Go Back   Android Forums > Android Phones > Samsung Galaxy Note 2

Get excited for the Samsung Galaxy S5! Find everything you need and discuss it in our Galaxy S5 Forum!

Like Tree16Likes
  • 3 Post By NZtechfreak
  • 2 Post By k3Ck
  • 1 Post By ScandaLeX
  • 1 Post By k3Ck
  • 2 Post By ScandaLeX
  • 1 Post By NZtechfreak
  • 1 Post By ren857
  • 1 Post By ren857
  • 2 Post By NZtechfreak
  • 1 Post By k3Ck
  • 1 Post By ScandaLeX

test: Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools
Old November 8th, 2012, 06:06 PM   #1 (permalink)
Junior Member
Thread Author (OP)
 
Join Date: Nov 2012
Posts: 37
 
Device(s):
Carrier: Not Provided

Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Default Audio on the Galaxy Note 2

Does this have the Beats audio like some of the Droid phones by chance? How are the speakers overall?

Thanks

EricE

Eric5964 is offline  
Reply With Quote
sponsored links
Old November 8th, 2012, 06:15 PM   #2 (permalink)
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: Auckland, New Zealand
Posts: 1,824
 
Device(s): Galaxy S, HTC Desire
Carrier: Not Provided

Thanks: 112
Thanked 771 Times in 407 Posts
Default

The speaker (singular) is very decent.

No Beats, but Beats is junk. Use a player with an EQ if you want to deteriorate the fidelity of your sound quality with flabby and boomy enhanced bass, same result.
__________________
Blogs: androidNZ.net and blog.clove.co.uk
Twitter: @NZtechfreak Facebook: http://goo.gl/baZHQ
Galaxy Note Mega Review: http://goo.gl/Lnoe9
Galaxy SIII Review Part 1 & 2: http://goo.gl/8GCHG & http://goo.gl/gDYkA
Galaxy SIII & Nexus 7 Root guides: http://goo.gl/DMN5v & http://goo.gl/pQbUB
NZtechfreak is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old November 8th, 2012, 07:10 PM   #3 (permalink)
Member
 
k3Ck's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: NJ
Gender: Male
Posts: 186
 
Device(s): Samsung Galaxy Note 3, Samsung Galaxy Note II, Motorola ATRIX 4G, iPhone 3G
Carrier: Not Provided

Thanks: 17
Thanked 27 Times in 20 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by NZtechfreak View Post
No Beats, but Beats is junk..
This. Beats is awful and anyone that knows audio will tell you that. Stop buying into the name...

Jocelyn84 and BleedingPurist like this.
k3Ck is offline  
Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to k3Ck For This Useful Post:
jaragon (November 8th, 2012)
Old November 8th, 2012, 07:18 PM   #4 (permalink)
Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2012
Posts: 105
 
Device(s):
Carrier: Not Provided

Thanks: 2
Thanked 5 Times in 5 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by k3Ck View Post
This. Beats is awful and anyone that knows audio will tell you that. Stop buying into the name...

Monster itself makes fairly decent stuff, but beats are just all bass, no mids or highs. People buy them to look cool. I'm in college now, and they sell them in the bookstore (the actual headphones, not the earbuds) and you can defer them against financial aid, and 99% of people on campus have them, and I just laugh at them all. lol
Jsucool76 is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old November 8th, 2012, 08:46 PM   #5 (permalink)
Wasn't Me
 
ScandaLeX's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2010
Location: PhiLLy
Gender: Female
Posts: 3,771
 
Device(s): NOTE II
Carrier: The NOW Network

Thanks: 1,147
Thanked 936 Times in 608 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Jsucool76 View Post
Monster itself makes fairly decent stuff, but beats are just all bass, no mids or highs. People buy them to look cool. I'm in college now, and they sell them in the bookstore (the actual headphones, not the earbuds) and you can defer them against financial aid, and 99% of people on campus have them, and I just laugh at them all. lol
I'm no audiophile and have long passed the age where I have to concern myself with looking cool. I enjoy my beats and have no problem saying I like them because of the base.
JunBringer likes this.
ScandaLeX is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old November 8th, 2012, 09:11 PM   #6 (permalink)
Junior Member
 
jaragon's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2012
Location: new york
Gender: Male
Posts: 18
 
Device(s): Galaxy Note 2
Carrier: Not Provided

Thanks: 5
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Default

I love the music player I also appreciate the equalizer there are numerous settings to choose from. No need for third party music player in my honest opinion
jaragon is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old November 8th, 2012, 10:30 PM   #7 (permalink)
Member
 
k3Ck's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: NJ
Gender: Male
Posts: 186
 
Device(s): Samsung Galaxy Note 3, Samsung Galaxy Note II, Motorola ATRIX 4G, iPhone 3G
Carrier: Not Provided

Thanks: 17
Thanked 27 Times in 20 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by ScandaLeX View Post
I'm no audiophile and have long passed the age where I have to concern myself with looking cool. I enjoy my beats and have no problem saying I like them because of the base.
The bass really isn't the problem with them. The problem is they are insanely overpriced. You can get far better headphones for half the price of Beats.

Anyone interested in headphones should check these Sennheiser headphones/buds out. They range from $25 to $3,000.

http://www.amazon.com/s/ref=nb_sb_noss?url=search-alias%3Daps&field-keywords=sennheiser&rh=i%3Aaps%2Ck%3Asennheiser

But if you want great value for the money then these are legendary in the audiophile forums...

http://www.monoprice.com/products/product.asp?c_id=108&cp_id=10823&cs_id=1082302&p_i d=8323&seq=1&format=2

Those $20 headphones sound much better than my best friends $300 Beats, no contest.
BleedingPurist likes this.
k3Ck is offline  
Last edited by k3Ck; November 8th, 2012 at 10:37 PM.
Reply With Quote
Old November 9th, 2012, 01:55 AM   #8 (permalink)
Wasn't Me
 
ScandaLeX's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2010
Location: PhiLLy
Gender: Female
Posts: 3,771
 
Device(s): NOTE II
Carrier: The NOW Network

Thanks: 1,147
Thanked 936 Times in 608 Posts
Default

Beats may be overpriced. So are a lot of things we choose to spend our money on. I bought them because I wanted them. I wasn't out bargaining shipping or trying to save a dollar. Not sure why people like slamming others when THEY don't like a particular product or brand.
JunBringer and ren857 like this.
ScandaLeX is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old November 9th, 2012, 02:14 AM   #9 (permalink)
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: Auckland, New Zealand
Posts: 1,824
 
Device(s): Galaxy S, HTC Desire
Carrier: Not Provided

Thanks: 112
Thanked 771 Times in 407 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by ScandaLeX View Post
Beats may be overpriced. So are a lot of things we choose to spend our money on. I bought them because I wanted them. I wasn't out bargaining shipping or trying to save a dollar. Not sure why people like slamming others when THEY don't like a particular product or brand.
Yep, if people want to buy Beats and enjoy how they sound more power to them. I've no problem with that. Suits me fine, lets me sit on the bus with my $1400 headphones secure in the knowledge that a thief will go for the guy wearing Beats

I wonder though how many would go for Beats if they'd heard the awesome kind of bass you get out of stuff like the HiFiMan HE-400 (@$400)?
bengadget likes this.
NZtechfreak is offline  
Last edited by NZtechfreak; November 9th, 2012 at 04:23 AM.
Reply With Quote
Old November 9th, 2012, 02:33 AM   #10 (permalink)
Wasn't Me
 
ScandaLeX's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2010
Location: PhiLLy
Gender: Female
Posts: 3,771
 
Device(s): NOTE II
Carrier: The NOW Network

Thanks: 1,147
Thanked 936 Times in 608 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by NZtechfreak View Post
Yep, if people want to buy Beats and enjoy how they sound more power to them. I've no problem with that. Suits me fine, lets me sit on the bus with my $1400 headphones secure in the knowledge that a thief will go for the guy wearing beats

I wonder though how many would go for Beats if they'd heard the awesome kind of bass you get out of stuff like the HiFiMan HE-400 (@$400)?
LOL!!! I don't ride the bus.
ScandaLeX is offline  
Reply With Quote
sponsored links
Old November 9th, 2012, 06:09 AM   #11 (permalink)
Junior Member
Thread Author (OP)
 
Join Date: Nov 2012
Posts: 37
 
Device(s):
Carrier: Not Provided

Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by ScandaLeX View Post
LOL!!! I don't ride the bus.
Yeah, maybe put the $1400 towards a car and some Beats....a Beater and some Beats!

EricE
Eric5964 is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old November 9th, 2012, 07:11 AM   #12 (permalink)
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: Auckland, New Zealand
Posts: 1,824
 
Device(s): Galaxy S, HTC Desire
Carrier: Not Provided

Thanks: 112
Thanked 771 Times in 407 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Eric5964 View Post
Yeah, maybe put the $1400 towards a car and some Beats....a Beater and some Beats!

EricE
I have a car, I just catch the bus sometimes.
NZtechfreak is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old November 9th, 2012, 07:39 AM   #13 (permalink)
Member
 
ren857's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Gender: Female
Posts: 443
 
Device(s): Nexus 5; Samsung Galaxy Note 3
Carrier: T-Mobile

Thanks: 72
Thanked 86 Times in 60 Posts
Default

Yeah, I never understood this obsession with bashing Beats headphones. It seems like most of the time, people bash because of the price.

I have a pair (of the big ones) and I like them. I am not ashamed of that.

Whether something sounds good or not is up to the listener of the music, not so-called and self-proclaimed "audiophiles" - whatever that is.
ScandaLeX likes this.
ren857 is offline  
Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to ren857 For This Useful Post:
ScandaLeX (November 9th, 2012)
Old November 9th, 2012, 07:46 AM   #14 (permalink)
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: Auckland, New Zealand
Posts: 1,824
 
Device(s): Galaxy S, HTC Desire
Carrier: Not Provided

Thanks: 112
Thanked 771 Times in 407 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by ren857 View Post
Yeah, I never understood this obsession with bashing Beats headphones. It seems like most of the time, people bash because of the price.

I have a pair (of the big ones) and I like them. I am not ashamed of that.

Whether something sounds good or not is up to the listener of the music, not so-called and self-proclaimed "audiophiles" - whatever that is.
Yes, generally bashed for the fact they are well overpriced for the sound quality they offer (which suits some people fine as you say).
NZtechfreak is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old November 9th, 2012, 08:09 AM   #15 (permalink)
Member
 
ren857's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Gender: Female
Posts: 443
 
Device(s): Nexus 5; Samsung Galaxy Note 3
Carrier: T-Mobile

Thanks: 72
Thanked 86 Times in 60 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by NZtechfreak View Post
Yes, generally bashed for the fact they are well overpriced for the sound quality they offer (which suits some people fine as you say).
Fact? No. Opinion? Yes. Professional opinion? Sure, why not. LOL

Quality is subjective.
ScandaLeX likes this.
ren857 is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old November 9th, 2012, 08:18 AM   #16 (permalink)
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: Auckland, New Zealand
Posts: 1,824
 
Device(s): Galaxy S, HTC Desire
Carrier: Not Provided

Thanks: 112
Thanked 771 Times in 407 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by ren857 View Post
Fact? No. Opinion? Yes. Professional opinion? Sure, why not. LOL

Quality is subjective.
No, sound quality is quite measurable in fact, and compared to many other headphones in their respective price brackets Beats headphones perform fairly miserably.

Taste in sound is subjective, and Beats runs to some peoples tastes, but that isn't the same thing.

http://www.innerfidelity.com/content/monster-beats-dr-dre-solo
Jocelyn84 and k3Ck like this.
NZtechfreak is offline  
Last edited by NZtechfreak; November 9th, 2012 at 08:24 AM.
Reply With Quote
Old November 9th, 2012, 09:42 AM   #17 (permalink)
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2012
Location: Toledo
Gender: Male
Posts: 32
 
Device(s): Samsung Galaxy Note 2 (AT&T) Samsung Galaxy Note 3 (pre-order)
Carrier: AT&T

Thanks: 1
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Default

I bought 3 different versions of the Beats headphones and I was extremely disappointed in

all of them. MY $50 Skull Candy earbuds are better than those Beats. But hey thats just

my opinion
RalfyJ is online now  
Reply With Quote
Old November 9th, 2012, 09:50 AM   #18 (permalink)
Member
 
ren857's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Gender: Female
Posts: 443
 
Device(s): Nexus 5; Samsung Galaxy Note 3
Carrier: T-Mobile

Thanks: 72
Thanked 86 Times in 60 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by NZtechfreak View Post
No, sound quality is quite measurable in fact, and compared to many other headphones in their respective price brackets Beats headphones perform fairly miserably.

Taste in sound is subjective, and Beats runs to some peoples tastes, but that isn't the same thing.

Monster Beats by Dr. Dre Solo | InnerFidelity
Ah. That's interesting! Thanks for the link. I like to learn new things!
ren857 is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old November 9th, 2012, 02:15 PM   #19 (permalink)
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: Auckland, New Zealand
Posts: 1,824
 
Device(s): Galaxy S, HTC Desire
Carrier: Not Provided

Thanks: 112
Thanked 771 Times in 407 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by ren857 View Post
Ah. That's interesting! Thanks for the link. I like to learn new things!
No worries, glad you liked. Excellent site about audio stuff that one.
NZtechfreak is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old November 9th, 2012, 02:24 PM   #20 (permalink)
Senior Member
 
evohicks's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: Shropshire, UK
Posts: 901
 
Device(s): Galaxy Note 2 Amber Brown, Galaxy Note 3 Jet Black
Carrier: EE, but sim free

Thanks: 18
Thanked 148 Times in 116 Posts
Default

Back to the OP, siund is pretty good on the Note 2. Best I've heard in a phone so far.
evohicks is online now  
Reply With Quote
sponsored links
Old November 9th, 2012, 02:36 PM   #21 (permalink)
Member
 
k3Ck's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: NJ
Gender: Male
Posts: 186
 
Device(s): Samsung Galaxy Note 3, Samsung Galaxy Note II, Motorola ATRIX 4G, iPhone 3G
Carrier: Not Provided

Thanks: 17
Thanked 27 Times in 20 Posts
Exclamation

Quote:
Originally Posted by ren857 View Post
Whether something sounds good or not is up to the listener of the music, not so-called and self-proclaimed "audiophiles" - whatever that is.
They're actually put through audio tests in sound engineering labs on review sites and forums. It's not just an audiophile opinion, there's scientific ways of testing audio gear.

People buy Beats for image alone, the end. Sorry if I have offended anyone - it was not my intention, was just trying to give advice and steer people away from buying extremely overpriced stuff.





EDIT

Quote:
Originally Posted by NZtechfreak View Post
No, sound quality is quite measurable in fact, and compared to many other headphones in their respective price brackets Beats headphones perform fairly miserably.

Taste in sound is subjective, and Beats runs to some peoples tastes, but that isn't the same thing.

Monster Beats by Dr. Dre Solo | InnerFidelity
You beat me to it, didn't read the thread. Thanks for saying it for me so I didn't have to sound like an asshole. Beats are indeed miserable and would be a ripoff at $50 let alone $300. Beats are all just a marketing ploy and they suckered you guys in real good. Bose audio stuff are another prime example of a ripoff although they're a little bit better the Beats I suppose. At least you'll know next time...



PS: Sound is indeed subjective to the user but I'd but my house that anyone who bought Beats didn't even listen to them first let alone try anything else in the same price range.

Quote:
Originally Posted by RalfyJ View Post
Skull Candy


Quote:
Originally Posted by Jsucool76 View Post
Monster itself makes fairly decent stuff
No they don't. They make $150 HDMI cables that perform the same as tin foil. There was a test between shoving tin foil into the sockets and their $150 HDMI cable and no one could tell the difference. Monster and everything they make (Beats ect) are pure trash.
Jocelyn84 likes this.
k3Ck is offline  
Last edited by k3Ck; November 9th, 2012 at 02:52 PM.
Reply With Quote
Old November 9th, 2012, 02:38 PM   #22 (permalink)
Senior Member
 
sx4dude2013's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: Georgia
Posts: 857
 
Device(s): Droid Bionic Rooted
Carrier: Not Provided

Thanks: 12
Thanked 64 Times in 44 Posts
Default

Sound is decent. Not amazing, but decent
__________________
Current: Nexus 4 via StraightTalk
sx4dude2013 is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old November 9th, 2012, 03:02 PM   #23 (permalink)
Member
 
ren857's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Gender: Female
Posts: 443
 
Device(s): Nexus 5; Samsung Galaxy Note 3
Carrier: T-Mobile

Thanks: 72
Thanked 86 Times in 60 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by k3Ck View Post

People buy Beats for image alone, the end. Sorry if I have offended anyone - it was not my intention, was just trying to give advice and steer people away from buying extremely overpriced stuff.




I'm not offended by a stranger's opinion on the internet.

But what you said is not true...especially for this buyer. I'm a 38-year old mother and wife. I can give a hoot about image. I leave that for the young people.

I buy what's good to my ears. If I want to pay a premium, that's my choice because my enjoyment is priceless...so to speak.

But say that I wanted to buy for image. And what?


ETA: Pardon me if I said too much on this. I just can't stand when someone belittles or is judgmental about another adult's purchases.
ren857 is offline  
Last edited by ren857; November 9th, 2012 at 03:05 PM.
Reply With Quote
Old November 9th, 2012, 03:19 PM   #24 (permalink)
Member
 
k3Ck's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: NJ
Gender: Male
Posts: 186
 
Device(s): Samsung Galaxy Note 3, Samsung Galaxy Note II, Motorola ATRIX 4G, iPhone 3G
Carrier: Not Provided

Thanks: 17
Thanked 27 Times in 20 Posts
Angry

Quote:
Originally Posted by ren857 View Post
I'm not offended by a stranger's opinion on the internet.

But what you said is not true...especially for this buyer. I'm a 38-year old mother and wife. I can give a hoot about image. I leave that for the young people.

I buy what's good to my ears. If I want to pay a premium, that's my choice because my enjoyment is priceless...so to speak.

But say that I wanted to buy for image. And what?


ETA: Pardon me if I said too much on this. I just can't stand when someone belittles or is judgmental about another adult's purchases.
1) You did buy them for the image and the marketing they have. If not, tell me what other headphones did you try in that price range?
2) You don't buy electronics for an image.
3) If you're happy (like you said) then that's great. Just know you that you overpaid tremendously for the sound quality they have.
4) It's pointless for me to argue with someone who is clueless about audio equipment.
5) I'm not belittling, I'm giving advice to future (and current) buyers so people don't get ripped off and have buyers remorse when they find out their $300 headphones are not half as good as a pair of $50 Sennheiser headphones.

Leaving this thread now forever because this is getting stupid.

Good day.
k3Ck is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old November 9th, 2012, 03:50 PM   #25 (permalink)
Wasn't Me
 
ScandaLeX's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2010
Location: PhiLLy
Gender: Female
Posts: 3,771
 
Device(s): NOTE II
Carrier: The NOW Network

Thanks: 1,147
Thanked 936 Times in 608 Posts
Default

Test or no test you seem to be very opinionated of the product and the people who buy them yet you mean no offense. Why the need to pass so much judgement?

Wanting people to not waste their money is great but at the end of the day it's their money and their choice of what they choose to spend it on.

You said you bet whoever bought Beats did not listen to them first. You can't possibly know that. I'm listening to music with my ears not yours and the type of music I like may be very different from yours.

Everyone is entitled to their opinion but you have to realize it really is just that....your opinion. Count your pennies and buy that really great sounding $20 headset. I'm not going to trash your choice.
ScandaLeX is offline  
Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to ScandaLeX For This Useful Post:
ren857 (November 11th, 2012)
Old November 9th, 2012, 03:57 PM   #26 (permalink)
Member
 
k3Ck's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: NJ
Gender: Male
Posts: 186
 
Device(s): Samsung Galaxy Note 3, Samsung Galaxy Note II, Motorola ATRIX 4G, iPhone 3G
Carrier: Not Provided

Thanks: 17
Thanked 27 Times in 20 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by ScandaLeX View Post
opinion


Read above. They're scientifically proven to be absolute trash in terms of sound quality through various audio lab tests. There's no opinion, it's fact and there's really nothing to argue about. I'm happy I didn't buy them and you're happy you did so who cares.

Lets just be happy now.



http://youtu.be/ipZY0qGrA9Y
k3Ck is offline  
Last edited by k3Ck; November 9th, 2012 at 04:06 PM.
Reply With Quote
Old November 9th, 2012, 05:12 PM   #27 (permalink)
Wasn't Me
 
ScandaLeX's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2010
Location: PhiLLy
Gender: Female
Posts: 3,771
 
Device(s): NOTE II
Carrier: The NOW Network

Thanks: 1,147
Thanked 936 Times in 608 Posts
Default

Well, since this thread is regarding Audio On The Galaxy Note 2, let's get back to that instead of this headphone argument.
ren857 likes this.
ScandaLeX is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old November 9th, 2012, 06:40 PM   #28 (permalink)
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: Auckland, New Zealand
Posts: 1,824
 
Device(s): Galaxy S, HTC Desire
Carrier: Not Provided

Thanks: 112
Thanked 771 Times in 407 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by ScandaLeX View Post
Well, since this thread is regarding Audio On The Galaxy Note 2, let's get back to that instead of this headphone argument.
Good idea, lets not hijack this thread any further with (another) discussion about Beats.
NZtechfreak is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old November 9th, 2012, 06:50 PM   #29 (permalink)
Member
 
k3Ck's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: NJ
Gender: Male
Posts: 186
 
Device(s): Samsung Galaxy Note 3, Samsung Galaxy Note II, Motorola ATRIX 4G, iPhone 3G
Carrier: Not Provided

Thanks: 17
Thanked 27 Times in 20 Posts
Thumbs up

Quote:
Originally Posted by ScandaLeX View Post
Well, since this thread is regarding Audio On The Galaxy Note 2, let's get back to that instead of this headphone argument.
The audio is pretty good but can be slightly scratchy on max volumes with certain sounds/music. Overall it's really good, loud, and clear.
k3Ck is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old November 10th, 2012, 09:22 PM   #30 (permalink)
Senior Member
 
JunBringer's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2010
Posts: 3,175
 
Device(s): Sony Xperia Z Ultra (White), LG Nexus 5(White), LG Nexus 4 (Black), Pebble (white), Google CR-48
Carrier: T-Mobile (Prepaid)

Thanks: 688
Thanked 331 Times in 264 Posts
Default

Did anyone have the original Note that could say if this is better/louder?
__________________
TechBringer.tumblr.com
JunBringer is offline  
Reply With Quote
sponsored links
Old November 11th, 2012, 12:00 PM   #31 (permalink)
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: Auckland, New Zealand
Posts: 1,824
 
Device(s): Galaxy S, HTC Desire
Carrier: Not Provided

Thanks: 112
Thanked 771 Times in 407 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by JunBringer View Post
Did anyone have the original Note that could say if this is better/louder?
Don't have my original Note anymore, so can't compare loudness, but in terms of sound quality it is better than the original Note.
NZtechfreak is offline  
Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to NZtechfreak For This Useful Post:
JunBringer (November 11th, 2012)
Old November 11th, 2012, 01:26 PM   #32 (permalink)
Wasn't Me
 
ScandaLeX's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2010
Location: PhiLLy
Gender: Female
Posts: 3,771
 
Device(s): NOTE II
Carrier: The NOW Network

Thanks: 1,147
Thanked 936 Times in 608 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by JunBringer View Post
Did anyone have the original Note that could say if this is better/louder?
I vaguely recall seeing somewhere that it was better and louder than the original.
ScandaLeX is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old November 11th, 2012, 06:15 PM   #33 (permalink)
Senior Member
 
JunBringer's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2010
Posts: 3,175
 
Device(s): Sony Xperia Z Ultra (White), LG Nexus 5(White), LG Nexus 4 (Black), Pebble (white), Google CR-48
Carrier: T-Mobile (Prepaid)

Thanks: 688
Thanked 331 Times in 264 Posts
Default

oh good, thanks guys!
JunBringer is offline  
Reply With Quote
Reply

Samsung Galaxy Note 2
Current Rating:
Rate this Phone:

Announced at IFA 2012, the Samsung Galaxy Note 2 follows its predecessor with a focus on creativity. The device improves the experience by adding more S-Pen functionality and new-generation specs, not to mention the slightly larger 5.5-inch display... Read More



Go Back   Android Forums > Android Phones > Samsung Galaxy Note 2
Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 02:24 PM.
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2014, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.