Does new law stop blocking bootloaders?


Last Updated:

  1. Gazooo

    Gazooo Active Member This Topic's Starter

    Joined:
    Nov 22, 2009
    Messages:
    30
    Likes Received:
    2

    Advertisement
  2. hexon

    hexon Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jan 25, 2010
    Messages:
    165
    Likes Received:
    8
    No it only establishes that rooting/jailbreaking is in no way considered illegal so long as the software being installed is acquired by legal means.
     
  3. vincentp

    vincentp Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Nov 11, 2009
    Messages:
    1,640
    Likes Received:
    59
    Nope. Just like you now have the right to hack that phone, Motorola has the right to lock the phone before they sell it to you, as stupid as that is. Oh, and did I mention that I'm still really angry about that stupid, stupid decision? Screw you Motorola.
     
  4. OMJ

    OMJ Bazinga VIP Member

    Joined:
    Nov 27, 2009
    Messages:
    3,290
    Likes Received:
    825
    The law does not even stop your warranty from being void when you root your phone.
     
  5. supersaki

    supersaki Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Dec 3, 2009
    Messages:
    386
    Likes Received:
    36
    voiding warranty isn't the same as going to jail/being fined thousands of dollars :p
     
  6. bemenaker

    bemenaker Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Dec 10, 2009
    Messages:
    137
    Likes Received:
    16
    You have the right to any unlock codes for your phone for personal use according the Library of Congress, and this plays on top of that. You may have to fight for it, but if you demand that encryption key, they are supposed to give it too you. Now they could make you sign and NDA to get it, which would make distributing it trade secret violation.
     
  7. OMJ

    OMJ Bazinga VIP Member

    Joined:
    Nov 27, 2009
    Messages:
    3,290
    Likes Received:
    825
    I was never concerned about being put in jail for modding my property. I just dont think this whole thing makes much difference if any.
     
  8. nightelvesreasy

    nightelvesreasy Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Oct 24, 2009
    Messages:
    198
    Likes Received:
    19
    my personal opinion, its about time they made this into law, think about it, some of us pay how many hundreds of dollars for a smart phone just to have it be locked down to what the provider wants it to be, thats like buying a new car and having the dealer tell you you cant put any upgrades in it, like i said, its about time
     
  9. OMJ

    OMJ Bazinga VIP Member

    Joined:
    Nov 27, 2009
    Messages:
    3,290
    Likes Received:
    825
    If you buy a phone at a subsidized price then I see nothing wrong with the provider limiting it to their network. They are giving you hundreds off the retail price of the phone under the assumption that you will be using their service.

    If you are talking about paying full retail for a phone then I agree with you
     
  10. nb_mitch

    nb_mitch Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    May 28, 2010
    Messages:
    604
    Likes Received:
    42
    I almost agree with you, but at the same time, you sign a contract to stay on their network for 2 years with a huge ETF that prohibits you from leaving, almost. So I don't see a huge difference between buying on-contract or off.

    As far as unlocking, I have always got my devices unlocked by just asking, but unlocked and rooted are 2 different things.
     
  11. VIO

    VIO Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    May 12, 2010
    Messages:
    263
    Likes Received:
    62
    Honestly I'm just wondering if this will push Verizon away from non SIM card phones, or whether the other Carriers will move towards that model as a loophole to the law.

    Also does this mean that phones must be unlocked on request or that hackers cannot go to jail for figuring out how to unlock a phone. seems like it doesn't eliminate the "battle" between hacker and developer but just keeps the law from interfering with a "fair" fight.
     
  12. OMJ

    OMJ Bazinga VIP Member

    Joined:
    Nov 27, 2009
    Messages:
    3,290
    Likes Received:
    825
    With the newer ETFs that is mostly true but in cases like buying a Droid right now you can get the phone for $50 and pay a $350 ETF and still have the phone for more than $100 off the retail price. Not sure why you would want to do that but you could.
     
  13. nightelvesreasy

    nightelvesreasy Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Oct 24, 2009
    Messages:
    198
    Likes Received:
    19

    i see your point, but you kinda missed mine, i said "some of us pay hundreds of dollars" meaning that some people do pay full retail price for a phone (my bad for not being clear enough) but yes you are right as far as limiting a phone to just their network at a lower retail price
     
  14. supersaki

    supersaki Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Dec 3, 2009
    Messages:
    386
    Likes Received:
    36
    Yeah, in the end, it won't affect us much at all. In the article I read, the author was hopeful it was a step in the right direction.
     
  15. OMJ

    OMJ Bazinga VIP Member

    Joined:
    Nov 27, 2009
    Messages:
    3,290
    Likes Received:
    825
    oh ok I see what you are saying now. I thought you meant when people pay $200 for a subsidized phone when I read your original post
     
  16. ska.t73

    ska.t73 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Mar 11, 2010
    Messages:
    1,659
    Likes Received:
    305
    The way I look at this is that it doesn't change much if anything. All they are doing is telling the manufactures (and I think this is aimed mainly at Apple) that they can not go after people for rooting or jailbreaking their phones. This does not however prevent the manufactures from voiding warantees or makes them obligated to help people root or jailbreak.

    In other words, no Moto will still be able to release signed bootloaders and in no way will be obligated to help anyone un-sign them. They just can't prosecute or sue anyone if people try to get around it.
     

Share This Page

Loading...