Open Source or just Google Big Brother?

Discussion in 'Android Lounge' started by porquepine, Oct 21, 2008.

  1. porquepine

    porquepine Well-Known Member
    36

    Oct 19, 2008
    74
    4
    36
    Ok, so here is what is in the fine print for the Terms of Service:

     

    Advertisement

  2. dballz

    dballz Well-Known Member
    36

    Oct 6, 2008
    48
    1
    36
    Medical Management
    Yonkers, NY
    I think the big brother feature is to not allow programs and apps that would do harm to the phone or the OS
     
  3. eli

    eli Member
    15

    Oct 17, 2008
    14
    0
    15
    This has nothing to do with "open source." You can still develop whatever you want, but Google isn't going to keep applications in the official store if, for example, they try to dial 1-900 numbers or steal your email password. This is entirely reasonable.

    The big difference between the Apple store's kill switch and Google's is that if you have an iPhone you can *only* gets apps from the official store (without voiding your warranty). Google is considerably more open in this regard.
     
  4. Cryptic79

    Cryptic79 Well-Known Member
    VIP Member
    88

    Sep 10, 2008
    576
    25
    88
    SharePoint Architect
    St. Louis, MO
    I'm just fine with it. They don't want to have security breaches on their OS. Makes sense to me.

    In addition, they will attempt to recover funds. See the article about the "kill switch" on phandroid.com.
     
  5. ram100987

    ram100987 Well-Known Member
    16

    Sep 26, 2008
    82
    2
    16
    I don't see anything wrong with this. They are just keeping you safe from threatening apps. With an open source app market, someone could easily create an app to screw up your phone or steal personal info. If google finds apps like this they will remove them and do their best to recover any money you paid dor it. They are not doing this for proprietary control like apple
     
  6. sleebus.jones

    sleebus.jones Well-Known Member
    35

    Sep 27, 2008
    240
    0
    35
    Houston, TX
    "what gives" is that you are freaking out over standard boilerplate verbiage. Personally, I'm damn glad to see they have a way of terminating malicious apps. Google et al know that if they want their platform to succeed, they can't go shooting themselves in the foot and nuking apps willy nilly. The market (i.e. the users) won't put up with that, and will leave the platform in droves.

    Relax, take off the tinfoil hat and breathe easy, man. It'll be fine. :cool:
     
  7. porquepine

    porquepine Well-Known Member
    36

    Oct 19, 2008
    74
    4
    36

    Ok I will admit, I am a bit relieved and now that I fully understand what the fine print means, I do not mind Google having this feature, now that I understand it's true purpose. I have been wondering how Google was going to protect their phones.
     
  8. Rob

    Rob I'm tellin' mommy on you!
    Administrator
    543

    Mar 26, 2008
    1,786
    3,132
    543
    Androiding
    Yeah... Google may not be able to foresee what ridiculous problem arises but suppose some malicious app starts crawling phone to phone to phone and stealing all your personal information?

    THEN withOUT this in the terms of service google would say, "sorry we can't do anything about it... its against the law and we didn't have it in our terms of service."

    I'd rather have this line in there. It makes me more comfortable and feel "safe" as long as they don't use it for the wrong purposes.
     

Share This Page

Loading...