I am not an expert on the technologies involved in the disputes or the legal aspects of them.
A couple of things come to mind, however:
1. For a large company to intentionally grab and use patented methods in its new devices seems naive, almost suicidal from a business standpoint, and
2. For Apple to see devices come into the market place with characteristics even similar to its marketed devices and then bring suit to the manufacturers of those devices seems quite the ploy for attention as well as quite the knee-jerk reaction to being well-competed against on those technological levels.
When we read the patents we first think, "uh oh, iPhone got copied." But those technologies that we're using on Android devices probably and likely have their similarities in usage but lose the exacting similarities in actual build that Apple uses in its devices.
I'm sure HTC, et al, are prepared to show those things in a court of law and have been since the inception of their own similar but different technologies.
Where HTC erred is thinking touch screen technology is common knowledge. Steve simply got tired of people ripping him off. The facts are pretty clear. IPhone owns the pattent and technology of touch screen phones.
Think about it like this. I can't make a movie called Gravatar using the same characters and premise as Avatar. I am stealing that idea and calling it my own.
Simply put, you can't just jump on the coat tales of someone else without paying the piper.
Upvote
0