2.1 & 3.2 startup comparisonGeneral


Last Updated:

  1. BlackberrySux

    BlackberrySux Well-Known Member This Topic's Starter

    Joined:
    Oct 21, 2011
    Messages:
    95
    Likes Received:
    7

    Advertisement
  2. TheSarge

    TheSarge Active Member

    Joined:
    May 22, 2011
    Messages:
    38
    Likes Received:
    3
    3.2 is ****ed. Tell me something I didn't already know.

    Burn in hell, LG.
     
  3. karendar

    karendar Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jun 22, 2010
    Messages:
    513
    Likes Received:
    60
    Surprisingly enough, I have faster boot times with 2.3 as opposed to 2.1. But then again, how many times do you really boot up your phone? Unless you shut it down 2-3 times a day for various reasons, I don't see how this is a major issue... Also keep in mind that Gingerbread was a step up architecture wise, they rewrote the way dalvik handles cache, changed a bunch of underlying drivers and how they interacted with kernel + radio. So boot time might be increase somewhat.
     
  4. BlackberrySux

    BlackberrySux Well-Known Member This Topic's Starter

    Joined:
    Oct 21, 2011
    Messages:
    95
    Likes Received:
    7
    Is there any kind of a possibility of the slowness on my 2.3 is cause by either Super Manger or the fact that I have it rooted? That would cause a whole bunch of other things that have to change during startup would it not? The fast 2.1 phone is still stock.
     

Share This Page

Loading...