All I'm saying is that there's a whole lot of hullabaloo and people jumping to conclusions on both sides, but no one has any concrete evidence either for or against Seidio. There is no hard evidence that says these batteries are underrated or not, just a small handful of mildly suspicious things, which is hardly enough to warrant all of the fury and threats of BBB reporting.
Thus I, as a consumer, can only go by experience, and my EXPERIENCE is that my battery lasts a couple hours longer than my stock did. My stock would be in the yellow at the end of work before, now I've got 50% (although I did change a few things along the way). My battery life is good now, and this means that until I get any PROOF that Seidio is lying, I'm not about to get up in arms.
After all, it'd be pretty convenient if Seidio WAS lying. I'd get my money back from them and I'd buy something else.
I hear you, which is why I'm trying to just argue for the other side, since I don't think there's conclusive evidence either way with the information we do have. No one knows anything conclusively, and until someone decides to test a number of these bad boys under controlled settings, we won't know. It does make for an interesting and fun discussion though, no?
Upvote
0