Go Back   Android Forums > Android Phones > Samsung Galaxy S2 (AT&T)

Get excited for the Samsung Galaxy S5! Find everything you need and discuss it in our Galaxy S5 Forum!

test: Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools
Old August 31st, 2011, 08:17 AM   #1 (permalink)
Member
Thread Author (OP)
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Posts: 209
 
Device(s):
Carrier: Not Provided

Thanks: 7
Thanked 23 Times in 16 Posts
Default Attain 4.3" screen instead of 4.5"=major letdown

So the one thing that probably really bugs me about my current phone the Captivate is the paltry 4.0" screen. At the time it was one of the biggest (only the Evo and Droid X were bigger at the time) but now it has fallen way behind.

So basically if I spend big bucks on another phone (and I'm not upgrade eligible til March) I want to be ahead of the curve on screen size (as well as all other major specs IE dual core, 1GB RAM etc, so the Infuse is out).

That means I'm probably not settling for less than 4.5", and heck 4.65 as the rumored Nexus Prime might be nice for a little future proofing.

So it's really disappointing to me to see ATT got the only GS2 with a 4.3 inch screen, while the other carriers get 4.5". Maybe I'm the only one who cares, but major enthusiasm killer for me. Real letdown by ATT imo.

I feel like I could buy a 4.5" SGS2 and be happy for two solid years, even the Nexus Prime wouldn't tempt me that much. But 4.3 (and in fact I think it's really even less, like 4.27") just isn't enough. It will be just like the 4.0 on my Captivate, feeling outdated way too fast once I buy it. It seems like all flagships are already switching to 4.5, and they'll get even bigger once Ice Cream removes the space taken by the hardware buttons.

Call me immature but I like having the "biggest and badest" phone among everybody I know. You cant do that if your screen is smaller. If I get a 4.3, random people will be sporting bigger 4.5's in no time. Whereas a 4.5, will probably stay at the top for a while. Besides the utility, the SINGLE biggest need on smartphones is more screen space imo.

shark974 is offline  
Last edited by shark974; August 31st, 2011 at 08:20 AM.
Reply With Quote
sponsored links
Old August 31st, 2011, 08:45 AM   #2 (permalink)
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Posts: 24
 
Device(s):
Carrier: Not Provided

Thanks: 4
Thanked 3 Times in 3 Posts
Default

If it is really that disappointing wait for the nexus prime or HTC Holiday. I for one am pleased its not going to be 4.5. I always use otterbox defender cases so its going to be tough as is.
hd779 is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old August 31st, 2011, 09:00 AM   #3 (permalink)
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: Texas
Posts: 50
 
Device(s): Contract up and waiting for Samsung Attain
Carrier: Not Provided

Thanks: 1
Thanked 3 Times in 2 Posts
Default

I am very very very happy it only has a 4.3. When the Infuse came out, I wasnt even aware of SGSII. I didn't do my homework because my contract was up and I needed a phone right then and right now. I liked the Infuse, but couldn't pull the trigger because it was just too ridiculously big for me. It was definitely a deal breaker for me. That's when I started researching phones thinking there has to be something better coming out with a smaller screen. Sure enough, it was the "Attain". After many months of waiting, I was disappointed to hear rumors about the US version going to have a 4.5". So glad AT&T didn't go that route.
archittech7 is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old August 31st, 2011, 10:03 AM   #4 (permalink)
Senior Member
 
Mr. Ed's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: Over Yonder
Posts: 6,675
 
Device(s): S3, Evo LTE,Galaxy Note, Skyrocket, Aria, Nook Color Lg thrill,HTC EVO 4g, HTC Inspire,S7 slim,Acer
Carrier: Not Provided

Thanks: 1,008
Thanked 1,467 Times in 989 Posts
Default

lol..you guys continue to crack me up... like I have said before..once you hold a 4.3" and a 4.5" in your hands ...side by side...you won't be able to tell the difference.


There are soooo many more good reasons to wait for the Holiday though...so I will give you that one
__________________
I'm back....
Mr. Ed is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old August 31st, 2011, 10:07 AM   #5 (permalink)
Member
Thread Author (OP)
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Posts: 209
 
Device(s):
Carrier: Not Provided

Thanks: 7
Thanked 23 Times in 16 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by hd779 View Post
If it is really that disappointing wait for the nexus prime or HTC Holiday. I for one am pleased its not going to be 4.5. I always use otterbox defender cases so its going to be tough as is.

The Nexus Prime I read is headed for Verizon, obviously I'm on ATT. The HTC Holiday is intriguing and indeed 4.5". However I do love Samsung's Super Amoled technology and might have a hard time switching.

Also HTC builds a chunky, heavy phone compared to Samsung's slim mantra. It's really neither here nor there some people prefer one way some another, so HTC's designs arent BAD per se, but I do have a physical labor job, and a light phone is somewhat more necessary to me to carry around all day without being obtrusive in the pocket.

So the HTC might be an option but does have those drawbacks. Probably mainly the lack of super amoled.
shark974 is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old August 31st, 2011, 10:11 AM   #6 (permalink)
Member
Thread Author (OP)
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Posts: 209
 
Device(s):
Carrier: Not Provided

Thanks: 7
Thanked 23 Times in 16 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by archittech7 View Post
I am very very very happy it only has a 4.3. When the Infuse came out, I wasnt even aware of SGSII. I didn't do my homework because my contract was up and I needed a phone right then and right now. I liked the Infuse, but couldn't pull the trigger because it was just too ridiculously big for me. It was definitely a deal breaker for me. That's when I started researching phones thinking there has to be something better coming out with a smaller screen. Sure enough, it was the "Attain". After many months of waiting, I was disappointed to hear rumors about the US version going to have a 4.5". So glad AT&T didn't go that route.

I wouldn't be surprised if the Attain is the same size as the Infuse, ironically.

It's just like my Captivate, if I hold it against my brother's Evo, they are almost the exact same size (Evo=4.3 screen, Captivate=4.0). The Captivate just has way more bezel.

From the SGS2 preview vids I've seen so far handling the Attain next to the other SGS2 variants from the launch event, I haven't noticed the Attain looking any smaller than it's 4.5" SGS2 counterparts. I'd bet they are the same size the Attain just has a bigger bezel.
shark974 is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old August 31st, 2011, 10:19 AM   #7 (permalink)
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2011
Posts: 73
 
Device(s):
Carrier: Not Provided

Thanks: 2
Thanked 3 Times in 3 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Mr. Ed View Post
lol..you guys continue to crack me up... like I have said before..once you hold a 4.3" and a 4.5" in your hands ...side by side...you won't be able to tell the difference.


There are soooo many more good reasons to wait for the Holiday though...so I will give you that one
I tried to respond to this thread earlier, and looks like it never went through....oh wells. Try try again..

Well, again, for me as well 4.5 is just crossing the line. I mean, if you use the logic that 4.3 is pretty much 4.5....well ok then, but 4.5 is basically 4.6...and well since we're at 4.6 lets just go to 5" and so on and so forth and the madness continues. If you hold up an inspire next to an Infuse...the size difference is obvious.

A phone with a 4" screen would be great for me, if honestly if they made an SGS2 with a 4" screen (and assuming the case takes up no extra real-estate than it does with the Infuse) and samsung also made the one they area about to release I'd pick the smaller once. Call me crazy.

I'd own an Atrix right now if the penTile screen it uses wasn't subpar compared to everything else.
KMPrenger is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old August 31st, 2011, 10:22 AM   #8 (permalink)
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2011
Posts: 73
 
Device(s):
Carrier: Not Provided

Thanks: 2
Thanked 3 Times in 3 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by shark974 View Post
I wouldn't be surprised if the Attain is the same size as the Infuse, ironically.

It's just like my Captivate, if I hold it against my brother's Evo, they are almost the exact same size (Evo=4.3 screen, Captivate=4.0). The Captivate just has way more bezel.

From the SGS2 preview vids I've seen so far handling the Attain next to the other SGS2 variants from the launch event, I haven't noticed the Attain looking any smaller than it's 4.5" SGS2 counterparts. I'd bet they are the same size the Attain just has a bigger bezel.
The specs say the AT&T version is 4.9x" inches. The Infuse is 5.2". The HTC Inspire is 4.84 so it will be in between those two, a bit closer to the size of the Inspire.
KMPrenger is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old August 31st, 2011, 10:44 AM   #9 (permalink)
Senior Member
 
MisterEd's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: New Joisey
Posts: 773
 
Device(s): Samsung Infuse
Carrier: Not Provided

Thanks: 14
Thanked 117 Times in 81 Posts
Default

I have an Infuse, and comparing it's 4.5" to 4.3" screen it looks a LOT bigger. Comparing it to physical size the difference is so minute I don't understand how anyone using a 4.3 can think it feels so much larger in hand.

What I have found, the THINNESS is more of an issue than the physical size. The Infuse is so thin (as will be the SGSII) it is like holding a playing card and having it "flip" out of your palm. For me it's actually too thin and doesn't feel stable to hold (I have dropped it numerous times, mostly on the carpet). Once I put a thin case on it that little extra thickness made it much more secure.

Thickness is sometimes more important than just length and width. Makes it feel much better in the palm.

After reading AT&T is going with 4.3" I think I'm just going to hang in with the Infuse for a while and see what comes out in the next month or 2. I may just switch to T-Mo.
__________________
I'm the ORIGINAL MisterEd and no, I am NOT related to Mr. Ed.
MisterEd is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old August 31st, 2011, 10:49 AM   #10 (permalink)
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: Texas
Posts: 50
 
Device(s): Contract up and waiting for Samsung Attain
Carrier: Not Provided

Thanks: 1
Thanked 3 Times in 2 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by KMPrenger View Post
The specs say the AT&T version is 4.9x" inches. The Infuse is 5.2". The HTC Inspire is 4.84 so it will be in between those two, a bit closer to the size of the Inspire.
Thanks for posting that. I'm glad I read to the end before replying with those specs.
I know we're only talking about fractions of inches, but it actually makes a difference when talking about people's hands and fingers. So many people have different attributes. The Infuse (5.2") was just outside my limit for size hand, so I imagine 4.9" will be perfect because that's more on par with the EVO that those at my office have.
archittech7 is offline  
Reply With Quote
sponsored links
Old August 31st, 2011, 11:34 AM   #11 (permalink)
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: Central TX
Gender: Male
Posts: 2,033
 
Device(s): Galaxy S5, Razr HD
Carrier: Not Provided

Thanks: 1,178
Thanked 815 Times in 622 Posts
Default

If I'm on AT&T, I would be very glad that their SGS2 remained at 4.3" unlike other two. WVGA resolution at 4.5" is really crossing the line in terms of clarity as pixels will be larger. Unless they bump up the resolution to like qHD or HD together, there is really no point of just increasing the physical size of screen. Remember that softwares recognize display resolution as the size of screen, not physical size.
Sandroidfan is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old August 31st, 2011, 12:18 PM   #12 (permalink)
Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2011
Posts: 164
 
Device(s): Samsung Galaxy S2
Carrier: Not Provided

Thanks: 61
Thanked 111 Times in 86 Posts
Default

I'm the opposite, I'm glad they kept the 4.3"
RX-78-2 is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old August 31st, 2011, 06:01 PM   #13 (permalink)
Senior Member
 
Mr. Ed's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: Over Yonder
Posts: 6,675
 
Device(s): S3, Evo LTE,Galaxy Note, Skyrocket, Aria, Nook Color Lg thrill,HTC EVO 4g, HTC Inspire,S7 slim,Acer
Carrier: Not Provided

Thanks: 1,008
Thanked 1,467 Times in 989 Posts
Default

I am sorry guys..I have an inspire and infuse...and have had all three (including the attain) laid out side by side...

the difference in SCREEN size is negligible...

The difference in PHONE size is pretty obvious, but as for me (6'4" 220lbs) The Attain is MUCH easier to hold than the Infuse...but this has NOTHING to do with screen size...

But hey..we all need something to complain about....I choose the lack of LTE
Mr. Ed is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old September 1st, 2011, 12:27 AM   #14 (permalink)
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2011
Posts: 53
 
Device(s):
Carrier: Not Provided

Thanks: 8
Thanked 13 Times in 6 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Mr. Ed View Post
I am sorry guys..I have an inspire and infuse...and have had all three (including the attain) laid out side by side...

the difference in SCREEN size is negligible...

The difference in PHONE size is pretty obvious, but as for me (6'4" 220lbs) The Attain is MUCH easier to hold than the Infuse...but this has NOTHING to do with screen size...

But hey..we all need something to complain about....I choose the lack of LTE
I too am confused by the lack of LTE and the smaller screen. Looks like I will be waiting for the Holiday. Can someone who knows more than me explain to me why these devices won't have LTE?
Calvin35 is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old September 1st, 2011, 01:19 AM   #15 (permalink)
Member
Thread Author (OP)
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Posts: 209
 
Device(s):
Carrier: Not Provided

Thanks: 7
Thanked 23 Times in 16 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by KMPrenger View Post
The specs say the AT&T version is 4.9x\ inches. The Infuse is 5.2. The HTC Inspire is 4.84 so it will be in between those two, a bit closer to the size of the Inspire.

According to GSM Arena the specs are:

GS2 (I'm assuming this is the European GS2, and since people say the Attain looks exactly like the Euro GS2 I'm using it, GSM arena doesnt have Attain dimensions yet. The attain might even be larger for all we know): 125.3 x 66.1 x 8.5 mm

Tmobile GS2 (one of the 4.5&quot : 131 x 70 x 9 mm

Not a whole lot of difference. But I guess a little if you care. In inches it's 5.15 vs 4.93


Better yet here's pics of them directly next to each other.

http://www.blogcdn.com/www.engadget.com/media/2011/08/gsii-family-2011-08-31-1.jpg

http://www.blogcdn.com/www.engadget.com/media/2011/08/gsii-family-2011-08-31-3.jpg

http://www.blogcdn.com/www.engadget.com/media/2011/08/gsii-family-2011-08-31-5.jpg

Really dont see much external size difference but to each his own I guess.
shark974 is offline  
Last edited by shark974; September 1st, 2011 at 01:25 AM.
Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to shark974 For This Useful Post:
Mind if I do a J? (September 3rd, 2011)
Old September 1st, 2011, 01:22 AM   #16 (permalink)
Member
Thread Author (OP)
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Posts: 209
 
Device(s):
Carrier: Not Provided

Thanks: 7
Thanked 23 Times in 16 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Sandroidfan View Post
If I'm on AT&T, I would be very glad that their SGS2 remained at 4.3" unlike other two. WVGA resolution at 4.5" is really crossing the line in terms of clarity as pixels will be larger. Unless they bump up the resolution to like qHD or HD together, there is really no point of just increasing the physical size of screen. Remember that softwares recognize display resolution as the size of screen, not physical size.
Why not say 4.3 crosses the line while 4.0 is OK? You just made up something arbitrary.

For the rest of your post, to a point screen size is more important than resolution. a 1" 1080P display wouldn't do anybody any good, despite having a much higher resolution.
shark974 is offline  
Last edited by shark974; September 1st, 2011 at 01:30 AM.
Reply With Quote
Old September 1st, 2011, 01:26 AM   #17 (permalink)
Member
Thread Author (OP)
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Posts: 209
 
Device(s):
Carrier: Not Provided

Thanks: 7
Thanked 23 Times in 16 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by archittech7 View Post
Thanks for posting that. I'm glad I read to the end before replying with those specs.
I know we're only talking about fractions of inches, but it actually makes a difference when talking about people's hands and fingers. So many people have different attributes. The Infuse (5.2") was just outside my limit for size hand, so I imagine 4.9" will be perfect because that's more on par with the EVO that those at my office have.

It's 125.3 mm length Attain (assuming again it's like Euro SGS2) vs 131 mm length 4.5" SGS2 by Tmo. Difference of 4%.
shark974 is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old September 1st, 2011, 01:34 AM   #18 (permalink)
Member
Thread Author (OP)
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Posts: 209
 
Device(s):
Carrier: Not Provided

Thanks: 7
Thanked 23 Times in 16 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Mr. Ed View Post
I am sorry guys..I have an inspire and infuse...and have had all three (including the attain) laid out side by side...

the difference in SCREEN size is negligible...

The difference in PHONE size is pretty obvious, but as for me (6'4" 220lbs) The Attain is MUCH easier to hold than the Infuse...but this has NOTHING to do with screen size...

But hey..we all need something to complain about....I choose the lack of LTE

The other Mr Ed just said the difference in physical size is minute and the difference in screen size is huge Contradict much?
shark974 is offline  
Last edited by shark974; September 1st, 2011 at 01:58 AM.
Reply With Quote
Old September 1st, 2011, 01:36 AM   #19 (permalink)
Member
Thread Author (OP)
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Posts: 209
 
Device(s):
Carrier: Not Provided

Thanks: 7
Thanked 23 Times in 16 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Calvin35 View Post
I too am confused by the lack of LTE and the smaller screen. Looks like I will be waiting for the Holiday. Can someone who knows more than me explain to me why these devices won't have LTE?

Well there is a 4.5" SGS2 LTE version announced, maybe hopefully ATT gets that down the line.
shark974 is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old September 1st, 2011, 01:52 AM   #20 (permalink)
Member
Thread Author (OP)
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Posts: 209
 
Device(s):
Carrier: Not Provided

Thanks: 7
Thanked 23 Times in 16 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by KMPrenger View Post

Well, again, for me as well 4.5 is just crossing the line. I mean, if you use the logic that 4.3 is pretty much 4.5....well ok then, but 4.5 is basically 4.6...and well since we're at 4.6 lets just go to 5" and so on and so forth and the madness continues. If you hold up an inspire next to an Infuse...the size difference is obvious.
And of course you can do the same thing in the other direction. If a 4.5 is too big, the 4.3 is pretty much 4.5...well ok then but 4.3 is basically 4.2, well since we're at 4.2 lets just got to 3.8 and so on and so forth

I would think if you're wanting a 4.3 phone 4.5 isn't much different. 4.3 is already big, if you're worried about size you should be down at 3.7" or so, or at most maybe an Atrix or SGS1. Although as I noted my 4.0" Captivate isn't really smaller than a 4.3 Evo.

The truth is you have to draw the line somewhere both ways, but again if compact is your desire I dont think 4.3 vs 4.5 is exactly where you should draw it that doesn't seem to make a lot of sense, it should be drawn at maybe 3.7 and below, But it's whatever.
shark974 is offline  
Last edited by shark974; September 1st, 2011 at 02:00 AM.
Reply With Quote
sponsored links
Old September 1st, 2011, 07:22 AM   #21 (permalink)
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2011
Posts: 20
 
Device(s):
Carrier: Not Provided

Thanks: 0
Thanked 1 Time in 1 Post
Default

Guys, really?...Really?

I can't believe 0.2" diagonal would make any bit of difference to anyone, realistically. Holding both side-by-side, I doubt most folks would even notice without taking out a ruler.

I superimposed the AT&T screen onto the Sprint screen for reference.

AndroidDazed is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old September 1st, 2011, 07:23 AM   #22 (permalink)
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2011
Posts: 20
 
Device(s):
Carrier: Not Provided

Thanks: 0
Thanked 1 Time in 1 Post
Default

Sorry, I guess I can't post images yet.

But anyway, I agree with those saying that the difference is extremely negligible.
AndroidDazed is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old September 1st, 2011, 07:54 AM   #23 (permalink)
Senior Member
 
MisterEd's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: New Joisey
Posts: 773
 
Device(s): Samsung Infuse
Carrier: Not Provided

Thanks: 14
Thanked 117 Times in 81 Posts
Default

Eat your heart out!
Samsung Galaxy Note Official Video - YouTube
MisterEd is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old September 1st, 2011, 08:10 AM   #24 (permalink)
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2011
Posts: 20
 
Device(s):
Carrier: Not Provided

Thanks: 0
Thanked 1 Time in 1 Post
Default

That Note is awesome. I'd be all over that thing if it were available.
1.4 GHz dual-core processor, 5.3-inch HD AMOLED screen with resolution of 1280800, 285ppi.
AndroidDazed is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old September 1st, 2011, 08:38 AM   #25 (permalink)
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: Texas
Posts: 50
 
Device(s): Contract up and waiting for Samsung Attain
Carrier: Not Provided

Thanks: 1
Thanked 3 Times in 2 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by shark974 View Post
It's 125.3 mm length Attain (assuming again it's like Euro SGS2) vs 131 mm length 4.5" SGS2 by Tmo. Difference of 4%.
We were comparing the Infuse vs. the Attain.
archittech7 is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old September 1st, 2011, 11:25 AM   #26 (permalink)
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: Central TX
Gender: Male
Posts: 2,033
 
Device(s): Galaxy S5, Razr HD
Carrier: Not Provided

Thanks: 1,178
Thanked 815 Times in 622 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Calvin35 View Post
I too am confused by the lack of LTE and the smaller screen. Looks like I will be waiting for the Holiday. Can someone who knows more than me explain to me why these devices won't have LTE?
I think the better question is why do you need LTE on AT&T now? How much area did they cover so far with LTE? If their HSPA+ is as good as they claim to market it as 4G with 21Mbps speed, how much is the speed gain from LTE?

As for the screen size debate, a lot of folks are still overlooking ppi issue and merely looking at physical size as I mentioned before. Bumping up screen size hurts sharpness if it doesn't come with resolution increase. I think 4.3" is already pushing limit for WVGA resolution. You really need at least qHD or HD resolution from 4.5" and beyond.
Sandroidfan is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old September 1st, 2011, 11:43 AM   #27 (permalink)
Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2011
Posts: 164
 
Device(s): Samsung Galaxy S2
Carrier: Not Provided

Thanks: 61
Thanked 111 Times in 86 Posts
Default

Why don't they use the super amoled plus on the galaxy note?
RX-78-2 is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old September 1st, 2011, 12:23 PM   #28 (permalink)
New Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2011
Posts: 11
 
Device(s):
Carrier: Not Provided

Thanks: 0
Thanked 1 Time in 1 Post
Default

Oh God, now I want the Galaxy Note! *sigh*

I think I will just keep racking up 30 day returns at this rate.
Artisan is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old September 1st, 2011, 12:30 PM   #29 (permalink)
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: Central TX
Gender: Male
Posts: 2,033
 
Device(s): Galaxy S5, Razr HD
Carrier: Not Provided

Thanks: 1,178
Thanked 815 Times in 622 Posts
Default

I think Galaxy Note might come to AT&T as Prime like phone while Verizon is getting Droid Prime. It has GSM/HSPA+ radio.
Sandroidfan is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old September 1st, 2011, 12:46 PM   #30 (permalink)
Senior Member
 
MisterEd's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: New Joisey
Posts: 773
 
Device(s): Samsung Infuse
Carrier: Not Provided

Thanks: 14
Thanked 117 Times in 81 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by RX-78-2 View Post
Why don't they use the super amoled plus on the galaxy note?
Because it's the Super HD Amoled. That's like PLUS PLUS.
MisterEd is offline  
Reply With Quote
sponsored links
Old September 1st, 2011, 12:50 PM   #31 (permalink)
Senior Member
 
MisterEd's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: New Joisey
Posts: 773
 
Device(s): Samsung Infuse
Carrier: Not Provided

Thanks: 14
Thanked 117 Times in 81 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Artisan View Post
Oh God, now I want the Galaxy Note! *sigh*

I think I will just keep racking up 30 day returns at this rate.
I'm pretty sure you can only have ONE 30 day return/refund of a device under the guarantee, you can't "stack" them. That's why I like Costco, you have a 90 day Window. Buy now and you have until Dec 1st to swap although I don't think Costco carries ALL the available devices. I know they don't carry the iPhone/iPad.
MisterEd is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old September 1st, 2011, 12:59 PM   #32 (permalink)
Senior Member
 
MisterEd's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: New Joisey
Posts: 773
 
Device(s): Samsung Infuse
Carrier: Not Provided

Thanks: 14
Thanked 117 Times in 81 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by AndroidDazed View Post
Guys, really?...Really?

I can't believe 0.2" diagonal would make any bit of difference to anyone, realistically. Holding both side-by-side, I doubt most folks would even notice without taking out a ruler.

I superimposed the AT&T screen onto the Sprint screen for reference.

If you're referring to the screen size to me it makes a very noticeable difference. I've compared 4.5 to 4.3 numerous times at various mobile stores and it's really more than the 2/10th everyone mentions because it increases total square inches area. The 2/10th is only the diagonal measurement increase. When I went from a 50" to a 52" TV the difference was very noticeable. It may have been only 2" in diagonal measurement but the screen area in sq inches L x W was much bigger than the 50" and quite obvious.

If you're talking about the actual physical size of the phone, from the store tests I've tried (obviously not on the Attain) to ME it makes hardly any difference.
MisterEd is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old September 1st, 2011, 01:05 PM   #33 (permalink)
Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2011
Posts: 164
 
Device(s): Samsung Galaxy S2
Carrier: Not Provided

Thanks: 61
Thanked 111 Times in 86 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by MisterEd View Post
Because it's the Super HD Amoled. That's like PLUS PLUS.
Isn't the samoled HD using pentile while the samoled+ doesn't? (please help me understand this lol)

Also I read on engadget that the galaxy note will be using a single core 1.4GHz exynos, is that correct?
RX-78-2 is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old September 1st, 2011, 01:38 PM   #34 (permalink)
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: Central TX
Gender: Male
Posts: 2,033
 
Device(s): Galaxy S5, Razr HD
Carrier: Not Provided

Thanks: 1,178
Thanked 815 Times in 622 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by RX-78-2 View Post
Isn't the samoled HD using pentile while the samoled+ doesn't? (please help me understand this lol)

Also I read on engadget that the galaxy note will be using a single core 1.4GHz exynos, is that correct?
HD means resolution and + means square RGB pixels (no pentile matrix). It's referring to different characteristic of display. The one on Note is Super AMOLED HD, which means HD resolution and pentile AMOLED pixels.

And that's 1.4Ghz dual core Exynos. There is no such thing as single core Exynos.
Sandroidfan is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old September 1st, 2011, 03:07 PM   #35 (permalink)
Senior Member
 
Mr. Ed's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: Over Yonder
Posts: 6,675
 
Device(s): S3, Evo LTE,Galaxy Note, Skyrocket, Aria, Nook Color Lg thrill,HTC EVO 4g, HTC Inspire,S7 slim,Acer
Carrier: Not Provided

Thanks: 1,008
Thanked 1,467 Times in 989 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by shark974 View Post
The other Mr Ed just said the difference in physical size is minute and the difference in screen size is huge Contradict much?
Did i misuse negligible? the difference in screensize is not noticeable

difference in phone size is.

i am going to see if my sammy friend will let me take pics tonight.
Mr. Ed is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old September 1st, 2011, 05:24 PM   #36 (permalink)
Member
Thread Author (OP)
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Posts: 209
 
Device(s):
Carrier: Not Provided

Thanks: 7
Thanked 23 Times in 16 Posts
Default

Actually, the difference in phone size is not noticeable, difference in screen size is.

Haha I knew Galaxy Note would be in this thread...to me the Galaxy Note might actually be too big, but I'm intrigued at least, I'd have to see it in person. I'm interested, at the least. Looks like it's coming to ATT too, so, perfect!

If nothing else the Galaxy Note proves to me that a 4.7-4.9 will be here before you know it and very usable. Actually theres already a 4.7" WP7 phone coming as well.

But the Note proves exactly what I said, if I had bought the Attain, I would have been mad as these new bigger and bigger phones like the note get announced and I would have been left behind! I didn't want the same sinking feeling I had with my captivate, I want at LEAST 4.5 inches!

BTW part one, I noticed one website (think it was Android Central) saying the ATT SGS2 is not actually called the Attain it's just called the Galaxy S 2...guess this forum is misnamed going forward LOL.

And BTW part 2, it looks like the Galaxy S 2 LTE 4.5" version I was hoping for, is indeed headed to ATT according to an engadget post today...http://www.engadget.com/2011/09/01/samsung-i727-shows-off-at-the-fcc-confesses-its-atandt-lte-secret/

Though with the SGS 2 just announced, I have to wonder why ATT would bother with an LTE version so soon, so I think we could be waiting a while, but it's still good news.

At this point though since my upgrade is in March (although I might be willing to pay 600 for a phone before then if the situation is right), and with huge phones like the Note, and hopefully ATT will get a version of the Nexus Prime, and Ice Cream coming eventually and yadda yadda, I'm kind of doubting I'll end up with a SGS2 at all, even the superior 4.5" LTE version. Might as well wait now I guess.
shark974 is offline  
Last edited by shark974; September 1st, 2011 at 05:36 PM.
Reply With Quote
Old September 1st, 2011, 06:09 PM   #37 (permalink)
Senior Member
 
MisterEd's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: New Joisey
Posts: 773
 
Device(s): Samsung Infuse
Carrier: Not Provided

Thanks: 14
Thanked 117 Times in 81 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by shark974 View Post
Actually, the difference in phone size is not noticeable, difference in screen size is.
I have to agree. I just came back from AT&T for the 3rd time and put my Infuse up against the Inspire and TO ME the screen size made a noticeable difference displaying the same webpage. To some it might not, but for my lousy eyes it really helped. While the Infuse physically was slightly larger it made absolutely no difference in how it "felt" where the slight difference in size would have made no difference in which one I used.

Holding the iPhone in my hand after having the Infuse was like playing with a toy (size wise not quality).
MisterEd is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old September 2nd, 2011, 02:32 AM   #38 (permalink)
Senior Member
 
Mr. Ed's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: Over Yonder
Posts: 6,675
 
Device(s): S3, Evo LTE,Galaxy Note, Skyrocket, Aria, Nook Color Lg thrill,HTC EVO 4g, HTC Inspire,S7 slim,Acer
Carrier: Not Provided

Thanks: 1,008
Thanked 1,467 Times in 989 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by MisterEd View Post
I have to agree. I just came back from AT&T for the 3rd time and put my Infuse up against the Inspire and TO ME the screen size made a noticeable difference displaying the same webpage. To some it might not, but for my lousy eyes it really helped. While the Infuse physically was slightly larger it made absolutely no difference in how it "felt" where the slight difference in size would have made no difference in which one I used.

Holding the iPhone in my hand after having the Infuse was like playing with a toy (size wise not quality).
I was able to get pics of the infuse and attain side by side. will post tomorrow
Mr. Ed is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old September 2nd, 2011, 12:14 PM   #39 (permalink)
New Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Posts: 2
 
Device(s):
Carrier: Not Provided

Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Default

Major bummer. I was so excited to get this phone when I thought we were going to get 4.5 inches of glory. Now I am just kinda excited. I saw the Galaxy Note and thought could I wait it out but then I just read an article that the Note will not be coming to the US. I am rocking a Captivate so it will be a huge improvement spec wise over my phone. Just having a camera flash will be huge but yeah I am dissapointed. But hey at least we are getting the fastest processor the Exeynos instead of the slightly slower processors that the other phones will have.
DinoBurke is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old September 2nd, 2011, 12:41 PM   #40 (permalink)
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: Central TX
Gender: Male
Posts: 2,033
 
Device(s): Galaxy S5, Razr HD
Carrier: Not Provided

Thanks: 1,178
Thanked 815 Times in 622 Posts
Default

It's just beyond me that 0.2" difference in screen size is such big deal for some folks here. I think 4.3" is already pushing limit for WVGA resolution in ppi. You are only losing the picture sharpness, portability when going bigger screen at same resolution.
Sandroidfan is offline  
Reply With Quote
sponsored links
Old September 2nd, 2011, 12:43 PM   #41 (permalink)
Senior Member
 
Mr. Ed's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: Over Yonder
Posts: 6,675
 
Device(s): S3, Evo LTE,Galaxy Note, Skyrocket, Aria, Nook Color Lg thrill,HTC EVO 4g, HTC Inspire,S7 slim,Acer
Carrier: Not Provided

Thanks: 1,008
Thanked 1,467 Times in 989 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Sandroidfan View Post
It's just beyond me that 0.2" difference in screen size is such big deal for some folks here. I think 4.3" is already pushing limit for WVGA resolution in ppi. You are only losing the picture sharpness, portability when going bigger screen at same resolution.
exactly...which is why text looks like garbage on the infuse imo

as promised..sorry they are blurry..I actually haven't used my point and shoot since buying an android phone lol. not to mention I had only a few moments left alone with the phone while he was "occupied"





Mr. Ed is offline  
Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to Mr. Ed For This Useful Post:
RX-78-2 (September 2nd, 2011)
Old September 2nd, 2011, 04:08 PM   #42 (permalink)
Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2011
Posts: 164
 
Device(s): Samsung Galaxy S2
Carrier: Not Provided

Thanks: 61
Thanked 111 Times in 86 Posts
Default

I's a beauty, please release it soon :s
RX-78-2 is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old September 2nd, 2011, 08:17 PM   #43 (permalink)
Senior Member
 
MisterEd's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: New Joisey
Posts: 773
 
Device(s): Samsung Infuse
Carrier: Not Provided

Thanks: 14
Thanked 117 Times in 81 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Sandroidfan View Post
It's just beyond me that 0.2" difference in screen size is such big deal for some folks here. I think 4.3" is already pushing limit for WVGA resolution in ppi. You are only losing the picture sharpness, portability when going bigger screen at same resolution.
It's 0.2" in the DIAGONAL but the screen area itself (L x W) make a lot more difference than the small amount of diagonal difference might indicate.
MisterEd is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old September 2nd, 2011, 09:00 PM   #44 (permalink)
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2011
Posts: 73
 
Device(s):
Carrier: Not Provided

Thanks: 2
Thanked 3 Times in 3 Posts
Default

I know the Attain isn't actually a whole lot smaller than the Infuse, but those pictures sure makes the Infuse look much bigger, all the more reason for me to be happy the Attain is 4.3".

Its not the screen size I care about (well, I care about that too)..its the phone size. The more easily pocketable the better.

Thanks for the shots.
KMPrenger is offline  
Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to KMPrenger For This Useful Post:
Mr. Ed (September 3rd, 2011)
Old September 3rd, 2011, 07:06 AM   #45 (permalink)
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: Kansas City, MO
Posts: 50
 
Device(s): IP3G
Carrier: Not Provided

Thanks: 10
Thanked 5 Times in 3 Posts
Default

I think the 4.3" is just fine for the screen. My current Iphone is 3.5" so it'll be a big upgrade. I looked at the Infuse closely in the store and did notice the pixilation of text and pics... especially if any zoom is used at all. I don't think the Infuse is too big.... i just think that it needs a higher res screen. If it was a Super AMOLED HD screen then i think it'd be just fine... If the Nexus Prime indeed has a HD screen that'd be nice... and the upcoming Note... heck it's got a 5.3" Super AMOLED HD screen so it should be ok. And about the overall size of the Infuse based on the pics... if you actually look at the Infuse in THAT pic... it has a case on it... whereas the Attain does not.. so that will add a little bulk. I'm just not going to whine about the Attain being 4.3" instead of 4.5".... to each their own.
HeroNtheShadow is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old September 3rd, 2011, 12:51 PM   #46 (permalink)
Senior Member
 
Mr. Ed's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: Over Yonder
Posts: 6,675
 
Device(s): S3, Evo LTE,Galaxy Note, Skyrocket, Aria, Nook Color Lg thrill,HTC EVO 4g, HTC Inspire,S7 slim,Acer
Carrier: Not Provided

Thanks: 1,008
Thanked 1,467 Times in 989 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by HeroNtheShadow View Post
I think the 4.3" is just fine for the screen. My current Iphone is 3.5" so it'll be a big upgrade. I looked at the Infuse closely in the store and did notice the pixilation of text and pics... especially if any zoom is used at all. I don't think the Infuse is too big.... i just think that it needs a higher res screen. If it was a Super AMOLED HD screen then i think it'd be just fine... If the Nexus Prime indeed has a HD screen that'd be nice... and the upcoming Note... heck it's got a 5.3" Super AMOLED HD screen so it should be ok. And about the overall size of the Infuse based on the pics... if you actually look at the Infuse in THAT pic... it has a case on it... whereas the Attain does not.. so that will add a little bulk. I'm just not going to whine about the Attain being 4.3" instead of 4.5".... to each their own.
thank you for noticing the case...I completely forgot that it was on there and it does make the infuse look a bit chunky.
Mr. Ed is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old September 3rd, 2011, 08:21 PM   #47 (permalink)
Senior Member
 
MisterEd's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: New Joisey
Posts: 773
 
Device(s): Samsung Infuse
Carrier: Not Provided

Thanks: 14
Thanked 117 Times in 81 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Mr. Ed View Post
thank you for noticing the case...I completely forgot that it was on there and it does make the infuse look a bit chunky.
LMBFFAO! You crack me up Nacho. You forgot there was a case on the phone! Seriously?
MisterEd is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old September 3rd, 2011, 09:51 PM   #48 (permalink)
Senior Member
 
Mr. Ed's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: Over Yonder
Posts: 6,675
 
Device(s): S3, Evo LTE,Galaxy Note, Skyrocket, Aria, Nook Color Lg thrill,HTC EVO 4g, HTC Inspire,S7 slim,Acer
Carrier: Not Provided

Thanks: 1,008
Thanked 1,467 Times in 989 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by MisterEd View Post
LMBFFAO! You crack me up Nacho. You forgot there was a case on the phone! Seriously?
Again you seem to miss what exactly was going on
but anyway....yeah I forgot. phone scooping isnt something I do for a living.. and the case has nothing to do with the screen size.

I'd say I have done pretty good considering haha..
Mr. Ed is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old September 4th, 2011, 12:24 AM   #49 (permalink)
Senior Member
 
Android26's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: Atlanta, GA
Posts: 506
 
Device(s): Samsung Galaxy S (Captivate) & Nexus 7
Carrier: AT&T

Thanks: 299
Thanked 39 Times in 33 Posts
Default

Gosh, the Attain is perfect in pretty much every way for me. Plus, samsung has hooked me completely: I wouldn't dream of ever buying a non-AMOLED phone.
__________________
"If you have an apple and I have an apple and we exchange these apples, then you and I still each have one apple, but if you have an idea and I have an idea and we exchange these ideas, then each of us will have two ideas."
Android26 is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old September 5th, 2011, 06:00 PM   #50 (permalink)
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: Crossville, TN
Posts: 1,353
 
Device(s): Motorola Atrix HD (pos)
Carrier: AT&T

Thanks: 59
Thanked 106 Times in 84 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by MisterEd View Post
Thickness is sometimes more important than just length and width. Makes it feel much better in the palm.

I agree.
__________________
www.gofundme.com/justiceforjim
forddna is offline  
Reply With Quote
Reply


Go Back   Android Forums > Android Phones > Samsung Galaxy S2 (AT&T)
Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 12:08 AM.
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2014, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.