bakesnack vs fresh 3.2


Last Updated:

  1. d1reyad

    d1reyad Active Member This Topic's Starter

    Joined:
    Aug 21, 2010
    Messages:
    37
    Likes Received:
    0
    which one of these rom do you guys thing is better on battery life bakesnack or the new fresh 3.2?
     

    Advertisement
  2. uminchu

    uminchu Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Oct 14, 2009
    Messages:
    525
    Likes Received:
    134
    Depends on the kernel. The last BakedSnack I ran was 1.5 with (I think) kernel 5. Good ROM, everything works, faster than Fresh32, average battery life. There are newer bakedSnacks since then that I haven't tried yet.

    Fresh 3200/stock kernel isn't as fast, but IMO is smoother with better battery life. It's faster with netarchy419, and battery is only slightly decreased, still longer than BakedSnack15/k5.
     
  3. exBBuser

    exBBuser Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jun 6, 2010
    Messages:
    921
    Likes Received:
    123
    Even with netarchys Kernal is not that fast.
     
  4. uminchu

    uminchu Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Oct 14, 2009
    Messages:
    525
    Likes Received:
    134
    I agree.
     
  5. v01rider

    v01rider Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    May 26, 2010
    Messages:
    985
    Likes Received:
    169
  6. exBBuser

    exBBuser Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jun 6, 2010
    Messages:
    921
    Likes Received:
    123
  7. v01rider

    v01rider Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    May 26, 2010
    Messages:
    985
    Likes Received:
    169
    hmm good to know.
     
  8. exBBuser

    exBBuser Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jun 6, 2010
    Messages:
    921
    Likes Received:
    123
    That's @1.15 performance.[​IMG]
     
  9. Hazy

    Hazy Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Aug 10, 2010
    Messages:
    82
    Likes Received:
    6
    I just read up on it a lil bit... is it worth giving it a try? with snap 8.2 im getting good result as of the overall performance of the system, smoothness speed, etc. (not to mention 1950 quadrant scores) Battery life is not that great but it 'might' get me through the day....
    So since u have become my unofficial reference for snap, lol... how does 7.5 run? i dont really care much about score but actual system performance and battery life
     
  10. exBBuser

    exBBuser Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jun 6, 2010
    Messages:
    921
    Likes Received:
    123
    Coming from 8.2 I must say is not as fast since its based on .32 but it is really smooth and performs as expected. Battery is better than 8.2 IMO. My only issue with 8.2 was battery life and it was getting on my nerves so until get my 3500mah battery 8.2 is out of the picture for me.

    When it comes to quadrant score 7.5 is really close to 8.2,I just edited my previous post with a snap shot of my benchmark scores performance governor @1.15 with conservative at the same speed I get close to 1700 sometimes a lil bit further.
     

Share This Page

Loading...