Go Back   Android Forums > Android Phones > Samsung Galaxy S3
Gamers - Check out our new sister sites!
Nintendo Wii U!    |    OUYA - $99 Android System!

test: Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools
Old May 4th, 2012, 04:59 AM   #851 (permalink)
AF Addict
 
AntimonyER's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: Statesboro, GA
Posts: 12,437
 
Device(s): Droid DNA, Nexus 7 16GB
Carrier: Verizon

Thanks: 4,513
Thanked 8,352 Times in 4,535 Posts
Default

My biggest question is battery life. Especially with the fancy background services. Perhaps the Quad core helps, but my GNex with flat tear through my extended batt with the screen on, and the GSIII is even bigger.

__________________


Site Rules & Guidelines
Got some help? Hit Thanks!
See something you like? Hit Like!
See something you hate? Hit Report!
AntimonyER is online now  
Reply With Quote
Sponsors
Old May 4th, 2012, 05:01 AM   #852 (permalink)
Senior Member
 
Mr. Ed's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: Over Yonder
Posts: 6,557
 
Device(s): S3, Evo LTE,Galaxy Note, Skyrocket, Aria, Nook Color Lg thrill,HTC EVO 4g, HTC Inspire,S7 slim,Acer
Carrier: Not Provided

Thanks: 965
Thanked 1,326 Times in 932 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by matttye View Post
- S-beam does not already exist. This uses wifi direct to send data which is hundreds if not thousands of times faster than NFC.
- S-voice does not already exist. It uses natural language rather than commands, so if you're thinking it's Vlingo, you're mistaken.
- cant comment on the us carriers. Can't you buy them sim free over there?
- Anandtech has posted some blazingly fast early benchmarks..fastest phone out there.
- call quality (or call volume, should I say) should be better because of an in call equaliser, nothing to do with carriers.
- I saw no shutter lag in any of the demos, it just shoots straight away?

Can't help but feel that people are picking on this phone just because it doesn't have a 2GHz quad core processor, 2GB RAM, a 6" display and wings.

I have a gs2 and I think it's a huge upgrade; not sure how anyone can say otherwise. Nearly all of the hardware has been upgraded and there are plenty of software improvements.

I'm not necessarily picking it apart...people often forget a good friend of mine is employed by Samsung. He told me we would see mild upgrades and clever marketing...that is exactly what I see

s-beam is already available now as wifi direct... they just gave it a snazzy new name..I use it frequently on my note. The sad part is they didn't even touch on the possibilities available with it as other manufacturers start to incorporate it into everyday devices

s-voice is in fact available on all samsung releases since the gs2...and yes. it is repackaged vlingo with a snazzy new name

come to find out..the floating video player is not new either. It is available now, in the market. It is called "stick it!" (pretty cool too, I bought it today)
The processor remarks do drive me crazy. The US will not see that processor AND LTE and the carriers want LTE...so for the US masses, those benchmarks are pointless

I don't doubt there is a new sound processor, and from what we know now thanks to supercurio maybe it will sound better, but every new phone claims this. my remarks to carrier call quality is in regards to signal..there is no voice software that they can put on a phone that will correct crap signal

As for shutter, I passed on owning a gs2, so my comparison is to the skyrocket and note, which do have a small amount of lag...and from I have seen in the demos it isn't much better...I would hold an official comment on that until I have one in hand.


many of our differences in opinion are that you will actually be coming from a gs2 and the international gs3 does have some improvements over that. in my case, coming from a Galaxy Note to a GS3 just wouldn't make sense (my opinion of course) and overall..yes, I think it is a mild upgrade, hardly worth spending $$ for if on contract already, and a waste of an upgrade if eligible for one.
Mr. Ed is offline  
Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to Mr. Ed For This Useful Post:
Roze (May 4th, 2012)
Old May 4th, 2012, 05:51 AM   #853 (permalink)
Senior Member
 
davoid's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: London
Posts: 1,173
 
Device(s): Galaxy SIII
Carrier: 3UK

Thanks: 309
Thanked 318 Times in 247 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by AntimonyER View Post
My biggest question is battery life. Especially with the fancy background services. Perhaps the Quad core helps, but my GNex with flat tear through my extended batt with the screen on, and the GSIII is even bigger.
Not to mention that the front facing camera will be on all the time scanning your eyes which I imagine would be a bit of a drain on the battery.
davoid is online now  
Reply With Quote
Old May 4th, 2012, 06:01 AM   #854 (permalink)
Senior Member
 
Gearu's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2011
Posts: 720
 
Device(s): Samsung Galaxy SII Silver Edition
Carrier: Not Provided

Thanks: 49
Thanked 78 Times in 51 Posts
Default

Aye, we've got to give Ed credit for his efforts.

And I agree it's not worth changing to if your phone is only a year old, but an option if you have something like the Desire/DesireHD/Sensation etc
Gearu is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old May 4th, 2012, 06:55 AM   #855 (permalink)
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: Lincoln, England
Posts: 1,940
 
Device(s): Apple iPhone 5 64GB (iOS 6.0.1), Apple iPad 2 16GB (iOS 6.0.1), Nexus 7 (Android 4.2 Jelly Bean)
Carrier: Not Provided

Thanks: 121
Thanked 380 Times in 251 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Mr. Ed View Post
s-beam is already available now as wifi direct... they just gave it a snazzy new name..I use it frequently on my note. The sad part is they didn't even touch on the possibilities available with it as other manufacturers start to incorporate it into everyday devices

s-voice is in fact available on all samsung releases since the gs2...and yes. it is repackaged vlingo with a snazzy new name

come to find out..the floating video player is not new either. It is available now, in the market. It is called "stick it!" (pretty cool too, I bought it today)
The processor remarks do drive me crazy. The US will not see that processor AND LTE and the carriers want LTE...so for the US masses, those benchmarks are pointless

I don't doubt there is a new sound processor, and from what we know now thanks to supercurio maybe it will sound better, but every new phone claims this. my remarks to carrier call quality is in regards to signal..there is no voice software that they can put on a phone that will correct crap signal

As for shutter, I passed on owning a gs2, so my comparison is to the skyrocket and note, which do have a small amount of lag...and from I have seen in the demos it isn't much better...I would hold an official comment on that until I have one in hand.


many of our differences in opinion are that you will actually be coming from a gs2 and the international gs3 does have some improvements over that. in my case, coming from a Galaxy Note to a GS3 just wouldn't make sense (my opinion of course) and overall..yes, I think it is a mild upgrade, hardly worth spending $$ for if on contract already, and a waste of an upgrade if eligible for one.
S-beam is a combination of the two features, it's not exactly wifi direct or Android beam, but both combined to make it more useful. Hopefully well still be able to access android beam and wifi direct. If not, that will suck!

The current Vlingo offerings are command based: "call my friend," "search the web," "weather for home." S voice will probably use Vlingos voice recognition, but it's not the same as current offerings as it uses natural language and ai. I.e.: "I want to take a picture" launches the camera. Some will call it gimmicky and to an extent it is, but more ways to access the same features without having to remember commands can only be a good thing.

There's minimal lag in my S2 camera too. I think burst and best shot are the better features, and the improved flash. Although it wasn't mentioned, I'm hoping the actual picture quality is improved also.

The exynos in the S2 is really fast already, so the new one will be incredible.

I think they're making a great effort to offer great hardware and software together as a package. I'll definitely be getting one, only question for me is when, because I want a 64GB version which is apparently not coming out until later.
__________________
iPhone 5 (iOS 6.0.1), iPad 2 (iOS 6.0.1), Nexus 7 (Android 4.2 Jelly Bean)
matttye is offline  
Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to matttye For This Useful Post:
Sandroidfan (May 7th, 2012)
Old May 4th, 2012, 07:56 AM   #856 (permalink)
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Posts: 67
 
Device(s): Samsung Galaxy S3
Carrier: Not Provided

Thanks: 5
Thanked 2 Times in 2 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by THE ANDROID View Post
Absolutely disgusting plastic design. Yuck. At least the GS2 looked pretty nice and fits in your hand.

HTC One X or Sony Xperia S are the best Android phones. People who buy this phone over HTC or Sony have no taste in art or beauty.
Quote:
Originally Posted by brownhornet View Post
Or maybe actually buy the phone to use it as a phone? One X can look nice but still has that clunky sense on there which will eventually slow the phone down like always.
I've had 3 HTC's (Hero, Desire Z, Desire HD), and yes, they're loving looking and Sense is beautiful, but each one of them, within 6 months, have slowed down to a minimum, they do not, in my experience, withstand time.

Moving over to S3 at the end of the month, and I genuinely can't wait.
disconfigured is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old May 4th, 2012, 08:14 AM   #857 (permalink)
Member
 
Join Date: May 2010
Posts: 320
 
Device(s):
Carrier: Not Provided

Thanks: 11
Thanked 67 Times in 47 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Gearu View Post

Until we see an S2 versus S3 camera quality showdown, I have to say that 8 megapixels is a joke, I couldn't believe it.

I'm interested to know how big the extended battery will be when that comes. Although the III has 2100mAh out of the box, I don't think it'll really be 'enough' given the screen size and bunch of unnecessary battery draining features. I do think the SIIIs original battery will last longer for it than the SII's 1650mAh affair did for that, but they'll be in the same neighborhood. (Are extended batteries a great way to get people to pay more for the phone or what?)

Awaiting confirmation on USB 2.0 for the S3.... lol, I'd say 2.0 is a done deal now.

I was going to make a Dark Knight reference but we neither deserve nor need this, I declare the SIII nothing more than a Super Nexus with a fruity sauce topping in the form of TouchWiz.
8mp camera a joke ? why would that be ? higher pixel count means NOTHING to image quality nowadays. Its all about the sensor size and quality.

Ref the battery remember that the quad core cpu is 20% more efficient, from what i can gather its the mean reason for using it over dual core.

Why do you want USB 3 ? its a mobile device and has many communication methods, the only time I've ever used USB is to upload new firmware. USB 2.0 will be fine. No point adding spec just for the sake of it.
Crafty is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old May 4th, 2012, 08:23 AM   #858 (permalink)
Senior Member
 
Orion's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: New York
Posts: 1,267
 
Device(s): Samsung Galaxy Nexus
Carrier: Sprint

Thanks: 324
Thanked 402 Times in 255 Posts
Default

So how's this camera compared to the One X?
Orion is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old May 4th, 2012, 08:41 AM   #859 (permalink)
Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Posts: 413
 
Device(s):
Carrier: Not Provided

Thanks: 6
Thanked 312 Times in 212 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Crafty View Post
8mp camera a joke ? why would that be ? higher pixel count means NOTHING to image quality nowadays. Its all about the sensor size and quality.

Ref the battery remember that the quad core cpu is 20% more efficient, from what i can gather its the mean reason for using it over dual core.

Why do you want USB 3 ? its a mobile device and has many communication methods, the only time I've ever used USB is to upload new firmware. USB 2.0 will be fine. No point adding spec just for the sake of it.
yeah not sure why 8mp is a joke. anything higher is a joke.

its not the cores that are important as far as battery life is concerned, its more to do with it being 32nm.

usb 3 would be great though. its supposed to be in phones at some point this year, but i thought i had read it would be in the fall. it won't be full usb 3.0 speeds either, but its a lot faster than usb 2.

edit: yeah, won't hit till the end of the year or 2013. Smartphones and tablets to get MicroUSB 3.0 ports, just in time for it to seem old -- Engadget

edit2: to prove its more than just another spec for the sake of specs...

http://www.pcworld.com/article/247507/highspeed_usb_30_to_reach_smartphones_tablets_by_y ear_end.html

Quote:
"What takes 15 minutes will roughly take 1 minute and 10 seconds," Ismail said.
xtop is offline  
Last edited by xtop; May 4th, 2012 at 08:47 AM.
Reply With Quote
Old May 4th, 2012, 08:54 AM   #860 (permalink)
Member
 
Join Date: May 2010
Posts: 320
 
Device(s):
Carrier: Not Provided

Thanks: 11
Thanked 67 Times in 47 Posts
Default

yeah but how often do people actually USB ? I don't really see any need for it to be honest, bluetooth, cloud storage etc..
Crafty is offline  
Reply With Quote
Sponsors
Old May 4th, 2012, 08:59 AM   #861 (permalink)
Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Posts: 413
 
Device(s):
Carrier: Not Provided

Thanks: 6
Thanked 312 Times in 212 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Crafty View Post
yeah but how often do people actually USB ? I don't really see any need for it to be honest, bluetooth, cloud storage etc..
i imagine the same group of people who complain about no sd card lol. i use it a ton because i'm always flashing new roms and stuff
xtop is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old May 4th, 2012, 10:12 AM   #862 (permalink)
Senior Member
 
Baldilocks's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: Delaware, U.S.A.
Posts: 1,242
 
Device(s): HTC One X (International)
Carrier: AT&T

Thanks: 54
Thanked 158 Times in 115 Posts
Default

I'm glad there is a notification light this time.
Baldilocks is offline  
Reply With Quote
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to Baldilocks For This Useful Post:
Android26 (May 4th, 2012), matttye (May 4th, 2012)
Old May 4th, 2012, 10:15 AM   #863 (permalink)
Senior Member
 
JunBringer's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2010
Posts: 3,077
 
Device(s): LG Nexus 4, Samsung Galaxy Note 2, Htc Evo 3D, Google Chrome Cr-48
Carrier: AT&T and T-Mobile (prepaid)

Thanks: 668
Thanked 320 Times in 254 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by matttye View Post
S-beam is a combination of the two features, it's not exactly wifi direct or Android beam, but both combined to make it more useful. Hopefully well still be able to access android beam and wifi direct. If not, that will suck!

I want a 64GB version which is apparently not coming out until later.
So if they're combined it will use NFC for smaller files and Wifi for larger?

Yeah I'd want that 64GB as well. Hopefully they make the Note 2 with that option.
JunBringer is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old May 4th, 2012, 11:22 AM   #864 (permalink)
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2011
Posts: 20
 
Device(s):
Carrier: Not Provided

Thanks: 9
Thanked 3 Times in 3 Posts
Default

Anyone else surprised/disappointed that there is no dedicated multi-task button (like on the Nexus) to take full advantage of ICS? Hold down home instead... thought the separate button that was a nice differentiated feature from the iPhone.
tpXXV is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old May 4th, 2012, 12:17 PM   #865 (permalink)
Senior Member
 
Android26's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: Atlanta, GA
Posts: 506
 
Device(s): Samsung Galaxy S (Captivate) & Nexus 7
Carrier: AT&T

Thanks: 299
Thanked 39 Times in 33 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by tpXXV View Post
Anyone else surprised/disappointed that there is no dedicated multi-task button (like on the Nexus) to take full advantage of ICS? Hold down home instead... thought the separate button that was a nice differentiated feature from the iPhone.
I like the home button functionality on the SGS3, personally.
__________________
"If you have an apple and I have an apple and we exchange these apples, then you and I still each have one apple, but if you have an idea and I have an idea and we exchange these ideas, then each of us will have two ideas."
Android26 is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old May 4th, 2012, 12:44 PM   #866 (permalink)
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: Central TX
Gender: Male
Posts: 1,894
 
Device(s): Razr HD, Galaxy Nexus
Carrier: Verizon

Thanks: 1,151
Thanked 785 Times in 599 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Mr. Ed View Post
many of our differences in opinion are that you will actually be coming from a gs2 and the international gs3 does have some improvements over that. in my case, coming from a Galaxy Note to a GS3 just wouldn't make sense (my opinion of course) and overall..yes, I think it is a mild upgrade, hardly worth spending $$ for if on contract already, and a waste of an upgrade if eligible for one.
But what you seem to be forgetting is that those GSII, Note owners are still well within 2 years contract in US mostly. What about OG Galaxy S owners and others coming out of contract? This would be huge upgrade for them.

I'm not sure what exactly defines big upgrade at this point. 2Ghz A15 processor, 2Gb RAM, 1080p screen? We knew that's not happening anytime soon and 1080p on phone screen is pointless. US versions not getting Exynos at all is not set in stone officially yet. Even if it comes all with Krait S4 processor, it's way faster more efficient than any US GSII from last year.
Sandroidfan is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old May 4th, 2012, 12:47 PM   #867 (permalink)
Hiding behind a mystery
 
Roze's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Where the Sakura grows
Posts: 9,847
 
Device(s): Moto Atrix [lovin'] Nexus One [Lost] LG Vu [Lost]
Carrier: Not Provided

Thanks: 809
Thanked 2,190 Times in 1,489 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Mr. Ed View Post
It is called "stick it!" (pretty cool too, I bought it today)
*yay* best post today You get a thanks for just that Ed!
__________________
Sign up with Dropbox using my referral and get an additional 1/2GB on top of the 2GB you get for signing up http://db.tt/YbULMZX

Many thanks,
Roze
Roze is offline  
Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to Roze For This Useful Post:
Mr. Ed (May 4th, 2012)
Old May 4th, 2012, 12:55 PM   #868 (permalink)
Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Posts: 413
 
Device(s):
Carrier: Not Provided

Thanks: 6
Thanked 312 Times in 212 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Sandroidfan View Post
But what you seem to be forgetting is that those GSII, Note owners are still well within 2 years contract in US mostly. What about OG Galaxy S owners and others coming out of contract? This would be huge upgrade for them.

I'm not sure what exactly defines big upgrade at this point. 2Ghz A15 processor, 2Gb RAM, 1080p screen? We knew that's not happening anytime soon and 1080p on phone screen is pointless. US versions not getting Exynos at all is not set in stone officially yet. Even if it comes all with Krait S4 processor, it's way faster more efficient than any US GSII from last year.
yeah i see a lot of galaxy s1 owners around the internet claiming it wasn't a big enough jump to be worth the upgrade. don't know what phone they're looking at, but this is a massive jump for s1 owners
xtop is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old May 4th, 2012, 12:57 PM   #869 (permalink)
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Posts: 2,079
 
Device(s): Galaxy S4, Nexus 7
Carrier: giffgaff

Thanks: 108
Thanked 206 Times in 184 Posts
Default

This looks like a winner to me.

Also the Galaxy S II also looking very impressive for a year old phone.




Shocky is offline  
Last edited by Shocky; May 4th, 2012 at 01:02 PM.
Reply With Quote
Old May 4th, 2012, 01:08 PM   #870 (permalink)
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: Lincoln, England
Posts: 1,940
 
Device(s): Apple iPhone 5 64GB (iOS 6.0.1), Apple iPad 2 16GB (iOS 6.0.1), Nexus 7 (Android 4.2 Jelly Bean)
Carrier: Not Provided

Thanks: 121
Thanked 380 Times in 251 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by JunBringer View Post
So if they're combined it will use NFC for smaller files and Wifi for larger?

Yeah I'd want that 64GB as well. Hopefully they make the Note 2 with that option.
It uses NFC to connect the phones (so you just hold the phones back to back) and then WiFi to send the files.
matttye is offline  
Reply With Quote
Sponsors
Old May 4th, 2012, 01:54 PM   #871 (permalink)
Senior Member
 
JunBringer's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2010
Posts: 3,077
 
Device(s): LG Nexus 4, Samsung Galaxy Note 2, Htc Evo 3D, Google Chrome Cr-48
Carrier: AT&T and T-Mobile (prepaid)

Thanks: 668
Thanked 320 Times in 254 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by matttye View Post
It uses NFC to connect the phones (so you just hold the phones back to back) and then WiFi to send the files.
Ooooo I like that. Only problem is not every phone will be using that same software. I would think they would use Android Beam across the board.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Sandroidfan View Post
But what you seem to be forgetting is that those GSII, Note owners are still well within 2 years contract in US mostly. What about OG Galaxy S owners and others coming out of contract? This would be huge upgrade for them.
Yeah they must use that logic when they do new phones. This is a huge bump for GS1 folks for sure.
JunBringer is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old May 4th, 2012, 02:04 PM   #872 (permalink)
Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Posts: 205
 
Device(s):
Carrier: Not Provided

Thanks: 7
Thanked 23 Times in 16 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by xtop View Post
yeah i see a lot of galaxy s1 owners around the internet claiming it wasn't a big enough jump to be worth the upgrade. don't know what phone they're looking at, but this is a massive jump for s1 owners

Yes, I'm one of those S1 owners, I absolutely cant WAIT to get into a new phone!

MY GS1 is ok, but it's often slow, laggy, buggy, the GPS has never worked correctly, I'm dying for more screen real estate and some power and speed! It ought to be wonderful.
shark974 is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old May 4th, 2012, 02:10 PM   #873 (permalink)
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: Lincoln, England
Posts: 1,940
 
Device(s): Apple iPhone 5 64GB (iOS 6.0.1), Apple iPad 2 16GB (iOS 6.0.1), Nexus 7 (Android 4.2 Jelly Bean)
Carrier: Not Provided

Thanks: 121
Thanked 380 Times in 251 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by JunBringer View Post
Ooooo I like that. Only problem is not every phone will be using that same software. I would think they would use Android Beam across the board.



Yeah they must use that logic when they do new phones. This is a huge bump for GS1 folks for sure.
IF they have any sense we will still be able to use Android Beam, in addition to S-Beam.
matttye is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old May 4th, 2012, 02:47 PM   #874 (permalink)
Senior Member
 
Mr. Ed's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: Over Yonder
Posts: 6,557
 
Device(s): S3, Evo LTE,Galaxy Note, Skyrocket, Aria, Nook Color Lg thrill,HTC EVO 4g, HTC Inspire,S7 slim,Acer
Carrier: Not Provided

Thanks: 965
Thanked 1,326 Times in 932 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Sandroidfan View Post
But what you seem to be forgetting is that those GSII, Note owners are still well within 2 years contract in US mostly. What about OG Galaxy S owners and others coming out of contract? This would be huge upgrade for them.

I'm not sure what exactly defines big upgrade at this point. 2Ghz A15 processor, 2Gb RAM, 1080p screen? We knew that's not happening anytime soon and 1080p on phone screen is pointless. US versions not getting Exynos at all is not set in stone officially yet. Even if it comes all with Krait S4 processor, it's way faster more efficient than any US GSII from last year.
The processor is set in stone to be a dual core snspdragon. There is a reason I know that and you do not.

Those gs1 owners (god bless them for holding on to a phone so long) are exactly who i refer to as the market in my posts.
Mr. Ed is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old May 4th, 2012, 02:53 PM   #875 (permalink)
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: Lincoln, England
Posts: 1,940
 
Device(s): Apple iPhone 5 64GB (iOS 6.0.1), Apple iPad 2 16GB (iOS 6.0.1), Nexus 7 (Android 4.2 Jelly Bean)
Carrier: Not Provided

Thanks: 121
Thanked 380 Times in 251 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Mr. Ed View Post
The processor is set in stone to be a dual core snspdragon. There is a reason I know that and you do not.

Those gs1 owners (god bless them for holding on to a phone so long) are exactly who i refer to as the market in my posts.
From what I've read the S4 snapdragon holds its own against quad core processors anyway, so there shouldn't be much of a problem? The exynos doesn't look to be light years ahead of Tegra 3 (which is what the S4 is comparable to). Yes it's a clear winner, but nothing massive to write home about.
matttye is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old May 4th, 2012, 04:03 PM   #876 (permalink)
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: Central TX
Gender: Male
Posts: 1,894
 
Device(s): Razr HD, Galaxy Nexus
Carrier: Verizon

Thanks: 1,151
Thanked 785 Times in 599 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Mr. Ed View Post
The processor is set in stone to be a dual core snspdragon. There is a reason I know that and you do not.

Those gs1 owners (god bless them for holding on to a phone so long) are exactly who i refer to as the market in my posts.
OK. Even so, this new Snapdragon S4 is almost twice faster than sluggish S3 in phones like Skyrocket, Rezound from last year. It's only slightly behind quad Exynos at the same clock and most folks would be plenty happy with speed, battery and stable LTE.
Sandroidfan is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old May 4th, 2012, 04:03 PM   #877 (permalink)
Member
 
Join Date: May 2010
Posts: 320
 
Device(s):
Carrier: Not Provided

Thanks: 11
Thanked 67 Times in 47 Posts
Default

Ok guys this might be a bit off topic so direct me to the right place if it really shouldn't be here..

I'm getting a bit confused here with HTC sense and TouchWizz.

I currently have a Desire running gingerbread. Its non rooted, uses Sense launcher, basically other than various accounts and a backdrop its factory.

My upgrade is due now and I'm looking at the SG3, partly on the reputation of the SG2 but also because of the storage capabilities. I have a 32gb ipod touch that I hate with a passion, so I'd like to ditch it and replace with the phone. I have around 35gb of music so if I got a big card I can put it on the card and carry it in the phone. The alternative is the HOX and I just deal with swapping music around in the limited storage (not really ideal).

Anyway, so I'm reading various different sites and some say that TW isn't that great, for example: Samsung Galaxy S III versus the HTC One X! | Android Central says:
Quote:
Originally Posted by Android Central
If you've listened to our Galaxy S III podcast, you know that I'm not crazy about the latest version of Touchwiz. As far as home screens and the launcher go, they're functional, but they're more of the same. But Samsung's camera app, and the S Voice and motion tweaks are pretty killer. We'll call that one a wash, perhaps, because a third-party launcher will cure some what Touchwiz ails. At the end of the day, though, it doesn't feel like you're using an Ice Cream Sandwich device like it does on One X.
Engadget (Samsung Galaxy S III software impressions (video) -- Engadget) said:
Quote:
Originally Posted by Engadget
The base style remains unmistakably TouchWiz, but there are some extra twists. Unlike stock ICS, there's now a settings option immediately available in the drop-down menu, and there are new gesture menu and sharing options, but the remaining look and layout is largely unchanged -- save for little details, like on-off switches, that have been tweaked for Samsung's own design reasons. Samsung's added in Google's own ICS widgets alongside its own versions if you're picky about exactly which calendar app displays on your home screen.
Also in the video its noted that there are some features that "bring it [the S3] closer to its cousin the galaxy nexus"

Which would make me think that its reasonably close to ICS but obviously with all the added Samsung extras. There is also a forum post here: What is with all the TouchWiz hate? | The Verge Forums (sorry for the x-post) where the author compares TW to a stock ROM (least as close as he can get), there doesn't appear to be huge differences.

The impression I've had until now is that TW used to smother android a bit but in more recent versions (especially for ICS) its been scaled back a little or should I say aligned with ICS.
I've had a very quick play with a HOX today and to be honest it doesn't feel radically different to my Desire - sure there are prettier widgets and all that good stuff but Sense doesn't appear to of changed very much, so does that mean it is covering up ICS pretty well ?

I'm guessing that people here will have some knowledge of TW on ICS and maybe have used Sense as well that could give their input ?
If TW is junk as some people claim maybe I'm better going for the HOX ?

ETA: Sorry this is so long I also had a quick play with a SG2 running TW on ICS, so it looks a bit different to Sense but it seemed to do the same basic things and I found my way around it easily enough. I guess it has its own little quirks and features but it wasn't as different as I had expected..
Crafty is offline  
Last edited by Crafty; May 4th, 2012 at 04:11 PM.
Reply With Quote
Old May 4th, 2012, 05:04 PM   #878 (permalink)
Senior Member
 
Mr. Ed's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: Over Yonder
Posts: 6,557
 
Device(s): S3, Evo LTE,Galaxy Note, Skyrocket, Aria, Nook Color Lg thrill,HTC EVO 4g, HTC Inspire,S7 slim,Acer
Carrier: Not Provided

Thanks: 965
Thanked 1,326 Times in 932 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Sandroidfan View Post
OK. Even so, this new Snapdragon S4 is almost twice faster than sluggish S3 in phones like Skyrocket, Rezound from last year. It's only slightly behind quad Exynos at the same clock and most folks would be plenty happy with speed, battery and stable LTE.
I dont disagree with that
Mr. Ed is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old May 5th, 2012, 05:26 AM   #879 (permalink)
New Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2012
Posts: 5
 
Device(s):
Carrier: Not Provided

Thanks: 0
Thanked 1 Time in 1 Post
Default

Only complaint here is the screen, by no means its a bad screen but it did not quite give me the wow factor as the S2 did. Was really digging for that 4.7 inch, high resolution, AMOLED plus screen. In all honesty probably they needed to make a trade-off in production costs, but I would have prefered a smaller screen with truely amazing image quality in that case.

Processor, RAM, Battery no complains there though. I also like the touch wiz on first sight.

Htc one x and the S3 are both great phones, probably going for the most cheapest of the both.
spanktastik is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old May 5th, 2012, 08:07 AM   #880 (permalink)
Senior Member
 
JunBringer's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2010
Posts: 3,077
 
Device(s): LG Nexus 4, Samsung Galaxy Note 2, Htc Evo 3D, Google Chrome Cr-48
Carrier: AT&T and T-Mobile (prepaid)

Thanks: 668
Thanked 320 Times in 254 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by matttye View Post
IF they have any sense we will still be able to use Android Beam, in addition to S-Beam.
Hopefully that is the case. If not maybe someone will make an apk for Android Beam.
JunBringer is offline  
Reply With Quote
Sponsors
Old May 6th, 2012, 07:46 AM   #881 (permalink)
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: Auckland, New Zealand
Posts: 1,810
 
Device(s): Galaxy S, HTC Desire
Carrier: Not Provided

Thanks: 109
Thanked 737 Times in 401 Posts
Default

Some more interesting stuff on the S3 (32nm process, battery life, exFAT support):

AndroidNZ: Samsung Galaxy S3, secrets revealed: Battery life, exFAT, Apt-X (bonus scandal: the iPad2 buyers lottery)
__________________
Blogs: androidNZ.net and blog.clove.co.uk
Twitter: @NZtechfreak Facebook: http://goo.gl/baZHQ
Galaxy Note Mega Review: http://goo.gl/Lnoe9
Galaxy SIII Review Part 1 & 2: http://goo.gl/8GCHG & http://goo.gl/gDYkA
Galaxy SIII & Nexus 7 Root guides: http://goo.gl/DMN5v & http://goo.gl/pQbUB
NZtechfreak is offline  
Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to NZtechfreak For This Useful Post:
JunBringer (May 6th, 2012)
Old May 6th, 2012, 02:27 PM   #882 (permalink)
Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Posts: 311
 
Device(s):
Carrier: Not Provided

Thanks: 3
Thanked 17 Times in 15 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by NZtechfreak View Post
Some more interesting stuff on the S3 (32nm process, battery life, exFAT support):

AndroidNZ: Samsung Galaxy S3, secrets revealed: Battery life, exFAT, Apt-X (bonus scandal: the iPad2 buyers lottery)

That worries me a bit, he part about the chip. Is the S4 the same metal and die size? If not will the dual core US version be a battery hog while the Euro sips?
Eryl Flynn is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old May 6th, 2012, 03:58 PM   #883 (permalink)
Member
 
Join Date: May 2010
Posts: 320
 
Device(s):
Carrier: Not Provided

Thanks: 11
Thanked 67 Times in 47 Posts
Default

So, apparently someone got hold of an S3 and did back to back camera shots with a HOX

Michael's Album: GALAXY III v One X [Photos]

Full size here: Photo Comparison Samsung Galaxy III and HTC One X

My first thought was the S3 looks horrendous, washed out colours, not sharp, flare from lighting... but on second look its better at some pictures - the roses in the hallway and the apples are sharper than the HOX and less saturated. The image looking down a road with cars parked either side the HOX white balance is off (cold) and slightly underexposed.
Some shots show camera shake and/or loss of focus. Both of these could be user error (My HTC Desire can be a little awkward sometimes).

Note there is no EXIF data on any of these images, someone removed it.

Its also odd that Samsung let someone wander off with an unreleased phone that from what I read is still on pre-production software. I looked on a map and found the outside locations are up to a mile from Earls Court, but all reviews etc that I've seen no-one got allowed to be out of the building with the phone.
In the outside pictures there are no cars or people, which would indicate early morning ? I wouldn't expect that area of London to be that quiet in daylight hours.

The HOX uses the same sensor as the SG2, I don't know about the lens, but at any rate the S3 having a worse lens than the S2 or HOX doesn't really make sense.

What do we think guys ? I posted here because until I actually see some confirmation I'm treating this as rumour.

Edit: also just found this that has a few detail pictures from an S3 vs S2 which would be more what I'd expect : xda-developers - View Single Post - Samsung Disappoints & HTC Steals The Show!
Crafty is offline  
Last edited by Crafty; May 6th, 2012 at 04:03 PM.
Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to Crafty For This Useful Post:
zanza (May 7th, 2012)
Old May 6th, 2012, 07:01 PM   #884 (permalink)
Senior Member
 
Android26's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: Atlanta, GA
Posts: 506
 
Device(s): Samsung Galaxy S (Captivate) & Nexus 7
Carrier: AT&T

Thanks: 299
Thanked 39 Times in 33 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Crafty View Post
So, apparently someone got hold of an S3 and did back to back camera shots with a HOX

Michael's Album: GALAXY III v One X [Photos]

Full size here: Photo Comparison Samsung Galaxy III and HTC One X

My first thought was the S3 looks horrendous, washed out colours, not sharp, flare from lighting... but on second look its better at some pictures - the roses in the hallway and the apples are sharper than the HOX and less saturated. The image looking down a road with cars parked either side the HOX white balance is off (cold) and slightly underexposed.
Some shots show camera shake and/or loss of focus. Both of these could be user error (My HTC Desire can be a little awkward sometimes).

Note there is no EXIF data on any of these images, someone removed it.

Its also odd that Samsung let someone wander off with an unreleased phone that from what I read is still on pre-production software. I looked on a map and found the outside locations are up to a mile from Earls Court, but all reviews etc that I've seen no-one got allowed to be out of the building with the phone.
In the outside pictures there are no cars or people, which would indicate early morning ? I wouldn't expect that area of London to be that quiet in daylight hours.

The HOX uses the same sensor as the SG2, I don't know about the lens, but at any rate the S3 having a worse lens than the S2 or HOX doesn't really make sense.

What do we think guys ? I posted here because until I actually see some confirmation I'm treating this as rumour.

Edit: also just found this that has a few detail pictures from an S3 vs S2 which would be more what I'd expect : xda-developers - View Single Post - Samsung Disappoints & HTC Steals The Show!
It looks like he had the flash on for the SGS3 and not the HOX.

Anyone else feel the same way? Maybe I'm wrong.
Android26 is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old May 6th, 2012, 08:01 PM   #885 (permalink)
Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Posts: 413
 
Device(s):
Carrier: Not Provided

Thanks: 6
Thanked 312 Times in 212 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Eryl Flynn View Post
That worries me a bit, he part about the chip. Is the S4 the same metal and die size? If not will the dual core US version be a battery hog while the Euro sips?
huh?

AnandTech - The HTC One X for AT&T Review
xtop is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old May 6th, 2012, 11:19 PM   #886 (permalink)
Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Posts: 311
 
Device(s):
Carrier: Not Provided

Thanks: 3
Thanked 17 Times in 15 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by xtop View Post

I appreciate that but not a guaranteed accurate comparison. They are not using the Exynos quad in the EU version of the HOX. It may be similar or the same end results but I do not see how we would know they compare.
Eryl Flynn is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old May 7th, 2012, 03:48 AM   #887 (permalink)
Member
 
Join Date: May 2010
Posts: 320
 
Device(s):
Carrier: Not Provided

Thanks: 11
Thanked 67 Times in 47 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Android26 View Post
It looks like he had the flash on for the SGS3 and not the HOX.

Anyone else feel the same way? Maybe I'm wrong.
Could be any number of things, since all EXIF got removed we can't tell, which is one of the reasons I'm suspicious. We don't even know they are from an S3...
Crafty is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old May 7th, 2012, 06:34 AM   #888 (permalink)
Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Posts: 413
 
Device(s):
Carrier: Not Provided

Thanks: 6
Thanked 312 Times in 212 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Eryl Flynn View Post
I appreciate that but not a guaranteed accurate comparison. They are not using the Exynos quad in the EU version of the HOX. It may be similar or the same end results but I do not see how we would know they compare.
i posted it to prove it wouldn't be a battery hog like you suggested. the s4 one x was in 2nd place in nearly every test.
xtop is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old May 7th, 2012, 01:22 PM   #889 (permalink)
Senior Member
 
rushmore's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Kentucky
Posts: 7,083
 
Device(s): GS3, Excite 7.7 32GB, iPad 4 128GB wifi, TF300 32GB & dock
Carrier: VZW

Thanks: 357
Thanked 1,251 Times in 876 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Sandroidfan View Post
Tegra2 and Exynos had some issue with LTE radios last year, but still Samsung managed to make LTE tab 10.1 with tegra2. So that doesn't mean they will have the same issue with LTE this year going forward. I heard Samsung said last year that their next versions of Exynos will fully support LTE radios. They also reconfirmed it unofficially recently.

Given how big deal LTE is even in Asia, I think these big guys are well aware how important it is to make sure their chips are LTE compatible, and it will be silly to make processors working with only 3G these days.

As for SGSIII on verizon, I feel your concern as they are using CDMA. So it remains to be seen if new Exynos can also support verizon CDMA/LTE network. They might go with Krait S4 for verizon, but that's still giant leap from S3 snapdragon of last year.

Regardless, a VZW version is likely waaaaaaay down the road.
rushmore is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old May 7th, 2012, 01:57 PM   #890 (permalink)
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: Central TX
Gender: Male
Posts: 1,894
 
Device(s): Razr HD, Galaxy Nexus
Carrier: Verizon

Thanks: 1,151
Thanked 785 Times in 599 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by rushmore View Post
Regardless, a VZW version is likely waaaaaaay down the road.
Maybe so if they try to do Exynos/LTE combo on Verizon version. But if it's S4 Krait (which seems more likely now), I don't think it will take too long.

BTW, isn't verizon also getting Razr HD? I wonder what kind of processor/radio it might have. There was leak that indicates S4 krait but I don't think it's confirmed. And verizon doesn't seem to be getting One X anytime soon.
Sandroidfan is offline  
Reply With Quote
Sponsors
Old May 7th, 2012, 01:58 PM   #891 (permalink)
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2011
Posts: 67
 
Device(s):
Carrier: Not Provided

Thanks: 0
Thanked 1 Time in 1 Post
Default

Any guesses on the price this will be? I'm due for an upgrade in July and I'm debating between getting the Sony Xperia Ion SGSIII and the Skyrocket, which one?
Attain???????? is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old May 7th, 2012, 02:14 PM   #892 (permalink)
Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Posts: 413
 
Device(s):
Carrier: Not Provided

Thanks: 6
Thanked 312 Times in 212 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Attain???????? View Post
Any guesses on the price this will be? I'm due for an upgrade in July and I'm debating between getting the Sony Xperia Ion SGSIII and the Skyrocket, which one?
i would take the skyrocket off of your list and leave it between the s3, ion and one x. but it'll be the usual $199 on contract, $550+ off contract
xtop is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old May 7th, 2012, 02:31 PM   #893 (permalink)
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2011
Posts: 67
 
Device(s):
Carrier: Not Provided

Thanks: 0
Thanked 1 Time in 1 Post
Default

I'm not interested in the One-X i want an SD slot and a removable battery...
Attain???????? is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old May 7th, 2012, 02:34 PM   #894 (permalink)
Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Posts: 413
 
Device(s):
Carrier: Not Provided

Thanks: 6
Thanked 312 Times in 212 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Attain???????? View Post
I'm not interested in the One-X i want an SD slot and a removable battery...
ok?....
xtop is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old May 7th, 2012, 03:16 PM   #895 (permalink)
Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Posts: 227
 
Device(s):
Carrier: Not Provided

Thanks: 46
Thanked 43 Times in 35 Posts
Default

different ends of the spectrum, but the inc4g sounds enticing...
powdbyrice is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old May 8th, 2012, 06:20 AM   #896 (permalink)
New Member
 
Join Date: May 2012
Posts: 11
 
Device(s):
Carrier: Not Provided

Thanks: 2
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Attain???????? View Post
I'm not interested in the One-X i want an SD slot and a removable battery...
this
Xplorah is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old May 8th, 2012, 07:03 AM   #897 (permalink)
Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2011
Posts: 194
 
Device(s):
Carrier: Not Provided

Thanks: 81
Thanked 244 Times in 193 Posts
Default

HTC One X is ugly in my taste. SGS3 surprised me a lot in a positive meaning. I have I9000 now so changing into SGS 3 will be a big upgrade for me. Im waiting for it. Hey guys, did you see Han Solo somewhere here last time? BTW hello after a long time again. ;]
Thejungle is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old May 8th, 2012, 08:42 AM   #898 (permalink)
New Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Posts: 12
 
Device(s):
Carrier: Not Provided

Thanks: 2
Thanked 2 Times in 1 Post
Default

This will come with a removable 2100 mah battery

Samsung Galaxy S III (S3) Review - Watch CNET's Video Review
Nice review.

+ I found this interesting doing a side by side comparison to the EVO 4G LTE

Samsung Galaxy S III VS HTC EVO 4G LTE - Phone specs comparison
souredgrapes is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old May 9th, 2012, 11:13 PM   #899 (permalink)
Member
 
nascar01's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: Buffalo, New York
Posts: 127
 
Device(s):
Carrier: Not Provided

Thanks: 45
Thanked 88 Times in 31 Posts
Default

Does anyone know if the US model will have the physical home button or is it too early to tell? I like the button but like the s2 the US model didn't use it. Kinda of hoping that they don't do that again.
nascar01 is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old May 10th, 2012, 09:49 AM   #900 (permalink)
Senior Member
 
Baldilocks's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: Delaware, U.S.A.
Posts: 1,242
 
Device(s): HTC One X (International)
Carrier: AT&T

Thanks: 54
Thanked 158 Times in 115 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by nascar01 View Post
Does anyone know if the US model will have the physical home button or is it too early to tell? I like the button but like the s2 the US model didn't use it. Kinda of hoping that they don't do that again.
All of the U.S. models will have 4 capacitve keys. I'll be buying the UK version. I love having a home button.
Baldilocks is offline  
Reply With Quote
Reply

Buy the Samsung Galaxy S III
Sign up for instant notification when the Samsung Galaxy S III goes on sale!
Samsung Galaxy S III

  The Samsung Galaxy S3 is the company's flagship device of 2012. As one of the most anticipated devices of the year, this device is the first to come with a Exynos 4 Quad processor. It also has Android 4.0, a 4.8-inch 720p Super AMOLED ... Read More



Go Back   Android Forums > Android Phones > Samsung Galaxy S3
Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


LinkBacks (?)
LinkBack to this Thread: http://androidforums.com/samsung-galaxy-s3/476091-updated-13-2-12-discuss-all-samsung-galaxy-s-iii-rumors-release-date-speculation-news.html
Posted By For Type Date
Samsung Galaxy S3 Rumor Roundup: What to Expect : Android This thread Refback February 20th, 2012 07:56 AM


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 09:33 PM.
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2013, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.