Last Updated: Sep 05,2010
which one of these rom do you guys thing is better on battery life bakesnack or the new fresh 3.2?
Depends on the kernel. The last BakedSnack I ran was 1.5 with (I think) kernel 5. Good ROM, everything works, faster than Fresh32, average battery life. There are newer bakedSnacks since then that I haven't tried yet.
Fresh 3200/stock kernel isn't as fast, but IMO is smoother with better battery life. It's faster with netarchy419, and battery is only slightly decreased, still longer than BakedSnack15/k5.
Even with netarchys Kernal is not that fast.
is this not fast enough? http://androidforums.com/evo-4g-all-things-root/166969-fresh-3-2-available-sept-3-a.html#post1521654
No is not. I went back to CM6 and with the new snap7.5 OC @1.15 I'm getting way better results than that.(Conservative Governor.)
Edit: Battery is looking better now than wen I was running Fresh and Netarchys Kernel.
hmm good to know.
That's @1.15 performance.
I just read up on it a lil bit... is it worth giving it a try? with snap 8.2 im getting good result as of the overall performance of the system, smoothness speed, etc. (not to mention 1950 quadrant scores) Battery life is not that great but it 'might' get me through the day....
So since u have become my unofficial reference for snap, lol... how does 7.5 run? i dont really care much about score but actual system performance and battery life
Coming from 8.2 I must say is not as fast since its based on .32 but it is really smooth and performs as expected. Battery is better than 8.2 IMO. My only issue with 8.2 was battery life and it was getting on my nerves so until get my 3500mah battery 8.2 is out of the picture for me.
When it comes to quadrant score 7.5 is really close to 8.2,I just edited my previous post with a snap shot of my benchmark scores performance governor @1.15 with conservative at the same speed I get close to 1700 sometimes a lil bit further.
Separate names with a comma.