Is Motorola violating the spirit of "EFF v Apple"?


Last Updated:

  1. AshG

    AshG Well-Known Member This Topic's Starter

    Joined:
    Aug 10, 2010
    Messages:
    82
    Likes Received:
    24
    I just finished reading a few briefs concerning the Electronic Frontier Foundation v Apple case concerning jailbreaking, firmare modification, etc and have gone from eyeing the topic warily on the side of Motorola to sitting firmly in the modder's corner.

    The sprit of the ruling, in my opinion, is that our phones are personal property to be done with as we please. I understand full well that neither Motorola nor Verizon should be in any implicit or explicit way culpable for or responsible for the repair of damage to modded phones, but the more I read the more I feel that Motorola has violated the spirit of the ruling by modifying the bootloader to act in a destructive fashion when attempting to revert to a previously accepted and supported OS revision.

    How off-base am I with this train of thought?
     

    Advertisement
  2. bigbadwulff

    bigbadwulff Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jun 15, 2010
    Messages:
    2,442
    Likes Received:
    200
    You can. They just aren't facilitating the way to do it.
     
  3. mazz0310

    mazz0310 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Nov 4, 2009
    Messages:
    587
    Likes Received:
    38
    The only reason I'll say you have a case is because they made us install a defective/broken update with no way of going back to a working OS.

    If they fix it then I would say no.
     

Share This Page

Loading...