Device(s): LG Spectrum (Working on porting CM9); Samsung Galaxy Nexus (CM10)
Carrier: Not Provided
Thanks: 1
Thanked 34 Times in 7 Posts
It is, we don't have 3.0 kernel source yet, so why compare 3.0 kernel to a 2.6.35 kernel? So he is comparing 2.6.35 for the p930 to 2.6.35 for the spectrum
Device(s): VS920, TF700T, Droid X, Droid Inc, T-bolt <-smashed into a million bits, Galaxy Note 2 :)
Carrier: Verizon
Thanks: 69
Thanked 38 Times in 26 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by death2all111
It is, we don't have 3.0 kernel source yet, so why compare 3.0 kernel to a 2.6.35 kernel? So he is comparing 2.6.35 for the p930 to 2.6.35 for the spectrum
My bad, I thought he was using the ICS kernel source from the P930
Last edited by hayneskr; October 1st, 2012 at 05:33 PM.
My bad, I thought he was using the kernel source from the P930
I am comparing 2.6.35 vs920 to 2.6.35 p930 in order to see what the differences are in the kernel sources between the two devices. This tells us what needs to be applied to the 3.0.8 p930 kernel (or rather, what might need to be applied -- many of the differences are just minor edits for whitespace and such).
Now I don't care for the ics update I would way rather have this!
Thanks tdm and death2all and everyone else taking all of your time working on something that is very hard to do, I appreciate it, thanks so much!!!
__________________ FUSION DEV G+ COMMUNITY GOOGLE+TWITTERFOLLOW
Device(s): VS920, TF700T, Droid X, Droid Inc, T-bolt <-smashed into a million bits, Galaxy Note 2 :)
Carrier: Verizon
Thanks: 69
Thanked 38 Times in 26 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by tdm
I am comparing 2.6.35 vs920 to 2.6.35 p930 in order to see what the differences are in the kernel sources between the two devices. This tells us what needs to be applied to the 3.0.8 p930 kernel (or rather, what might need to be applied -- many of the differences are just minor edits for whitespace and such).
I went back to your original post and I see where I read it wrong.
Guess I got so excited about the progress being made!
Device(s): LG Spectrum,
HTC Hero CDMA,
HTC Evo Shift,
Nook Tablet
Carrier: Verizon
Thanks: 52
Thanked 42 Times in 30 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by MrB206
Agreed. I tried cm9 and cm10 on my Transformer and I really don't notice a difference. I think it's more firmware than a esthetic.
depends is cm10 stable for it and it also depends on the rom.. also about the droid RAZR having better signal, I don't know if they do this with Motorola's to but htcs have something in them that don't tell you when you are roaming until a certain point therefor better signal ( from what I've been told) I do believe its true because I've had some developers put a mod in roms that shows true signal and its just horrible. So that's something to take into consideration also the moto RAZR has ics. Ics has better signal then GB from what I've seen on roms on my past phones... I could be wrong. Again though IMO
Quote:
Originally Posted by Biotic
Waaa?
Lol.. I got a bad behind rom called alien droid for my nook tablet complete gui customization and jb what more could you want? infact I'm updating it tomorrow.
Agreed. I tried cm9 and cm10 on my Transformer and I really don't notice a difference. I think it's more firmware than a esthetic.
There is a definite difference between cm9 and cm10. Not so much visually but in smoothness and general performance there is a big distinction between the two.
Working through wifi, radio, sound, and bluetooth. Once I have those going, I'll make a test build and push to github. Should be this week, I'm pretty sure.
Device(s): LG Spectrum,
HTC Hero CDMA,
HTC Evo Shift,
Nook Tablet
Carrier: Verizon
Thanks: 52
Thanked 42 Times in 30 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by tdm
Working through wifi, radio, sound, and bluetooth. Once I have those going, I'll make a test build and push to github. Should be this week, I'm pretty sure.
Thanks for keeping us informed :-)
Last edited by megaghostgamer; October 1st, 2012 at 11:46 PM.
the droid RAZR having better signal, I don't know if they do this with Motorola's to but htcs have something in them that don't tell you when you are roaming until a certain point therefor better signal ( from what I've been told) I do believe its true because I've had some developers put a mod in roms that shows true signal and its just horrible. So that's something to take into consideration also the moto RAZR has ics. Ics has better signal then GB from what I've seen on roms on my past phones... I could be wrong. Again though IMO
Not exactly the case. HOWEVER, with ics, its gives the device more options with the antenna than gingerbread. For instance, the razr didnt have global or gsm mode untill the ics update. In the case of cyanogen9-10, it does give us those options and more.
Last edited by Biotic; October 2nd, 2012 at 08:50 AM.
Device(s): LG Spectrum, ASUS Transformer 300T, Droid 2 Global, Droid X
Carrier: Not Provided
Thanks: 12
Thanked 251 Times in 223 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by ortrigger
There is a definite difference between cm9 and cm10. Not so much visually but in smoothness and general performance there is a big distinction between the two.
That's kinda what I thought. Oddly enough, I ran some AnTuTu tests on both roms and cm9 consistently got better scores. Granted, it was only by 100-200, but I thought that was interesting. I'm much happier with little things in 10, like the notification clearing.
Been looking at wifi, radio, and sound. Summary: it's a complicated mess. I could use some help. Who are the devs here that can help out? I will create a github org for collaboration if I can get a team together.
Wifi is a bit of an issue. I think the vendor is using wpa_supplicant 0.6.x but CM9 for the p930 is using 0.8.x. Should be fixed soon, I think.
From what I see, there are two main ways to get audio working. Either use the spectrum's vendor audio libs for GB, or use the p930 vendor audio libs for ICS. It will take some work to get the GB audio libs working but I don't really know how much. Could be easy, could be hard. But the end result will be GB audio libs on ICS. I'd rather have native ICS audio, but I'm not sure if any kernel changes are required. They may require the ICS kernel drivers. So I might go back and revisit the p930 ICS kernel ... it's where I want to go anyway.
The spectrum's radio setup is ... unique. It has two rild services, presumably one for CDMA and one for GSM. This greatly complicates radio handling. It will take a bit to untangle that. But I am not using VZW so I can only test CDMA and 3G.
The Following 5 Users Say Thank You to tdm For This Useful Post:
Device(s): LG Spectrum, ASUS Transformer 300T, Droid 2 Global, Droid X
Carrier: Not Provided
Thanks: 12
Thanked 251 Times in 223 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by tdm
The spectrum's radio setup is ... unique. It has two rild services, presumably one for CDMA and one for GSM. This greatly complicates radio handling. It will take a bit to untangle that. But I am not using VZW so I can only test CDMA and 3G.
You might want to talk to the Droid 2 Global devs over @ Rootz. We encountered that same issue with the d2g radio and one of them figured it out. That sh*t is above my paygrade.
The Following User Says Thank You to MrB206 For This Useful Post:
Been looking at wifi, radio, and sound. Summary: it's a complicated mess. I could use some help. Who are the devs here that can help out? I will create a github org for collaboration if I can get a team together.
Wifi is a bit of an issue. I think the vendor is using wpa_supplicant 0.6.x but CM9 for the p930 is using 0.8.x. Should be fixed soon, I think.
From what I see, there are two main ways to get audio working. Either use the spectrum's vendor audio libs for GB, or use the p930 vendor audio libs for ICS. It will take some work to get the GB audio libs working but I don't really know how much. Could be easy, could be hard. But the end result will be GB audio libs on ICS. I'd rather have native ICS audio, but I'm not sure if any kernel changes are required. They may require the ICS kernel drivers. So I might go back and revisit the p930 ICS kernel ... it's where I want to go anyway.
The spectrum's radio setup is ... unique. It has two rild services, presumably one for CDMA and one for GSM. This greatly complicates radio handling. It will take a bit to untangle that. But I am not using VZW so I can only test CDMA and 3G.
not to be rude but where is all the devs that people donated to get the spectrum
The Following User Says Thank You to phillip_viado For This Useful Post:
Finally figured out how to get the p930 ics kernel to load initramfs. The problem (as always) was a silly little thing that I missed:
BOARD_FORCE_RAMDISK_ADDRESS := 0x41a00000
My itty bitty fbcon is now telling me that the kernel booted, loaded the initramfs, and init is doing stuff. Unfortunately, adb is not functional. But this is a great step forward!
Lol.. I got a bad behind rom called alien droid for my nook tablet complete gui customization and jb what more could you want? infact I'm updating it tomorrow.
Where'd you get this rom? I've only found CM9 for my nook color
I think I'm getting close to finding the issue with adb. It seems the usb port is not being initialized correctly due to some code differences between the two kernels in the function msm_hsusb_ldo_init().
Device(s): LG Spectrum,
LG Ally-Bionic Zero v.05-DEAD :(
Carrier: Not Provided
Thanks: 269
Thanked 136 Times in 92 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by real0325
Good shiznit. Death there will always be haters, I just don't understand why people just can't go with the flow.
It seems to me like the mods just like to come in here and try to control/censor what we can and cannot say, whether a thread has gotten off topic and needs to be moved. I mean I think we have a nice, small community that doesn't really need constant patrolling. I mean what did d2a do that was so bad and worth him being banned...well repeatedly? I'll probably wind up banned like d2a for saying this lol but I think it needs to be said/asked.
Device(s): LG Spectrum, ASUS Transformer 300T, Droid 2 Global, Droid X
Carrier: Not Provided
Thanks: 12
Thanked 251 Times in 223 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by admn81
I mean what did d2a do that was so bad and worth him being banned...well repeatedly? I'll probably wind up banned like d2a for saying this lol but I think it needs to be said/asked.
I'd love to know as well. Anyone that wants to hit me up in PM, cool. I understand mods can censor us (it's their right as owners of the site), but why does he keep getting banned? I've never seen him do anything worth banning... ignoring when he goes on rants? maybe... but we all rant and babble.
Device(s): LG Spectrum runnin 10.1 & Nexus 7 Stock 8gigger
Carrier: Not Provided
Thanks: 77
Thanked 18 Times in 13 Posts
this website got hacked because of a known exploit. i had to change my password. i should have banned myself from this website. weak! a known exploit?!?! come on. instead, i keep coming back because of a few awesome people. ban those and i don't come back. that is a few less clicks that equals a few less dollars. known exploit. hahaha. now they want to get uppity and ban people.
You guys are out of control. Just chill. You have no right to complain about the rules because this site/forum doesn't belong to you.
If I invited you in my house and required that you abide by certain rules while there, you would have no grounds for a valid or legitimate complaint if I kicked you out based on a disregard and/or disrespect of me or the rules.
And don't think I'm taking sides, I know death pretty well (for someone I haven't met in real life) based on a lot of personal conversations we've had, and I think I even know why death went off. And I'm sure death knows I'm not attacking him because I'm not that kind of person. I am just looking at this objectively and the truth is death even knew that his outburst would most likely result in a ban. I really hope death original account gets unbanned because he is a valuable part of this forum. But we all must play by the rules whether we like them or not. I've been annoyed a few times by certain things admins have done as well, but we are in someone else's house, and we must respect the house rules no matter how silly they seem. None of us are forced to be here.
PS. The admins did say if you have a complaint then pm them. I think that would be the wisest course of action. Let's try to act like adults here people.
The Following 5 Users Say Thank You to IMUcarmen For This Useful Post:
You guys are out of control. Just chill. You have no right to complain about the rules because this site/forum doesn't belong to you.
If I invited you in my house and required that you abide by certain rules while there, you would have no grounds for a valid or legitimate complaint if I kicked you out based on a disregard and/or disrespect of me or the rules.
And don't think I'm taking sides, I know death pretty well (for someone I haven't met in real life) based on a lot of personal conversations we've had, and I think I even know why death went off. And I'm sure death knows I'm not attacking him because I'm not that kind of person. I am just looking at this objectively and the truth is death even knew that his outburst would most likely result in a ban. I really hope death original account gets unbanned because he is a valuable part of this forum. But we all must play by the rules whether we like them or not. I've been annoyed a few times by certain things admins have done as well, but we are in someone else's house, and we must respect the house rules no matter how silly they seem. None of us are forced to be here.
PS. The admins did say if you have a complaint then pm them. I think that would be the wisest course of action. Let's try to act like adults here people.
Well said. Too bad I missed this 'death2all110' guy. Seemed like a real character. xD
Device(s): LG Spectrum,
LG Ally-Bionic Zero v.05-DEAD :(
Carrier: Not Provided
Thanks: 269
Thanked 136 Times in 92 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by IMUcarmen
You guys are out of control. Just chill. You have no right to complain about the rules because this site/forum doesn't belong to you.
If I invited you in my house and required that you abide by certain rules while there, you would have no grounds for a valid or legitimate complaint if I kicked you out based on a disregard and/or disrespect of me or the rules.
And don't think I'm taking sides, I know death pretty well (for someone I haven't met in real life) based on a lot of personal conversations we've had, and I think I even know why death went off. And I'm sure death knows I'm not attacking him because I'm not that kind of person. I am just looking at this objectively and the truth is death even knew that his outburst would most likely result in a ban. I really hope death original account gets unbanned because he is a valuable part of this forum. But we all must play by the rules whether we like them or not. I've been annoyed a few times by certain things admins have done as well, but we are in someone else's house, and we must respect the house rules no matter how silly they seem. None of us are forced to be here.
PS. The admins did say if you have a complaint then pm them. I think that would be the wisest course of action. Let's try to act like adults here people.
I'm actually surprised by your response imu, but guess it is what it is...man i do hate that cliche..lol. Well androidforums, i think you are gonna loose a lot of members after this debacle.
Today I was reading about what the schedulers do, and I read that the deadline scheduler executes task /required ram at a moments notice. Which keeps the phone from overload, and my wife called me today complaining about 6-7 reboots within 30 minute window. So I decided to do some fiddling and sure enough the scheduler was set to noop. So tomorrow I will have run multiple task to see what happens, and I will report back.
Last edited by real0325; October 2nd, 2012 at 11:33 PM.
I think I'm getting close to finding the issue with adb. It seems the usb port is not being initialized correctly due to some code differences between the two kernels in the function msm_hsusb_ldo_init().
Found the problem with msm_hsusb_ldo_init(), it was a config issue. Unfortunately, adb still isn't available for some reason.