Go Back   Android Forums > Android Forums Community > The Lounge
The Lounge We're all friends here. Hang out, kick your feet up and talk about whatever the heck you want!

View Poll Results: 62(1+2) = ?
9 94 54.34%
1 77 44.51%
7 2 1.16%
Voters: 173. You may not vote on this poll

Like Tree27Likes

test: Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools
Old April 28th, 2011, 03:44 AM   #1 (permalink)
Destroying Balls Everyday
Thread Author (OP)
 
Vihzel's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: Manhattan, NY
Posts: 5,369
 
Device(s): Galaxy Nexus
Carrier: Not Provided

Thanks: 190
Thanked 1,061 Times in 673 Posts
Default 62(1+2) = ?

Welcome to one of the easiest algebraic equations in the world!... or is it? MUAHAHAHAHA!

Can you solve this pesky little problem while also giving damning evidence that the other 2 can not possibly work?

YOU MUST CHOOSE ONE AND ONLY ONE!

Calculations:

62(1+2) =
62(3) =
3*3 =
9

62(1+2) =
62(3) =
66 =
1

62(1+2) =
62+4 =
3+4 =
7

ADDED: Those calculations are simply thought processes for each possible answer. I am aware that there may or may not be something missing that could help clarify, but I am leaving it up to you to figure it out.

Advertisements
Vihzel is offline  
Last edited by Vihzel; April 28th, 2011 at 05:17 AM.
Reply With Quote
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to Vihzel For This Useful Post:
alostpacket (April 28th, 2011), Stinky Stinky (April 28th, 2011)
sponsored links
Old April 28th, 2011, 04:05 AM   #2 (permalink)
Senior Member
 
Bob Maxey's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2010
Posts: 4,837
 
Device(s):
Carrier: Not Provided

Thanks: 381
Thanked 811 Times in 641 Posts
Default

LOL . . . the debate continues.

Actually, I once used a similar problem in HP ICT Training. In my case, it was this one: 1 + 2 x 3 = ?

Some said 9, some said 7. Oddly, when I expressed it the following way, time to solve was longer: 1.0 + 2.00 x 3.000 = ___

The answer to your question is 8.96. Also, make the responders prove their answer.

Since I am a world champion thread hijacker, I'll ask the gathered group to give the next number in this series and explain their guess.

1,1,1,2,1 _____

Bob

PEMDAS!

Nuff Said

If you are bored, try these math problems.

Unsolved Problems -- from Wolfram MathWorld

Bob
Bob Maxey is offline  
Last edited by Vihzel; April 28th, 2011 at 04:19 AM.
Reply With Quote
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to Bob Maxey For This Useful Post:
jroc (April 28th, 2011), Stinky Stinky (April 28th, 2011)
Old April 28th, 2011, 04:25 AM   #3 (permalink)
Senior Member
 
Usta's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: The Netherlands
Posts: 2,585
 
Device(s): SGS II I9100
Carrier: Not Provided

Thanks: 127
Thanked 1,360 Times in 331 Posts
Default

@Vihzel,
Can I have a voting option: Both "9" and "1"?
Usta is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old April 28th, 2011, 04:38 AM   #4 (permalink)
Member
 
Abdur's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2010
Posts: 252
 
Device(s): HTC Desire Rooted S-off dGB with custom HBOOT
Carrier: Not Provided

Thanks: 231
Thanked 35 Times in 28 Posts
Default

If you use the order of operations, Brackets comes before all :P Therefore 9 would be the correct answer
(Either 9 or 1 :P )
__________________
Feel free to thank people if you like their post.

This is true speed.



Abdur is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old April 28th, 2011, 05:15 AM   #5 (permalink)
Destroying Balls Everyday
Thread Author (OP)
 
Vihzel's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: Manhattan, NY
Posts: 5,369
 
Device(s): Galaxy Nexus
Carrier: Not Provided

Thanks: 190
Thanked 1,061 Times in 673 Posts
Default

You have to make a decision simply based on the equation given in the title. Imagine as if you had that on a test. Better be careful.

An equivalent problem was posted on a physics forum with two answers essentially at 50/50.
Vihzel is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old April 28th, 2011, 06:07 AM   #6 (permalink)
Senior Member
 
Stinky Stinky's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: In a Dumpster! :D
Posts: 3,793
 
Device(s): Huawei Ascend Y300 :D
Carrier: Not Provided

Thanks: 5,112
Thanked 1,406 Times in 1,053 Posts
Default

Ahhh!

I like a challenge!

I LOVE Maths even though I suck at it so much!

Hmm the brackets say that is a single unit but on the other hand the division sign shows the whole thing or the entire equation is divided by 6.

So it looks like this:

2(1 + 2)
________

6

So it is 1.

So I think the answer is 1 if we use BODMAS. It should be that I think so at least.

However BODMAS claims that Division comes before multiplication and then multiplication comes after Division in that order / sequence.

But some Mathematicians say that neither Division and Mulitplication comes before the other but I am not too sure why lol.

I think they are both equally important because both basically boil down to Add and Subtract.



Quote:
Originally Posted by Bob Maxey View Post
Since I am a world champion thread hijacker, I'll ask the gathered group to give the next number in this series and explain their guess.

1,1,1,2,1 _____
World champion thread hi-jacker LOL you make me laugh dude!

If we use sequences and series I think the answer is 3

I think this is an "Dual" infinite sequence

That is there are two sequences in this number line.

First Sequence is 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1,

NOW the second sequence is:

1, 2, 3, 4, 5, etc etc

But I could be totally wrong lol
__________________
Out walking me Roach Coach ek se!

Brb in 1 000 years
Stinky Stinky is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old April 28th, 2011, 06:33 AM   #7 (permalink)
From My Cold Dead Hands
 
330D's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: upstate NY
Posts: 2,863
 
Device(s): Googlerola Droid Maxx, Moto Spyder, HTC Knight retired, HTC Hero retired,
Carrier: Not Provided

Thanks: 507
Thanked 784 Times in 519 Posts
Default

You must solve the problem within the brackets as per the order of operations, therefore it must be 9. Don't you guys remember 6th grade math?
330D is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old April 28th, 2011, 06:55 AM   #8 (permalink)
Senior Member
 
Usta's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: The Netherlands
Posts: 2,585
 
Device(s): SGS II I9100
Carrier: Not Provided

Thanks: 127
Thanked 1,360 Times in 331 Posts
Default

Brackets are clear enough. The more interesting part is this:

6
--- * 3 = 9
2

or

6
--- = 1
2*3

Depends how you look at it...
Usta is offline  
Reply With Quote
The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to Usta For This Useful Post:
jroc (April 28th, 2011), Stinky Stinky (April 28th, 2011), Tumeg (April 29th, 2011)
Old April 28th, 2011, 07:09 AM   #9 (permalink)
Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: Indianapolis, IN
Posts: 139
 
Device(s): Samsung Gravity 2.2
Carrier: Not Provided

Thanks: 7
Thanked 13 Times in 12 Posts
Default The parentheses define the breakdown of the function

The parentheses dictate that the product within them should multiplied by the product external to them.
indybail is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old April 28th, 2011, 07:12 AM   #10 (permalink)
Moderati ergo sum
 
lunatic59's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: Pennsylvania
Posts: 24,826
 
Device(s): Galaxy Note 10.1 (2014), Nexus 4, Galaxy S II, Captivate, Nexus 1, Nook Color, Asus Transformer T-1
Carrier: AT&T

Thanks: 8,332
Thanked 13,234 Times in 7,235 Posts
Default

Ahh, wonderful trick question. I haven't seen this since my days as a janitor for the CIA ... ladies rooms only (hey, government jobs have their perks.)

It a basic binary cipher where integers represent 1's and symbols 0's so:

62(1+2) = ?

is

1010101000

The answer is 680.

Of course, now I have to kill you.
__________________
_
If the information is useful, Like the post, if the person was helpful, Thank the member.
RULES: Lest we forget | This part of signature intentionally left blank.
_________________________________________________

No Ivory-Billed Woodpeckers were harmed in the composition of this message.
lunatic59 is offline  
Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to lunatic59 For This Useful Post:
alostpacket (April 29th, 2011)
sponsored links
Old April 28th, 2011, 08:09 AM   #11 (permalink)
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: NY
Posts: 802
 
Device(s): AT&T SGS2 i777
Carrier: Not Provided

Thanks: 33
Thanked 115 Times in 96 Posts
Default

google says so ... i'm voting "9"
Google
nyydynasty is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old April 28th, 2011, 09:52 AM   #12 (permalink)
Hiding behind a mystery
 
Roze's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Where the Sakura grows
Posts: 9,847
 
Device(s): Moto Atrix [lovin'] Nexus One [Lost] LG Vu [Lost]
Carrier: Not Provided

Thanks: 809
Thanked 2,192 Times in 1,489 Posts
Default

I go with 9 because of BODMAS

Quote:
62(1+2) =
62(3) =
3*3 =
9
Quote:
B
Brackets first
O
Orders (ie Powers and Square Roots, etc.)
DM
Division and Multiplication (left-to-right)
AS
Addition and Subtraction (left-to-right)
__________________
Sign up with Dropbox using my referral and get an additional 1/2GB on top of the 2GB you get for signing up http://db.tt/YbULMZX

Many thanks,
Roze
Roze is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old April 28th, 2011, 10:02 AM   #13 (permalink)
Ex CEO-DNPSEA foundation
 
shawn1224's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: Houston, TX
Gender: Male
Posts: 2,181
 
Device(s): Samsung Galaxy Note 3 - 32GB Gold iPhone 5s - 16GB Nexus 7 (2nd gen) - Chromecast
Carrier: Verizon

Thanks: 188
Thanked 290 Times in 208 Posts
Default

Wolfram Alpha says 9 so I'm going with that.


Quote:
Originally Posted by Bob Maxey View Post
LOL . . . the debate continues.

Actually, I once used a similar problem in HP ICT Training. In my case, it was this one: 1 + 2 x 3 = ?

Some said 9, some said 7. Oddly, when I expressed it the following way, time to solve was longer: 1.0 + 2.00 x 3.000 = ___

The answer to your question is 8.96. Also, make the responders prove their answer.

Since I am a world champion thread hijacker, I'll ask the gathered group to give the next number in this series and explain their guess.

1,1,1,2,1 _____

Bob

PEMDAS!

Nuff Said

If you are bored, try these math problems.

Unsolved Problems -- from Wolfram MathWorld

Bob
I'm guessing the answer is 3

The sequence is

1,1

1,2

1,3

1,4

1,5

and so on ...
__________________
life is one huge game that infinite awareness has with itself
shawn1224 is online now  
Last edited by shawn1224; April 28th, 2011 at 10:06 AM.
Reply With Quote
Old April 28th, 2011, 10:23 AM   #14 (permalink)
Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Posts: 445
 
Device(s): Droid, Charge, Bionic, Xoom, Nexus 7('12&'13)/10, GS4, Galaxy Nexus, Moto X (DE)
Carrier: T-Mobile (ex-VZW)

Thanks: 176
Thanked 122 Times in 75 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Usta View Post
Brackets are clear enough. The more interesting part is this:

6
--- * 3 = 9
2

or

6
--- = 1
2*3

Depends how you look at it...
The problem is more clearly written like this: (6/2) * (1+2), in which the answer is 9.

We were always taught to write using parenthesis/brackets when in question, so as to be clear about our intention, and to circumvent confusion.

In order for it to be 1, people would have to add their own set of parenthesis/brackets, which wouldn't follow the problem, as written. It's not written as: 6/[2*(1+2)], for example.
krouget is offline  
Last edited by krouget; April 28th, 2011 at 10:26 AM.
Reply With Quote
Old April 28th, 2011, 11:31 AM   #15 (permalink)
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Posts: 9,884
 
Device(s):
Carrier: Not Provided

Thanks: 1,741
Thanked 1,981 Times in 1,537 Posts
Default

my answer is 1.
following BODMAS
and the assumption of (), when next to a #, there is an assumption fo () around them.

so the equation should read:
(6) / (2(1+2)) =
6 / (2(3)) =
6 / 6 =
1 = x
davoid and PrinceCorwin like this.
dan330 is online now  
Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to dan330 For This Useful Post:
PrinceCorwin (January 11th, 2013)
Old April 28th, 2011, 12:43 PM   #16 (permalink)
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Posts: 2,615
 
Device(s): Droid X1, Droid 1, RAZR, Rezound, Maxx HD
Carrier: Not Provided

Thanks: 4,171
Thanked 363 Times in 282 Posts
Default

its 1

In school many years ago they taught us PEMDAS or Please Excuse My Dear Aunt Sally if that helped ppl remember it easier. They still do this today, my kids school anyway.

Parenthese
Exponents
Multiplication
Division
Addition
Subtraction

Ahhh I was in so big of a rush I see Bob Maxey aleady bought up PEMDAS. It pays to read threads from the beginning to end and not skip...lol

I see one thing...there are some different schools of thought in here...lol I'm sticking with 1.

Now I'm curious: I see BODMAS could be interpreted division first than multiplication. How can one use both PEMDAS and BODMAS and get the same answer?

And doing some reading I guess I should say they taught us PEMDAS in the U.S.
__________________
The ultimate measure of a man is not where he stands in moments of comfort and convenience, but where he stands at times of challenge and controversy.

MLK, Jr.
jroc is offline  
Last edited by jroc; April 28th, 2011 at 01:07 PM.
Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to jroc For This Useful Post:
PrinceCorwin (January 11th, 2013)
Old April 28th, 2011, 01:25 PM   #17 (permalink)
Senior Member
 
gallandof's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: south of boston
Posts: 1,927
 
Device(s): Droid x CM7, droid 1 CM7, Dinc 2, Droid Razr rooted debloated, Galaxy Nexus rooted&unlocked, xoom, d
Carrier: Not Provided

Thanks: 161
Thanked 335 Times in 214 Posts
michael.cristoferi@gmail
Default

theres two right answers, if I remember PEMDAS was actually


P
E
M+D
A+S

and it shouldnt matter what order you use. except with this problem CURSE YOU!
gallandof is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old April 28th, 2011, 01:30 PM   #18 (permalink)
Senior Member
 
gallandof's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: south of boston
Posts: 1,927
 
Device(s): Droid x CM7, droid 1 CM7, Dinc 2, Droid Razr rooted debloated, Galaxy Nexus rooted&unlocked, xoom, d
Carrier: Not Provided

Thanks: 161
Thanked 335 Times in 214 Posts
michael.cristoferi@gmail
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Bob Maxey View Post
LOL . . . the debate continues.

Actually, I once used a similar problem in HP ICT Training. In my case, it was this one: 1 + 2 x 3 = ?

Some said 9, some said 7. Oddly, when I expressed it the following way, time to solve was longer: 1.0 + 2.00 x 3.000 = ___

The answer to your question is 8.96. Also, make the responders prove their answer.

Since I am a world champion thread hijacker, I'll ask the gathered group to give the next number in this series and explain their guess.

1,1,1,2,1 _____

Bob

PEMDAS!

Nuff Said

If you are bored, try these math problems.

Unsolved Problems -- from Wolfram MathWorld

Bob


as for your problem bobby boy (just felt like it ) im going to guess the answer is 3 although with my answer im inputting my own order

1(multiply->),1(divide->),1(subtract->),2(add->),1 _____
gallandof is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old April 28th, 2011, 02:17 PM   #19 (permalink)
Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: Colorado
Posts: 409
 
Device(s): Galaxy S4, Galaxy S2, Vibrant, myTouch
Carrier: Not Provided

Thanks: 21
Thanked 105 Times in 77 Posts
Default

I say 9 as well. With PEMDAS, it's what's inside the parenthesis. As others have said, when the one number is in the parenthesis and the other is outside, it can simply be rewritten with a multiplication symbole.

2(3) = 2 * 3, and once you rewrite it that way, PEMDAS takes over and you divide 6/2 first then multiply by 3.

Also just punched it into my TI-83 and got 9. I trust that thing with my life...well at least when it comes to math.
ParishL31 is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old April 28th, 2011, 02:24 PM   #20 (permalink)
Member
 
apavolka's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Flagstaff, AZ
Posts: 492
 
Device(s): Nexus 7, Galaxy Nexus, LG Ally, Droid X
Carrier: Verizon

Thanks: 84
Thanked 38 Times in 35 Posts
apavolka
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Usta View Post
Brackets are clear enough. The more interesting part is this:

6
--- * 3 = 9
2

or

6
--- = 1
2*3

Depends how you look at it...
Order of operations (PEMDAS) states that multiplication and division is done left to right in the same step... as is addition and subtraction.. answer is 9.

http://www.purplemath.com/modules/orderops.htm
Second paragraph about ranks
__________________
Just call me Andrew

Droid Eris>Droid X>HTC Rezound>LG Ally>Galaxy Nexus
Acer A500>Nexus 7
apavolka is offline  
Last edited by apavolka; April 28th, 2011 at 02:29 PM.
Reply With Quote
sponsored links
Old April 28th, 2011, 02:26 PM   #21 (permalink)
Member
 
apavolka's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Flagstaff, AZ
Posts: 492
 
Device(s): Nexus 7, Galaxy Nexus, LG Ally, Droid X
Carrier: Verizon

Thanks: 84
Thanked 38 Times in 35 Posts
apavolka
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by ParishL31 View Post
I say 9 as well. With PEMDAS, it's what's inside the parenthesis. As others have said, when the one number is in the parenthesis and the other is outside, it can simply be rewritten with a multiplication symbole.

2(3) = 2 * 3, and once you rewrite it that way, PEMDAS takes over and you divide 6/2 first then multiply by 3.

Also just punched it into my TI-83 and got 9. I trust that thing with my life...well at least when it comes to math.
Also hate to burst your bubble but unless you dictate the order of operations into the equation when it is entered into a ti-83/84, the calculator will NOT follow order of operations.

However you are still correct.
apavolka is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old April 28th, 2011, 02:30 PM   #22 (permalink)
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Posts: 826
 
Device(s):
Carrier: Not Provided

Thanks: 19
Thanked 50 Times in 48 Posts
Default

it's 1...order of operations.
MyNamesTooLong is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old April 28th, 2011, 02:46 PM   #23 (permalink)
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Posts: 9,884
 
Device(s):
Carrier: Not Provided

Thanks: 1,741
Thanked 1,981 Times in 1,537 Posts
Default

so.. does the OP even have the right answer?????
dan330 is online now  
Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to dan330 For This Useful Post:
jroc (April 28th, 2011)
Old April 28th, 2011, 03:08 PM   #24 (permalink)
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Posts: 2,615
 
Device(s): Droid X1, Droid 1, RAZR, Rezound, Maxx HD
Carrier: Not Provided

Thanks: 4,171
Thanked 363 Times in 282 Posts
Default

^lol!!

The parentheses is the key. Thats why I think its 1. Now that I think about it, I see how using BODMAS gives the same answer of 1. You work with the parentheses until you cant anymore.

Now I see how dan330 could use BODMAS and still get 1. And 2(3) is 2 times 3, thats what I was taught. Solving that still working with the parentheses makes that 6. Then its 66.

The reason why the other 2 answers wont work is you have to do everything inside the parentheses first then go from there. That cancels the answer being 7 out off the break.

And the only way for the answer to be 9 is if you go out of order.

What do I win?
jroc is offline  
Last edited by jroc; April 28th, 2011 at 03:17 PM.
Reply With Quote
Old April 28th, 2011, 03:54 PM   #25 (permalink)
Senior Member
 
Bob Maxey's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2010
Posts: 4,837
 
Device(s):
Carrier: Not Provided

Thanks: 381
Thanked 811 Times in 641 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Stinky Stinky View Post
Ahhh!

If we use sequences and series I think the answer is 3

I think this is an "Dual" infinite sequence

That is there are two sequences in this number line.

First Sequence is 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1,

NOW the second sequence is:

1, 2, 3, 4, 5, etc etc

But I could be totally wrong lol
Clue #1:

Do not look at it as a math problem. Think every day life.
Bob Maxey is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old April 28th, 2011, 03:58 PM   #26 (permalink)
Senior Member
 
Bob Maxey's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2010
Posts: 4,837
 
Device(s):
Carrier: Not Provided

Thanks: 381
Thanked 811 Times in 641 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by shawn1224 View Post
Wolfram Alpha says 9 so I'm going with that.




I'm guessing the answer is 3

The sequence is

1,1

1,2

1,3

1,4

1,5

and so on ...
No soup for you!

Clue #2: 1, 1, 2, 1, 3, 1, 4, . . . Next number and why. Do not think of it as a math problem; it is a sequence, so what is the next number and why?

Bob
Bob Maxey is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old April 28th, 2011, 04:10 PM   #27 (permalink)
The PearlyMon
 
EarlyMon's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: New Mexico, USA
Posts: 46,323
 
Device(s): M8, LTEvo, 3vo, and Shift - Evo retired
Carrier: Sprint

Thanks: 42,706
Thanked 57,146 Times in 22,962 Posts
Default

Rules say the answer is 9, but some older compilers would evaluate that as 1.

Which also happens to be the next number in the sequence, 1,1,1,2,1,... or 1,1,2,1,3,1,4,1,...

Unless there's no rhythm to this riddle.
EarlyMon is online now  
Reply With Quote
Old April 28th, 2011, 04:26 PM   #28 (permalink)
Senior Member
 
Bob Maxey's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2010
Posts: 4,837
 
Device(s):
Carrier: Not Provided

Thanks: 381
Thanked 811 Times in 641 Posts
Smile

Quote:
Originally Posted by EarlyMon View Post
Rules say the answer is 9, but some older compilers would evaluate that as 1.

Which also happens to be the next number in the sequence, 1,1,1,2,1,... or 1,1,2,1,3,1,4,1,...

Unless there's no rhythm to this riddle.
Think not of math, young grasshopper; but those things that interest Mr. Bilbie. Not integer sequences real math folks consider sequences. No Corn Flake numbers, and forget Mr. Fibonacci. You might consider obvious sequences of common events in your daily life.

Stop using Google, too! Dag Nabbit. much of the above stuff is what some call a distraction.

Remember, you cannot just give the numbers arriving next, but explain your answer. Just like in school.

Smiley

Bob
Bob Maxey is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old April 28th, 2011, 04:53 PM   #29 (permalink)
Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: NYC
Posts: 498
 
Device(s): Droid X
Carrier: Not Provided

Thanks: 33
Thanked 48 Times in 45 Posts
alex.amp502
Default

Though people are usually taught that putting a number next to parentheses means multiply, what it actually means is the number is a FUNCTION OF what's in the parentheses... meaning that in the above scenario, two is a function of 1+2, meaning you apply the 2 to what's in the parentheses (1+2, or 3) giving you 6.

Meaning it's 6/6 = 1.

You can't really say it's (6/3) * (1+2), because that's extrapolating parentheses to indicate multiplication, when they really don't-- it's just an easier way of thinking of it (which in this case is inaccurate). That's why using PEMDAS or what have you doesn't work here, because there's no "M".

edit: to be a little more clear, let's say you have the function 6/f(x). Looking at it like that, most of you would probably agree that you can't separate f from x. Well, if f=2 and x=3, you STILL can't separate f from x, even if we've assigned it a constant.
davoid likes this.
sonofaresiii is offline  
Last edited by sonofaresiii; April 28th, 2011 at 04:57 PM.
Reply With Quote
Old April 28th, 2011, 05:01 PM   #30 (permalink)
Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: Belfast, Northern Ireland
Posts: 330
 
Device(s): Galaxy SIII
Carrier: Not Provided

Thanks: 33
Thanked 35 Times in 26 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Bob Maxey View Post
No soup for you!

Clue #2: 1, 1, 2, 1, 3, 1, 4, . . . Next number and why. Do not think of it as a math problem; it is a sequence, so what is the next number and why?

Bob
1, 1, 2, 1, 3, 1, 4, 1, 5, 1, 6, 1, 7, 1, 8...etc etc
czechplastik is offline  
Reply With Quote
sponsored links
Old April 28th, 2011, 05:29 PM   #31 (permalink)
Senior Member
 
Bob Maxey's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2010
Posts: 4,837
 
Device(s):
Carrier: Not Provided

Thanks: 381
Thanked 811 Times in 641 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by czechplastik View Post
1, 1, 2, 1, 3, 1, 4, 1, 5, 1, 6, 1, 7, 1, 8...etc etc
No crackers or soup for you. Also, tell us what the string represents.

CLUE: Think finite sets.

CLUE: Forget about math, has nothing to do with it. Think number substitution and review Furnelli Rialto's famous 1946 MIT paper on Differential set number mutational differentiational strings within infinite negative number sets.

Google it.

CLUE: Since I am thinking of a finite set, your string will fail if allowed to continue. So here is part of the sequence: 10 1 11 1 12 1 1 1

God, what a seriously challenged group (Smiley, ducking, smiley)

Bob
Bob Maxey is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old April 28th, 2011, 06:01 PM   #32 (permalink)
The PearlyMon
 
EarlyMon's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: New Mexico, USA
Posts: 46,323
 
Device(s): M8, LTEvo, 3vo, and Shift - Evo retired
Carrier: Sprint

Thanks: 42,706
Thanked 57,146 Times in 22,962 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by sonofaresiii View Post
Though people are usually taught that putting a number next to parentheses means multiply, what it actually means is the number is a FUNCTION OF what's in the parentheses... meaning that in the above scenario, two is a function of 1+2, meaning you apply the 2 to what's in the parentheses (1+2, or 3) giving you 6.

Meaning it's 6/6 = 1.

You can't really say it's (6/3) * (1+2), because that's extrapolating parentheses to indicate multiplication, when they really don't-- it's just an easier way of thinking of it (which in this case is inaccurate). That's why using PEMDAS or what have you doesn't work here, because there's no "M".

edit: to be a little more clear, let's say you have the function 6/f(x). Looking at it like that, most of you would probably agree that you can't separate f from x. Well, if f=2 and x=3, you STILL can't separate f from x, even if we've assigned it a constant.
Disagree.

By saying that f(x)=2*x, you've said that implied parens that didn't exist in the originally malformed expression are in effect. In other words, you've re-expressed the problem as:

6/(2(1+2))

Malformed expressions can only be evaluated on their face.
EarlyMon is online now  
Reply With Quote
Old April 28th, 2011, 06:09 PM   #33 (permalink)
Senior Member
 
Bob Maxey's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2010
Posts: 4,837
 
Device(s):
Carrier: Not Provided

Thanks: 381
Thanked 811 Times in 641 Posts
Default

I hope 1 + 1 still equals 2, or I'll be sad.
Bob Maxey is offline  
Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to Bob Maxey For This Useful Post:
Xyro (April 28th, 2011)
Old April 28th, 2011, 06:12 PM   #34 (permalink)
From My Cold Dead Hands
 
330D's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: upstate NY
Posts: 2,863
 
Device(s): Googlerola Droid Maxx, Moto Spyder, HTC Knight retired, HTC Hero retired,
Carrier: Not Provided

Thanks: 507
Thanked 784 Times in 519 Posts
Default

Give a bunch of geeks some numbers....
330D is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old April 28th, 2011, 06:13 PM   #35 (permalink)
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Posts: 2,615
 
Device(s): Droid X1, Droid 1, RAZR, Rezound, Maxx HD
Carrier: Not Provided

Thanks: 4,171
Thanked 363 Times in 282 Posts
Default

lol@the last 2 posts...
jroc is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old April 28th, 2011, 06:19 PM   #36 (permalink)
The PearlyMon
 
EarlyMon's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: New Mexico, USA
Posts: 46,323
 
Device(s): M8, LTEvo, 3vo, and Shift - Evo retired
Carrier: Sprint

Thanks: 42,706
Thanked 57,146 Times in 22,962 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Bob Maxey View Post
Think not of math, young grasshopper; but those things that interest Mr. Bilbie. Not integer sequences real math folks consider sequences. No Corn Flake numbers, and forget Mr. Fibonacci. You might consider obvious sequences of common events in your daily life.

Stop using Google, too! Dag Nabbit. much of the above stuff is what some call a distraction.

Remember, you cannot just give the numbers arriving next, but explain your answer. Just like in school.

Smiley

Bob
I thought not of math, didn't use google, and did explain my answer - rhythm; evidently not so far from your own Mr. Bilbie.

I simply got it wrong.
EarlyMon is online now  
Reply With Quote
Old April 28th, 2011, 06:21 PM   #37 (permalink)
Senior Member
 
Bob Maxey's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2010
Posts: 4,837
 
Device(s):
Carrier: Not Provided

Thanks: 381
Thanked 811 Times in 641 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by 330D View Post
Give a bunch of geeks some numbers....
I like Geeks. Not in squads, but individually.
Bob Maxey is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old April 28th, 2011, 06:22 PM   #38 (permalink)
Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: NYC
Posts: 498
 
Device(s): Droid X
Carrier: Not Provided

Thanks: 33
Thanked 48 Times in 45 Posts
alex.amp502
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by EarlyMon View Post
Disagree.

By saying that f(x)=2*x, you've said that implied parens that didn't exist in the originally malformed expression are in effect. In other words, you've re-expressed the problem as:

6/(2(1+2))

Malformed expressions can only be evaluated on their face.
Well I disagree with your disagreement! So there!

edit: to explain myself a little better, no, i'm not saying f(x) = 2*x. In fact, I'm saying that's the problem-- OTHER people are saying that, but it's not true. f(x) is a function, that is f of x (f is a function of x), meaning the variable f is applied to the variable x. In our equation, we would apply 2 to 3, which in effect is multiplying it... but it's not the same as saying f(x) = f*x (though isolated, those equations are redundant). The problem is that USUALLY creating a function simply means multiplying it, so we've been trained to think that 2(3) = 2*3. But it isn't.
sonofaresiii is offline  
Last edited by sonofaresiii; April 28th, 2011 at 06:26 PM.
Reply With Quote
Old April 28th, 2011, 06:22 PM   #39 (permalink)
Senior Member
 
Bob Maxey's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2010
Posts: 4,837
 
Device(s):
Carrier: Not Provided

Thanks: 381
Thanked 811 Times in 641 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by EarlyMon View Post
I thought not of math, didn't use google, and did explain my answer - rhythm; evidently not so far from your own Mr. Bilbie.

I simply got it wrong.
when should I hand out the answer?

CLUE: Horology, think Horology
Bob Maxey is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old April 28th, 2011, 06:30 PM   #40 (permalink)
Destroying Balls Everyday
Thread Author (OP)
 
Vihzel's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: Manhattan, NY
Posts: 5,369
 
Device(s): Galaxy Nexus
Carrier: Not Provided

Thanks: 190
Thanked 1,061 Times in 673 Posts
Default

I knew this thread would attract a fair amount of attention. I do have the answer... or perhaps I only have the answer that I believe to be true...

What I suspected would happen in this thread has happened on Facebook and on the physics forum where 34 people voted for one number and 36 voted for the other. Very fascinating stuff!
Vihzel is offline  
Reply With Quote
sponsored links
Old April 28th, 2011, 06:32 PM   #41 (permalink)
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Posts: 2,615
 
Device(s): Droid X1, Droid 1, RAZR, Rezound, Maxx HD
Carrier: Not Provided

Thanks: 4,171
Thanked 363 Times in 282 Posts
Default

^See...u know what.....
jroc is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old April 28th, 2011, 06:34 PM   #42 (permalink)
Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: NYC
Posts: 498
 
Device(s): Droid X
Carrier: Not Provided

Thanks: 33
Thanked 48 Times in 45 Posts
alex.amp502
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Vihzel View Post
I knew this thread would attract a fair amount of attention. I do have the answer... or perhaps I only have the answer that I believe to be true...

What I suspected would happen in this thread has happened on Facebook and on the physics forum where 34 people voted for one number and 36 voted for the other. Very fascinating stuff!
I really, really hope it doesn't turn out I'm pulling this explanation out of my @ss
sonofaresiii is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old April 28th, 2011, 06:35 PM   #43 (permalink)
Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: Belfast, Northern Ireland
Posts: 330
 
Device(s): Galaxy SIII
Carrier: Not Provided

Thanks: 33
Thanked 35 Times in 26 Posts
Default

2+2=5
czechplastik is offline  
Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to czechplastik For This Useful Post:
breadnatty08 (May 4th, 2011)
Old April 28th, 2011, 06:37 PM   #44 (permalink)
Member
 
Sombre's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: Canberra, Australia
Posts: 123
 
Device(s): HTC Desire HD w/LeeDrOiD_HD_V5.1.1_GB.
Carrier: Not Provided

Thanks: 19
Thanked 21 Times in 19 Posts
Send a message via MSN to Sombre
Default

I want the last 15 minutes of my life back!
Sombre is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old April 28th, 2011, 06:40 PM   #45 (permalink)
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Posts: 2,615
 
Device(s): Droid X1, Droid 1, RAZR, Rezound, Maxx HD
Carrier: Not Provided

Thanks: 4,171
Thanked 363 Times in 282 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by sonofaresiii View Post
I really, really hope it doesn't turn out I'm pulling this explanation out of my @ss

lol!!
jroc is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old April 28th, 2011, 06:43 PM   #46 (permalink)
From My Cold Dead Hands
 
330D's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: upstate NY
Posts: 2,863
 
Device(s): Googlerola Droid Maxx, Moto Spyder, HTC Knight retired, HTC Hero retired,
Carrier: Not Provided

Thanks: 507
Thanked 784 Times in 519 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Bob Maxey View Post
I like Geeks. Not in squads, but individually.
Me too, would I be here if it were otherwise?
330D is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old April 28th, 2011, 06:46 PM   #47 (permalink)
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: SC, USA
Posts: 16
 
Device(s): Samsung Captivate
Carrier: Not Provided

Thanks: 4
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Send a message via MSN to Rlad78
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by czechplastik View Post
2+2=5
Wrong




Anyway, the answer is 1.

First off, we must follow PEMDAS

Parenthesis
Exponentials
Multiplication
Division
Addition
Subtraction

Therefore, we start out with the parenthesis

62(2+1)

(2+1) = 3

62(3)

Then multiplication

2(3) = 6

66

Then division

1


Simple as that lol.
Rlad78 is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old April 28th, 2011, 06:49 PM   #48 (permalink)
Senior Member
 
Stinky Stinky's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: In a Dumpster! :D
Posts: 3,793
 
Device(s): Huawei Ascend Y300 :D
Carrier: Not Provided

Thanks: 5,112
Thanked 1,406 Times in 1,053 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Bob Maxey View Post
Clue #1:

Do not look at it as a math problem. Think every day life.
Hahah!

LOL I was wrong!

Yay!

I told you I suck at maths!

Hmm every day life hey?

Not a maths question but has numbers involved, that is a little strange but that is cool by me

So then what...

NO DON'T FRACKING JOKE!!!

I think it's TIME!!!

xD

Hahahaa!

I am going crazy trying to answer this 1
Stinky Stinky is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old April 28th, 2011, 06:58 PM   #49 (permalink)
Senior Member
 
Stinky Stinky's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: In a Dumpster! :D
Posts: 3,793
 
Device(s): Huawei Ascend Y300 :D
Carrier: Not Provided

Thanks: 5,112
Thanked 1,406 Times in 1,053 Posts
Default

No wait I think I am tripping LOL

Never mind what I said I am going tokig / crazy
Stinky Stinky is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old April 28th, 2011, 07:00 PM   #50 (permalink)
Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: NYC
Posts: 498
 
Device(s): Droid X
Carrier: Not Provided

Thanks: 33
Thanked 48 Times in 45 Posts
alex.amp502
Default

1, 1, 2, 1, 3, 1, 4, 1, 5, 1, 6, 1, 7, 1, 8, 1, 9, 1, 1, 2, 2, 2, 3, 2...

the first number denotes the unit's sequential order, the second the "round." It's like a date followed by a year.

edited because I forgot one of the numbers
sonofaresiii is offline  
Reply With Quote
Reply


Go Back   Android Forums > Android Forums Community > The Lounge
Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 12:48 AM.
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2014, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.