can I use this as an example I mean this is clearly showing a chocolate candy bar with the kit kat name on it rite big and huge or im I seeing things here...
How is this allowed but shame others for helping them I'am seriously confused here...
Google associates their makings as a candy bar Ice cream and jelly beans how is there no damages being done here to the candy makers...
sounds alot like to me "who's on first" Abbott & Costello in my opinion more like the blind leading the blind
So many of years ago I used to be able to search for candy and actually find candy but now all I seem to find is android phones
Is this the way we think maybe to rap this all up in the nut shell I here once used to be a website is now a over sized wallet that shames others for doing what I do best difference is I can get away with it because I have enough money to be sued and don't care lmao.....
simple point I'll make here
means they can control the level of exposure of what is seen across the net means that
there is near half the nation uses google.com to search for and through the search terms
of android, jellybean, kit kat, they make it show up the candy first then they make it show heaps amount of operating systems so in return keeping it a leveled playing field for both so no damages could be done long as candy items that they name the os after is seen first...
"EVERYTHING BOILS DOWN TO THIS" -----> THIS IS WHAT HAPPENS WHEN EVERYONE RUNS OUT OF NAMES TO CALL THEIR PRODUCTS.. AND OR WHAT BETTER WAY TO NAME THINGS IS WHAT EVERYONE CAN RELATE WITH.. IT GAINS MORE TRUST IF ANYTHING YOU SELL REMINDS YOU OF THINGS THAT MAKES YOU FEEL GOOD IT BECOMES HARMLESS RITE???