Go Back   Android Forums > Android Phones > Samsung Mesmerize

Get excited for the Samsung Galaxy S5! Find everything you need and discuss it in our Galaxy S5 Forum!

test: Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools
Old October 17th, 2011, 07:08 AM   #1 (permalink)
Member
Thread Author (OP)
 
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: Martinsburg, West Virginia
Gender: Male
Posts: 102
 
Device(s): Samsung Galaxy Note II HTC One X Motorola Atrix HD
Carrier: Not Provided

Thanks: 10
Thanked 4 Times in 4 Posts
Send a message via Yahoo to tritiumman
Default Sprint purchasing U.S Cellular?

I read this on > Broadband DSL reports Any truth to this?

"I would say that probably next year or 2013 U.S Cellular will be picked up by Sprint."

tritiumman is offline  
Reply With Quote
sponsored links
Old October 17th, 2011, 07:19 AM   #2 (permalink)
AF Contributor
 
LaTuFu's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: Virginia
Posts: 1,123
 
Device(s): Samsung Galaxy S4, Motorola Electrify 2, Samsung Galaxy S II, Samsung Galaxy S Mesmerize, Galaxy 10.
Carrier: US Cellular

Thanks: 82
Thanked 219 Times in 191 Posts
Send a message via Skype™ to LaTuFu LaTuFu
Default

Grow or die has been the way of big corporates for years, so it isn't surprising to hear something like that.

It would make more sense for Verizon to pick up USCC, since they share the same technology platforms.

But Sprint picked up NexTel for reasons nobody could figure out, so they certainly have proven willing to go the road less traveled.
LaTuFu is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old October 17th, 2011, 08:08 AM   #3 (permalink)
Member
Thread Author (OP)
 
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: Martinsburg, West Virginia
Gender: Male
Posts: 102
 
Device(s): Samsung Galaxy Note II HTC One X Motorola Atrix HD
Carrier: Not Provided

Thanks: 10
Thanked 4 Times in 4 Posts
Send a message via Yahoo to tritiumman
Default

All I can say is. I certainly hope not. I left Sprint for U.S. Cellular due to very shitty service, and I don't mean customer service. The call quality was horrible, I could not use my phone in my office or home with out an "airave". Data speeds were very very slow I could go on and on. I'm please with USCC service call quality is fantastic and I can use my phone in my home or office.
tritiumman is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old October 17th, 2011, 03:19 PM   #4 (permalink)
kmf
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: Northeast Iowa
Posts: 550
 
Device(s): Verizon: DROID RAZZR MAXX HD; DROID RAZZ M; Nook Color.
Carrier: Verizon

Thanks: 98
Thanked 46 Times in 40 Posts
Default

USCC and Verizon have tower agreements, so I hope that Sprint does not get involved.
kmf is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old October 17th, 2011, 03:33 PM   #5 (permalink)
Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: Des Moines, Iowa
Posts: 370
 
Device(s): Samsung Galaxy Note 2 - JellyBomb Detonation Asus Transformer Prime - NRG
Carrier: Not Provided

Thanks: 19
Thanked 61 Times in 48 Posts
Default

Jeez, I hope that's not true. Sprint is terrible.
Zebulon is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old October 25th, 2011, 08:45 AM   #6 (permalink)
Member
 
matt88si's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: Downers Grove, IL
Gender: Male
Posts: 259
 
Device(s): Samsung Galaxy S3 (L710)
Carrier: Sprint

Thanks: 27
Thanked 31 Times in 26 Posts
mattper@gmail.com
Default

I was once a Helio user (dont you dare call it phone). Although the phone was pretty kickass for its time (the oyster lookin-one), the quality of service was something to be desired. Left the carrier in less than a month.

At the rate USCC is going, I dont think they'll need to be bought out. They're the first carrier with a points system for crying out loud! Nothing beats out points! POINTS! POINTS!!!
matt88si is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old October 25th, 2011, 02:07 PM   #7 (permalink)
Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: Des Moines, Iowa
Posts: 370
 
Device(s): Samsung Galaxy Note 2 - JellyBomb Detonation Asus Transformer Prime - NRG
Carrier: Not Provided

Thanks: 19
Thanked 61 Times in 48 Posts
Default

Re-read that post. There is no reason to believe that the poster who put that comment up has any sort info that would support his claim. It seems to be purely conjecture.
Zebulon is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old October 25th, 2011, 02:35 PM   #8 (permalink)
Member
 
matt88si's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: Downers Grove, IL
Gender: Male
Posts: 259
 
Device(s): Samsung Galaxy S3 (L710)
Carrier: Sprint

Thanks: 27
Thanked 31 Times in 26 Posts
mattper@gmail.com
Default

Yeah I read the article he posted and nothing stating a merger between the two carriers was stated.

Trolls... .

Just kidding. n.n
matt88si is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old October 25th, 2011, 02:57 PM   #9 (permalink)
Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2010
Posts: 223
 
Device(s):
Carrier: Not Provided

Thanks: 3
Thanked 18 Times in 17 Posts
Default

no crystal ball here but a merger could be in the works. US Cell is a small company and they seldom go unnoticed if they're successful.

The T-mobile/AT&T buyout is dead in the water right now. The point system for me is a joke. How about lowering the monthly bill than I'll save the extra each month and just buy a new phone when I need it?
2acclaim is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old October 25th, 2011, 03:26 PM   #10 (permalink)
Member
 
matt88si's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: Downers Grove, IL
Gender: Male
Posts: 259
 
Device(s): Samsung Galaxy S3 (L710)
Carrier: Sprint

Thanks: 27
Thanked 31 Times in 26 Posts
mattper@gmail.com
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by 2acclaim View Post
no crystal ball here but a merger could be in the works. US Cell is a small company and they seldom go unnoticed if they're successful.

The T-mobile/AT&T buyout is dead in the water right now. The point system for me is a joke. How about lowering the monthly bill than I'll save the extra each month and just buy a new phone when I need it?
That would defeat the purpose of the point system. It's identical to those used on credit cards, checking accounts, and even stores like GameStop.

If you want to save money on your phone bill, switch to a lower-tier plan.

If a merger does happen (which at this point seems unlikely due to the sucess rate of USCC with customer base) I'd be the first to protest it (probably not).
matt88si is offline  
Reply With Quote
sponsored links
Old October 31st, 2011, 09:21 AM   #11 (permalink)
Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: SE Oklahoma
Posts: 102
 
Device(s):
Carrier: Not Provided

Thanks: 0
Thanked 3 Times in 3 Posts
Default

There has been something going on here locally that is a little puzzling. I live in a fairly small town of 8500 population and there has been a new cell phone town put up recently but nobody seems to know who's tower it is. US Cellular say's that it's not theirs but they will not say who it belongs to here in Southeastern Oklahoma. US Cellular has had this area service exclusively for some time now and probably is not wanting to give it up to competition willingly.

I hope it's a Verizon tower.
shortride is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old October 31st, 2011, 12:08 PM   #12 (permalink)
Member
 
matt88si's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: Downers Grove, IL
Gender: Male
Posts: 259
 
Device(s): Samsung Galaxy S3 (L710)
Carrier: Sprint

Thanks: 27
Thanked 31 Times in 26 Posts
mattper@gmail.com
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by shortride View Post
There has been something going on here locally that is a little puzzling. I live in a fairly small town of 8500 population and there has been a new cell phone town put up recently but nobody seems to know who's tower it is. US Cellular say's that it's not theirs but they will not say who it belongs to here in Southeastern Oklahoma. US Cellular has had this area service exclusively for some time now and probably is not wanting to give it up to competition willingly.

I hope it's a Verizon tower.
It's a government tower and they're watching you.
matt88si is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old November 3rd, 2011, 07:50 AM   #13 (permalink)
Member
Thread Author (OP)
 
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: Martinsburg, West Virginia
Gender: Male
Posts: 102
 
Device(s): Samsung Galaxy Note II HTC One X Motorola Atrix HD
Carrier: Not Provided

Thanks: 10
Thanked 4 Times in 4 Posts
Send a message via Yahoo to tritiumman
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by matt88si View Post
It's a government tower and they're watching you.
You,, don't know just how correct you are. The U.S. government with assistance from major telecommunications carriers including AT&T has engaged in a massive program of illegal dragnet surveillance of domestic communications and communications records of millions of ordinary Americans since at least 2001.
tritiumman is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old November 4th, 2011, 10:30 AM   #14 (permalink)
AF Contributor
 
LaTuFu's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: Virginia
Posts: 1,123
 
Device(s): Samsung Galaxy S4, Motorola Electrify 2, Samsung Galaxy S II, Samsung Galaxy S Mesmerize, Galaxy 10.
Carrier: US Cellular

Thanks: 82
Thanked 219 Times in 191 Posts
Send a message via Skype™ to LaTuFu LaTuFu
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by tritiumman View Post
You,, don't know just how correct you are. The U.S. government with assistance from major telecommunications carriers including AT&T has engaged in a massive program of illegal dragnet surveillance of domestic communications and communications records of millions of ordinary Americans since at least 2001.
It's not illegal, at least not under the auspices of the Patriot Act.

Whether or not it is an abrogation of the constitution, well, healthy topic for another thread...
LaTuFu is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old November 4th, 2011, 11:00 AM   #15 (permalink)
Member
 
matt88si's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: Downers Grove, IL
Gender: Male
Posts: 259
 
Device(s): Samsung Galaxy S3 (L710)
Carrier: Sprint

Thanks: 27
Thanked 31 Times in 26 Posts
mattper@gmail.com
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by LaTuFu View Post
It's not illegal, at least not under the auspices of the Patriot Act.

Whether or not it is an abrogation of the constitution, well, healthy topic for another thread...
Ugh. The US 'government' is a great topic for just about any forum considering just about everything has to do with them.

If someone starts it I'll be sure to chime in now and again.
matt88si is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old November 4th, 2011, 11:20 AM   #16 (permalink)
Member
Thread Author (OP)
 
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: Martinsburg, West Virginia
Gender: Male
Posts: 102
 
Device(s): Samsung Galaxy Note II HTC One X Motorola Atrix HD
Carrier: Not Provided

Thanks: 10
Thanked 4 Times in 4 Posts
Send a message via Yahoo to tritiumman
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by LaTuFu View Post
It's not illegal, at least not under the auspices of the Patriot Act.

Whether or not it is an abrogation of the constitution, well, healthy topic for another thread...
NOT ILLEGAL!!!!! The Constitution of the United States was ordained with the primary object being the defense of Liberty. Congress can only create laws in the pursuance of liberty -- in pursuance of the Constitution. any anti-constitutional decree or "executive order" Congress and the President might install is not valid.
tritiumman is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old November 4th, 2011, 12:31 PM   #17 (permalink)
AF Contributor
 
LaTuFu's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: Virginia
Posts: 1,123
 
Device(s): Samsung Galaxy S4, Motorola Electrify 2, Samsung Galaxy S II, Samsung Galaxy S Mesmerize, Galaxy 10.
Carrier: US Cellular

Thanks: 82
Thanked 219 Times in 191 Posts
Send a message via Skype™ to LaTuFu LaTuFu
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by tritiumman View Post
NOT ILLEGAL!!!!! The Constitution of the United States was ordained with the primary object being the defense of Liberty. Congress can only create laws in the pursuance of liberty -- in pursuance of the Constitution. any anti-constitutional decree or "executive order" Congress and the President might install is not valid.
I don't dispute anything you're saying. But until someone in the Supreme Court or the Executive Branch of the Government take those steps, the civil rights that were taken away by the Patriot Act will not return. And it's perfectly legal until that happens because A) the Patriot Act was enacted, whether legal or not and B) No one has challenged it.
LaTuFu is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old November 4th, 2011, 01:04 PM   #18 (permalink)
Member
 
matt88si's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: Downers Grove, IL
Gender: Male
Posts: 259
 
Device(s): Samsung Galaxy S3 (L710)
Carrier: Sprint

Thanks: 27
Thanked 31 Times in 26 Posts
mattper@gmail.com
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by LaTuFu View Post
I don't dispute anything you're saying. But until someone in the Supreme Court or the Executive Branch of the Government take those steps, the civil rights that were taken away by the Patriot Act will not return. And it's perfectly legal until that happens because A) the Patriot Act was enacted, whether legal or not and B) No one has challenged it.
No one has challenged it because it just happened to work so well that it was wrong (I think).

"Big brother" has always been here in one way or another. Cell phones (and now, smart phones) have made it incredibly easier for not just our 'government,' but anyone to access personal data and read messages between cellular devices.
matt88si is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old November 7th, 2011, 11:53 AM   #19 (permalink)
 
Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: Alaska
Posts: 57
 
Device(s): Nexus on SPRINT! Yeah!
Carrier: Not Provided

Thanks: 10
Thanked 6 Times in 6 Posts
Default

BooBoo says, Sprint is going to purchase Verizon wireless....and then USC And be the largest phone carrier in the world!
booboo12 is offline  
Last edited by booboo12; November 7th, 2011 at 01:27 PM.
Reply With Quote
Reply


Go Back   Android Forums > Android Phones > Samsung Mesmerize
Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 09:17 PM.
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2014, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.