Not Provided

Thanks: 11
Thanked 56 Times in 51 Posts
Default

Gry Riddle: Words that End in Gry
MoodyBlues likes this.
funpig is offline  
Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to funpig For This Useful Post:
jhawkkw (January 10th, 2013)
Old January 10th, 2013, 04:13 PM   #284 (permalink)
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2010
Posts: 556
 
Device(s):
Carrier: Not Provided

Thanks: 11
Thanked 56 Times in 51 Posts
Default

Hey jhawkkw, is answer still same if question was written 6/2(3)?
funpig is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old January 10th, 2013, 04:28 PM   #285 (permalink)
Moderator
 
jhawkkw's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: Rochester, NY
Posts: 9,363
 
Device(s): Nexus 5, HP 14 Chomebook, Google Glass, LTE Nexus 7(2013), Logitech Revue, Chromecast
Carrier: T-Mobile USA

Thanks: 2,725
Thanked 5,829 Times in 3,291 Posts
jhawkkw
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by funpig View Post
Hey jhawkkw, is answer still same if question was written 6/2(3)?
Yes, the answer is still 9. The parenthesis part of PEMDAS means an operation within parenthesis. Since only the 3 is inside the () and no operation, that step is done. No exponents, so that is skipped. The multiplication is outside the (), and since multiplication and division have equal precedence, you do them in the order they occur from left to right.
MoodyBlues likes this.
jhawkkw is online now  
Reply With Quote
Old January 10th, 2013, 05:10 PM   #286 (permalink)
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2010
Posts: 556
 
Device(s):
Carrier: Not Provided

Thanks: 11
Thanked 56 Times in 51 Posts
Default

Thanks. I just have to accept the mathematical convention, but it sure looks funny in my mind's eye, like an optical illusion. I can still see my self mixing up 1/2n as 1/(2n) as opposed to (1/2)n. Good thing I am not an engineer or bridges would be falling down all over the place.
funpig is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old January 10th, 2013, 06:03 PM   #287 (permalink)
Senior Member
 
davoid's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: London
Posts: 1,640
 
Device(s): Galaxy SIII
Carrier: 3UK

Thanks: 610
Thanked 568 Times in 432 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by novox77 View Post
Order of operations - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Scroll down to "Gaps in the Standard."

What this section states (or implies) is that if you try to interpret 62(1+2) strictly by the HUMAN-MADE order of operations, it is ambiguous. The system is not perfect. There are gaps where additional parens are needed to remove ambiguity. But as long as ambiguity exists, it can go multiple ways.

Of course the problem is, most people don't believe that it's ambiguous; they think there must be a correct answer and that their interpretation of PEDMAS is absolutely correct. And in both directions, it's a correct interpretation. That is the definition of ambiguous. That's the reason people are split 50/50 no matter where this question is posed.

It doesn't matter how many PhDs you have and in what field. I'm sure there are super-intellects on both camps. The right answer is: don't expect a consensus until you add parentheses to the original problem to make it unambiguous. The problem was designed to exploit the gap in the order of operations.
Quote:
Originally Posted by XplosiV View Post
It seems to me that the answer is somewhat split between the simple folk and the math geeks. Ask anyone in the street and they will probably solve the question using left to right. where as ask anyone with some kind of higher education in math, and they will probably use the math parenthesis. Theres not a lot of point 'simplifying' the problem, the problem 'as is' done by a mathematician, using the common laws of math, will simply answer it as 1.

Who can tell me the highest number, that when written in the queens English, consists of only three words?

(IE 110 = one hundred and ten, 4 words)
I voted for 1.

Although I follow and appreciate all the 9 explanations, I think the above posts nicely explain why we are ALL RIGHT.

For me in particular I would be more inclined to accept 9 if the problem had been set out as 62x(2+1) instead of 62(2+1)

But because the 2 is adjacent to the parenthesis it looks like they are connected in a more intimate and therefore immediate way than are the 6 and 2.

As another post pointed out, 6(2+1)2 would be more obviously 9 than would 62(2+1), because 2(2+1) appears to be (2*2) + (2*1)

In a democracy we might say that the answer with the most votes is the correct one, but we might be wrong... it is only the accepted one

Without the additional parenthesis to clear up the ambiguity it is as clear as saying "I helped my uncle jack off his horse" without adding the necessary capitals

And my guess at XplosiV's puzzle (after his clarification that he meant the smallest number) is... one half dozen
davoid is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old January 10th, 2013, 06:30 PM   #288 (permalink)
- Crazy peacock person -
 
MoodyBlues's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: echo $HOME; California
Posts: 2,779
 
Device(s): Kindle Fire HD 8.9" (rooted), Motorola Atrix 2, Motorola Atrix 4G (retired), Motorola Bravo (retired
Carrier: AT&T

Thanks: 925
Thanked 1,361 Times in 822 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by davoid View Post
I voted for 1.

Although I follow and appreciate all the 9 explanations, I think the above posts nicely explain why we are ALL RIGHT.
Sorry, but math doesn't work that way.

Quote:
For me in particular I would be more inclined to accept 9 if the problem had been set out as 62x(2+1) instead of 62(2+1)
How it LOOKS has no bearing on how it's supposed to be solved according to mathematical rules. Those rules have been stated in previous posts, including mine, so I won't bother repeating them.

Quote:
But because the 2 is adjacent to the parenthesis it looks like they are connected in a more intimate and therefore immediate way than are the 6 and 2.

As another post pointed out, 6(2+1)2 would be more obviously 9 than would 62(2+1), because 2(2+1) appears to be (2*2) + (2*1)
Again, none of that matters. How it looks doesn't determine how it's solved. That's based on rules of math.

Quote:
Without the additional parenthesis to clear up the ambiguity it is as clear as saying "I helped my uncle jack off his horse" without adding the necessary capitals
That's a funny analogy...but not an accurate one. Unlike written English, where things like capitalization matter in how a sentence is interpreted, math doesn't work that way.
jhawkkw likes this.
MoodyBlues is online now  
Reply With Quote
Old January 10th, 2013, 06:37 PM   #289 (permalink)
Moderator
 
jhawkkw's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: Rochester, NY
Posts: 9,363
 
Device(s): Nexus 5, HP 14 Chomebook, Google Glass, LTE Nexus 7(2013), Logitech Revue, Chromecast
Carrier: T-Mobile USA

Thanks: 2,725
Thanked 5,829 Times in 3,291 Posts
jhawkkw
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by davoid View Post
I voted for 1.

Although I follow and appreciate all the 9 explanations, I think the above posts nicely explain why we are ALL RIGHT.

For me in particular I would be more inclined to accept 9 if the problem had been set out as 62x(2+1) instead of 62(2+1)

But because the 2 is adjacent to the parenthesis it looks like they are connected in a more intimate and therefore immediate way than are the 6 and 2.

As another post pointed out, 6(2+1)2 would be more obviously 9 than would 62(2+1), because 2(2+1) appears to be (2*2) + (2*1)

In a democracy we might say that the answer with the most votes is the correct one, but we might be wrong... it is only the accepted one

Without the additional parenthesis to clear up the ambiguity it is as clear as saying "I helped my uncle jack off his horse" without adding the necessary capitals

And my guess at XplosiV's puzzle (after his clarification that he meant the smallest number) is... one half dozen
Well, I teach math at the college level so I guess that contradicts XplosiV's idea that mathematicians would vote 1. These math question threads that pop up continue to convey the idea that mathematics is something you can opinionate, and is not absolute fact. If I add 3 apples to 5 apples, you get 8. Not 2, not 10, but 8. The laws of mathematics are absolute and breaking them results in contradictions. An example is one of the many division by zero fallacies. I'll show this one as an example:

let a=b,
by multiplying both sides by a, you would get a^2 = ab.
subtract b^2 from both sides yields a^2-b^2 = ab - b^2.
factoring using the difference of squares on the left side, and the common factor of b on the right side yields (a+b)(a-b)=b(a-b).
dividing (a-b) on both sides yields a+b = b.
since a=b, making the substitution yields b+b or 2b = b.
finally, dividing both sides by b yields a final result of 2=1, which is clearly not correct. This is because of the division of (a-b) because that is equal to zero. Division by 0 isn't allowed under standard mathematical arithmetic, which causes the contradiction of 2=1.

62x(2+1) is identical to 62(2+1) under the standard rules of arithmetic. One of the topics one would encounter in the 4th year of a bachelor's in mathematics called modern/abstract alegrba, is a course where you investigate operations at it's absolute core. Addition and multiplication form an abelian ring, otherwise known as a field, on the set of real numbers. Subtraction and division is nothing more than addition and multiplication respectively by use of it's corresponding inverse. For example, 3-5 = 3 + -5; as well as 6 2 = 6 * (1/2) (<--one half). Using this idea, you can change the original problem: 62(1+2) to 6*(1/2)*(1+2). Using PEMDAS normally, you would get 6*(1/2)*3. Performing the multiplication, 6*(1/2) gives you 3, and then 3*3 gives you 9.
MoodyBlues likes this.
jhawkkw is online now  
Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to jhawkkw For This Useful Post:
MoodyBlues (January 10th, 2013)
Old January 10th, 2013, 07:04 PM   #290 (permalink)
Senior Member
 
davoid's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: London
Posts: 1,640
 
Device(s): Galaxy SIII
Carrier: 3UK

Thanks: 610
Thanked 568 Times in 432 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by jhawkkw View Post
Well, I teach math at the college level so I guess that contradicts XplosiV's idea that mathematicians would vote 1. These math question threads that pop up continue to convey the idea that mathematics is something you can opinionate, and is not absolute fact. If I add 3 apples to 5 apples, you get 8. Not 2, not 10, but 8. The laws of mathematics are absolute and breaking them results in contradictions. An example is one of the many division by zero fallacies. I'll show this one as an example:

let a=b,
by multiplying both sides by a, you would get a^2 = ab.
subtract b^2 from both sides yields a^2-b^2 = ab - b^2.
factoring using the difference of squares on the left side, and the common factor of b on the right side yields (a+b)(a-b)=b(a-b).
dividing (a-b) on both sides yields a+b = b.
since a=b, making the substitution yields b+b or 2b = b.
finally, dividing both sides by b yields a final result of 2=1, which is clearly not correct. This is because of the division of (a-b) because that is equal to zero. Division by 0 isn't allowed under standard mathematical arithmetic, which causes the contradiction of 2=1.

62x(2+1) is identical to 62(2+1) under the standard rules of arithmetic. One of the topics one would encounter in the 4th year of a bachelor's in mathematics called modern/abstract alegrba, is a course where you investigate operations at it's absolute core. Addition and multiplication form an abelian ring, otherwise known as a field, on the set of real numbers. Subtraction and division is nothing more than addition and multiplication respectively by use of it's corresponding inverse. For example, 3-5 = 3 + -5; as well as 6 2 = 6 * (1/2) (<--one half). Using this idea, you can change the original problem: 62(1+2) to 6*(1/2)*(1+2). Using PEMDAS normally, you would get 6*(1/2)*3. Performing the multiplication, 6*(1/2) gives you 3, and then 3*3 gives you 9.
I do follow that but I guess I agree with XplosiV because I studied electronic engineering at uni (a long time ago) and my maths is ok but I did see the 2(2+1) as having operational priority, placing the product in the denominator. I guess I didn't read it as a computer algorithm would interpret it but tackled the parenthesis and its immediate product first. I'm not claiming I'm right, just that the presentation of the problem invites alternative interpretations due to ambiguity.

I like this thread.
davoid is offline  
Reply With Quote
sponsored links
Old January 10th, 2013, 07:08 PM   #291 (permalink)
Moderator
 
jhawkkw's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: Rochester, NY
Posts: 9,363
 
Device(s): Nexus 5, HP 14 Chomebook, Google Glass, LTE Nexus 7(2013), Logitech Revue, Chromecast
Carrier: T-Mobile USA

Thanks: 2,725
Thanked 5,829 Times in 3,291 Posts
jhawkkw
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by davoid View Post
I do follow that but I guess I agree with XplosiV because I studied electronic engineering at uni (a long time ago) and my maths is ok but I did see the 2(2+1) as having operational priority, placing the product in the denominator. I guess I didn't read it as a computer algorithm would interpret it but tackled the parenthesis and its immediate product first. I'm not claiming I'm right, just that the presentation of the problem invites alternative interpretations due to ambiguity.

I like this thread.
Indeed. There is no doubt that because of the way one types(all on one line), versus hand writes, there is inherent ambiguity. Maybe the author of this thread intended it to be that way to cause the debate, maybe not. It certainly has spurred some.
jhawkkw is online now  
Reply With Quote
Old January 10th, 2013, 07:21 PM   #292 (permalink)
Senior Member
 
davoid's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: London
Posts: 1,640
 
Device(s): Galaxy SIII
Carrier: 3UK

Thanks: 610
Thanked 568 Times in 432 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by jhawkkw View Post
Indeed. There is no doubt that because of the way one types(all on one line), versus hand writes, there is inherent ambiguity. Maybe the author of this thread intended it to be that way to cause the debate, maybe not. It certainly has spurred some.
It certainly has.

I read through the whole thread and I don't know how it got reprized but I'm glad it did and I can see it continuing for a good while.

It took me a long while to reconcile myself to the probability that I might have chosen the wrong answer. Lots of hedging there; I still can't accept it completely
davoid is offline  
Last edited by davoid; January 10th, 2013 at 07:25 PM.
Reply With Quote
Old January 10th, 2013, 07:34 PM   #293 (permalink)
- Crazy peacock person -
 
MoodyBlues's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: echo $HOME; California
Posts: 2,779
 
Device(s): Kindle Fire HD 8.9" (rooted), Motorola Atrix 2, Motorola Atrix 4G (retired), Motorola Bravo (retired
Carrier: AT&T

Thanks: 925
Thanked 1,361 Times in 822 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by davoid View Post
I do follow that but I guess I agree with XplosiV because I studied electronic engineering at uni (a long time ago) and my maths is ok but I did see the 2(2+1) as having operational priority, placing the product in the denominator. I guess I didn't read it as a computer algorithm would interpret it but tackled the parenthesis and its immediate product first. I'm not claiming I'm right, just that the presentation of the problem invites alternative interpretations due to ambiguity.
But, as I see it, there is no ambiguity. There's only PERCEIVED ambiguity by people who don't understand how math problems are supposed to be solved!
MoodyBlues is online now  
Reply With Quote
Old January 10th, 2013, 08:53 PM   #294 (permalink)
Senior Member
 
davoid's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: London
Posts: 1,640
 
Device(s): Galaxy SIII
Carrier: 3UK

Thanks: 610
Thanked 568 Times in 432 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by MoodyBlues View Post
But, as I see it, there is no ambiguity. There's only PERCEIVED ambiguity by people who don't understand how math problems are supposed to be solved!
Or there's only perceived ambiguity by people who do understand how maths problems are supposed to be written?

As jhawkkw, who teaches maths at college level, says in his post above:

Quote:
Originally Posted by jhawkkw View Post
There is no doubt that because of the way one types(all on one line), versus hand writes, there is inherent ambiguity.
The ambiguity is caused because maths problems are not usually written in one typed line as the OP provided. That is more akin to a line of computer code, and the way a computer interprets a line of code is not the same as the way a hand written maths equation is usually solved. But to complicate matters, a line of code would not usually have the 2 immediately in front of the parenthesis without an asterisk * to indicate multiplication. The problem 62(2+1) = ? is not a syntax you would come across either in maths or programming. In maths, the 6 would be drawn over the 2, and in code there would be an asterisk present.
davoid is offline  
Last edited by davoid; January 10th, 2013 at 09:09 PM.
Reply With Quote
Old January 10th, 2013, 08:58 PM   #295 (permalink)
huh
Senior Member
 
huh's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2012
Location: in total denial
Gender: Female
Posts: 2,789
 
Device(s):
Carrier: carry this

Thanks: 499
Thanked 1,040 Times in 839 Posts
yes
Default

there is no relativity in math. it is constant and predictable..the answer is 9
there is no other correct answer or interpretation
it is exactly the same as 1+1=2
2 is ..and always will be... the only outcome...
the original equation is not written ambiguously it is the standard in mathematics
I think the point of the whole thing is to draw attention to the fact that a simple middle school math problem is difficult and confusing for many and it shouldn't be..so it's a fail on the state of math and education.... ...those dern kids...get off my lawn !



.
huh is offline  
Last edited by huh; January 10th, 2013 at 09:10 PM.
Reply With Quote
Old January 10th, 2013, 09:32 PM   #296 (permalink)
Senior Member
 
davoid's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: London
Posts: 1,640
 
Device(s): Galaxy SIII
Carrier: 3UK

Thanks: 610
Thanked 568 Times in 432 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by huh View Post
the original equation is not written ambiguously it is the standard in mathematics.
I don't believe it's the standard in mathematics to use a "" symbol

6
--- x (2+1)
2

That would be a standard equation in mathematics, not a linear formula using a symbol. And that would not have been ambiguous.

And if the linear formula is to be calculated following a linear order similar to the interpretation of computer code, it shouldn't have the form 2(2+1) from mathematics, but the form 2*(2+1) from programming.

I believe the original problem was designed to be ambiguous
davoid is offline  
Last edited by davoid; January 10th, 2013 at 09:35 PM.
Reply With Quote
Old January 10th, 2013, 09:49 PM   #297 (permalink)
huh
Senior Member
 
huh's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2012
Location: in total denial
Gender: Female
Posts: 2,789
 
Device(s):
Carrier: carry this

Thanks: 499
Thanked 1,040 Times in 839 Posts
yes
Default

yikes!! I was just coming back on to say I think thatI may have sounded all stiff and snooty and maybe even a little b I didnt mean it that way.. in fact I don't even like math!!
huh is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old January 10th, 2013, 09:50 PM   #298 (permalink)
huh
Senior Member
 
huh's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2012
Location: in total denial
Gender: Female
Posts: 2,789
 
Device(s):
Carrier: carry this

Thanks: 499
Thanked 1,040 Times in 839 Posts
yes
Default

shoot! Ninja'd!!!!
huh is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old January 10th, 2013, 09:58 PM   #299 (permalink)
- Crazy peacock person -
 
MoodyBlues's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: echo $HOME; California
Posts: 2,779
 
Device(s): Kindle Fire HD 8.9" (rooted), Motorola Atrix 2, Motorola Atrix 4G (retired), Motorola Bravo (retired
Carrier: AT&T

Thanks: 925
Thanked 1,361 Times in 822 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by davoid View Post
I don't believe it's the standard in mathematics to use a "" symbol
Then why does it exist?

Quote:
6
--- x (2+1)
2

That would be a standard equation in mathematics, not a linear formula using a symbol.
The 'order of operations' handles linear formulas just fine.

Quote:
And that would not have been ambiguous.
Neither is the way it was written in this thread.

Quote:
And if the linear formula is to be calculated following a linear order similar to the interpretation of computer code, it shouldn't have the form 2(2+1) from mathematics, but the form 2*(2+1) from programming.
But then it wouldn't be a MATH problem. MATH problems are solved according to MATHEMATIC rules. I've been both a math whiz and a programming whiz, and I'm FINE with this!

Quote:
I believe the original problem was designed to be ambiguous
Only to people who don't understand math's rules.

Quote:
The ambiguity is caused because maths problems are not usually written in one typed line as the OP provided.
Again, it doesn't matter HOW it's written, solving it is based purely on the rules of math.

Quote:
The problem 62(2+1) = ? is not a syntax you would come across either in maths
Sure it is. Even I--some 30 years out from College Algebra--knew exactly how to solve it. It's not that unusual to see something written like that.

Quote:
Or there's only perceived ambiguity by people who do understand how maths problems are supposed to be written?
Hey, I said "as I see it"!
MoodyBlues is online now  
Reply With Quote
Old January 10th, 2013, 11:17 PM   #300 (permalink)
Psychotic Female
 
Petrah's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: Hanover Park, IL
Gender: Female
Posts: 4,080
 
Device(s): GE Galaxy S4 CM 11 | GSM Galaxy Nexus CM 11 | G-Note 10.1 2014
Carrier: T-Mobile USA

Thanks: 1,152
Thanked 1,437 Times in 925 Posts
Default

I slept in math, so used Google Now to do it for me.
__________________
Forum Rules & Guidelines & Zero Tolerance Policy
Agree with a post? Hit Like! Someone help you? Hit Thanks!
See a naughty post or a thread in the wrong area? Hit Report!
Petrah is offline  
Reply With Quote
Reply


Go Back   Android Forums > Android Community > The Lounge
Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 03:25 PM.
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2014, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.