How does the new SIII's reception compare to the Captivate's?
I'm considering upgrading, but if the reception isn't improved I'll wait.
Removable battery and better than my Captivate reception are high on my priority list.
I've read numerous times on these forums and seen in YouTube reviews that the call quality on the Galaxy S3 is upgraded significantly from the S2 call quality, but I guess that doesn't help you 100%... its hard to find any (much less good) direct comparisons of the GS3 vs GS1.
I'm looking forward to comparing the Motorola Razr HD when it is released in next month or so to the Sam S3. The most important requirements for me are the voice quality and reception as I live in a marginal and mountainous area served by both Verizon and ATT. I have Verizon and am pretty happy with service but my phone is a first gen HTC Incredible.
I have read that the Sam 3 is one of the phones with earSmart technology improving the voice quality Audience - Americas
Motorola usually is known for voice and reception quality but according to the earSmart site Motorola Razr does not have it. I am not sure if anyone has had a chance to actually compare the voice/reception on the HD as it has not been released yet. I am wondering if anyone here has an opinion on these two qualities for these phones?
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.