Go Back   Android Forums > Android Carriers > Metro PCS

Get excited for the Samsung Galaxy S5! Find everything you need and discuss it in our Galaxy S5 Forum!

Like Tree18Likes
  • 7 Post By myrieboy
  • 2 Post By mike28
  • 1 Post By 05TRAILBLAZER
  • 1 Post By myrieboy
  • 1 Post By horsecharles
  • 1 Post By THE W
  • 1 Post By alfick3
  • 1 Post By THE W
  • 1 Post By Gman9831
  • 2 Post By pastafarian

Closed Thread
 
LinkBack Thread Tools
Old October 18th, 2012, 08:40 PM   #1 (permalink)
Junior Member
Thread Author (OP)
 
myrieboy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: New York City (Queens) NY
Gender: Male
Posts: 51
 
Device(s): Samsung Galaxy S3, Nokia Lumia 900, LG Optimus M, Samsung Galaxy Indulge, HTC Wildfire, LG Esteem.
Carrier: MetroPCS

Thanks: 18
Thanked 25 Times in 10 Posts
Send a message via AIM to myrieboy Send a message via Yahoo to myrieboy myrieboy@gmail.com
Default MetroPCS & T-Mobile merger detailed breakdown

I saw somebody created a thread about the MetroPCS and T-Mobile merger based on them getting the Galaxy S3 and wanting to know how it will affect their service and LTE/CDMA network.. I decided to give a more long winded explanation as it seems the media has failed to truthfully explain this merger. For those curious about what the heck is going on with this "T-Metro" merger this posting is for you.

First I will make a few things clear. This is called a "reverse merger" T-Mobile is actually being bought out by MetroPCS, the difference is that so far Metro has decided that when the dust settles they will keep the T-Mobile name although that is subject to change.

As it stands metropcs share holders are attempting to sue as they feel this Merger is a rip off, I am not going to get into any details relating to that however.

So starting off, i always explain it like this, do you guys remember Cingular Wireless? They had acquired AT&T years ago but some years later AT&T literally took over that company. These are the affects of reverse mergers, smaller companies allow bigger companies to "buy them" and then allow the bigger company to swallow in more customers while the smaller company grows in the background with bigger companies finances and then once the remaining shareholders walk out the door or the shareholders for the smaller half have enough money they gobble up the stock on the other once bigger half and become one whole entity. Now AT&T was a huge company even before the Cingular merger but AT&T did not have much market share in the wireless industry to justify a place for them so they let Cingular do all the foot work while they watched in the shadows. once Cingular grew to a point AT&T basically said "good job we'll take over from here". now there is more to this than I am explaining but i just want to give you guys that example.

T-Mobile: the German parent company was in talks to merge with Sprint and then later AT&T. This an attempt for the parent company to drop T-Mobile from they're shoulders. T-Mobile has been basically trying to "sell itself". MetroPCS is a smaller company that does not have the funds to buyout a company as big as T-Mobile so a reverse merger was the only solution.

MetroPCS and it's customers: it works like this, lets say you have an LTE capable phone with MetroPCS and your friend has one of metro's CDMA-only phones I think metro calls them "feature phones"?? Anywho, this is how the merger will affect you and that basic phone touting friend. Next year 2013, the merger kicks off full throttle with T-Mobile running the show, Metro customers who want to Upgrade will be steered towards a GSM/HSPA+ phone, your friend with that CDMA device can either join the bandwagon, or keep his current phone. in the background, MetroPCS will continue rolling out more LTE towers mixed with T-Mobile's LTE blueprint plans and T-Mobile's finances, so you and your LTE device will be just fine. The merger will continue in this fashion with T-Mobile slowly converting CDMA metro users to GSM/HSPA+ until 2015 comes around.

So it's 2015...what's next? : T-Mobile will deactivate all MetroPCS CDMA towers for good. This means if your CDMA friend didn't jump ship already he/she will be out of luck once T-Mobile flips that switch. But what about you and your LTE? Well while T-Mobile did all the stress work in the front end, MetroPCS did all the foot work in the back end, there are LTE towers in more places providing more coverage than metro gave you before all over shadowing T-Mobile's wireless foot print.

Pros/Cons and Concerns: you will then get great LTE coverage and T-Metro will nab better spectrum density that can compete with Verizon Wireless' LTE and the prices will be competitive and speeds will be aggressive at the heels of the bigger companies Verizon & AT&T. Using a MetroPCS pre-merger LTE device will provide compatibility with the after merger T-Metro LTE network but for arguments sake, if you should hit an area with no LTE coverage using that device your device will attempt to roam on another CDMA network. Now lets say no roaming agreements are in place for that area and Metro's legacy CDMA towers are not active due to T-Mobile deactivating them. Well, your phone just won't work until it hits an LTE coverage area again.

"But T-Mobile has a 74% stake in this merger to Metro's 26% clearly T-Mobile owns metro": this is my favorite response I get from people because its obvious they missed the most crucial detail of whatever they read. I explain it like this, T-Mobile's parent company owns 74% and MetroPCS owns 26% however T-Mobile itself, owns NOTHING. Watch out for what most articles make it seem like. Also, keep in mind T-Mobile gave Metro shareholders $1.5 billion on top of the 26% stake in the merger. Explaining the 74% is even more simple, once the merger is completed in 2015 T-Metro will be worth even more than it was going into the merger, the German parent company knows this, so they invested the most. If you had a 74% stake in a company and that company blew up into something even better and was worth more money than you could ever imagine and you decided to sell your 74% stake... well just imagine how much money you'd get out of that worth. That's why some metro shareholders are upset with the merger deal, money.

Closing statement: in case your wondering, I say "German parent company" because of my lack of remembering how to spell the real name correctly, too impatient to check from a mobile device lol. I honestly would like this merger to go through because I think these 2 companies are a good match, Sprint owns Clear wire, Boost, Virgin Mobile, Voice stream and some other companies and honestly they have done very little with them. They also keep jumping from WiMax to LTE which just confuses customers, to me I don't find them to be a stable company. And after that crazy Nextel merger... I just stay away from them.

Questions or comments? Please share. Otherwise I hope this was helpful enough to understand. If anyone would like to add to this please do.

myrieboy is offline  
The Following 14 Users Say Thank You to myrieboy For This Useful Post:
2GigayteSD (October 19th, 2012), agardner58 (March 28th, 2013), alfick3 (October 19th, 2012), douglasr007 (October 31st, 2012), EarlyMon (October 18th, 2012), horsecharles (October 19th, 2012), Joshuah22a (March 21st, 2013), jpizle (October 23rd, 2012), mike28 (October 18th, 2012), mrpnut (October 18th, 2012), peachypinkvita (October 23rd, 2012), reilus (November 9th, 2012), SexySteve603 (October 18th, 2012), THE W (October 21st, 2012)
sponsored links
Old October 18th, 2012, 09:45 PM   #2 (permalink)
Senior Member
 
mike28's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: Tampa
Gender: Male
Posts: 4,054
 
Device(s): Galaxy s4 Galaxy Tab 10.1 1 Kindle fire 1 Nexus 7
Carrier: Metropcs

Thanks: 3,832
Thanked 1,061 Times in 777 Posts
Default

Thanks very detailed breakdown I will go ahead and purchase a CDMA/ lte s3 of course knowing that once 2015 if the world still stands I will know that it will only work on lte areas so my guess is that if they do have a roaming agreement then we can use the device outside the lte areas which is fine also the way technology is going in 2015 I will get a s6 but nonetheless thanks again I also agree with the merger
myrieboy and Speeds03 like this.
mike28 is offline  
Old October 18th, 2012, 10:13 PM   #3 (permalink)
THE WORLD IS YOURS
 
mrpnut's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: CALI
Gender: Male
Posts: 3,514
 
Device(s): Galaxy note 3 /Galaxy s4/ Baked Galaxy tab 2 / Galaxy S3
Carrier: T-Mobile

Thanks: 1,417
Thanked 1,776 Times in 1,060 Posts
Send a message via Yahoo to mrpnut mrpnut310@gmail.com
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by myrieboy View Post
I saw somebody created a thread about the MetroPCS and T-Mobile merger based on them getting the Galaxy S3 and wanting to know how it will affect their service and LTE/CDMA network.. I decided to give a more long winded explanation as it seems the media has failed to truthfully explain this merger. For those curious about what the heck is going on with this "T-Metro" merger this posting is for you.

First I will make a few things clear. This is called a "reverse merger" T-Mobile is actually being bought out by MetroPCS, the difference is that so far Metro has decided that when the dust settles they will keep the T-Mobile name although that is subject to change.

As it stands metropcs share holders are attempting to sue as they feel this Merger is a rip off, I am not going to get into any details relating to that however.

So starting off, i always explain it like this, do you guys remember Cingular Wireless? They had acquired AT&T years ago but some years later AT&T literally took over that company. These are the affects of reverse mergers, smaller companies allow bigger companies to "buy them" and then allow the bigger company to swallow in more customers while the smaller company grows in the background with bigger companies finances and then once the remaining shareholders walk out the door or the shareholders for the smaller half have enough money they gobble up the stock on the other once bigger half and become one whole entity. Now AT&T was a huge company even before the Cingular merger but AT&T did not have much market share in the wireless industry to justify a place for them so they let Cingular do all the foot work while they watched in the shadows. once Cingular grew to a point AT&T basically said "good job we'll take over from here". now there is more to this than I am explaining but i just want to give you guys that example.

T-Mobile: the German parent company was in talks to merge with Sprint and then later AT&T. This an attempt for the parent company to drop T-Mobile from they're shoulders. T-Mobile has been basically trying to "sell itself". MetroPCS is a smaller company that does not have the funds to buyout a company as big as T-Mobile so a reverse merger was the only solution.

MetroPCS and it's customers: it works like this, lets say you have an LTE capable phone with MetroPCS and your friend has one of metro's CDMA-only phones I think metro calls them "feature phones"?? Anywho, this is how the merger will affect you and that basic phone touting friend. Next year 2013, the merger kicks off full throttle with T-Mobile running the show, Metro customers who want to Upgrade will be steered towards a GSM/HSPA+ phone, your friend with that CDMA device can either join the bandwagon, or keep his current phone. in the background, MetroPCS will continue rolling out more LTE towers mixed with T-Mobile's LTE blueprint plans and T-Mobile's finances, so you and your LTE device will be just fine. The merger will continue in this fashion with T-Mobile slowly converting CDMA metro users to GSM/HSPA+ until 2015 comes around.

So it's 2015...what's next? : T-Mobile will deactivate all MetroPCS CDMA towers for good. This means if your CDMA friend didn't jump ship already he/she will be out of luck once T-Mobile flips that switch. But what about you and your LTE? Well while T-Mobile did all the stress work in the front end, MetroPCS did all the foot work in the back end, there are LTE towers in more places providing more coverage than metro gave you before all over shadowing T-Mobile's wireless foot print.

Pros/Cons and Concerns: you will then get great LTE coverage and T-Metro will nab better spectrum density that can compete with Verizon Wireless' LTE and the prices will be competitive and speeds will be aggressive at the heels of the bigger companies Verizon & AT&T. Using a MetroPCS pre-merger LTE device will provide compatibility with the after merger T-Metro LTE network but for arguments sake, if you should hit an area with no LTE coverage using that device your device will attempt to roam on another CDMA network. Now lets say no roaming agreements are in place for that area and Metro's legacy CDMA towers are not active due to T-Mobile deactivating them. Well, your phone just won't work until it hits an LTE coverage area again.

"But T-Mobile has a 74% stake in this merger to Metro's 26% clearly T-Mobile owns metro": this is my favorite response I get from people because its obvious they missed the most crucial detail of whatever they read. I explain it like this, T-Mobile's parent company owns 74% and MetroPCS owns 26% however T-Mobile itself, owns NOTHING. Watch out for what most articles make it seem like. Also, keep in mind T-Mobile gave Metro shareholders $1.5 billion on top of the 26% stake in the merger. Explaining the 74% is even more simple, once the merger is completed in 2015 T-Metro will be worth even more than it was going into the merger, the German parent company knows this, so they invested the most. If you had a 74% stake in a company and that company blew up into something even better and was worth more money than you could ever imagine and you decided to sell your 74% stake... well just imagine how much money you'd get out of that worth. That's why some metro shareholders are upset with the merger deal, money.

Closing statement: in case your wondering, I say "German parent company" because of my lack of remembering how to spell the real name correctly, too impatient to check from a mobile device lol. I honestly would like this merger to go through because I think these 2 companies are a good match, Sprint owns Clear wire, Boost, Virgin Mobile, Voice stream and some other companies and honestly they have done very little with them. They also keep jumping from WiMax to LTE which just confuses customers, to me I don't find them to be a stable company. And after that crazy Nextel merger... I just stay away from them.

Questions or comments? Please share. Otherwise I hope this was helpful enough to understand. If anyone would like to add to this please do.
Thats a really good breakdown, well said :-)
__________________

mrpnut is offline  
The Following User Says Thank You to mrpnut For This Useful Post:
myrieboy (October 22nd, 2012)
Old October 18th, 2012, 10:37 PM   #4 (permalink)
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2011
Posts: 21
 
Device(s):
Carrier: Not Provided

Thanks: 0
Thanked 4 Times in 3 Posts
Default

The merger seems practically unavoidable, and I believe the transition will be faster than other mergers in the past. Deustche Telekomm has been trying to leave the US market at any way possible, that's why negotiations with ATT and Sprint, and MetroPCS happened to occur. That means better coverage and phone selections.

Now there are some things unclear. MetroPCS is the largest prepaid provider and has the best experience to know what prepaid consumers want, also it offers the best plans in the prepaid market being probably the first carrier to offer unlimited talk and texts, which this is what they are known for. With the merger, will MetroPCS keep their prepaid characteristic or is it MetroPCS once the final stage of merger will absorb the contract accounts from T-Mobile meaning MetroPCS will offer both contract plans (T-mobile) and prepaid plans (MetroPCS) under the same brand.

Another scenario would be MetroPCS the largest MNVO of T-mobile. T-mobile already has two smaller MNVOs (H20 and Simple Mobile) receiving slower capped speeds. Will MetroPCS a more independent MNVO?

What will happen to authorized dealers?

These are questions I have with possible scenarios to happen.
AndroidGoogle is offline  
Old October 19th, 2012, 08:28 AM   #5 (permalink)
Junior Member
Thread Author (OP)
 
myrieboy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: New York City (Queens) NY
Gender: Male
Posts: 51
 
Device(s): Samsung Galaxy S3, Nokia Lumia 900, LG Optimus M, Samsung Galaxy Indulge, HTC Wildfire, LG Esteem.
Carrier: MetroPCS

Thanks: 18
Thanked 25 Times in 10 Posts
Send a message via AIM to myrieboy Send a message via Yahoo to myrieboy myrieboy@gmail.com
Default Good Point

Quote:
Originally Posted by AndroidGoogle View Post
The merger seems practically unavoidable, and I believe the transition will be faster than other mergers in the past. Deustche Telekomm has been trying to leave the US market at any way possible, that's why negotiations with ATT and Sprint, and MetroPCS happened to occur. That means better coverage and phone selections.

Now there are some things unclear. MetroPCS is the largest prepaid provider and has the best experience to know what prepaid consumers want, also it offers the best plans in the prepaid market being probably the first carrier to offer unlimited talk and texts, which this is what they are known for. With the merger, will MetroPCS keep their prepaid characteristic or is it MetroPCS once the final stage of merger will absorb the contract accounts from T-Mobile meaning MetroPCS will offer both contract plans (T-mobile) and prepaid plans (MetroPCS) under the same brand.

Another scenario would be MetroPCS the largest MNVO of T-mobile. T-mobile already has two smaller MNVOs (H20 and Simple Mobile) receiving slower capped speeds. Will MetroPCS a more independent MNVO?

What will happen to authorized dealers?

These are questions I have with possible scenarios to happen.
This is a good point. In terms of how things would turn out, I can't really say much to what has no answers but I can give you something interesting about the authorized dealers.

T-Mobile: since 2008 T-Mobile has been slowly cutting its contracts with authorized dealers. This was probably the start of T-Mobile trying to break external ties to sell itself. for authorized dealers that wanted to keep the relationship going T-Mobile put strict guidelines in place that the authorized dealer had to meet making the relationship more challenging for the dealer. But...

MetroPCS: this company being smaller has put a system in place to save money, authorized dealers. By allowing the external connections to finance store locations, and focus on selling the products this allows metro to focus on the more strategic things. Its like managers owning a McDonald's or other fast food franchise.

T-Mobile has announced pre merger will have on job cuts on they're side... MetroPCS hasn't said much yet but I think they may cut some dealers as well. why this is interesting to me is because why wouldn't T-Mobile want to adopt Metro's money saving strategy? However as you mentioned it is unknown if metro will maintain to run its business as it does now or change entirely. Outside of MetroPCS claiming to keep the T-Mobile name there is no clarification as to what will come along with that.

In terms of operating separately I know they will up until 2015 when the merger closes and then they operate as 1 which would be called T-Mobile. Now how they plan to operate post paid and prepaid customers is up in the air. T-Mobile is not that aggressive as they used to be in Sidekick days with prepaid and MetroPCS is.. but there is no telling if the focus will change or stay the same or become something new entirely.
myrieboy is offline  
Old October 19th, 2012, 11:30 AM   #6 (permalink)
I'm no Senior
 
Gman9831's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: South Florida
Posts: 2,827
 
Device(s): Samsung Galaxy S3, LG Motion(SOLD), LG Connect, Samsung Galaxy Indulge, LG Optimus M (All rooted)
Carrier: MetroPCS

Thanks: 149
Thanked 919 Times in 626 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by AndroidGoogle View Post
Another scenario would be MetroPCS the largest MNVO of T-mobile. T-mobile already has two smaller MNVOs (H20 & Simple Mobile) receiving slower capped speeds. Will MetroPCS a more independent MNVO?
Neither are owned by tmobile & H20 is a MVNO off of AT&Ts network & simple & straight talk are owned by Tracfone, simple goes of tmobile & straight talk goes off AT&T/Tmobile
Gman9831 is online now  
Last edited by Gman9831; October 19th, 2012 at 11:32 AM.
The Following User Says Thank You to Gman9831 For This Useful Post:
myrieboy (October 22nd, 2012)
Old October 19th, 2012, 12:37 PM   #7 (permalink)
Senior Member
 
alfick3's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: DFW, TX
Gender: Male
Posts: 2,077
 
Device(s): LG Motion 4G
Carrier: MetroPCS

Thanks: 1,073
Thanked 225 Times in 197 Posts
Thumbs up

Quote:
Originally Posted by myrieboy View Post
I saw somebody created a thread about the MetroPCS and T-Mobile merger based on them getting the Galaxy S3 and wanting to know how it will affect their service and LTE/CDMA network.. I decided to give a more long winded explanation as it seems the media has failed to truthfully explain this merger. For those curious about what the heck is going on with this "T-Metro" merger this posting is for you.

First I will make a few things clear. This is called a "reverse merger" T-Mobile is actually being bought out by MetroPCS, the difference is that so far Metro has decided that when the dust settles they will keep the T-Mobile name although that is subject to change.

As it stands metropcs share holders are attempting to sue as they feel this Merger is a rip off, I am not going to get into any details relating to that however.

So starting off, i always explain it like this, do you guys remember Cingular Wireless? They had acquired AT&T years ago but some years later AT&T literally took over that company. These are the affects of reverse mergers, smaller companies allow bigger companies to "buy them" and then allow the bigger company to swallow in more customers while the smaller company grows in the background with bigger companies finances and then once the remaining shareholders walk out the door or the shareholders for the smaller half have enough money they gobble up the stock on the other once bigger half and become one whole entity. Now AT&T was a huge company even before the Cingular merger but AT&T did not have much market share in the wireless industry to justify a place for them so they let Cingular do all the foot work while they watched in the shadows. once Cingular grew to a point AT&T basically said "good job we'll take over from here". now there is more to this than I am explaining but i just want to give you guys that example.

....
Very good and thorough. Thank you for this, hopefully it'll help put some of those with doubts at ease.

A point though, if I may. I believe (and it's just from my memory since I was with Cingular at the time) that after the merger, Cingular kept the name A T & T for the company just because it was a well established name where as Cingular was established in all areas of the country. They felt it was better for business to have the better known name. That is what I was also told about while I was going to DeVry University getting a telecommunications degree. We were discussing it cause it was the big news at the time. Now, I could be wrong but that is what I remember learning about the Cingular/AT & T merger.
alfick3 is offline  
Last edited by alfick3; October 19th, 2012 at 12:39 PM. Reason: Edited out some of the quoted material, that didn't pertain to my point, for brevity
The Following User Says Thank You to alfick3 For This Useful Post:
myrieboy (October 22nd, 2012)
Old October 19th, 2012, 02:38 PM   #8 (permalink)
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2012
Location: ft worth, tx
Posts: 94
 
Device(s): had ESteem, now SGIII Metro FTW
Carrier: Not Provided

Thanks: 9
Thanked 3 Times in 3 Posts
Default

that would suck to be paying high as plans and hidden fee's... i hope they change to prepaid and have learned something from metro.
myrieboy likes this.
05TRAILBLAZER is offline  
Old October 20th, 2012, 09:38 PM   #9 (permalink)
Junior Member
Thread Author (OP)
 
myrieboy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: New York City (Queens) NY
Gender: Male
Posts: 51
 
Device(s): Samsung Galaxy S3, Nokia Lumia 900, LG Optimus M, Samsung Galaxy Indulge, HTC Wildfire, LG Esteem.
Carrier: MetroPCS

Thanks: 18
Thanked 25 Times in 10 Posts
Send a message via AIM to myrieboy Send a message via Yahoo to myrieboy myrieboy@gmail.com
Default Very True

Quote:
Originally Posted by alfick3 View Post
Very good and thorough. Thank you for this, hopefully it'll help put some of those with doubts at ease.

A point though, if I may. I believe (and it's just from my memory since I was with Cingular at the time) that after the merger, Cingular kept the name A T & T for the company just because it was a well established name where as Cingular was established in all areas of the country. They felt it was better for business to have the better known name. That is what I was also told about while I was going to DeVry University getting a telecommunications degree. We were discussing it cause it was the big news at the time. Now, I could be wrong but that is what I remember learning about the Cingular/AT & T merger.
You are right, as i said, there was a lot more to that than i was explaining but it's the best example to give for the T-Mobile and MetroPCS merger. what I was driving at was the reason why the T-Mobile name will stay is because MetroPCS chose to keep that name. If MetroPCS wanted to they can switch the name back to MetroPCS anytime if they wanted to. Just as AT&T can say "let's change the name back to Cingular" but the companies would have to agree to that. The AT&T name didn't have a strong presence in the wireless industry as it did in the Landline industry, Compared to Cingular at the time that is. as a known brand name to all consumers AT&T is highly recognized. Your statement is correct.
alfick3 likes this.
myrieboy is offline  
The Following User Says Thank You to myrieboy For This Useful Post:
alfick3 (October 20th, 2012)
Old October 20th, 2012, 10:08 PM   #10 (permalink)
Junior Member
Thread Author (OP)
 
myrieboy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: New York City (Queens) NY
Gender: Male
Posts: 51
 
Device(s): Samsung Galaxy S3, Nokia Lumia 900, LG Optimus M, Samsung Galaxy Indulge, HTC Wildfire, LG Esteem.
Carrier: MetroPCS

Thanks: 18
Thanked 25 Times in 10 Posts
Send a message via AIM to myrieboy Send a message via Yahoo to myrieboy myrieboy@gmail.com
Default Good Point

Quote:
Originally Posted by 05TRAILBLAZER View Post
that would suck to be paying high as plans and hidden fee's... i hope they change to prepaid and have learned something from metro.
I know exactly what you mean by this. Thing is though, Post Paid and Pre-Paid are highly debateable. These two options are highly opinionated when discussed. But because of this I think its best to have both. Each has advantages and disadvantages to both the consumer and wireless company.

Post-Paid: You run a business, and you want that business to have a foundation, so you invest alot of money into cheaper products for consumers and this is something that will give you some power to your competition. You pay manufacturers a certain percentage of the cost of their products or pay for it in full so you can provide the customer with your own set prices and deals. However you know that if your customer leaves freely, you will have a huge financial loss on your hands that would add up with other customers who freely leave. So you decide to have customers sign in to a contract to make a commitment to you so you have time to turn a profit before any potential loss happens. This keeps you in business for the long run.

Pre-Paid: again you run a business but sacrifice not spending money up front on manufacturers products which ultimately save you money. You leave the full pay out of the products to the consumer, now of course you can't provide extreme discounts to the consumer so you move your pricing fixes into the service with those products which makes your plans come out cheaper which make up for the lack of price adjusting to the devices and products. Another thing you bank on is customers feeling more comfortable to be in control of the length of time they stay with you. Giving customers any sense of freedom can help gain you the loyalty more quickly which can attract more customers and earn your company more profit.

Some customers like deals and benefits so postpaid works for them. Some customers like freedom and flexibility so pre- paid works for them. So in a sense I think it would be wise for the new "T-Metro" to maintain focus to both areas with out favoring either over the other. This benefits the business because they will be attractive to any consumers mind set.
myrieboy is offline  
The Following User Says Thank You to myrieboy For This Useful Post:
mike28 (October 20th, 2012)
sponsored links
Old October 21st, 2012, 04:41 AM   #11 (permalink)
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: NYC
Posts: 515
 
Device(s): LG Esteem(LD-ICS v1.2 GSE + 360 Launcher), Samsung Galaxy Indulge, LG Optimus M
Carrier: Metro PCS

Thanks: 434
Thanked 45 Times in 38 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by myrieboy View Post
I know exactly what you mean by this. Thing is though, Post Paid and Pre-Paid are highly debateable. These two options are highly opinionated when discussed. But because of this I think its best to have both. Each has advantages and disadvantages to both the consumer and wireless company.

Post-Paid: You run a business, and you want that business to have a foundation, so you invest alot of money into cheaper products for consumers and this is something that will give you some power to your competition. You pay manufacturers a certain percentage of the cost of their products or pay for it in full so you can provide the customer with your own set prices and deals. However you know that if your customer leaves freely, you will have a huge financial loss on your hands that would add up with other customers who freely leave. So you decide to have customers sign in to a contract to make a commitment to you so you have time to turn a profit before any potential loss happens. This keeps you in business for the long run.

Pre-Paid: again you run a business but sacrifice not spending money up front on manufacturers products which ultimately save you money. You leave the full pay out of the products to the consumer, now of course you can't provide extreme discounts to the consumer so you move your pricing fixes into the service with those products which makes your plans come out cheaper which make up for the lack of price adjusting to the devices and products. Another thing you bank on is customers feeling more comfortable to be in control of the length of time they stay with you. Giving customers any sense of freedom can help gain you the loyalty more quickly which can attract more customers and earn your company more profit.

Some customers like deals and benefits so postpaid works for them. Some customers like freedom and flexibility so pre- paid works for them. So in a sense I think it would be wise for the new "T-Metro" to maintain focus to both areas with out favoring either over the other. This benefits the business because they will be attractive to any consumers mind set.
I totally agree. The new T-Mob will be wise to keep both segments, esp. the faster-growing prepaid. If it plays its cards right, it should gobble up most all mvno business.
I'd hate to be an mvno right now after this announced merger.

One of my local Metro dealers left to become independent just 3/4 weeks ago because he felt he could make a better go of it by peddling mvno's, especially after T-Mob announced truly unlimited & unthrottled data--joining Sprint.
And you couldn't blame him. Most Metro stores i've seen have become complete deserts--maybe a straggler here and there. The only stores doing well are in immigrant areas where the international calling plans & addons are beneficial.
This is such a contrast from the heady days of when smartphones first proliferated--lines were long, even with plentiful csr's-- you took a number and waited and waited.
Stores have now cut back from a dozen or more csr's to 1,2 at at most, bored/sleepy/doing homework/reading/etc.
myrieboy likes this.
horsecharles is offline  
Old October 21st, 2012, 11:30 AM   #12 (permalink)
Senior Member
 
THE W's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2012
Location: Detroit
Posts: 1,980
 
Device(s): Kyocera Domino, Freeform II, Freeform III, LG Connect, LG Motion, Samsung Galaxy S III
Carrier: MetroPCS

Thanks: 92
Thanked 180 Times in 157 Posts
Default

Quote:
First I will make a few things clear. This is called a "reverse merger" T-Mobile is actually being bought out by MetroPCS, the difference is that so far Metro has decided that when the dust settles they will keep the T-Mobile name although that is subject to change.
i said something along these lines when this stuff was first coming out and got killed for it..ha.

so what you're saying is that this is, in fact, another attempt by deutsche telekom to sell TMUSA? that this is more or less a fire sale by DT to give TM to metro?

some commented on the reverse merger being done because of taxes, though one of the first articles i quoted before talked about how DT wanted to hand over TM in small bits over time, eventually getting the company off its hands completely.

Deutsche Telekom and MetroPCS Announce Merger (Phone Scoop)

Quote:
The transaction would be a reverse merger, wherein the smaller MetroPCS will acquire the larger T-Mobile USA. Deutsche Telekom would then have time to reduce its ownership of the firm through gradual equity sales rather than all at once.
its not so much that metroPCS is buying out tmobile, but that DT is gradually selling off tmobile to metro and, as you said, metro will retain the tmobile name.

is this ultimately true?
myrieboy likes this.
__________________
when it comes to choosing the best service one must remember: location location location!!!
THE W is offline  
Last edited by THE W; October 21st, 2012 at 11:38 AM.
Old October 21st, 2012, 12:04 PM   #13 (permalink)
Senior Member
 
alfick3's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: DFW, TX
Gender: Male
Posts: 2,077
 
Device(s): LG Motion 4G
Carrier: MetroPCS

Thanks: 1,073
Thanked 225 Times in 197 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by THE W View Post
i said something along these lines when this stuff was first coming out and got killed for it..ha.

so what you're saying is that this is, in fact, another attempt by deutsche telekom to sell TMUSA? that this is more or less a fire sale by DT to give TM to metro?

some commented on the reverse merger being done because of taxes, though one of the first articles i quoted before talked about how DT wanted to hand over TM in small bits over time, eventually getting the company off its hands completely.

Deutsche Telekom and MetroPCS Announce Merger (Phone Scoop)

its not so much that metroPCS is buying out tmobile, but that DT is gradually selling off tmobile to metro and, as you said, metro will retain the tmobile name.

is this ultimately true?

What you are saying sounds about right. For what it's worth, I remember thinking then that what you were saying sounded right, then, as well.
myrieboy likes this.
alfick3 is offline  
Old October 22nd, 2012, 09:01 AM   #14 (permalink)
Junior Member
Thread Author (OP)
 
myrieboy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: New York City (Queens) NY
Gender: Male
Posts: 51
 
Device(s): Samsung Galaxy S3, Nokia Lumia 900, LG Optimus M, Samsung Galaxy Indulge, HTC Wildfire, LG Esteem.
Carrier: MetroPCS

Thanks: 18
Thanked 25 Times in 10 Posts
Send a message via AIM to myrieboy Send a message via Yahoo to myrieboy myrieboy@gmail.com
Default That's exactly what i am saying :)

Quote:
Originally Posted by THE W View Post
i said something along these lines when this stuff was first coming out and got killed for it..ha.

so what you're saying is that this is, in fact, another attempt by deutsche telekom to sell TMUSA? that this is more or less a fire sale by DT to give TM to metro?

some commented on the reverse merger being done because of taxes, though one of the first articles i quoted before talked about how DT wanted to hand over TM in small bits over time, eventually getting the company off its hands completely.

Deutsche Telekom and MetroPCS Announce Merger (Phone Scoop)

its not so much that metroPCS is buying out tmobile, but that DT is gradually selling off tmobile to metro and, as you said, metro will retain the tmobile name.

is this ultimately true?
You got it man. I was bashed by people when I first announced it as well. Most people were just going by how some sites made it seem and the whole 74/26% thing. So I had to break it down in more detail. I actually knew this merger was going to happen almost a year in advance because a lot of the times most stock/business websites give information that seem to tell a "future story" compared to most tech websites based on a companies stock and financing decisions like the whole Verizon possibly buying out direct TV thing for NFL Sunday Ticket.

Metro is definately gaining full ownership of T-Mobile in time as you mentioned. DT just wants to focus on their customers in germany. Its just Metro's disadvantage of being the smaller company but I think Metro made a good choice. I actually am not sure about the tax thing though. I did read about it but I didn't dig deep to get the concrete understanding to that, I can research it though.

This is a very good site to place this information on because in my own opinion this site has the biggest user base of Metro customers, hopefully this helps everyone of them understand what's going on with they're company. especially, with the responses everyone else gave I think any metro customer or even a T-Mobile customer can come here and read this whole thread and have a clear understanding of this merger. I must thank you guys for all your help and feedback with this.
myrieboy is offline  
Old October 22nd, 2012, 09:07 AM   #15 (permalink)
Senior Member
 
THE W's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2012
Location: Detroit
Posts: 1,980
 
Device(s): Kyocera Domino, Freeform II, Freeform III, LG Connect, LG Motion, Samsung Galaxy S III
Carrier: MetroPCS

Thanks: 92
Thanked 180 Times in 157 Posts
Default

if this turned out to ultimately be the case it would be awesome for metro.
myrieboy likes this.
THE W is offline  
Old March 21st, 2013, 06:16 AM   #16 (permalink)
Junior Member
Thread Author (OP)
 
myrieboy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: New York City (Queens) NY
Gender: Male
Posts: 51
 
Device(s): Samsung Galaxy S3, Nokia Lumia 900, LG Optimus M, Samsung Galaxy Indulge, HTC Wildfire, LG Esteem.
Carrier: MetroPCS

Thanks: 18
Thanked 25 Times in 10 Posts
Send a message via AIM to myrieboy Send a message via Yahoo to myrieboy myrieboy@gmail.com
Default

Just an update.

So DT and Metro have approved the Merger deal, the FCC as of March 13th gave the green light on the deal as well the final road block? awaiting Stock holder approval. they have until April 13th according to stock news sites. MetroPCS stocks are also slowly rising.

so we've gotten 2 yes' so far let's see how things turn out next month for the 3rd yes.
myrieboy is offline  
Old March 21st, 2013, 01:50 PM   #17 (permalink)
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2011
Gender: Male
Posts: 501
 
Device(s): Samsung Galaxy Note 3
Carrier: metroPCS

Thanks: 44
Thanked 37 Times in 32 Posts
Default

So at the end of the day my metro gs3 will be getting the same speeds under tmo gs3?? And does anyone know anything regarding if we can keep our planss??
Joshuah22a is offline  
Old March 21st, 2013, 02:37 PM   #18 (permalink)
Junior Member
Thread Author (OP)
 
myrieboy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: New York City (Queens) NY
Gender: Male
Posts: 51
 
Device(s): Samsung Galaxy S3, Nokia Lumia 900, LG Optimus M, Samsung Galaxy Indulge, HTC Wildfire, LG Esteem.
Carrier: MetroPCS

Thanks: 18
Thanked 25 Times in 10 Posts
Send a message via AIM to myrieboy Send a message via Yahoo to myrieboy myrieboy@gmail.com
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Joshuah22a View Post
So at the end of the day my metro gs3 will be getting the same speeds under tmo gs3?? And does anyone know anything regarding if we can keep our planss??
As mentioned, MetroPCS customers will be migrated into the T-Mobile network, in example; MetroPCS and T-Mobile slowly begin to merge into one company which is an expected 2 year progress, let's say during this progression you decide "i wanna upgrade from my S3" and mid-merger you upgrade your phone, your handset will have a Radio in it that supports T-Mobile's GSM/HSPA+ network.

since the time i created this post, T-Mobile has been slowly rolling out LTE towers which we at MetroPCS already run on when in a 4G coverage area.

all in all, you will be able to keep using your handset before, during and after the merger so long as you are within LTE coverage, with the S3 once MetroPCS shuts off it's CDMA towers, only the 4G LTE towers will remain active for T-Mobile to make use of.

Your S3 will operate on those 4G LTE towers as well as T-Mobile's 4G LTE towers but should you leave MetroPCS' 4G LTE coverage area after the CDMA towers are shut off, your S3 will not pick up signal until reaching LTE towers again.

this is not a bad thing though, it's only a scenario, to better explain everything. T-Mobile and MetroPCS are working to have the US LTE coverage as one big blanket by then to avoid such scenarios.
myrieboy is offline  
The Following User Says Thank You to myrieboy For This Useful Post:
Joshuah22a (March 22nd, 2013)
Old March 21st, 2013, 02:58 PM   #19 (permalink)
Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2012
Location: Louisiana
Gender: Male
Posts: 197
 
Device(s): Stock Rooted GS4 i337
Carrier: T-Mobile

Thanks: 60
Thanked 36 Times in 26 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by myrieboy View Post
As mentioned, MetroPCS customers will be migrated into the T-Mobile network, in example; MetroPCS and T-Mobile slowly begin to merge into one company which is an expected 2 year progress, let's say during this progression you decide "i wanna upgrade from my S3" and mid-merger you upgrade your phone, your handset will have a Radio in it that supports T-Mobile's GSM/HSPA+ network.

since the time i created this post, T-Mobile has been slowly rolling out LTE towers which we at MetroPCS already run on when in a 4G coverage area.

all in all, you will be able to keep using your handset before, during and after the merger so long as you are within LTE coverage, with the S3 once MetroPCS shuts off it's CDMA towers, only the 4G LTE towers will remain active for T-Mobile to make use of.

Your S3 will operate on those 4G LTE towers as well as T-Mobile's 4G LTE towers but should you leave MetroPCS' 4G LTE coverage area after the CDMA towers are shut off, your S3 will not pick up signal until reaching LTE towers again.

this is not a bad thing though, it's only a scenario, to better explain everything. T-Mobile and MetroPCS are working to have the US LTE coverage as one big blanket by then to avoid such scenarios.
Do you have any idea about when T-mobile is planning on killing the Sprint roaming agreement?
g0lden is offline  
Old March 21st, 2013, 03:02 PM   #20 (permalink)
Junior Member
Thread Author (OP)
 
myrieboy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: New York City (Queens) NY
Gender: Male
Posts: 51
 
Device(s): Samsung Galaxy S3, Nokia Lumia 900, LG Optimus M, Samsung Galaxy Indulge, HTC Wildfire, LG Esteem.
Carrier: MetroPCS

Thanks: 18
Thanked 25 Times in 10 Posts
Send a message via AIM to myrieboy Send a message via Yahoo to myrieboy myrieboy@gmail.com
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by g0lden View Post
Do you have any idea about when T-mobile is planning on killing the Sprint roaming agreement?
Honestly, I don't have any information on that. If i do come across any core details I will respond to this post.
myrieboy is offline  
sponsored links
Old March 21st, 2013, 03:37 PM   #21 (permalink)
I'm no Senior
 
Gman9831's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: South Florida
Posts: 2,827
 
Device(s): Samsung Galaxy S3, LG Motion(SOLD), LG Connect, Samsung Galaxy Indulge, LG Optimus M (All rooted)
Carrier: MetroPCS

Thanks: 149
Thanked 919 Times in 626 Posts
Default

The metropcs LTE network will be shut down as tmobile upgrades there LTE network and start overlapping. Shouldn't take long since tmobile should match the pops. covered by metropcs LTE by mid-year
Gman9831 is online now  
Old March 21st, 2013, 03:38 PM   #22 (permalink)
I'm no Senior
 
Gman9831's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: South Florida
Posts: 2,827
 
Device(s): Samsung Galaxy S3, LG Motion(SOLD), LG Connect, Samsung Galaxy Indulge, LG Optimus M (All rooted)
Carrier: MetroPCS

Thanks: 149
Thanked 919 Times in 626 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by g0lden View Post
Do you have any idea about when T-mobile is planning on killing the Sprint roaming agreement?
Probably will wait till the last CDMA tower is decommissioned. Sprint has some pretty good roaming rates though. Should be pretty inexpensive for them to keep though with people moving off the CDMA network and if they cap it to 60 days off network usage with some simple caps.
myrieboy likes this.
Gman9831 is online now  
Last edited by Gman9831; March 21st, 2013 at 03:41 PM.
Old March 21st, 2013, 03:57 PM   #23 (permalink)
Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: Miami, FL
Gender: Male
Posts: 195
 
Device(s): Galaxy s3 - t999N
Carrier: Metropcs

Thanks: 1
Thanked 25 Times in 19 Posts
Default

So in other words, any of us currently on Metro's 4G LTE by the end of this year if the merger is approved we'll automatically be merged with the TMo LTE and literally and possibly jump up in speed from one day to the next correct?
Vyrus69 is offline  
Old March 21st, 2013, 06:00 PM   #24 (permalink)
I'm no Senior
 
Gman9831's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: South Florida
Posts: 2,827
 
Device(s): Samsung Galaxy S3, LG Motion(SOLD), LG Connect, Samsung Galaxy Indulge, LG Optimus M (All rooted)
Carrier: MetroPCS

Thanks: 149
Thanked 919 Times in 626 Posts
Default Re: MetroPCS & T-Mobile merger detailed breakdown

Quote:
Originally Posted by Vyrus69 View Post
So in other words, any of us currently on Metro's 4G LTE by the end of this year if the merger is approved we'll automatically be merged with the TMo LTE and literally and possibly jump up in speed from one day to the next correct?
Not merged into you'll be pushed to they dont want metropcs LTE tower equipment in their network. Dont blame them they have release 10 LTE-Advanced equipment while metropcs has the release 8 equipment, you need 10 or higher to be LTE-Advanced capable. But yes one day you might just jump from 5mbps to 50mbps
Gman9831 is online now  
Old March 21st, 2013, 06:20 PM   #25 (permalink)
Junior Member
Thread Author (OP)
 
myrieboy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: New York City (Queens) NY
Gender: Male
Posts: 51
 
Device(s): Samsung Galaxy S3, Nokia Lumia 900, LG Optimus M, Samsung Galaxy Indulge, HTC Wildfire, LG Esteem.
Carrier: MetroPCS

Thanks: 18
Thanked 25 Times in 10 Posts
Send a message via AIM to myrieboy Send a message via Yahoo to myrieboy myrieboy@gmail.com
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Gman9831 View Post
Not merged into you'll be pushed to they dont want metropcs LTE tower equipment in their network. Dont blame them they have release 10 LTE-Advanced equipment while metropcs has the release 8 equipment, you need 10 or higher to be LTE-Advanced capable. But yes one day you might just jump from 5mbps to 50mbps
You will not be "pushed" customers will be migrated over annual upgrades, those who do not upgrade will be given incentives to entice upgrading to T-Mobile handsets. The merger is not about consumer base only, MetroPCS has invested in LTE technology the way T-Mobile has not.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Vyrus69 View Post
So in other words, any of us currently on Metro's 4G LTE by the end of this year if the merger is approved we'll automatically be merged with the TMo LTE and literally and possibly jump up in speed from one day to the next correct?
To an extent yes. But we will not be able to squeeze out those peak LTE on even our S3 handsets with out a good radio upgrade if T-Mobile chooses to support the MetroPCS S3's that way.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Gman9831 View Post
Probably will wait till the last CDMA tower is decommissioned. Sprint has some pretty good roaming rates though. Should be pretty inexpensive for them to keep though with people moving off the CDMA network and if they cap it to 60 days off network usage with some simple caps.
Who knows if Sprint will even play nice if this Metro and T-Mo merger is approved.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Gman9831 View Post
The metropcs LTE network will be shut down as tmobile upgrades there LTE network and start overlapping. Shouldn't take long since tmobile should match the pops. covered by metropcs LTE by mid-year
The MetroPCS LTE towers will not be shut down. They will be upgraded though. It's too expensive to shut down those towers for new ones when simply tweaking them is more efficient.
myrieboy is offline  
Old March 21st, 2013, 06:40 PM   #26 (permalink)
I'm no Senior
 
Gman9831's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: South Florida
Posts: 2,827
 
Device(s): Samsung Galaxy S3, LG Motion(SOLD), LG Connect, Samsung Galaxy Indulge, LG Optimus M (All rooted)
Carrier: MetroPCS

Thanks: 149
Thanked 919 Times in 626 Posts
Default Re: MetroPCS & T-Mobile merger detailed breakdown

Quote:
Originally Posted by myrieboy View Post
You will not be "pushed" customers will be migrated over annual upgrades, those who do not upgrade will be given incentives to entice upgrading to T-Mobile handsets. The merger is not about consumer base only, MetroPCS has invested in LTE technology the way T-Mobile has not.



To an extent yes. But we will not be able to squeeze out those peak LTE on even our S3 handsets with out a good radio upgrade if T-Mobile chooses to support the MetroPCS S3's that way.



Who knows if Sprint will even play nice if this Metro and T-Mo merger is approved.



The MetroPCS LTE towers will not be shut down. They will be upgraded though. It's too expensive to shut down those towers for new ones when simply tweaking them is more efficient.
T-Mobile has said they'll be shutting of the metropcs LTE in areas which they overlap. Then moving those customers onto the newer T-Mobile LTE network. They'll be moving people of the CDMA network through a phone upgrade. But with LTE they simply stop broadcasting metropcs LTE signal then let you authenticate on T-Mobile LTE signal.


Peak is 73mbps with overhead already included so you could likely see in the 50's on a 10x10MHz network. Then much higher when the 20x20MHz network goes live speeds would be faster than all the other current 4G by double.

Sprint's a corporation that wants money. Dont think they would see metropcs's limited access CDMA network as a threat especially since it'll only have about 2 years of life left. Also since T-Mobile wont be letting new customers on it.

Where have you been? They have even said they're eventually gonna decommission about 90% of metro's cell sites.
Gman9831 is online now  
Old March 21st, 2013, 07:04 PM   #27 (permalink)
Junior Member
Thread Author (OP)
 
myrieboy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: New York City (Queens) NY
Gender: Male
Posts: 51
 
Device(s): Samsung Galaxy S3, Nokia Lumia 900, LG Optimus M, Samsung Galaxy Indulge, HTC Wildfire, LG Esteem.
Carrier: MetroPCS

Thanks: 18
Thanked 25 Times in 10 Posts
Send a message via AIM to myrieboy Send a message via Yahoo to myrieboy myrieboy@gmail.com
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Gman9831 View Post
T-Mobile has said they'll be shutting of the metropcs LTE in areas which they overlap. Then moving those customers onto the newer T-Mobile LTE network. They'll be moving people of the CDMA network through a phone upgrade. But with LTE they simply stop broadcasting metropcs LTE signal then let you authenticate on T-Mobile LTE signal.


Peak is 73mbps with overhead already included so you could likely see in the 50's on a 10x10MHz network. Then much higher when the 20x20MHz network goes live speeds would be faster than all the other current 4G by double.

Sprint's a corporation that wants money. Dont think they would see metropcs's limited access CDMA network as a threat especially since it'll only have about 2 years of life left. Also since T-Mobile wont be letting new customers on it.

Where have you been? They have even said they're eventually gonna decommission about 90% of metro's cell sites.
Where did you hear this? In terms of tower over lapping, T-Mobile can only over lap a tower where MetroPCS LTE is already placed. However, MetroPCS beat all companies to the punch, they were to first to release LTE, and they had a plan to release a more deeper LTE signal similar to what T-Mobile just started doing this year. (T-Mobile's LTE JUST went live, Galaxy Note II's received an update to try it out in beta form. They can not cut the LTE broadcast because the push for getting towers out, takes time, MetroPCS already has that covered in densely, populated urban areas.

What you mention about T-Mobile's 20x20 Network is actually what T-Mobile wanted to do and finally did that off of MetroPCS' blueprint plans. Before this merger, DT was not thinking 20x20 LTE, they were thinking, "why are spending money on T-Mobile when we have a German install base to take care of? Let's sell! They pitched to Sprint that failed. AT&T, Denied. MetroPCS did not have the money to buy them but the contracts to lay out the LTE and they won some of that auctioned spectrum all while T-Mobile was looking for a buyer, so, Metro had the investments in the technology, T-Mobile had the cash flow and consumer to get Metro off the ground, a match made in heaven.

Sprint is currently working out a partial sell out of the company with a Japanese one, so again who knows how sprint is going to play this one especially when they will no longer have 100% say in how they use contracts and towers anymore. That is up in the air.

They will slowly power off CDMA towers until the last CDMA/Feature Phone customer is off. In what you state here, its true for the CDMA part, the LTE part is a different story.

I have been where the money is, not where the news is. I keep up with stock sites as I am invested on MetroPCS stock. I did not invest enough to make an earthquake, but there is enough for me to keep updated on the status of the merger with concern for where my money is going.
myrieboy is offline  
The Following User Says Thank You to myrieboy For This Useful Post:
alfick3 (March 21st, 2013)
Old March 21st, 2013, 07:23 PM   #28 (permalink)
I'm no Senior
 
Gman9831's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: South Florida
Posts: 2,827
 
Device(s): Samsung Galaxy S3, LG Motion(SOLD), LG Connect, Samsung Galaxy Indulge, LG Optimus M (All rooted)
Carrier: MetroPCS

Thanks: 149
Thanked 919 Times in 626 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by myrieboy View Post
Where did you hear this? In terms of tower over lapping, T-Mobile can only over lap a tower where MetroPCS LTE is already placed. However, MetroPCS beat all companies to the punch, they were to first to release LTE, and they had a plan to release a more deeper LTE signal similar to what T-Mobile just started doing this year. (T-Mobile's LTE JUST went live, Galaxy Note II's received an update to try it out in beta form. They can not cut the LTE broadcast because the push for getting towers out, takes time, MetroPCS already has that covered in densely, populated urban areas.

What you mention about T-Mobile's 20x20 Network is actually what T-Mobile wanted to do and finally did that off of MetroPCS' blueprint plans. Before this merger, DT was not thinking 20x20 LTE, they were thinking, "why are spending money on T-Mobile when we have a German install base to take care of? Let's sell! They pitched to Sprint that failed. AT&T, Denied. MetroPCS did not have the money to buy them but the contracts to lay out the LTE and they won some of that auctioned spectrum all while T-Mobile was looking for a buyer, so, Metro had the investments in the technology, T-Mobile had the cash flow and consumer to get Metro off the ground, a match made in heaven.

Sprint is currently working out a partial sell out of the company with a Japanese one, so again who knows how sprint is going to play this one especially when they will no longer have 100% say in how they use contracts and towers anymore. That is up in the air.

They will slowly power off CDMA towers until the last CDMA/Feature Phone customer is off. In what you state here, its true for the CDMA part, the LTE part is a different story.

I have been where the money is, not where the news is. I keep up with stock sites as I am invested on MetroPCS stock. I did not invest enough to make an earthquake, but there is enough for me to keep updated on the status of the merger with concern for where my money is going.
T-Mobile has been placing LTE on towers since about November of last year they also said they'll have 200 million covered with LTE by the end of the year, thats double the current MetroPCS LTE network. Thats double metro's current network so not worried about how long it'll take.
Dont think SoftBank will make that much of a difference on that front.
Gman9831 is online now  
Old March 22nd, 2013, 07:34 AM   #29 (permalink)
Pātes avec votre foie
 
pastafarian's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: The Sea of Tranquility
Posts: 5,445
 
Device(s): Samsung Note 2(Me), Evo4G LTE(Wife), Nexus 7, Nook Tablet All rooted? Of course!!
Carrier: Sprint

Thanks: 3,749
Thanked 4,410 Times in 1,952 Posts
pastafarianaf@gmail.com
Default

We have two very similar threads that are d=now converging. I don't think merging them would do either justice. Since this thread was more about the initial information about the merger, I'm going to close it and we'll move further discussion to this thread-

Tmobile-MetroPCS Merger Updates & Questions

Thanks!
mike28 and gbiggie like this.
__________________
The RULES, follow them and prosper!

Did you forget to kiss a Mod today?
pastafarian is offline  
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to pastafarian For This Useful Post:
Fuzzy13 (March 22nd, 2013), mike28 (March 22nd, 2013)
Closed Thread


Go Back   Android Forums > Android Carriers > Metro PCS
Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 11:09 PM.
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2014, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.