6

Discussion in 'The Lounge' started by Vihzel, Apr 28, 2011.

?

6รท2(1+2) = ?

  1. 9

    94 vote(s)
    54.3%
  2. 1

    77 vote(s)
    44.5%
  3. 7

    2 vote(s)
    1.2%
  1. Bob Maxey

    Bob Maxey Well-Known Member
    223

    Sep 24, 2010
    4,836
    806
    223
    No soup for you!

    Clue #2: 1, 1, 2, 1, 3, 1, 4, . . . Next number and why. Do not think of it as a math problem; it is a sequence, so what is the next number and why?

    Bob
     

    Advertisement
  2. EarlyMon

    EarlyMon The PearlyMon
    Moderator
    10,118

    Jun 10, 2010
    57,623
    70,354
    10,118
    New Mexico, USA
    Rules say the answer is 9, but some older compilers would evaluate that as 1.

    Which also happens to be the next number in the sequence, 1,1,1,2,1,... or 1,1,2,1,3,1,4,1,...

    Unless there's no rhythm to this riddle. ;)
     
  3. Bob Maxey

    Bob Maxey Well-Known Member
    223

    Sep 24, 2010
    4,836
    806
    223
    Think not of math, young grasshopper; but those things that interest Mr. Bilbie. Not integer sequences real math folks consider sequences. No Corn Flake numbers, and forget Mr. Fibonacci. You might consider obvious sequences of common events in your daily life.

    Stop using Google, too! Dag Nabbit. much of the above stuff is what some call a distraction.

    Remember, you cannot just give the numbers arriving next, but explain your answer. Just like in school.

    Smiley

    Bob
     
  4. sonofaresiii

    sonofaresiii Well-Known Member
    68

    Apr 9, 2011
    500
    49
    68
    NYC
    Though people are usually taught that putting a number next to parentheses means multiply, what it actually means is the number is a FUNCTION OF what's in the parentheses... meaning that in the above scenario, two is a function of 1+2, meaning you apply the 2 to what's in the parentheses (1+2, or 3) giving you 6.

    Meaning it's 6/6 = 1.

    You can't really say it's (6/3) * (1+2), because that's extrapolating parentheses to indicate multiplication, when they really don't-- it's just an easier way of thinking of it (which in this case is inaccurate). That's why using PEMDAS or what have you doesn't work here, because there's no "M".

    edit: to be a little more clear, let's say you have the function 6/f(x). Looking at it like that, most of you would probably agree that you can't separate f from x. Well, if f=2 and x=3, you STILL can't separate f from x, even if we've assigned it a constant.
     
  5. czechplastik

    czechplastik Well-Known Member
    53

    Apr 25, 2010
    343
    42
    53
    Belfast, Northern Ireland
    1, 1, 2, 1, 3, 1, 4, 1, 5, 1, 6, 1, 7, 1, 8...etc etc
     
  6. Bob Maxey

    Bob Maxey Well-Known Member
    223

    Sep 24, 2010
    4,836
    806
    223
    No crackers or soup for you. Also, tell us what the string represents.

    CLUE: Think finite sets.

    CLUE: Forget about math, has nothing to do with it. Think number substitution and review Furnelli Rialto's famous 1946 MIT paper on Differential set number mutational differentiational strings within infinite negative number sets.

    Google it.

    CLUE: Since I am thinking of a finite set, your string will fail if allowed to continue. So here is part of the sequence: 10 1 11 1 12 1 1 1

    God, what a seriously challenged group (Smiley, ducking, smiley)

    Bob
     
  7. EarlyMon

    EarlyMon The PearlyMon
    Moderator
    10,118

    Jun 10, 2010
    57,623
    70,354
    10,118
    New Mexico, USA
    Disagree.

    By saying that f(x)=2*x, you've said that implied parens that didn't exist in the originally malformed expression are in effect. In other words, you've re-expressed the problem as:

    6/(2(1+2))

    Malformed expressions can only be evaluated on their face.
     
  8. Bob Maxey

    Bob Maxey Well-Known Member
    223

    Sep 24, 2010
    4,836
    806
    223
    I hope 1 + 1 still equals 2, or I'll be sad.
     
    Xyro likes this.
  9. 330D

    330D From My Cold Dead Hands
    VIP Member
    213

    Mar 4, 2010
    2,863
    779
    213
    operator
    upstate NY
    Give a bunch of geeks some numbers....
     
  10. jroc

    jroc Well-Known Member
    363

    Apr 10, 2010
    2,614
    358
    363
    lol@the last 2 posts...
     
  11. EarlyMon

    EarlyMon The PearlyMon
    Moderator
    10,118

    Jun 10, 2010
    57,623
    70,354
    10,118
    New Mexico, USA
    I thought not of math, didn't use google, and did explain my answer - rhythm; evidently not so far from your own Mr. Bilbie.

    I simply got it wrong.
     
  12. Bob Maxey

    Bob Maxey Well-Known Member
    223

    Sep 24, 2010
    4,836
    806
    223
    I like Geeks. Not in squads, but individually.
     
  13. sonofaresiii

    sonofaresiii Well-Known Member
    68

    Apr 9, 2011
    500
    49
    68
    NYC
    Well I disagree with your disagreement! So there!

    edit: to explain myself a little better, no, i'm not saying f(x) = 2*x. In fact, I'm saying that's the problem-- OTHER people are saying that, but it's not true. f(x) is a function, that is f of x (f is a function of x), meaning the variable f is applied to the variable x. In our equation, we would apply 2 to 3, which in effect is multiplying it... but it's not the same as saying f(x) = f*x (though isolated, those equations are redundant). The problem is that USUALLY creating a function simply means multiplying it, so we've been trained to think that 2(3) = 2*3. But it isn't.
     
  14. Bob Maxey

    Bob Maxey Well-Known Member
    223

    Sep 24, 2010
    4,836
    806
    223
    when should I hand out the answer?

    CLUE: Horology, think Horology
     
  15. Vihzel

    Vihzel Destroying Balls Everyday
    VIP Member
    323

    Apr 8, 2010
    5,364
    1,055
    323
    NYU Student & Real Estate Agent
    Manhattan, NY
    I knew this thread would attract a fair amount of attention. :) I do have the answer... or perhaps I only have the answer that I believe to be true...

    What I suspected would happen in this thread has happened on Facebook and on the physics forum where 34 people voted for one number and 36 voted for the other. Very fascinating stuff!
     
  16. jroc

    jroc Well-Known Member
    363

    Apr 10, 2010
    2,614
    358
    363
    ^See...u know what.....
     
  17. sonofaresiii

    sonofaresiii Well-Known Member
    68

    Apr 9, 2011
    500
    49
    68
    NYC
    I really, really hope it doesn't turn out I'm pulling this explanation out of my @ss
    ;)
     
  18. czechplastik

    czechplastik Well-Known Member
    53

    Apr 25, 2010
    343
    42
    53
    Belfast, Northern Ireland
  19. Sombre

    Sombre Well-Known Member
    48

    Apr 10, 2011
    123
    21
    48
    I.T. Professional
    Canberra, Australia
    I want the last 15 minutes of my life back!
     
  20. jroc

    jroc Well-Known Member
    363

    Apr 10, 2010
    2,614
    358
    363

    lol!!
     
  21. 330D

    330D From My Cold Dead Hands
    VIP Member
    213

    Mar 4, 2010
    2,863
    779
    213
    operator
    upstate NY
    Me too, would I be here if it were otherwise?
     
  22. Rlad78

    Rlad78 Member
    15

    Dec 30, 2010
    16
    0
    15
    SC, USA
    Wrong

    [​IMG]


    Anyway, the answer is 1.

    First off, we must follow PEMDAS

    Parenthesis
    Exponentials
    Multiplication
    Division
    Addition
    Subtraction

    Therefore, we start out with the parenthesis

    6
     
  23. Stinky Stinky

    Stinky Stinky Well-Known Member
    533

    Aug 31, 2010
    4,211
    2,118
    533
    Monkey
    In a Dumpster!
    Hahah!

    LOL I was wrong! :D

    Yay!

    I told you I suck at maths! :cool:

    Hmm every day life hey?

    Not a maths question but has numbers involved, that is a little strange but that is cool by me :)

    So then what...

    NO DON'T FRACKING JOKE!!!

    I think it's TIME!!!

    xD

    Hahahaa!

    I am going crazy trying to answer this 1 :)
     
  24. Stinky Stinky

    Stinky Stinky Well-Known Member
    533

    Aug 31, 2010
    4,211
    2,118
    533
    Monkey
    In a Dumpster!
    No wait I think I am tripping LOL :)

    Never mind what I said I am going tokig / crazy :D
     
  25. sonofaresiii

    sonofaresiii Well-Known Member
    68

    Apr 9, 2011
    500
    49
    68
    NYC
    1, 1, 2, 1, 3, 1, 4, 1, 5, 1, 6, 1, 7, 1, 8, 1, 9, 1, 1, 2, 2, 2, 3, 2...

    the first number denotes the unit's sequential order, the second the "round." It's like a date followed by a year.

    edited because I forgot one of the numbers
     

Share This Page

Loading...